Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-04-11 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 1 Housing Needs Assessment

of 229

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

       Figure 41. Tenure type, Comparison areas, 2011




       Source: ABS 2013a;
       Notes: Excluding visitor only, and other non-classifiable households. Noosa Shire and Douglas Shire based
       on SA1s which do not fully align with the LGA boundary.

These differences will be considered when comparing the indicators for housing choice,
affordability and stress in the next sections. An indicator table showing the results of the
comparative analysis is provided in Appendix A.

4.2.1     Housing Choice
To simplify the analysis of housing choice, household types and dwelling sizes were grouped as
follows:

        Small households – households assumed to require a dwelling with 0-2 bedrooms. This is
         based not just on the number of people usually part of the household, but adjusted for
         different household types so that a small dwelling (0-2 bedrooms) would be suitable for
         them. For example, a couple with one child (3 people resident), and a single parent with
         one child (2 people resident), are both described here as small households;
        Large households – households assumed to require a dwelling with at least 3 bedrooms.
        Small dwellings - dwellings with 0-2 bedrooms;
        Large dwellings - 3+ bedrooms.


These definitions accord with those adopted in the State Interest Guideline - Housing supply and
diversity, April 2016.

Three related indicators were developed for housing choice:

        The proportion of small households living in small dwellings;
        The proportion of small households living in large dwellings;
        The proportion of large households living in large dwellings.

These proportions were obtained from the ABS Census in 2011 and charts showing the
comparisons are included below. Figure 42 below shows that around 72% of small households
were residing in large dwellings (with 3+ bedrooms) in 2011 in Noosa Shire. This was similar to
the proportion for Fraser Coast (72%), and Queensland (70%), but much higher than for Douglas
Shire (55%) and the Gold Coast (64%).




Briggs & Mortar Pty Ltd | Page 111
Log in to download the original file

2017-04-11 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 1 Housing Needs Assessment(PDF, 3MB).pdf · 3.6 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.