Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition

of 28

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

  Code Objective                 Developer's Assessment              Objectors' Assessment

  road system                                                        proposed accessand egress point
                                                                     does impact adversely on the safety
                                                                     and operation of the Eumundi-Noosa
                                                                     Road.

 014 Provision is made for      014 Complies                         Does not Comply
  pedestrian and vehicular      Can comply via condition             The Applicants response is
 queues at conflict points;     where applicable.                    inconsistent and vague. The
                                                                     Development will significantly affect
                                                                     traffic on the Eumundi-Noosa Road,
                                                                     the roundabout outside the School
                                                                     and pedestrian children on the
                                                                     footpath entrance in the event of
                                                                     queuing to accessthe proposed
                                                                     Development. The Applicant has
                                                                     provided no objective analysis of the
                                                                     likely queuing frequency or extent.
                                                                     The Applicant's response is indicative
                                                                     of the fact that the Applicant has not
                                                                     conducted the required analysis and
                                                                     expects the Assessment Manager to
                                                                     determine what is appropriate, which
                                                                     is unacceptable in the already
                                                                     challenging circumstances.

 017 Car parking areas are      017 Complies                         Does not Comply
 landscaped ...                 Car parking areas have been          Cannot be compliant as they do not
                                suitably landscaped.                 meet the requirements of the
                                                                     Landscaping Code Objective 028.


The Application does not comply in the areas outlined above and has completely failed to address
adequately the potential impacts on the adjoining School. At 6.2 of its Town Planning Report the
Applicant makes unfounded, unqualified and unsupported opinion as to the potential impacts on the
adjoining School. The assessment is neither comprehensive nor soundly validated for example:


  Applicants Response / Assertion                Objectors' Response

  l. The proposed petrol store building is      This is a statement of fact without justification as to
      located more than 10m form the school      its relevance.
      boundary
                                                10m is in effect too close to the School boundary to
                                                ensure the safety of the children attending the
                                                School. We have demonstrated            elsewhere in this
                                                document      that    international   and Australian     best




                                                                                                           23

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.1 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Petition.pdf · 10.1 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.