Council archive · source document
23688 DA - IDAS Application resubmission for Properly Made Application [As Published] · 132004.240015.3
“ey
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
Form 2, Version 3.3, 29 May 2006
Applicant details 42. Name:
Clearly identity who is making the application. [ Glen Morrison |
The applicant need not be the owner of the
land. 13. Postal address:
When signing and lodging this application a
The applicant is responsible for ensuring the | C/ Martoo Consulting PO BOX 1684 Noosa Heads Q 4567 |
information provided is correct. The .
assessment manager, any referral agency and | 14. Signature: 15. Date:
the Chief Executive (where applicable) will rely ZZ
on this information wheri assessing and ew LL (her 22 fy Lo
deciding the application, wl ea > cor
ifthe applicant is a company
A contact person must be shown. All 16. Contact person:
correspondence will be mailed to this address. [ Nadine Gorton |
17. Telephone number: 18. Mobile number: (if applicable)
| 5455 5425 | |
19. Fax number: (if applicable) 20. Email address: (if applicable)
| 5455 5725 | | [email protected] |
Land owner/s consent (ff applicable) 21, Land owners consent:
Section 3.5.24(3) of the IPA requires that the ‘1
land owner's consent must be provided if the Name in Full = Signature Date
person making the request to change an i : . Yew, s 2S ifer
existing approval is not the land owner. (i PGP ¢ Qcp) FY LTS “ o Le . Jt, 4 ‘OL,
For information about land owners refer to mn 7 ¢
Guide 1 Making an IDAS development (ii)
application.
Land owner's consent is not required fora (iti)
mobile or temporary ERA.
Ifan owner has signed this form as (iv)
applicant, their signature is not required again
in this section,
{fthere are multiple owners, the consent of
each owner is required.
Resource entitlement (if applicable) 22. At the time of the request, would a development application for the approval have required
eq P PP q|
Sections 3.5,22(4) & (5), 3.5.24(38) & (3C),
and 3.5.33(3B) & (3C) of the IPA may require
the written agreement of a resource manager if
the request involves a prescribed State
resource, if when the requesf was made a
development application for the approval would
have required evidence of resource entitlement
under section 3.2.1(5) of the IPA.
evidence of resource entitlement?
NO - go to 024 (YES - go to 023
Is this request accompanied by the written agreement of the chief executive from whom the
evidence is required? (tick the applicable box)
(J NO - the written agreement of the chief executive must accompany this request
(Yes
Nature of the request 24. This request is for:
aa may request to modify an existing {1 An extension of the relevant period for the development approval (s 3.5.22)
KX] To change or cancel conditions (s 3.5.33)
(J To change the development approval (other than a change of a condition) (8 3.5.24)
LD Achange to conditions of a rezoning approval given under the P&E Act (s 6.1.354)
25. Provide details of, & justification for, the proposed modification
tefer Planning Report.
Concurrence agencies 26. Did the previous application involve concurrence agencies or building referral agencies?
Under s3.5,22(1)(a) & 3.5.24(1){a) of IPA, a
copy of this request must be fonvarded to each
concurrence agency for the previous
application prior to lodgement of this form with
the assessment manager.
Note: “No” will aways apply to a request to
change conditions of a rezoning approval given
under the P&E Act.
KK] No
(DYES - tist the concurrence agencies who have been sent a copy of the request for modification
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
23688 DA - IDAS Application resubmission for Properly Made Application [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.