Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 3 - Traffic Further Issues Response_TTPlus10553_20220330.pdf
Department Principal:
Bryce Trevilyan
Project Contact:
Bryce Trevilyan
ABN: 54 619 700 239
Queensland
6 Mayneview Street, Milton Qld 4064
Date 30-Mar-2022 PO Box 1779, Milton BC, Qld 4064
P: +61 7 3871 0411 F: +61 7 3367 3317
TTPlus Ref: 10553
E: [email protected]
Phil Starkey
Noosa Springs Real Estate Pty Ltd
[email protected]
Dear Phil
Noosa Springs Resort Complex — Traffic Engineering response to further matters raised by
Council
Prefacing Comment
1. The advice in this report follows on from previous reports that have been produced by Traffic & Transport Plus
(TTPlus) for the proposed development, namely our traffic engineering assessment dated 18-Jun-2021 and our
response to Council’s RFI dated 22-Nov-2021. I have received a further request from Council for more
information about the proposal in an email from Council officer Patrick Murphy dated 18 March 2022. It contains
four specific queries.
Query 1
2. I note that with regards to Council’s first query “Need clarity as to whether the resort facilities can be used by
the public – this would need to be factored into a reviewed car parking analysis”. The proposal is described in
our 18-Jun-2021 report paragraph 9 “The proposal under assessment is to redevelop the north-eastern portion
of the land parcel, whilst leaving the southern and western areas largely unchanged. A 112 room hotel, spread
over 5 buildings is proposed, including ancillary facilities (bar, dining, café, pools) and associated servicing
arrangements. Post construction, the existing golf, day spa and function facilities are to be retained.”. The only
addition is the hotel — the existing facilities on site remain open to the public and are assumed to produce traffic
and parking demand at the rate previously observed and therefore their operation is accounted for under
existing/observed conditions.
3. In TTPlus’s experience, it is not routine for significant numbers of externally based patrons to frequent an internal
resort restaurant — it is not to say that there may not be some instances where this may occur, but at a design
level, it is considered to be somewhat insignificant. In any event, as will be seen in the car parking availability
analysis presented later in this advice, during the time at which such behaviour may occur (evening), there is
ample spare car parking available on site.
Traffic Transport Engineering www.ttplus.com.au
[OCR of page images]
TRAFP IAG RANSFORT
me Dis
Department Principal:
Bryce Trevilyan
Project Contact:
Bryce Trevilyan
ABN: 54 619 700 239
Queensland
6 Mayneview Street, Milton Qld 4064.
Date 30-Mar-2022 PO Box 1779, Milton BC, Qld 4064
TTPlus Ref: 10553 P: +61 7 3871 0411 F: +61 7 3367 3317
E: [email protected]
Phil Starkey
Noosa Springs Real Estate Pty Ltd
[email protected]
Dear Phil
Noosa Springs Resort Complex — Traffic Engineering response to further matters raised by
Council
Prefacing Comment
The advice in this report follows on from previous reports that have been produced by Traffic & Transport Plus
(TTPlus) for the proposed development, namely our traffic engineering assessment dated 18-Jun-2021 and our
response to Council’s RFI dated 22-Nov-2021. | have received a further request from Council for more
information about the proposal in an email from Council officer Patrick Murphy dated 18 March 2022. It contains
four specific queries.
Query 1
| note that with regards to Council's first query “Need clarity as to whether the resort facilities can be used by
the public — this would need to be factored into a reviewed car parking analysis”. The proposal is described in
our 18-Jun-2021 report paragraph 9 “The proposal under assessment is to redevelop the north-eastern portion
of the land parcel, whilst leaving the southern and western areas largely unchanged. A 112 room hotel, spread
over 5 buildings is proposed, including ancillary facilities (bar, dining, café, pools) and associated servicing
arrangements. Post construction, the existing golf, day spa and function facilities are to be retained.”. The only
addition is the hotel — the existing facilities on site remain open to the public and are assumed to produce traffic
and parking demand at the rate previously observed and therefore their operation is accounted for under
existing/observed conditions.
In TTPlus’s experience, it is not routine for significant numbers of externally based patrons to frequent an internal
resort restaurant — it is not to say that there may not be some instances where this may occur, but at a design
level, it is considered to be somewhat insignificant. In any event, as will be seen in the car parking availability
analysis presented later in this advice, during the time at which such behaviour may occur (evening), there is
ample spare car parking available on site.
Traffic Transport Engineering www.ttplus.com.au
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 18 pages
Page 2
Query 2
4. With regards to Council’s second query “How does the hotel manage potential hotel guests who want to travel
by private car when the number of car parking spaces available are already being utilised?”. It is unclear if this
is an expectation on Council’s part that this will happen occasionally or routinely.
5. If this was an occasional occurrence (as currently parking does overflow the site during the middle of the day
maybe once or twice a year) then there really is nothing to mitigate — the occasional parking overflows that
occur at the moment have not been a cause for Council action previously, nor for operation to be considered to
be problematic. In any event, as identified in previous reporting, the site has capacity for some overflow car
parking.
6. In the event the issue identified relates to a potential routine failure of the carpark to accommodate the parking
demand, this has been discussed further below.
7. The starting point for considering the concern from this point of view is that it ought not to be neglected that it is
in fact the Noosa Plan that asks development in the Noosa Heads area to embrace the idea of discouraging the
use of private motor vehicles and promoting alternative modes of transport — indeed Council should not only
be actively supporting and encouraging such uses that look to deliver on Council’s own vision, but also take an
active role in assisting to deliver that vision — this should include actively encouraging alternative mode
operators to locate to Noosa to help serve willing developments, such as that which is proposed in this instance.
8. The emergence of developments embracing this sound traffic engineering principle will assist to ‘break the
cycle’ of private motor vehicle dependence. A development such as the proposal enhances the prospect of
businesses operating services such as e-scooters, taxi services, ride-share etc from both developing and
broadening their footprint. For example, Beam scooters currently operate at Port Douglas, where they have
found that a positive operating environment exists at resort facilities.
9. Assuming that patrons will simply always arrive in a private motor vehicle misunderstands the nature of the
behaviour change that is sought to be driven by the proposed development, which as noted, is ultimately sought
by the Council’s own planning scheme. Noosa is trying to force behaviour change by ensuring that limited
parking is available, especially in the Noosa Heads area where this development is proposed and that
alternative transport modes are utilised instead. By approving this development and other similar developments
then this goal can be achieved. There is a degree of both ‘carrot’ and ‘stick’ required to deliver on Council’s
vision. The change sought is dependent on the behaviour changes espoused here. The fact that an occasional
overflow may occur whilst the necessary behaviour change is ramping up or manifesting is not a long-term
consideration.
10. If routine overflow of the carpark occurs overnight or during the middle of the day on weekends, there are
mitigation measures that can be put in place. I note that Gold Coast hotels handle this situation by charging
guests for parking. It is not unusual to see Gold Coast hotels offering parking in addition to rooms for $10-$20
per night. This is an option that is open to the hotel to ensure parking does not routinely exceed capacity. This
operating practice can be readily observed by looking online at booking websites to understand how limited
parking provision is handled on the Gold Coast. By and large, it is handled by the hotels simply charging for
parking as a secondary line item. Most hotels charge between $10-$20 per night. None of them claim to offer
the transport alternatives proposed here with the exception of some walking provisions.
11. An even better approach, in my opinion, is to have car parking included in the standard room rates and provide
patrons a discount (aligned with seasonal demands, even modified to suit residual supply level at any given
point in time) if they elect to not require a car parking space. In this way, the act of not arriving with a private
motor vehicle is presented as an incentive to a patron. It is my recommendation that this costing structure be
implemented with the proposed development — if necessary to appease Council’s concerns in this regard, a
suitable condition of approval could be formulated to ensure that it operates in this fashion.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 2
[OCR of page images]
10.
11.
Query 2
With regards to Council’s second query “How does the hotel manage potential hotel guests who want to travel
by private car when the number of car parking spaces available are already being utilised?”. It is unclear if this
is an expectation on Council’s part that this will happen occasionally or routinely.
If this was an occasional occurrence (as currently parking does overflow the site during the middle of the day
maybe once or twice a year) then there really is nothing to mitigate — the occasional parking overflows that
occur at the moment have not been a cause for Council action previously, nor for operation to be considered to
be problematic. In any event, as identified in previous reporting, the site has capacity for some overflow car
parking.
In the event the issue identified relates to a potential routine failure of the carpark to accommodate the parking
demand, this has been discussed further below.
The starting point for considering the concern from this point of view is that it ought not to be neglected that it is
in fact the Noosa Plan that asks development in the Noosa Heads area to embrace the idea of discouraging the
use of private motor vehicles and promoting alternative modes of transport — indeed Council should not only
be actively supporting and encouraging such uses that look to deliver on Council’s own vision, but also take an
active role in assisting to deliver that vision — this should include actively encouraging alternative mode
operators to locate to Noosa to help serve willing developments, such as that which is proposed in this instance.
The emergence of developments embracing this sound traffic engineering principle will assist to ‘break the
cycle’ of private motor vehicle dependence. A development such as the proposal enhances the prospect of
businesses operating services such as e-scooters, taxi services, ride-share etc from both developing and
broadening their footprint. For example, Beam scooters currently operate at Port Douglas, where they have
found that a positive operating environment exists at resort facilities.
Assuming that patrons will simply always arrive in a private motor vehicle misunderstands the nature of the
behaviour change that is sought to be driven by the proposed development, which as noted, is ultimately sought
by the Council’s own planning scheme. Noosa is trying to force behaviour change by ensuring that limited
parking is available, especially in the Noosa Heads area where this development is proposed and that
alternative transport modes are utilised instead. By approving this development and other similar developments
then this goal can be achieved. There is a degree of both ‘carrot’ and ‘stick’ required to deliver on Council's
vision. The change sought is dependent on the behaviour changes espoused here. The fact that an occasional
overflow may occur whilst the necessary behaviour change is ramping up or manifesting is not a long-term
consideration.
If routine overflow of the carpark occurs overnight or during the middle of the day on weekends, there are
mitigation measures that can be put in place. | note that Gold Coast hotels handle this situation by charging
guests for parking. It is not unusual to see Gold Coast hotels offering parking in addition to rooms for $10-$20
per night. This is an option that is open to the hotel to ensure parking does not routinely exceed capacity. This
operating practice can be readily observed by looking online at booking websites to understand how limited
parking provision is handled on the Gold Coast. By and large, it is handled by the hotels simply charging for
parking as a secondary line item. Most hotels charge between $10-$20 per night. None of them claim to offer
the transport alternatives proposed here with the exception of some walking provisions.
An even better approach, in my opinion, is to have car parking included in the standard room rates and provide
patrons a discount (aligned with seasonal demands, even modified to suit residual supply level at any given
point in time) if they elect to not require a car parking space. In this way, the act of not arriving with a private
motor vehicle is presented as an incentive to a patron. It is my recommendation that this costing structure be
implemented with the proposed development — if necessary to appease Council’s concerns in this regard, a
suitable condition of approval could be formulated to ensure that it operates in this fashion.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 2
Page 3
Query 3
12. Addressing Council’s third query “A travel management plan is required, having sufficient detail, which
addresses staff parking arrangements and travel demand management measures that firstly enforce low resort
guest private car usage (such as measures to address the questions in items 2(i) and (ii) [understood to mean
3(1) & (ii)] of RFI) and secondly measures to facilitate low resort private car usage (there are a multitude of
potential proposals put forward in the reporting, such as scooters, shuttle buses, ebikes, etc., but nothing is
being actually proposed or committed to).”.
13. I am unsure how something can be identified as a “potential proposal” but then also “[not] actually proposed”.
To clarify my opinion, the advice I am presenting is that the alternative modes be delivered (by a combination
of direct actions of the proposed development, and aligned with the commentary earlier in this advice, by
Council’s active support insofar as some elements are outside the purview of one individual development). I
consider the more appropriate consideration of Council in this regard would more appropriately have perhaps
been to ask for information related to where the e-scooters may be placed for example — this particular item is
not consequential as it is evident that ample space for this is available, and in any event, as will be demonstrated
later in this advice, the proposed development in fact will have ample car parking spaces available and
accordingly some of these spaces could be re-purposed if required. This is aligned with Council’s own actions
on Hastings Street whereby some car parking has been repurposed for the use of scooters and motorbikes.
14. There appears to be some concern related to envisaging how such a situation could be conditioned as part of
an approval. In the TTPlus RFI response dated 21 November 2022 paragraph 14, it states “[the conditioning of
cycles, mopeds and scooters] is similar to other services that new developments must provide, such as refuse
collection. The details of the refuse collection contract are not typically part of the application process, but key
to the application is that refuse collection is possible and that conditions are in place requiring the operator to
have suitable refuse collection arrangements. To this end, I consider that this matter can be dealt with via
conditions requiring a minimum number of alternative mode vehicles to be operational at any time during the
life of the proposed development.” From a traffic engineering point of view, all Council’s generally require for
refuse collection is ensure that large RCVs are able to manoeuvre on site and require that the developer have
an active contract to collect refuse. The commitment is in the conditioning. A similar level of conditioning will
suit in this instance. There are no manoeuvring issues for vehicles in this case, and it is my opinion that Council
could condition that these are provided and maintained by the operator of the site.
15. A similar approach can be applied to the recommendation to provide shuttle services to assist in the attenuation
of the use of private motor vehicles.
16. Notwithstanding the above, I note that this issue was largely addressed in TTPlus’ previous response to
Council’s RFI. At no stage has this development ever proposed to provide 1 space per four rooms. The Gold
Coast scheme provision of 1 space per 4 units was cited as an example of a modern approach to providing
parking provision at a modern resort facility — from a Council in SEQ that already suffers from significant traffic
issues and is trying to mitigate — a state of affairs it was presumed that Noosa Council was seeking to avoid in
the first place — an approach that I agree with. The examples provided showed that 207 spaces exist on the
site, the maximum demand related to the existing uses is 155 spaces, thereby leaving a residual supply of in
excess of this 1 space per four rooms rate — this was clear without any detailed analysis. In the RFI response
dated 22 Nov 2021 it was noted that with additional parking provision proposed to be provided by the proponent
would lead to a supply of in the order of 1 space per 1.6 rooms, if one took the absolute highest parking demand
from the 2017 parking survey undertaken as the benchmark for existing demand levels. At many times of the
day, including when the subject proposal’s demands are at their peak, the actual available supply would be
more than this.
17. The reality is that the highest level of observed parking demand is not necessarily the appropriate benchmark
to use as the typical design demand for parking on the subject site.
18. Two surveys of the parking for the Noosa Springs site have been undertaken for the project. The first was
conducted in June-July of 2017, and the second was conducted Jan-Feb 2022.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 3
[OCR of page images]
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Query 3
Addressing Council’s third query “A travel management plan is required, having sufficient detail, which
addresses staff parking arrangements and travel demand management measures that firstly enforce low resort
guest private car usage (such as measures to address the questions in items 2(i) and (ii) [understood to mean
3(1) & (ii)] of RFI) and secondly measures to facilitate low resort private car usage (there are a multitude of
potential proposals put forward in the reporting, such as scooters, shuttle buses, ebikes, etc., but nothing is
being actually proposed or committed to).”.
lam unsure how something can be identified as a “potential proposal” but then also “[not] actually proposed”.
To clarify my opinion, the advice | am presenting is that the alternative modes be delivered (by a combination
of direct actions of the proposed development, and aligned with the commentary earlier in this advice, by
Council's active support insofar as some elements are outside the purview of one individual development). |
consider the more appropriate consideration of Council in this regard would more appropriately have perhaps
been to ask for information related to where the e-scooters may be placed for example — this particular item is
not consequential as it is evident that ample space for this is available, and in any event, as will be demonstrated
later in this advice, the proposed development in fact will have ample car parking spaces available and
accordingly some of these spaces could be re-purposed if required. This is aligned with Council’s own actions
on Hastings Street whereby some car parking has been repurposed for the use of scooters and motorbikes.
There appears to be some concern related to envisaging how such a situation could be conditioned as part of
an approval. In the TTPlus RFI response dated 21 November 2022 paragraph 14, it states “[the conditioning of
cycles, mopeds and scooters] is similar to other services that new developments must provide, such as refuse
collection. The details of the refuse collection contract are not typically part of the application process, but key
to the application is that refuse collection is possible and that conditions are in place requiring the operator to
have suitable refuse collection arrangements. To this end, | consider that this matter can be dealt with via
conditions requiring a minimum number of alternative mode vehicles to be operational at any time during the
life of the proposed development.” From a traffic engineering point of view, all Council’s generally require for
refuse collection is ensure that large RCVs are able to manoeuvre on site and require that the developer have
an active contract to collect refuse. The commitment is in the conditioning. A similar level of conditioning will
suit in this instance. There are no manoeuvring issues for vehicles in this case, and it is my opinion that Council
could condition that these are provided and maintained by the operator of the site.
A similar approach can be applied to the recommendation to provide shuttle services to assist in the attenuation
of the use of private motor vehicles.
Notwithstanding the above, | note that this issue was largely addressed in TTPlus’ previous response to
Council's RFI. At no stage has this development ever proposed to provide 1 space per four rooms. The Gold
Coast scheme provision of 1 space per 4 units was cited as an example of a modern approach to providing
parking provision at a modern resort facility — from a Council in SEQ that already suffers from significant traffic
issues and is trying to mitigate — a state of affairs it was presumed that Noosa Council was seeking to avoid in
the first place — an approach that | agree with. The examples provided showed that 207 spaces exist on the
site, the maximum demand related to the existing uses is 155 spaces, thereby leaving a residual supply of in
excess of this 1 space per four rooms rate — this was clear without any detailed analysis. In the RFI response
dated 22 Nov 2021 it was noted that with additional parking provision proposed to be provided by the proponent
would lead to a supply of in the order of 1 space per 1.6 rooms, if one took the absolute highest parking demand
from the 2017 parking survey undertaken as the benchmark for existing demand levels. At many times of the
day, including when the subject proposal’s demands are at their peak, the actual available supply would be
more than this.
The reality is that the highest level of observed parking demand is not necessarily the appropriate benchmark
to use as the typical design demand for parking on the subject site.
Two surveys of the parking for the Noosa Springs site have been undertaken for the project. The first was
conducted in June-July of 2017, and the second was conducted Jan-Feb 2022.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 3
Page 4
19. The 2017 survey was appended to the response to Council’s Request for Information. It involved monitoring
the parking areas on site at various snapshots during the day, namely 7AM, Midday, 3PM & 7PM and counting
the cars that were parked at those times. The 2022 survey was undertaken in the same way. The results of
the 3 zones that cover the main parking area (currently 211 spaces, post redevelopment reduced to 207) at the
north of the subject site are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Larger versions of these graphs are appended.
Figure 1 — Results of 2017 Parking Survey
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C) — 2017 Survey
2017
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed
21-Jun 22-Jun 23-Jun 24-Jun 25-Jun 26-Jun 27-Jun 28-Jun 29-Jun 30-Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul 18-Jul 19-Jul
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 4
[OCR of page images]
19.
The 2017 survey was appended to the response to Council’s Request for Information. It involved monitoring
the parking areas on site at various snapshots during the day, namely 7AM, Midday, 3PM & 7PM and counting
the cars that were parked at those times. The 2022 survey was undertaken in the same way. The results of
the 3 zones that cover the main parking area (currently 211 spaces, post redevelopment reduced to 207) at the
north of the subject site are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Larger versions of these graphs are appended.
Figure 1 — Results of 2017 Parking Survey
Northern Parking Area (Zones A-C) — 2017 Survey
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 4
Page 5
Figure 2 — Results of 2022 Parking Survey
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C) — 2022 Survey
2022
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
29-Jan 30-Jan 31-Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb 10-Feb 11-Feb 12-Feb 13-Feb 14-Feb 15-Feb 16-Feb 17-Feb 18-Feb 19-Feb 20-Feb 21-Feb 22-Feb 23-Feb 24-Feb 25-Feb 26-Feb 27-Feb
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00
20. The results show similarity between the two surveys. It is noted that the golf greens at the Noosa Springs golf
course were being reconditioned during the first two weeks of the 2022 survey. The final weekend was impacted
by flooding in the Noosa Area (2022 SEQ floods). Nevertheless, I consider the results of the surveys to be
sufficiently similar with no significant behaviour changes with respect to users of the carpark. Notably, there is
no significant increase observed from 2017 to 2022.
21. Both surveys show that parking is significantly under-utilised. The peak parking times are midday, on a
weekday, with weekend midday parking by and large less than midday parking from Mon-Fri. Parking at 3PM
is the next busiest, with parking demand at 7AM and 7PM being the lowest.
22. It is noted that in the case of the proposed hotel, it is likely that parking demand will be focussed on “overnight”
parking. The operations of the hotel required guests to checkout before a certain time and check-in after a
certain time (say 10am and 2pm respectively) as this gives an opportunity for the hotel to service the room
between guests. As such, most guests who are departing will leave well before the midday peak and arriving
guests will predominantly arrive some time after the Midday peak, and often after the 3PM period. For a resort,
it is expected that weekends will be the highest demand times, with guests arriving on Friday evening and
departing on Sundays.
23. The expected peak parking of the hotel synchronises well with the existing uses. The survey data demonstrates
that the existing uses have heir highest parking demand during the middle of the day on weekdays and as
noted, the hotel will have its highest parking demand overnight on weekends. This is an efficient use of
infrastructure.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 5
[OCR of page images]
20.
21.
22.
23.
Figure 2 — Results of 2022 Parking Survey
Northern Parking Area (Zones A-C) — 2022 Survey
| Liv Val Mi LLAdAil oi
The results show similarity between the two surveys. It is noted that the golf greens at the Noosa Springs golf
course were being reconditioned during the first two weeks of the 2022 survey. The final weekend was impacted
by flooding in the Noosa Area (2022 SEQ floods). Nevertheless, | consider the results of the surveys to be
sufficiently similar with no significant behaviour changes with respect to users of the carpark. Notably, there is
no significant increase observed from 2017 to 2022.
Both surveys show that parking is significantly under-utilised. The peak parking times are midday, on a
weekday, with weekend midday parking by and large less than midday parking from Mon-Fri. Parking at 3PM
is the next busiest, with parking demand at 7AM and 7PM being the lowest.
It is noted that in the case of the proposed hotel, it is likely that parking demand will be focussed on “overnight”
parking. The operations of the hotel required guests to checkout before a certain time and check-in after a
certain time (say 10am and 2pm respectively) as this gives an opportunity for the hotel to service the room
between guests. As such, most guests who are departing will leave well before the midday peak and arriving
guests will predominantly arrive some time after the Midday peak, and often after the 3PM period. For a resort,
it is expected that weekends will be the highest demand times, with guests arriving on Friday evening and
departing on Sundays.
The expected peak parking of the hotel synchronises well with the existing uses. The survey data demonstrates
that the existing uses have heir highest parking demand during the middle of the day on weekdays and as
noted, the hotel will have its highest parking demand overnight on weekends. This is an efficient use of
infrastructure.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 5
Page 6
24. There are presently 211 spaces provided in the parking areas at the north of the site, which will be reduced to
207 post redevelopment. If it is assumed that the largest reasonable demand for the hotel was
1 space per 1½ rooms, then for 112 rooms there would be a demand of 75 spaces. This would leave 136
spaces allocated for existing uses. I have overlaid the 136 onto a graph that contains the results of the two
surveys in Figure 3 (depiction ignores temporal variations in peaks).
Figure 3 — Existing demand with provision of 1 space per 1½ rooms
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C)
2017 2022
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 29- 30- 31- Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27-
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul 18-Jul 19-Jul Jan Jan Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Reduced Threshold for
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00 Existing Capacity 1 space per 1½ rooms
(pre upgrade)
Notes: A parking rate of 1 space per 1½ rooms is considered to be a generously high provision rate for a resort.
It is reiterated that this 207 space utilisation depiction above relates to the existing parking levels on the site, which supports
TTPlus’ primary position that in fact no additional car parking spaces need be supplied to support the safe and efficient
operations of the existing and proposed uses on the site.
25. It is noted that the red line that represents the residual capacity available to non-hotel uses is only exceeded a
handful of times across the survey periods. In each of those exceedance cases, it only occurs for a Mon-Fri
midday period, and not during any of the observed 7AM, 3PM or 7PM periods. This means that even if demand
were to maximise for the hotel at 1 space per 1½ rooms, this would happen overnight and not interfere with
normal parking demand on the site for other uses.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 6
[OCR of page images]
24.
25.
There are presently 211 spaces provided in the parking areas at the north of the site, which will be reduced to
207 post redevelopment. If it is assumed that the largest reasonable demand for the hotel was
1 space per 1% rooms, then for 112 rooms there would be a demand of 75 spaces. This would leave 136
spaces allocated for existing uses. | have overlaid the 136 onto a graph that contains the results of the two
surveys in Figure 3 (depiction ignores temporal variations in peaks).
Figure 3 — Existing demand with provision of 1 space per 1% rooms
Northern Parking Area (Zones AC)
Notes: — A parking rate of 1 space per 1% rooms is considered to be a generously high provision rate for a resort.
Itis reiterated that this 207 space utilisation depiction above relates to the existing parking levels on the site, which supports
TTPlus’ primary position that in fact no additional car parking spaces need be supplied to support the safe and efficient
operations of the existing and proposed uses on the site.
It is noted that the red line that represents the residual capacity available to non-hotel uses is only exceeded a
handful of times across the survey periods. In each of those exceedance cases, it only occurs for a Mon-Fri
midday period, and not during any of the observed 7AM, 3PM or 7PM periods. This means that even if demand
were to maximise for the hotel at 1 space per 174 rooms, this would happen overnight and not interfere with
normal parking demand on the site for other uses.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 6
Page 7
26. I note however that the proponent is now proposing to provide in the order of 42 additional spaces as part of an
upgrade to the northern parking area in conjunction with the proposed hotel, against my advice, largely to
appease Council’s remaining concerns with respect to car parking. This means that an upgraded capacity of
249 spaces would be available (=207+42). Were Council to approve the additional capacity, it would be likely
that spaces could be provided such a that each room of the hotel could have a private vehicle, thereby not
actively promoting the use of alternative modes of transport. Setting aside staff requirements, if 112 vehicles
(1 space per room) were present, the residual capacity available for other uses would be
137 spaces (=249–112), which is more than all but the busiest of days. This is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4 — Existing demand with upgraded capacity and 1 space per room
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C)
2017 2022
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 29- 30- 31- Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27-
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul 18-Jul 19-Jul Jan Jan Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Reduced Threshold for Zones A–C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00 1 space per 1 rooms Upgrded Capacity
(with upgrade)
27. Under this scenario, even less of the non hotel uses parking demand would exceed the residual capacity
available for it. As such, I consider that if Council permits the upgrading of the carpark then parking is essentially
provided at a rate of 1 space per room. Accordingly, in reality the initiatives recommended are largely no longer
required to incentivise and support a lower car parking demand.
28. In Paragraph 12 of the TTPlus report dated 22-Nov-2021, it is noted that “a number of these categories [of
employees] such as housekeeping and admin are likely to be parked during the daytime, which is offset from
the peak parking expected to occur at the hotel. Parking is likely at a maximum between the evening and the
next morning when hotel customers are back at the hotel for the evening.”. It remains the case that employee
demand will be at its highest during the middle of the day, when parking demand for the hotel is at its lowest
(and vice versa) and that there will be sufficient residual demand to accommodate the staff parking.
29. The request items related to Council RFI paragraphs 3(i) and (ii) are resolved by the discussion in the previous
section of this advice.
30. Accordingly, with inclusion of the additional car parking facility proposed, a travel management plan actually
need not be provided, but nonetheless, one could be conditioned if desired.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 7
[OCR of page images]
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
| note however that the proponent is now proposing to provide in the order of 42 additional spaces as part of an
upgrade to the northern parking area in conjunction with the proposed hotel, against my advice, largely to
appease Council’s remaining concerns with respect to car parking. This means that an upgraded capacity of
249 spaces would be available (=207+42). Were Council to approve the additional capacity, it would be likely
that spaces could be provided such a that each room of the hotel could have a private vehicle, thereby not
actively promoting the use of alternative modes of transport. Setting aside staff requirements, if 112 vehicles
(1 space per room) were present, the residual capacity available for other uses would be
137 spaces (=249-112), which is more than all but the busiest of days. This is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4 — Existing demand with upgraded capacity and 1 space per room
Northern Parking Area (Zones AC)
A dell ii IL.
Under this scenario, even less of the non hotel uses parking demand would exceed the residual capacity
available for it. As such, I consider that if Council permits the upgrading of the carpark then parking is essentially
provided at a rate of 1 space per room. Accordingly, in reality the initiatives recommended are largely no longer
required to incentivise and support a lower car parking demand.
In Paragraph 12 of the TTPlus report dated 22-Nov-2021, it is noted that “a number of these categories [of
employees] such as housekeeping and admin are likely to be parked during the daytime, which is offset from
the peak parking expected to occur at the hotel. Parking is likely at a maximum between the evening and the
next morning when hotel customers are back at the hotel for the evening.”. |t remains the case that employee
demand will be at its highest during the middle of the day, when parking demand for the hotel is at its lowest
(and vice versa) and that there will be sufficient residual demand to accommodate the staff parking.
The request items related to Council RFI paragraphs 3(i) and (ii) are resolved by the discussion in the previous
section of this advice.
Accordingly, with inclusion of the additional car parking facility proposed, a travel management plan actually
need not be provided, but nonetheless, one could be conditioned if desired.
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 7
Page 8
Query 4
31. I note that with regards to Council’s fourth query “Item 8b of the RFI has not been addressed. This needs to be
resolved now, at least conceptually, and not put off to a later stage of approval, because parking supply may
need to reduce to achieve the eventual outcome.” — item 8b of the Council RFI was addressed in the TTPlus
report dated 22-Nov-2021 — “The eastern carpark is to be modified such that the southern access is to be
removed, leaving only the northern access to service both ingress and egress movements. As such, it is now
proposed to remove one of the parking spaces close to the proposed hotel entrance and provide a marked
turnaround bay at the southern end of the eastern carpark area. Therefore, if a car enters the eastern carpark
and is unable to find a space, the turnaround bay will allow the driver to manoeuvre their car to exit the carpark
without having to reverse down the aisle.”.
32. To clarify for the sake of directly responding to the query, there is no intent to dedicate/quarantine particular
areas of the site for specific uses. This allows optimal use of the infrastructure and is not of tangible
inconvenience to users as, for example, (as evidenced by the surveys) golf patrons already congregate towards
the western end of the site, whereas hotel patrons, naturally would prefer the eastern end. At busier times of
course, the appropriate level of mixing would occur.
Recommendations
33. To reiterate, as evidenced by the provided survey information, the primary position of TTPlus is that the existing
on-site car parking provisions would be suitable to accommodate the demands of the proposed use in an
environment where Noosa Council is actively pursuing an increase in alternative mode provision (to accord with
Noosa Plan). As a part of this the identified and recommended initiatives directly related to the site ought to be
implemented, and are able to be conditioned.
34. In the alternative, should additional car parking be provided on site as is now proposed, whilst still desirable of
course, no such conditioning related to alternative modes need be included in the conditions of approval as
sufficient parking will exist to provide 1 space per hotel room.
We trust that this information is of assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned to discuss any
aspect of the above further.
Yours faithfully
Bryce Trevilyan – RPEQ #07745
Traffic & Transport Plus
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 8
[OCR of page images]
31.
32.
33.
34.
Query 4
| note that with regards to Council's fourth query “/tem 8b of the RFI has not been addressed. This needs to be
resolved now, at least conceptually, and not put off to a later stage of approval, because parking supply may
need to reduce to achieve the eventual outcome.” — item 8b of the Council RFI was addressed in the TTPlus
report dated 22-Nov-2021 — “The eastern carpark is to be modified such that the southern access is to be
removed, leaving only the northern access to service both ingress and egress movements. As such, it is now
proposed to remove one of the parking spaces close to the proposed hotel entrance and provide a marked
turnaround bay at the southern end of the eastern carpark area. Therefore, if a car enters the eastern carpark
and is unable to find a space, the turnaround bay will allow the driver to manoeuvre their car to exit the carpark
without having to reverse down the aisle.”.
To clarify for the sake of directly responding to the query, there is no intent to dedicate/quarantine particular
areas of the site for specific uses. This allows optimal use of the infrastructure and is not of tangible
inconvenience to users as, for example, (as evidenced by the surveys) golf patrons already congregate towards
the western end of the site, whereas hotel patrons, naturally would prefer the eastern end. At busier times of
course, the appropriate level of mixing would occur.
Recommendations
To reiterate, as evidenced by the provided survey information, the primary position of TTPlus is that the existing
on-site car parking provisions would be suitable to accommodate the demands of the proposed use in an
environment where Noosa Council is actively pursuing an increase in alternative mode provision (to accord with
Noosa Plan). As a part of this the identified and recommended initiatives directly related to the site ought to be
implemented, and are able to be conditioned.
In the alternative, should additional car parking be provided on site as is now proposed, whilst still desirable of
course, no such conditioning related to alternative modes need be included in the conditions of approval as
sufficient parking will exist to provide 1 space per hotel room.
We trust that this information is of assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned to discuss any
aspect of the above further.
Yours faithfully
BryCe Trevilyan —- RPEQ #07745
Traffic & Transpoft Plus
Report2_10553—20220328.docx 8
Page 9
Date of Survey† (please circle)
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
29-Jan 30-Jan 31-Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb 10-Feb 11-Feb
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
12-Feb 13-Feb 14-Feb 15-Feb 16-Feb 17-Feb 18-Feb
Survey Zones
Vehicle Count (please record number of vehicles* parked in each zone at each time)
Parking Zone 7:00 AM Midday 3:00 PM 7:00 PM
Zone A
(east upper level)
Zone B
(east lower level)
Zone C
(west lower level)
Zone D
(Porte Cochere)
Zone E
(south carpark)
F
(on-street)
†Survey to be conducted over 14 consecutive days
*Count all cars, vans, utes, trucks, buses, motorbikes etc parked in each of the zones. Do not count Golf Buggies
© 2022 Traffic & Transport Plus
[OCR of page images]
Date of Surveyt (please circle)
Sat Sun
29-Jan 30-Jan
Sat Sun
5-Feb 6-Feb
Sat Sun
12-Feb 13-Feb
Survey Zones
ite
Mon
31-Jan
Mon
7-Feb
Mon
14-Feb
Tue
1-Feb
Tue
8-Feb
Tue
15-Feb
Wed
2-Feb
Wed
9-Feb
Wed
16-Feb
Thu
3-Feb
Thu
10-Feb
Thu
17-Feb
Vehicle Count (please record number of vehicles* parked in each zone at each time)
Fri
4-Feb
Fri
11-Feb
Fri
18-Feb
Parking Zone
7:00 AM
3:00 PM
7:00 PM
Zone B
(east lower level)
Zone E
(south carpark)
F
(on-street)
tSurvey to be conducted over 14 consecutive days
*Count all cars, vans, utes, trucks, buses, motorbikes etc parked in each of the zones. Do not count Golf Buggies
© 2022 Traffic & Transport Plus
Page 10
0 vehs
5 vehs
10 vehs
15 vehs
20 vehs
25 vehs
30 vehs
35 vehs
40 vehs
45 vehs
50 vehs
55 vehs
60 vehs
65 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 21 vehs
Sat
15:00 24 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 9 vehs
12:00 17 vehs
Sun
15:00 8 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 19 vehs
12:00 37 vehs
Mon
15:00 27 vehs
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
19:00 8 vehs
07:00 18 vehs
12:00 25 vehs
Tue
15:00 27 vehs
1-Feb-22
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 25 vehs
Wed
15:00 8 vehs
2-Feb-22
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 13 vehs
12:00 32 vehs
Thu
15:00 17 vehs
3-Feb-22
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 14 vehs
12:00 19 vehs
Fri
15:00 26 vehs
4-Feb-22
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 24 vehs
Sat
15:00 19 vehs
5-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 15 vehs
Sun
15:00 10 vehs
6-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 19 vehs
Mon
15:00 13 vehs
7-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 13 vehs
12:00 33 vehs
Tue
15:00 29 vehs
8-Feb-22
19:00 21 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 33 vehs
Wed
15:00 26 vehs
9-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 9 vehs
12:00 28 vehs
Thu
15:00 28 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 9 vehs
12:00 37 vehs
Fri
15:00 30 vehs
19:00
07:00 6 vehs
Zone A — Mon–Fri
12:00 28 vehs
Sat
15:00 31 vehs
19:00
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 19 vehs
Sun
15:00 12 vehs
19:00
07:00 9 vehs
12:00 40 vehs
Mon
15:00 15 vehs
– Observed Vehicles —
Zone A — Sat–Sun
19:00 10 vehs
Zone A—East Upper Level
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 33 vehs
Tue
15:00 24 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 60 vehs
Wed
15:00 19 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 12 vehs
12:00 44 vehs
Thu
15:00 35 vehs
19:00 7 vehs
07:00 12 vehs
12:00 37 vehs
Fri
15:00 24 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 25 vehs
Sat
15:00 18 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 12 vehs
Sun
15:00 6 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 7 vehs
12:00 28 vehs
Mon
15:00 31 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 14 vehs
12:00 32 vehs
Tue
15:00 21 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 8 vehs
Wed
15:00 8 vehs
19:00
07:00 22 vehs
12:00 25 vehs
Thu
15:00 43 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 19 vehs
Fri
15:00 9 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00 2 vehs
Sat
15:00 1 vehs
19:00
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Sun
15:00 3 vehs
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
[OCR of page images]
— Observed Vehicles —
Zone A—East Upper Level
a
2 [=|
ry
ES
o
65 vehs
4
a a
2 § 2
y ,
q sy
a nae Bk
60 vehs
55 vehs
50 vehs
45 vehs
40 vehs
q
2
3
g
al el
35 vehs
30 vehs
25 vehs
20 vehs
15 vehs
10 vehs
5 vehs
BEL
Seles
SYaA 9
SEL
w
BUELL
SYOA ST
SYOA
syar
BTENaE
BELTS
STEW
syan
SUDA TE
EET
SYA OT
ETE
SEL
BUENA
SUPA TT
SYOA €
SYaA 8
EUELWar
STEW
SUaA HZ
EY
STEW
Ovehs
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:20
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00°6T
00:sT
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:sT
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
Wed
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue
1-Feb-22 2-Feb-22 3-Feb-22 4-Feb-22 5-Feb-22 6-Feb-22 7-Feb-22 8-Feb-22 9-Feb-22
Sun
Sat
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
Zone A — Sat-Sun
m@ Zone A — Mon-Fri
Page 11
0 vehs
5 vehs
10 vehs
15 vehs
20 vehs
25 vehs
30 vehs
35 vehs
40 vehs
45 vehs
50 vehs
55 vehs
60 vehs
65 vehs
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 36 vehs
Sat
15:00 29 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 21 vehs
Sun
15:00 8 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 42 vehs
12:00 46 vehs
Mon
15:00 38 vehs
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
19:00 8 vehs
07:00 25 vehs
12:00 23 vehs
Tue
15:00 25 vehs
1-Feb-22
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 22 vehs
Wed
15:00 13 vehs
2-Feb-22
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 24 vehs
12:00 44 vehs
Thu
15:00 19 vehs
3-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 21 vehs
12:00 34 vehs
Fri
15:00 31 vehs
4-Feb-22
19:00 9 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 36 vehs
Sat
15:00 16 vehs
5-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 28 vehs
Sun
15:00 13 vehs
6-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 31 vehs
Mon
15:00 25 vehs
7-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 28 vehs
12:00 51 vehs
Tue
15:00 33 vehs
8-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 14 vehs
12:00 28 vehs
Wed
15:00 18 vehs
9-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 30 vehs
12:00 30 vehs
Thu
15:00 27 vehs
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 22 vehs
12:00 45 vehs
Fri
15:00 33 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 11 vehs
Zone B — Mon–Fri
12:00 42 vehs
Sat
15:00 40 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 32 vehs
Sun
15:00 15 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 16 vehs
12:00 52 vehs
Mon
15:00 24 vehs
– Observed Vehicles —
Zone B — Sat–Sun
19:00 8 vehs
Zone B—East Lower level
07:00 21 vehs
12:00 56 vehs
Tue
15:00 48 vehs
19:00
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 62 vehs
Wed
15:00 27 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 10 vehs
12:00 42 vehs
Thu
15:00 36 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 15 vehs
12:00 42 vehs
Fri
15:00 25 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 33 vehs
Sat
15:00 26 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 20 vehs
Sun
15:00 8 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 18 vehs
12:00 39 vehs
Mon
15:00 38 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 32 vehs
12:00 44 vehs
Tue
15:00 19 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Wed
15:00 3 vehs
19:00
07:00 12 vehs
12:00 26 vehs
Thu
15:00 31 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 9 vehs
12:00 22 vehs
Fri
15:00 14 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00
12:00 1 vehs
Sat
15:00
19:00
07:00 1 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Sun
15:00 2 vehs
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
[OCR of page images]
00:6T
ZRH 00:st
SUEDE 00:21
BB 00:20
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
SEI 00:57
00:2T
SEI 00:20
00:6T
SEI 00:ST
EUEDNSay 00:21
SEER 00:20
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
STEN 00:51
STELW4S 00:71
EE 00:20
00:6T
SEMAN 00:ST
SUPA cy [deras
SEU SM 00:20
Sun
2 2
£ £
4
a a ale
2 § 2 2s
y 3
fo} >
Pees a
a 2
2 £
ES
N
ES
al
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
@ Zone B — Sat-Sun
Sat
— Observed Vehicles —
Zone B—East Lower level
a
zs
oO
>
a
2
EES
SYBA BZ
PE
SYaA OE
Seas
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00°6T
00:sT
00:2T
00:40
Thu Fri
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
Wed
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue
2-Feb-22 3-Feb-22 4-Feb-22 5-Feb-22 6-Feb-22 7-Feb-22 8-Feb-22 9-Feb-22
1-Feb-22
Mon
m@ Zone B — Mon-Fri
65 vehs
EUEUW A 00:61
UCI 00:ST
ESTA 00:71
SUEY 00:40
00:6T
BUEUNY4 00:ST
SYoAQE Bideras
SUEY 00:40
H i |
60 vehs
55 vehs
50 vehs
45 vehs
40 vehs
35 vehs
30 vehs
25 vehs
20 vehs
15 vehs
10 vehs
5 vehs
Ovehs
Sun
Sat
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
Page 12
0 vehs
5 vehs
10 vehs
15 vehs
20 vehs
25 vehs
30 vehs
35 vehs
40 vehs
45 vehs
50 vehs
55 vehs
60 vehs
65 vehs
07:00 10 vehs
12:00 41 vehs
Sat
15:00 29 vehs
19:00
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 26 vehs
Sun
15:00 15 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 23 vehs
Mon
15:00 24 vehs
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
19:00 6 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00 15 vehs
Tue
15:00 18 vehs
1-Feb-22
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 10 vehs
Wed
15:00 12 vehs
2-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 12 vehs
12:00 28 vehs
Thu
15:00 8 vehs
3-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 22 vehs
Fri
15:00 20 vehs
4-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 54 vehs
Sat
15:00 27 vehs
5-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 23 vehs
Sun
15:00 23 vehs
6-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 28 vehs
Mon
15:00 26 vehs
7-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 19 vehs
12:00 31 vehs
Tue
15:00 28 vehs
8-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 24 vehs
Wed
15:00 21 vehs
9-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 24 vehs
Thu
15:00 23 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 12 vehs
12:00 29 vehs
Fri
15:00 25 vehs
19:00
07:00 14 vehs
Zone C — Mon–Fri
12:00 37 vehs
Sat
15:00 26 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 14 vehs
12:00 27 vehs
Sun
15:00 16 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 18 vehs
12:00 31 vehs
Mon
15:00 8 vehs
– Observed Vehicles —
Zone C — Sat–Sun
19:00 6 vehs
Zone C—West Lower Level
07:00 9 vehs
12:00 32 vehs
Tue
15:00 18 vehs
19:00
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 41 vehs
Wed
15:00 25 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 41 vehs
Thu
15:00 27 vehs
19:00
07:00 10 vehs
12:00 26 vehs
Fri
15:00 37 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 12 vehs
12:00 29 vehs
Sat
15:00 29 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 14 vehs
12:00 26 vehs
Sun
15:00 12 vehs
19:00
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 36 vehs
Mon
15:00 26 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 16 vehs
12:00 21 vehs
Tue
15:00 18 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Wed
15:00 4 vehs
19:00
07:00 14 vehs
12:00 11 vehs
Thu
15:00 10 vehs
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 11 vehs
12:00 26 vehs
Fri
15:00 6 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00
12:00
Sat
15:00
19:00
07:00 1 vehs
12:00
Sun
15:00 2 vehs
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
19:00
[OCR of page images]
— Observed Vehicles —
Zone C—West Lower Level
65 vehs
60 vehs
55 vehs
a
zs
50 vehs
45 vehs
2
£
. $
ea >
5 a
4
i
syan
SUDA ZT
SYaA9T
STELWal
a
BEN [74
TEN
Srewaa
7)
a]
Es
STEWS E
BTELWad
SEW
ES
N
BELA
TEvas
SEs
a
2
a
2
a
2
BELT
SUEANE
SYaA 9
BELW ea
SEA
STE
a
2
7)
o
BS ay
>
eer
a
2
syan
5
SyaA 97
EY
“
STEIN
Ea
40 vehs
35 vehs
30 vehs
25 vehs
20 vehs
15 vehs
10 vehs
5 vehs
SUA OT
Ovehs
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:20
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00°6T
00:sT
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:sT
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
Wed
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue
1-Feb-22 2-Feb-22 3-Feb-22 4-Feb-22 5-Feb-22 6-Feb-22 7-Feb-22 8-Feb-22 9-Feb-22
Sun
Sat
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
@ Zone C — Sat-Sun
m Zone C — Mon-Fri
Page 13
— Observed Vehicles — Zone D—Porte Cochere 65 vehs 60 vehs 55 vehs 50 vehs 45 vehs 40 vehs 35 vehs 30 vehs 25 vehs 20 vehs 15 vehs 10 vehs 5 vehs syon I suai syor I syor I syon I syor I suai syor I syon I a £ oO > sua sya i syon I suai syon I syor I a Ovehs - a 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:20 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 00°6T 00:sT 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:sT 00:2T 00:40 00:6T 00:ST 00:2T 00:40 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 1-Feb-22 2-Feb-22 3-Feb-22 4-Feb-22 5-Feb-22 6-Feb-22 7-Feb-22 8-Feb-22 9-Feb-22 10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22 Sun Sat 29-Jan-22 | 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22 m@ Zone D — Sat-Sun m@ Zone D — Mon-Fri
Page 14
0 vehs
5 vehs
10 vehs
15 vehs
20 vehs
25 vehs
30 vehs
35 vehs
40 vehs
45 vehs
50 vehs
55 vehs
60 vehs
65 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 3 vehs
Sat
15:00 2 vehs
19:00
07:00
12:00 1 vehs
Sun
15:00 4 vehs
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Mon
15:00 2 vehs
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
19:00 6 vehs
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 3 vehs
Tue
15:00 6 vehs
1-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Wed
15:00 6 vehs
2-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Thu
15:00 3 vehs
3-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Fri
15:00 5 vehs
4-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 1 vehs
Sat
15:00 6 vehs
5-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 2 vehs
12:00
Sun
15:00 2 vehs
6-Feb-22
19:00
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Mon
15:00 1 vehs
7-Feb-22
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Tue
15:00 2 vehs
8-Feb-22
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Wed
15:00 4 vehs
9-Feb-22
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Thu
15:00 3 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 6 vehs
Fri
15:00 4 vehs
19:00
07:00 4 vehs
Zone E — Mon–Fri
12:00 5 vehs
Sat
15:00 3 vehs
19:00
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 2 vehs
Sun
15:00 5 vehs
19:00
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Mon
15:00 3 vehs
– Observed Vehicles —
Zone E—South Carpark
Zone E — Sat–Sun
19:00 9 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Tue
15:00 7 vehs
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Wed
15:00 5 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Thu
15:00 2 vehs
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 6 vehs
Fri
15:00 4 vehs
19:00
07:00 4 vehs
12:00
Sat
15:00 3 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 3 vehs
Sun
15:00 1 vehs
19:00
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 3 vehs
Mon
15:00 2 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 6 vehs
Tue
15:00 4 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00
12:00 3 vehs
Wed
15:00 6 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 6 vehs
Thu
15:00 2 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 1 vehs
Fri
15:00 2 vehs
19:00
07:00
12:00
Sat
15:00
19:00
07:00
12:00
Sun
15:00
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
19:00
[OCR of page images]
— Observed Vehicles —
Zone E—South Carpark
65 vehs
60 vehs
55 vehs
50 vehs
45 vehs
40 vehs
35 vehs
30 vehs
25 vehs
20 vehs
15 vehs
10 vehs
2 ven
£ efec2ce
oO
>
2
2
Py ry
fay as el
mS py)
Be EE
+ “RRR
2
2
a
zs
a
zs
BELG
TELS
| r
[=| =
ry ype)
>| BE
i N}N] 4]
a
zs
oO
$
a
zs
2
zs
2
£
©
>
4
i)
Ee
is
SYaA 9
2 oe a
2222p 2 2
3 Ss
> >
a raw
a
2
5 vehs
2
£
SYOA S
SYOA 7
SUDA €
q
Fe
ile:
Ses
aa ll
Ovehs
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:20
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00°6T
00:sT
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:sT
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
Wed
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue
1-Feb-22 2-Feb-22 3-Feb-22 4-Feb-22 5-Feb-22 6-Feb-22 7-Feb-22 8-Feb-22 9-Feb-22
Sun
Sat
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
@ Zone E — Sat-Sun
m Zone E — Mon-Fri
Page 15
0 vehs
5 vehs
10 vehs
15 vehs
20 vehs
25 vehs
30 vehs
35 vehs
40 vehs
45 vehs
50 vehs
55 vehs
60 vehs
65 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 8 vehs
Sat
15:00 10 vehs
19:00 6 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00
Sun
15:00
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 7 vehs
12:00 3 vehs
Mon
15:00 1 vehs
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
19:00 9 vehs
07:00 7 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Tue
15:00 6 vehs
1-Feb-22
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 6 vehs
Wed
15:00 5 vehs
2-Feb-22
19:00 5 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 6 vehs
Thu
15:00 4 vehs
3-Feb-22
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Fri
15:00 5 vehs
4-Feb-22
19:00 2 vehs
07:00
12:00
Sat
15:00 8 vehs
5-Feb-22
19:00 8 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00 2 vehs
Sun
15:00 1 vehs
6-Feb-22
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 5 vehs
12:00 2 vehs
Mon
15:00 3 vehs
7-Feb-22
19:00 6 vehs
07:00 8 vehs
12:00 7 vehs
Tue
15:00 5 vehs
8-Feb-22
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Wed
15:00 6 vehs
9-Feb-22
19:00 6 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 6 vehs
Thu
15:00 6 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 8 vehs
Fri
15:00 5 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
Zone F — Mon–Fri
12:00 6 vehs
Sat
15:00 8 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00
Sun
15:00
19:00
07:00 2 vehs
Zone F—On Street
12:00 7 vehs
Mon
15:00 5 vehs
– Observed Vehicles —
Zone F — Sat–Sun
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 8 vehs
Tue
15:00 6 vehs
19:00 6 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 8 vehs
Wed
15:00 6 vehs
19:00 3 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 5 vehs
Thu
15:00 8 vehs
19:00 7 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 7 vehs
Fri
15:00 8 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00 2 vehs
Sat
15:00 4 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 1 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Sun
15:00 3 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 3 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Mon
15:00 1 vehs
19:00 4 vehs
07:00 6 vehs
12:00 2 vehs
Tue
15:00 6 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00
12:00 2 vehs
Wed
15:00 1 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 4 vehs
Thu
15:00 3 vehs
19:00 2 vehs
07:00 4 vehs
12:00 3 vehs
Fri
15:00 2 vehs
19:00 1 vehs
07:00 2 vehs
12:00
Sat
15:00
19:00
07:00
12:00
Sun
15:00 3 vehs
10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
19:00 3 vehs
[OCR of page images]
— Observed Vehicles —
Zone F—On Street
65 vehs
60 vehs
55 vehs
50 vehs
45 vehs
40 vehs
35 vehs
30 vehs
25 vehs
20 vehs
15 vehs
iy
5 YI
10 vehs
syor Bi
sua
|
a
2
q
Fs
3
g
nee
2
2
o
>
SUDA €
STEW
Syan
x
2 r
£ =
| o
> 4
A baba i)
a
2
SYaA 8
a
2
2
2
lea
Far
el
ae py
cal al
Sat
5-Feb-22
a
zs
5 vehs
a
2
2
£
©
>
SYOA 7
SYaA 9
aA OT
ry
|r
|
>
Ce)
Ovehs
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:20
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:2T
00:40
00°6T
00:sT
00:2T
00:40
00:6T
00:sT
00:21
00:40
00:6T
00:ST
00:21
00:40
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1-Feb-22 2-Feb-22 3-Feb-22 4-Feb-22 6-Feb-22 7-Feb-22 8-Feb-22 9-Feb-22 10-Feb-22 11-Feb-22 12-Feb-22 13-Feb-22 14-Feb-22 15-Feb-22 16-Feb-22 17-Feb-22 18-Feb-22 19-Feb-22 20-Feb-22 21-Feb-22 22-Feb-22 23-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 25-Feb-22 26-Feb-22 27-Feb-22
Sun
Sat
29-Jan-22 30-Jan-22 31-Jan-22
@ Zone F — Sat-Sun
m Zone F — Mon-Fri
Page 16
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C) — 2017 Survey
2017
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed
21-Jun 22-Jun 23-Jun 24-Jun 25-Jun 26-Jun 27-Jun 28-Jun 29-Jun 30-Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul 18-Jul 19-Jul
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00
[OCR of page images]
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
Ovehs
Wed
21Jun
Northern Parking Area (Zones A—C) — 2017 Survey
2017
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon
22-Jun 23-Jun 24-Jun 25-Jun 26-Jun 27-Jun 28-Jun 29-Jun 30-Jun dul 2Jul 3Jul 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul
Zones A-C Zones A-C Zones A-C m Zones A-C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A-C m Zones A-C m@ Zones A-C m@ Zones A-C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00
Tue
18-Jul
Wed
19-Jul
Page 17
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C) — 2022 Survey
2022
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
29-Jan 30-Jan 31-Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb 10-Feb 11-Feb 12-Feb 13-Feb 14-Feb 15-Feb 16-Feb 17-Feb 18-Feb 19-Feb 20-Feb 21-Feb 22-Feb 23-Feb 24-Feb 25-Feb 26-Feb 27-Feb
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00
[OCR of page images]
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
Ovehs
Northern Parking Area (Zones A—C) — 2022 Survey
2022
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu
29-Jan 30-Jan 31Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb 10-Feb ll-feb 12-Feb 13-Feb 14-Feb 15-Feb 16-Feb 17-Feb
Zones A-C Zones A-C Zones A-C m Zones A-C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A-C m Zones A-C m@ Zones A-C m@ Zones A-C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00
Fri
18-Feb
Sat
19-Feb
Sun
20-Feb
Mon
21-Feb
Tue
22-Feb
Wed
23-Feb
Thu
24-Feb
Fri Sat Sun
25-Feb 26-Feb 27-Feb
L.
Page 18
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C) — with Proposed Resort, Parking Upgrade present, allowance for 1 space per 1½ hotel rooms
2017 2022
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 29- 30- 31- Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27-
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul 18-Jul 19-Jul Jan Jan Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Reduced Threshold for
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00 Existing Capacity 1 space per 1½ rooms
(pre upgrade)
[OCR of page images]
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75vehs
50vehs
25 vehs
Ovehs
Northern Parking Area (Zones A-C) — with Proposed Resort, Parking Upgrade present, allowance for 1 space per 1% hotel rooms
2017 2022
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri | Sat Sun
21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 29- 30- 31- Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- | 25- 26- | 27-
Jun) Jun Jun) Jun) Jun Jun Jun) Jun Jun Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4Jul S-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul14-Jul12-Jul13-Jul14-Jul15-Jul 146-Jul 17-Jul18-Jul 19-Jul Jan Jan Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb | Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb
Nil Ua a a a a
Zones A-C Zones A-C Zones A-C mmm Zones A-C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Mmmm Zones A-C mmm Zones A-C Mmmm Zones A-C Mmmm Zones A-C == Zones A-C #eeeee Reduced Threshold for
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00 Existing Capacity 1 space per 1% rooms
(pre upgrade)
Page 19
Northern Parking Area (Zones A–C) — with Proposed Resort, Parking Upgrade present, allowance for 1 space per 1 hotel rooms
2017 2022
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 29- 30- 31- Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27-
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul 18-Jul 19-Jul Jan Jan Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75 vehs
50 vehs
25 vehs
0 vehs
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Zones A–C Reduced Threshold for Zones A–C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00 1 space per 1 rooms Upgrded Capacity
(with upgrade)
[OCR of page images]
250 vehs
225 vehs
200 vehs
175 vehs
150 vehs
125 vehs
100 vehs
75vehs
50vehs
25 vehs
Ovehs
Northern Parking Area (Zones A-C) — with Proposed Resort, Parking Upgrade present, allowance for 1 space per 1 hotel rooms
2017 2022
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri | Sat Sun
21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 29- 30- 31- Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- | 25- 26- | 27-
Jun) Jun Jun) Jun) Jun Jun Jun) Jun Jun Jun 1-Jul 2-Jul 3-Jul 4Jul S-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul14-Jul12-Jul13-Jul14-Jul15-Jul 146-Jul 17-Jul18-Jul 19-Jul Jan Jan Jan 1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb | Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb Feb
Nil Ua a a a a
Zones A-C Zones A-C Zones A-C mmm Zones A-C
Mon-Fri 07:00 Mon-Fri 12:00 Mon-Fri 15:00 Mon-Fri 19:00
Mmmm Zones A-C mmm Zones A-C Mmmm Zones A-C Mmmm Zones A-C ¢eeeeee Reduced Threshold for Zones A-C
Sat-Sun 07:00 Sat-Sun 12:00 Sat-Sun 15:00 Sat-Sun 19:00 1 space per 1 rooms Upgrded Capacity
(with upgrade)