Original source · versioned page text
2017-04-11 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 1 Housing Needs Assessment
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Table 70. Total estimated tourist accommodation and visitor dwelling needs (including new
supply due to secondary dwellings and growth in renting out spare capacity), Noosa Shire,
2016-2036
Year DEMAND NEW SUPPLY ADDITIONAL
NEED
Assumed Demand Secondary Growth in Renting Additional Need
for Tourist Dwellings for Out Spare for
Accommodation Tourists/Visitors Capacity to Tourist
/Visitor Dwellings Tourists/Visitors Accommodation/
Visitor Dwellings
2016 -253 0 0 -253
2021 42 140 75 257
2026 -226 280 154 208
2031 -640 419 236 16
2036 -1,139 559 323 -257
Notes: This table shows the total need over assumed provision at 2014/15. Figures are accumulative. Negative
figures show additional demand or a shortfall (shown in red). Positive figures show additional supply or an
‘oversupply’ (shown in black).
Implications for Housing
The overall finding of the analysis is that tourism demand could have a substantial impact on
residential housing in the event of continued ongoing growth in tourism in line with that over the
last decade. Considering tourism needs is a critical component of ensuring adequate and
appropriate housing for residents – and vice versa.
The modelling undertaken is unable to predict, with any certainty, the demand for tourism
accommodation and visitor dwellings. Rather, it demonstrates the outcome that will occur if
certain assumptions are applied. The modelling has a number of limitations:
Firstly, modelling has used a projection of the need for growth in tourism/visitor
accommodation derived through a continuation of past trends (with consideration of
State forecasts for other major tourism destinations (Gold Coast and Brisbane)), which are
considered potentially unrealistic in Noosa Shire. If the annual growth in tourism is
different – lower or higher than 2.5% each year – the outcome could change significantly.
However, no other evidence-based projection was available.
Secondly, it has been assumed that increased occupancy can be achieved in tourist and
visitor accommodation. The assumptions about current and future occupancy can
substantially impact the result of the modelling. In addition, higher occupancy rates may
encourage the ‘conversion’ of resident dwellings into visitor dwellings, and thus reduce
dwellings available for expected population growth. i.e. moving the issue elsewhere.
Thirdly, the modelling relies on a number of assumptions about the future supply of
tourist dwellings which may not occur including:
o Development of the remaining identified ‘tourist only’ site (at Settler’s Cove);
o Development of a proportion of new tourist accommodation (in line with DMaTT
projections) in existing visitor areas such as Noosaville, Noosa Heads, Sunshine Beach
and Peregian Beach in residential zones;
Briggs & Mortar Pty Ltd | Page 176
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.