Original source · versioned page text
2021-03-15 General Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (11.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 MARCH 2021
v. It does not preserve agricultural land, conserve open space for biodiversity
and water quality purposes or provide development at a density consistent
with the sites environmental constraints and proximity to the Lake
Macdonald water supply catchment.
vi. The development does not minimise cut and fill and is excessive.
vii. The development results in adverse impacts on the sites environmental
values.
viii. The development has the potential to impact on water quality of Lake
Macdonald.
ix. The proposal will result in a detrimental impact on the scenic vista from the
major road network and the entry into Cooroy township.
x. The proposed built form does not complement traditional streetscape and
building forms.
xi. The height of club house will dominate surrounding spaces and the existing
skyline.
xii. Parts of the development are located too close to Myall Street and are not
consistent with the streetscape.
xiii. The excessive site cover results in excessive bulk and development which
is not compatible with surrounding development.
xiv. The development has the potential to impact on the acoustic amenity of the
surrounding area, as no acoustic measures are proposed to be
implemented for the new golf club house.
6. The proposed development does not comply with Overall Outcomes 14.44.2 a),
b) and j) and Specific Outcomes O16 and O17 of the Residential Uses Code as:
i. It is proposed on land that is not suited to the development of residential
buildings;
ii. It is not consistent with the character of the neighbourhood;
iii. It does not maximise the use of the natural topography and minimise the
need for cut and fill; and
iv. It is not located within reasonable proximity to a variety of essential
services.
7. The proposed development fails to meet Overall Outcomes 13.7.2 a), b), c), d)
(i), (ii), (iii) and (v), e) and g) and Specific Outcomes O1, O3, O4, O5, O6, O8,
O9, O10, O14, O15, O18 and O19 of the Biodiversity Overlay Code as the
proposal will result in the removal of significant vegetation and intrude into the
site’s riparian buffer.
8. The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcomes 14.157.2 a) an b) of the
Water Sensitive Design Code as the development:
i. is not designed and could not be constructed in a manner that does not
impede, long term attainment of relevant Environmental Values and Water
Quality Objectives as specified in the Environmental Protection Policy
2009;
ii. proposes infrastructure within the riparian zone and an extent of cut and fill
that is likely to create adverse impacts on downstream ecosystems,
properties and infrastructure due to changes to stormwater flow, water
quality or ecosystem health.
Page 17 of 80
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.