Original source · versioned page text
2023-02-07 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 7 FEBRUARY 2023
Page 32 of 58
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 7 FEBRUARY 2023
e The Commission also considered the impact of inflation and relative volatility of CPI
in the past twelve (12) months, along with:
° the Commission’s inability to predict changes in CPI in the short or long
term;
° the potential differential impact of CPI changes across various parts of
Queensland (including rural and remote regions); and
° whether in a significantly inflationary environment remuneration should
match inflation, and the potentially differential impact on sustainability in
different parts of the State.
e The application of principles of consistency and austerity, when reviewing wages in
the public sector.
e The continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, global trade tensions, and the
ongoing impact and disruption caused by extreme or natural weather events
impacting many parts of the State.
e The impact on communities of global supply chain shortages and disruption.
e Theimpact on communities of global transition to renewable energy sources, climate
change and sustainability.
e Anecdotal evidence of:
° ‘communities in transition’, changing demographics and population
movement, resilience and sustainability challenges and opportunities;
° rapid trade and infrastructure diversification, and the potential for
disproportionate impact throughout communities;
° uncertainty and the cost to communities of ensuring sustainability, trade
diversification and investment in infrastructure and innovation; and
° the Commission’s observation of a generally increasing call for role
recognition through remuneration, particularly with regard to attracting and
retaining reasonable and diverse mayoral and councillor candidates, along
with the desire to foster and keep local talent, by creating competitive career
path opportunities.
e The disparity in actual dollar terms between the remuneration paid to Mayors and
councillors from the smaller rural, regional, and remote communities versus those
residing in the larger or more metropolitan communities as was highlighted for the
Commission through written and oral deputations this year.
e The gap between the remuneration (in real dollar/wage terms) payable to Mayors
and Councillors in Categories 1 to 3, compared to those Mayors and Councillors in
Categories 4 to 8, notwithstanding the work being carried out by local governments
generally in Categories 1 to 3 is no less important as those in Categories 4 to 8. This
is an issue the Commission will continue to consider as part of its general and
category review in 2023.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REMUNERATION COMMISSION | ANNUAL REPORT 2021-22 8
Page 32 of 58See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.