MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition

,-----   ._--




            Code Objective          Developer's Assessment             Objectors' Assessment

                                                                       of those making them, and faiis to
                                                                       address the potential impacts on the
                                                                       School children of the vapour
                                                                       emission from the facility.
                                                                       Detail provided elsewhere in this
                                                                       document demonstrates s clear link
                                                                       between service station proximity and
                                                                       harm to children. The Applicant fails
                                                                       to address these matters or to
                                                                       provide any credible data to support
                                                                       their contention. Neither does the
                                                                       Applicant does provide creditable, or
                                                                       indeed any, material to show that
                                                                       acceptable and safe exposure levels
                                                                      can and will be maintained during the
                                                                      operation of the service station.



            LANDSCAPINGCODE

            028 Landscaping of     028 Complies                       Does not Comply
            carparking areas ...   It is considered that one          The Development proposal is
                                   advanced tree for every 6          noncompliant and not suitable for the
                                   parking spaces is not              neighbourhood.
                                   appropriate given that the car
                                   parking area is located            The phrase "it is considered" is clearly
                                   between the petrol building        an obfuscation, without qualification,
                                   and the fuel court. It is          justification or validation of the
                                   considered that trees will limit   credentials of the person holding the
                                   casual surveillance of this        consideration. The siting of the car
                                   area.                              parking area is the responsibility of
                                                                      the Applicant. Furthermore it is the
                                   The site comprises 30%             Applicant's responsibility to design a
                                   landscaping. This is considered    compliant solution in all respects,
                                   more than suitable.                including provision of required trees
                                                                      AND sufficient casual surveillance to
                                                                      comply with the planning scheme.
                                                                      Council has determined by way of the
                                                                      planning scheme what is 'suitable'.
                                                                      The Applicant provides no
                                                                      qualification, expert opinion or
                                                                      justification to allow a conclusion that
                                                                      the amount proposed is " ...more than
                                                                      suitable." The Applicant furthermore




                                                                                                              19