Original source · versioned page text
Appendix F - Ecological Assessment Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (10.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Ecological Assessment Report v1 NCES REF: J001050 Lot 3 on RP131369 – 96 Black Mountain Range Road, Black Mountain 6.2 State Government 6.2.1 Remnant Regional Ecosystems The Vegetation Management Supporting Map identifies that Category C & R remnant vegetation is present within the site. Schedule 10, Part 3, Division 4, Table 2 of the Planning Regulation 2017 requires any reconfiguration of a lot application that is assessable development under section 21, which includes an allotment which is 5ha or larger, to be referred to SARA for assessment against SDAP State Code 16 - Native vegetation clearing. The site is >5ha in area, however, as the site only contains regulated regrowth vegetation (i.e. Category C & R) referral is not required as per Schedule 10, Part 3, Division 4, Table 2 of the Planning Regulation 2017. 6.2.2 Nature Conservation (Koala) Conservation Plan 2017 and SDAP State Code 25 Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas The SEQ Koala Conservation Strategy Koala Habitat Mapping identifies that the site occurs outside of a Koala Priority Area and contains no Koala Habitat Area (refer section 3.4). It should be noted that the Koala Habitat Mapping was recently updated as the result of a Koala Mapping Amendment application over the subject site. Therefore, no further assessment is required. Nature Conservation Act 1992 6.2.2.1 Protected Plants Flora Survey Trigger Map The Protected Plants Flora Survey Trigger Map identifies that a portion of the site is mapped as a ‘high risk area’ prescribed under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife Management) Regulation 2006. The flora survey carried out was undertaken in general accordance with the flora survey guidelines and no conservation significant flora species were identified within the development footprint. As the proposed development footprint (i.e. VC2) is considered to conform to the definition of a highly modified environment, a formal flora survey would not be required to be submitted to DES to support an exempt clearing application. No further consideration of the Protected Plants legislative framework is therefore required. 6.2.2.2 Fauna Provision of a suitably qualified and experienced fauna spotter/catcher is necessary during all vegetation clearing activities to satisfy the duty of care obligations under the NC Act. Note where active breeding habitat for least concern native fauna is observed, the applicant will be required to comply with DES’s Species Management Program – low risk of impacts. Where active breeding habitat for Conservation Significant fauna is observed, the applicant will be required to prepare and submit a DES compliant Species Management Program – High risk of impacts for approval prior to clearing commencing. Note active breeding habitat for least concern rainbow lorikeets was observed in the mature E. tereticornis tree in the west of the site. To avoid possible delay to clearing activities it is recommended the applicant become a signatory to DES’s Species Management Program – low risk of impacts. 6.3 Commonwealth Government No Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) were identified during the field investigation undertaken within the site. Whilst a fauna survey has not been completed the results of the habitat assessment infers that the threatened fauna species identified in the Protected Matters Search Report have a low potential to occur within the site due to the limited amount of suitable habitat and/or a lack of existing records in the locality. Furthermore, no native bushland clearing is proposed, precluding a small protruding unit (approx. 135m2) of VC1 which could be cleared under future exempt clearing rights gained from the development proposal. Therefore, a significant impact to any populations of the listed EPBC fauna species is highly unlikely. Consequently, application referral to the Commonwealth government under the EPBC Act is deemed unnecessary at this time. © 2022 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.