Council archive · source document
06/0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published] · 132006.823
Very large file (42.4 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
1.1. 1.1 1.2. 1.2 1.3. 1.3 Please provide a complete assessment of the proposal against the provisions of the Biodiversity Overlay Code. It is noted that no assessment is detailed with relation to Outcome 15. Acomplete assessment of the proposal against the provisions of the Biodiversity Overlay Code is included in the revised code assessment (refer Revised Code Assessment). Please provide confirmation that Blocks B, C, D, G & Q and associated access ways, turning and refuse storage areas do not encroach within the area of the site designated as Environmental Protection under the Biodiversity Overlay Code. The proposed development encroaches minimally within the area of the site designated as Environmental Protection under the Biodiversity Overlay Code. The areas of encroachment include the: + Garages of Blocks A (B) and C (B); « Access roads servicing Blocks A (B), C (B) and E (G); + — Lengths of gabion walls along the eastem boundary; + The constructed length of Alma Way; and + Viewing platform and private swimming pool located within the north eastern comer of the site. A plan detailing the extent of this encroachment is included in Attachment 2. For comparison purposes, a plan detailing the extent of the CAS encroachment is also included in Attachment 2. In addition to these plans, an assessment of the proposal against the provision of the Biodiversity Overlay Code is included in the Revised Code Assessment. This assessment confirms the proposed development complies with the Specific Outcomes of the code, and the encroachment within the mapped vegetation area will not result in a detrimental impact upon the environmental values of the site. It is noted that the current Bio-diversity Overlay mapping as detailed in The Noosa Plan does not accord with correspondence received from Noosa Council regarding mapping inconsistencies. For reference purposes this correspondence is included in Attachment 3. Please submit a Bushfire Management Plan prepared by a suitably qualified expert detailing any measures that are required to be undertaken on the subject site to ensure the risk of bushfire hazard is minimised and managed. Please note that any fire management measures undertaken on site shail be based on ecological Principles pursuant to the requirements of the Biodiversity Overlay Code. Please refer to Part 2, Section 14 of the Preliminary Environmental Management Plan. Visual Amenity 2. it is noted that Blocks K, M & N and the residential component of Block E provide little vertical or horizontal articulation. Please submit amended plans demonstrating a greater individual segmentation of each unit and increase stepping of the building line in accordance with the Probable Solutions $43.1 and Specific Outcome 043 of the Noosa Heads Locality Cade. Page 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 106 pages
Page 2
2. The amended plans detail greater articulation in building line through the stepping of balconies and wall alignments. Due the shaping of the larger building balconies to reflect the alignment of the creek, greater individual segmentation has been achieved for each accommodation unit. Following is an assessment of the larger buildings against Probable Solution S43.1 and Specific Outcome 043 contained within the Noosa Heads Locality Code. $43.1 Buildings and other structures are designed to— a) have a maximum wail length of 15m and each extemal wall plane incorporates at least one design element to add visual interest and amenity (such as windows, pergolas, sun shading devices, balconies or a change of building material); X — The larger buildings have wall lengths greater than 15 metres. However it is noted that all wall planes incorporate design elements such as_ sunshading devices, changes in building materials and balconies to contribute to the visual interest of the buildings. b) vary and break up the roof forms through gables or different pitches to add visual interest and define the individual dwetling units; X-— The larger buildings incorporate ‘non-roofs’. Details of the design, materials and colours of these roofs are addressed in Section 4.4 of the Architectural Design Report. °) provide individual segmented balconies for each dwelling unit to reduce dominant horizontal banding; v - As previously detailed, balconies fronting the creek buffer area have been individually shaped to reflect the creek alignment. Other elevations have been amended to include random balconies jutting out a further 600mm and treated with alternative balustrade treatments. d) visuaily break up building fagades by incorporating different but compiimentary colours, textures and building matenals; and v - The larger buildings incorporate a mix of building materials and colours similar to those utilised for the Morwong Villas. Further details regarding these building treatments are provided in Section 4 of the Architectural Design Report. e) visually break up the bulk of the building by integrating tall plant species in front of and to the side of buikdings. v - The Landscape Masterplan prepared by Edaw AECOM details the opportunites provided to establish tall plant species in front, to the side and intemal to the larger buildings. Further it is noted the recent amendments to the building setbacks from the creek buffer area will provide further opportunities for significant vegetation to be established. As the proposed !arger buildings do not comply with all probable solutions, following is an assessment of the larger buildings against the relevant Specific Outcomes: 043 Buildings and structures— a) have a bulk and an architectural scale consistent with buildings on adjacent properties; v - Due to the distance from adjoining buildings on Viewland Drive and Angler Street, the bulk and architectural scale of the proposal is determined by the adjacent Morwong Villas. The larger buildings are of a similar architectural tectonic to these residences, and as. detailed previously are proposed to mirror the mixture of building materials, roof forms and colours. b) do not dominate the streetscape or detract from the visual amenity of adjoining properties; v - The subject site is located in an isolated valley and as a result no prevailing dominance occurs. It is noted that the proximity of the larger buildings to Little Hasting Street is a deliberate strategy to create a village-like atmosphere through with the mixing of accommodation and other resort facilities. ¢) address the streetscape; ¥ - The larger buildings address the private and internalised streetscape through batconies that overlook Little Hastings Street and Alma Way. d) vary in line and plane, complementing the landform and landscapes; ¥ - Vertical articulation is provided in the building facade through the use of recessed balconies, horizontal and vertical stepping and through considerate site planning. Page 4
Page 3
By typically locating the proposed internal road network
in the same location as the original farm tracks and
“haul roads”, the siting of the proposed buildings further
compliments the landforms of the subject site, with the
larger buildings stepping down the slope towards the
creek.
e) utilise various building styles and materials to
create diversity and visual interest in the
streetscape;
v - The larger buildings, as a result of Building Code
requirements have a concrete/masonry super structure
with lightweight infill panets. The resuiting elevational
treatment and various materials alleviates visual
monotony similar to the Morwong Villas.
q make use of verandahs, eaves, and roof
overhangs for aesthetic, and lifestyle reasons;
v - Balconies, eaves, roof overhangs, and window
awnings/screens are prevalent throughout the proposal,
and are tocated on each building. This assists with
indoor/outdoor living, rain protection, reduction in sun
glare and privacy.
integrate landscaping into the building design to
provide visual relief and screening; and
9)
v - Landscaping has been integrated throughout the
development to provide visual relief and screening of
proposed buildings, whilst integrating the proposal with
the wider context of Noosa Hill.
h) present well articulated fagades where garages or
carports are not the dominant visual element when
viewed from the street.
v - The building facades of the larger buildings that
address the internal road networks are articulated with
balconies, screens and varying building planes. As
previously detailed the larger buildings cannot be
viewed from any streets external to the site.
As can be seen above the proposal complies with Specific Outcome 043 of the Noosa Heads
Locality Code.
it is considered that the built form of Blocks K, M & N and the residential component of Block
E do not comply with 044 of the Noosa Heads Locality Code.
in the reassessment of the
proposal as required by Item 1 of this Information Request, please address the compliance
and/or non-compliance of all structures on the site with relation to this Outcome.
Following is an assessment of the proposal against Probable Solution $44.1 contained within
the Noosa Heads Locality Code.
$44.1 Buildings have no more than 6 attached
dwelling units.
X — The proposal provides Buildings with greater that 6
attached dwelling units.
larger buildings against Specific Outcome 044:
As the proposed larger buildings do not comply with $44.1, following is an assessment of the
044 Buildings and structures take the form of small
separate buildings, rather than large single bulky
developments.
~“- Amendments to the larger building design resulting
from the increased creek setback has improved the
buildings stepping and articulation. Further, the
Proposed lightweight building materials and balcony
treatments reduce the visual bulk of the larger buitdings.
The CAS allowed for 192 keys to be constructed on the
site. The combination of this number of units in
configurations of 6 or tess is not considered a
reasonable or relevant requirement as it would result in
non-compliance with the Site Cover provisions outlined
in O9 of the Noosa Heads Locafity Code.
tt is noted that developments of a simitar scale recently
proposed in Noosa {ie. Settlers Cove and Noosa
Springs Resort) and have not been required to adhere
Page 5
Page 4
to this Probable Solution and have proposed more traditional multiple unit accommodation blocks. It is considered that the requirement for no more than 6 attached dwelling units relates more to the development of multiple dwellings rather than visitor accommodation. As can be seen the larger buildings comply with the provisions of Specific Outcome 044 of the Noosa Heads Locality Code. 4. Please provide colour perspectives (1:200 on A3) of Blocks K, M & N, clearly detailing proposed building materials and treatments intended to address Item 2 of this Information Request. 4. Colour artist perspectives which clearly detail the proposed building materials and treatments are included in Attachment 4. The first impression is taken from an upper area of Aima Way, looking north towards Laguna Bay. Buildings | (N) and H (M) are visible. The second impression is taken from between Building | (N) and Building V, looking back up towards the southern corner of the site. The Central Facilities Building V and Building | (N) are visible in the foreground, and Buildings H (M), D (E) & G (K) are visible in the background. These perspectives clearly illustrate the considerable vertical and horizontal articulation and significant balcony mixtures utilising lightweight building materials. 5. In order to ascertain the visual impact of the development when viewed from surrounding areas please provide a colour impression of the resort buildings superimposed on the natural background vegetation, when viewed from a cniical land viewing point such as main beach being a selected location with the most visual impact as agreed by Council officers. 5. It was agreed with Neil Blamey to provide a montage from a point close to the Central Groyne. Attachment 5 contains a photo (at that point) directed towards the subject site. Itis noted by Chenoweth Environmental Planning (a visual amenity expert) that the proposed development would not be visible from this viewing point. As such the production of a montage has not been supplied. Landscaping 6. Please provide details regarding the proposed methads to achieve 3-storey high planting within Blocks K & N, taking into consideration the location of the basement car parking. 6. The applicant's landscape consultant has confirmed that a number of species nominated on the Proposed Species List — Plant Schedule A, B & C contained within Edaw AECOM — Landscape Development Report (pages 13 & 14) are able to be accommodated within 1 metre deep planter areas. An example of these species include:- « Archontophoenix cunninghamiana (Bangalow palm); ¢ Elaeocarpus Eumundii (Eumundi quandong); ¢ Harpullia pendula (Tulip wood); « Macadamia integrifolia (Qld nut tree); + Macaranga tanarius (Macaranga); Page 6
Page 5
¢ Melliocope elleryana (Butterfly tree); and + Syzygium francisii (Giant water gum). Detailed landscaping plans, including the proposed species in these locations, shall be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. 7. Please provide details of the proposed planting and/or screening for all exposed building under-croft areas. 7. The exposed building undercroft areas will be finished with select gravel and as such no planting will be provided in these covered areas. However it is noted that soft landscaping will be established directly adjacent to all undercroft areas. This landscaping technique has been successfully incorporated into the Morwong Villas development, and is illustrated in the Landscape Masterplan and Detail Areas submitted as part of Edaw AECOM — Landscape Development Report (page 8 & 9). Photographs of example planting are included as Attachment 6. The project architect has submitted that the end walls of the Villa’s accommodation units will be finished with a combination of aluminium and timber screens and rainwater tanks. 8. Please provide details of the proposed screening for all on-site refuse storage, the compactus and extemal storage area associated with Block V. 8. Attachment 7 contains sketches of the on-site refuse storage area, compactus and external storage area located adjacent to Block V. As can been seen from these illustrations, the compactus is located approximately 6 metres below the adjacent Building C (D). To ensure this refuse facility causes no adverse impacts upon the surrounding units a number of design techniques have been incorporated, including: + The provision of screening blades for the length of the adjacent unit balcony edge; * The incorporation of timber and aluminium screens surrounding the facility; + The incorporation of screening vegetation surrounding the facility; and + A solid combination metal and concrete roof over the compactus store. Photographs of the proposed screening vegetation are also included in Attachment 7. Furthermore, a gate is proposed to be incorporated across the areas entryway. This gate will be operated by on-site management, and the access arrangement will be organised as part of operational management strategies developed between the applicant and Cleanaway. Further details regarding this facility will be provided at the Operational Works application stage. 9. Please provide plans confirming the proposed trees to be retained and details regarding the protection methods of these species during construction (including any pruning required). Please provide details of any building that is located closer to existing trees than in the CAS. 9. The additional work proposed as part of the amended plans have been sited to minimise tree removal. However, the gabion wall extension and construction of vehicle turning bays for ‘Quondong Lane’ and ‘Sheoak Lane’ will require approximately two or three mature and senescing Wattles to be removed. Page 7
Page 6
Attachment 8 includes images of the existing gabion wall constructed as part of the Morwong Villas development. These images demonstrate the ‘flexibility’ of the gabion structure, and illustrate that significant trees are able to be retained and stepped around. The proposed gabion wall extension is to be constructed in a similar fashion, with all significant trees to be incorporated into the design. Surveyed trees to be retained and removed for the proposed development are detailed on original development plan titled CEPLA Figure 2: Site Impacts of Proposed Development. As previously indicated in the original application, five native trees previously designated for retention will be removed. Two of these trees have already been removed as a Council requirement for sewer construction, and one tree near the Habitat Pond (a Cheese Tree - Glochidion ferdinandi) has died since the initial assessment. These additional trees have limited biodiversity value, and their loss will be offset by the retention of several other trees in the south-eastern part of the subject site and the additional landscaping proposed throughout the development. There will little change in biodiversity values of the site when compared to the CAS. In a wider context, any minor change that may occur is offset by the retention and replanting of trees throughout Noosa Hill, as well as by extensive tree planting as part of the proposed landscape plan. It is noted that a number of other species proposed to be retained are located within close Proximity to the building footprint. Due to the lightweight construction of these villas, a minimal amount of limb or root pruning will be required. An example of where similar construction has been undertaken within close proximity of an existing tree species is included in Attachment 9. Specifically, a Blue Quandong (Elaeocarpus grandis) tree located in the riparian area will require pruning for construction of Building E(G), and some large surface roots of Quandong trees will be severed to construct stormwater outfall upstream of Building F(J). It is noted that this outfall has been previously approved as part of the CAS Operational Works, but is being redesigned and re-routed to avoid removal of riparian trees. The other outfall, between Buildings H(M) and G(K), will be positioned between trees and will require no tree disturbances. Protection methods of retained tree species are specified in Section 7 of the Flora and Fauna Management Plan contained within the Preliminary Environmental Management Plan. The following methods are identified: * Trees located within the construction works areas that are >300mm diameter at breast height (DBH) are protected and can only be removed with the permission of Council. + Within construction works areas, trees identified may be removed or lopped following the issue of appropriate development permits for operational and building works. No other vegetation may be removed or lopped without site inspection and agreement by both the Council Manager Environmental Services and the PER, and then only in accordance with Council conditions. + In construction works areas vegetation and individual trees to be retained shall be clearly marked (using stakes or tape of different colour from those marking buffer areas and trees to be removed) and isolated trees close to proposed works should be protected by fencing around the tree’s canopy “drip line”. Where intrusion into the drip line is necessary pier foundations will be used. + Stockpiles will be located outside the drip line of retained trees, and no material will be stored or piled temporarily against the trunk of retained trees. Page 8
Page 7
* Vehicular movements should be restricted around the drip line to reduce soil compaction and trunk damage. Alternatively, vertical wooden planks should strapped around the trunk of at-risk trees to 3 m height to prevent trunk damage during construction, and soils de-compacted following construction. + The natural soil surface should not be excavated nor filled within the drip zone of trees. If this is unavoidable then a suitable strategy for managing the tree should be devised by a suitably qualified arborist/ecologist. Bedroom Numbers 10. Whilst it is noted that there is no increase in accommodation unit numbers, please provide confirmation of the total number of bedrooms (both proposed and the CAS) and a breakdown of the proposed bedroom numbers per Block. 10. The following table provides a summary of the number of bedrooms both in the proposed development and the CAS: | Uso CAS Current Proposal Visitor Accommodation | Keys 192 keys 192 keys Bedrooms 246 bedrooms 320 bedrooms Please refer to Appendix 1 of the Architectural Design Report prepared by JMA Architects for further detail regarding the configuration of bedroom numbers. It is noted that Specific Outcome O6 of the Noosa Heads Locality Code allows a maximum population density of 100 persons per hectare. The proposal development achieves a population density of 60.5 persons per hectare. 11. Please provide a plan of each Block with all 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom and 3 bedroom units shaded differing colours to assist staff to confirm the details provided by KPMG. 11. The relevance of this request is queried. It is noted that Appendix 1 of the Architectural Design Report prepared by JMA Architects provides a complete summary of the number of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units located on site. Site Layout 12. Please confirm the location of the central lobby/check-in facility. Further, please provide justification with regard to the departure from the traditional resort-style reception area as provided within the CAS. 12. After advice from resort management consultants, the lobby / check in facility has been moved to the other side of Little Hastings Street to be incorporated in Building V. The lobby is located on the ground level of Building V, and is accessible directly from Little Hastings Street via a porte cochere. At-grade short-term parking is provided for visitors, mini buses and taxis immediately adjacent to this facility. Page 9
Page 8
13. 13. 14. 14. The proposed lobby is considerably smaller that the CAS lobby (90m? vs 258.6m”). This area was revised as traditional ‘Gold Coast’ style resorts with large lobbies have not successfully evolved in the Noosa region. The reasons for this trend have not been specifically addressed, however a number of observations are made regarding the differences between the Gold Coast and Noosa: » Differing tourist types — international tour groups vs. family groups; + Differing character of the local area — fast paced & urban vs. low key & vegetated; and + Differing allotment sizes & building types ~ small allotments & high rise vs. large allotment & iow rise. Based on a review of the existing resort facilities in the Noosa area it is considered the proposed resort will be able to operate efficiently with the smaller lobby facility. Furthermore, from an economic point of view it is simply unviable to have a foyer of this size within the cost plan. In some ways the proposal with its village laneway is a microcosm of the tourism experience of Hastings Street itself. People who arrive in Hastings Street are initially directed to a Management Office (ie. Accom Noosa) to check in, and then proceed to their accommodation facilities. Little Hastings Street will operate in the same way. Once guests check in at the lobby they proceed to the various accommodation types distributed throughout the site. However, Little Hastings Street unlike any other street will have its off street car parking properly designed with coordinated signage including “P” signs. Various off street parking options will be prominent as one enters the precinct. This, together with the fact that Building | (N) has been eased westward, will enhance the legibility of the lobby location from the entrance to Little Hastings Street. Once people have arrived by car it is envisaged that vehicular use during their stay will be minimal. it appears that a lobby is located in Block N, however Council staff express concer regarding the location, size and functionality of this facility if it is intended to service the entire resort. Please provide further details justifying these concems, and detail why the bus and taxi loading area is not located directly adjacent to this facility. The size of the lobby has been revised and increased to 90m? and has been incorporated into Building V on the opposite side of Little Hastings Street. A mini bus and taxi loading area has been provided adjacent to the lobby entryway. The bus and taxi area associated with Building H (M) is designed to cater for overflow vehicles. Please provide details regarding the proposed way-finding techniques to the lobby area, and any additional way-finding signage proposed throughout the resort complex. The amended plans illustrate that the lobby is now located in Building V and directly adjoins the Little Hastings Street frontage. This variation in location allows the lobby area to be both easily identified and accessed by visitors to the site as it is visible from the intersection of Alma Way and Little Hastings Street, and is predominantly located in a central area of the development. Page 10
Page 9
Attachment 10 contains photographs of the existing signage provided as part of the previous stages of development. It is noted that the proposed way-finding signage within the resort will adopt a form consistent with this existing signage. A detailed Signage and Way-Finding proposal shall be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. Noise 15. 15. Parkin 16. 16. It is noted that the Lobby in Block N, Bar/Reception in Block M and Bus & Taxi Loading area in Block M are located within close proximity to accommodation units. Please address the potential for noise conflict between these uses, and provide detail regarding any attenuation devices proposed. The configuration of this area has been modified with planters incorporated to provide greater visual and acoustic separation. However it is noted that the design of the units inherently provides an acoustic buffer between the sleeping areas and the external resort facilities. Should Council require additional acoustic treatment to these units, conditions may be recommended accordingly. Access Please provide an assessment of the proposal against Table 14.47 of the Driveways & Carparking Code. Please note staff consider the proposal to contain the following uses.- 16.1 Type 2 — Medical 16.2 Type 1 — Food & beverage 16.3 Type 2-— Shop 16.4 Type 4 — Conventional Following is an assessment of the proposal against Table 14-47 — Minimum vehicle parking requirements contained in the Driveways & Carparking Code. Proposed Use Code Requirement Proposal Complies | Type 4 — | For motels & guesthouses — 1 | Villas Conventional Space per accommodation unit or guest room; AND Block A—4.4 spaces | Block A- 8 spaces v Tspaceper10 Block B-3.3 spaces | Block 8 -6 spaces v accommodation units Block C — 8.8 spaces Block C — 15 spaces v Block E - 8.8 spaces Block E — 9 spaces v Block F—9.9 spaces | Block F — 18 spaces v Block J — 7.7 spaces Block J — 14 spaces Y Page 11
Page 10
Apartments Block D — 8.8 spaces Block D - 17 spaces v Blocks G, H & | - | Blocks G, H & I - x 159.5 spaces 155 spaces Type 2-Medicat | 1 space per 20m’, or part | 35.25 spaces 19 spaces Refer therefore, of use area; OR below 3. spaces per medical Practitioner whichever it the greater. Type 1-Food & | 1 space per 10m, or part 78.7 spaces 29 internal spaces Refer beverage thereof, of use area and below outdoor dining area (excluding 4 extemal spaces AND kitchen and food storage areas) (setdown spaces not Type 2 -— Sho included yp P 1 space per 20m’, or part 285 ) thereof, of use area for areas | “:°9 Spaces up to 100m? (excluding outdoor dining area) It is noted that an additional 22 on-grade carparking spaces are provided throughout the site. These spaces have not been included in the above calculations. Villas The car parking provided for the developments Villa components (ie. Villa Blocks A (B), B (C), C (D), E (D), F (G) and J (Q)) either equals or exceeds Council's car parking requirements. Apartments The car parking provided for the apartment component of Building D (E) exceeds Council's car parking requirements. Car parking to be provided within Blocks G (KK), H (M) and | (N) is as follows: + 138 x regular single spaces; and + 17x tandem spaces (ie. for 34 cars). For the accommodation units within Blocks G (K), H (M) and | (N), the provision of car parking is as follows: + the 6 penthouse units will each be permanently allocated a tandem space (ie. for Parking of two cars). This allocation exceeds Council's car parking requirements; * 138 of the remaining 139 units will utilise the 138 regular single car parking spaces - this allocation equals the 1st part of Council's car parking requirement for accommodation units (ie. 1 space per accommodation unit); « for these 138 units, the 2nd part of Council's car parking requirement for accommodation units (ie. 1 space per 10 units) will be accommodated within 14 of the 21 on-grade parking spaces proximate to Buildings G (K), H (M) and | (IN); Page 12
Page 11
17. + the remaining non-penthouse unit will utilise a tandem space (ie. for parking of two cars). This allocation exceeds Council's car parking requirements. Therefore, the provision of car parking for Buildings G (K), H (M) and | (N) is consistent with Council's car parking requirement for accommodation units. Health Spa A total of 19 car parking spaces are provided for the development’s Health Spa component. This provision coupled with the surplus car parking spaces within the adjacent Building D (8 spaces) is considered by the Health Spa operator to be adequate for the proposed operations. Correspondence from the proposed operator (Golden Door) is included as Attachment 11 confirming their satisfaction with the provision of 19 spaces. Central Facilities A total of 29 internal and 4 external car parking spaces are provided for Building V. This provision is 49 spaces less than Council’s parking requirement. However it is considered that the proposed number of spaces is adequate when the following is taken into consideration: + the provision of on-grade parking proximate to this building; + the staff use of 10 tandem parking spaces within Blocks G (K), H (M) and I (N); and * the integrated nature of the site operations, particularly with regard to the uses located within Building V. Staff Resort staff will be allocated the remaining tandem spaces (ie. parking up to 20 cars) within Blocks G (K), H (M) and 1 (N). The operation of these spaces will be managed by the resort operator. When considering the compliance of the proposed development with the Driveways and Carparking Code, it is critical to understand that the application is for an integrated resort, and as such an assessment of the individual component parts is not a true reflection of the parking demand likely to be generated. Table 3.1 contained within the Traffic Impact Assessment is not considered to be correct. For example it is noted that Table 14.47 of the Driveways & Car Parking Code requires:- 17.1 1 space per accommodation unit; AND 17.2 1 space per 10 accommodation units. These additional ‘1 per 10’ spaces have not been addressed. Further, in accordance with Item 15 of this Information Request, please amend the report to reference all proposed uses on the site. Page 13
Page 12
17. 18. 18. 19, 19. 20. 20. The response provided for Item 16 details the operation of the remaining ‘1 space per 10 accommodation units’ spaces. As noted in this response, not all individual uses comply with the Driveways and Carparking Code requirements. However, it is stressed that the development should be considered as a ‘holistic’ resort rather than a compilation of component uses. Please provide clarification regarding the availability of car spaces associated with Blocks E, K, M, N &V. For instance, please detail whether each unit will be designated a specific space (i.e. through line marking), and if so, please detail how staff and service providers will be aware of the spaces not being utilised by guests. Villa Buildings A (B), B (C), C (D), E (G), F (J) and J (Q) will be allocated specific car parking spaces as will the resort's penthouse units. As identified in Item 16, each of the 6 penthouse units and 1 of the non-penthouse units within Buildings G (K), H (M) and i (N) will be provided with a permanently allocated tandem parking space (ie. for parking for two cars). The remaining accommodation units in Buildings D (E), G (K), H (M) and | (N) will be allocated a parking space on arrival (ie. at check-in), with this parking space remaining allocated for the unit guests entire duration of stay. Resort management will operate a suitable ‘car park allocation/booking’ system similar to that used in other resorts to coordinate and manage car park allocation for guests. Resort staff will be allocated car parking, by resort management, which will be provided within the remaining 10 tandem car parking spaces (ie. parking for up to 20 cars). It is noted that there is a discrepancy between accommodation unit numbers and spaces available in the main residential Blocks (i.e. K, M & N). Please provide justification with regard to the functionality of this operation. As detailed previously in Items 16 and 18, the number of penthouse units and one of the non- penthouse units will be provided with a tandem parking space (ie. car parking for 2 cars). The remaining 138 units will be allocated a single space each. It is noted that the numbers of single spaces available in each basement does not directly correlate with the number of apartments in the associated building. However due to the proximity of the buildings to each other and luggage drop-off facilities provided, it is considered these circumstances are able to be successfully managed by the resort operator. Table 3.1 of the Traffic Impact Assessment expresses a ‘surplus’ of car parking. However it is noted that this calculation includes the double garages servicing the self-contained ‘villas’. As the additional space attributed to each villa will not reasonably be able to accommodate the shortfall of car parking from the main accommodation and central facilities blocks, it is considered these should not be included in the on-site car parking calculations. A summary of the carparking requirements, separating the Villa accommodation from the Apartments and Central Facilities is provided in Item 16 of this Response. Based on the assessment of the resort as an integrated development, it is considered that there is ample parking provided for the larger accommodation buildings and other ancillary activities. Page 14
Page 13
21. 21. 22. 22. 23. 23. 24, Please confirm the location of the 39 carspaces provided for the Central Facilities component of the development (as reference on p.26 pf Volume 1). Based upon preliminary review, it appears only 37 spaces are provided. It can be confirmed that 29 internal and 4 external spaces are provided in association with the Central Facilities Building. This is now reflected in the amended plans. Please detail the provision of bicycle parking in accordance with Table 14-48 of the Driveways and Carparking Code contained within The Noosa Plan. Areas adjacent to Buildings D(E), I(N) and the Central Facilities Building have been nominated for the storage of bicycle parking. These areas are detailed on the amended plans. The following table provides a summary of the requirements for bicycle parking as nominated in Table 14-48 of the Driveways and Carparking Code. Use Code Requirement Proposed Number of Floor Area Spaces Type 2 - Medical 1 bicycle parking space per 50m? or part thereof of | 764m? 15.28 spaces gross floor area Type 1 - Food & | 1 bicycle parking space per 50m’ or part thereof of | 787m? 15.74 spaces beverage gross floor area Type 2 - Shop 1 bicycle parking space per 100m? or part thereof | 57m? 0.57 spaces of gross floor area Type 4 - Conventional | Nil Nil Totalspaces | 32 spaces required Detail designs regarding the bicycle parking area shall be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. Please detail the provision of end-of-trip facilities in accordance with Table 14-5 of the Business Uses Code contained within The Noosa Plan. Table 14-5 of the Business Uses Code requires: At least 1 unisex shower and 1m’ of locker or cupboard space is provided for every 500m’ of gross floor area End of trip facilities in accordance with this requirement have been provided in:- * Building D (E) — within the Health Spa facility on the upper Level; and + Building | (N) — adjacent to the Store/Office on Level 1. Provide details of the widths and grades of driveways on separate plans for each building. Cross-sections for each entry to the underground carparks should be provided on A3 at an appropriate scale to check the grades. Page 15
Page 14
24. Each driveway has a minimum width of 5.5 metres. Long-sections for each basement carpark entrance are included in Attachment 12. It is noted that all basement entry ways have been checked in detail and it can be confirmed that all accesses comply with normal grading and clearance requirements. 25. 25. it is noted there are some garages/carpark spaces that do not appear to comply with the manoeuvring requirements of AS.NZS2890.1-2004. The following examples were noted for non-compliance:- 25.1 The last garage in B Block for unit B-1d; 25.2 The access for D-15a; 25.3 Space 17 under E Block; 25.4 The entry to both E Block and the Health Spa parking; 25.5 Garages for G Block are difficult to reverse out of: 25.6 The dimensions of the “small car’ spaces under K Block are incorrect: 25.7 Entry to carpark spaces 1 and 2 under N Block will require reversing in and 25.8 The access for Q-168a. The garages and carpark spaces identified in parts 1 to 8 of Item 25 have been reviewed and the following amendments have been made. It is noted that turning circles for sections 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 are provided in Attachment 13. 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 25.7 25.8 A 2 metre reversing bay has been provided and the bins have been shifted north. Access to C15a (D15a) has been revised to include a reversing bay. The width of carpark bay 17 under Building D (E) has been widened to increase manoeuvrability. A turning circle of 7.5 metres radius has been used to provide access to the parking area of Building D (E). The garages associated with Building E (G) have been reduced to a single car garage. The width of the ‘small car' spaces under Building G (K) have been revised and are now compliant. It is not considered a reasonable request to require all 220 internal spaces provided on the site to be able to be entered via a forward motion. A 6.8 metre aisle width has been provided to assist with manoeuvrability (1 metre in excess of minimum). It is considered that Council's request refers to the access for Q-186a, rather than the stated Q-768a. Turning circles included in Attachment 13 demonstrate the compliance of this space. Page 16
Page 15
26. 26. 27. 27. 28. 28. The applicant is advised that the proposed tandom parking under Blocks K & M is not an acceptable solution to providing car parking spaces for a commercial business. Please provide amended drawings showing the car park layout to comply with AS/NZS2890. 1-2004. The Australian Standard for Off-street car parking does not address the issue of tandem parking. However it is noted that Brisbane City Council's Design Guidelines for On-site Carparking states:- Tandem parking spaces may be acceptable in some situations as follows.- + Residential developments where both spaces are attached to one unit: and + Reserved car parking areas where both spaces are allocated to a single tenant. Tandem spaces are not appropriate in visitor or public car parking areas. As detailed previously in Item 17 of this Response, the tandem spaces are to be allocated to: + the 6 penthouse units will each be permanently allocated a tandem space (ie. for parking of two cars) — this allocation exceeds Council's car parking requirement for accommodation units (ie. 1 space per accommodation unit + 1 space per 10 accommodation units); + the remaining non-penthouse unit will utilise a tandem space (ie. for parking of two cars) - this allocation exceeds Council’s car parking requirement for accommodation units (ie. 1 space per accommodation unit + 1 space per 10 accommodation units) + Resort staff will be allocated car parking within Blocks G, H and 1, by resort management, which will be provided within 10 tandem spaces (ie. parking for to 20 cars). Accordingly the provision of the tandem spaces is considered an acceptable parking solution for the proposed integrated resort development. It is noted that the width of carparking spaces is required to be measured from the inside of line marking. Please submit amended plans ensuring all spaces are sufficient in width. For example, the width of spaces under Block V appear to be approximately 2.3m wide, whereas they require a minimum width of 2.5m. Clause 4.4.1 (Making of Parking Spaces) of AS/NZS2890.1:2004 Parking Facilities Part 1: Off-Street Car Parking states:- Where linemarking is used to separate adjacent parking bays, the nominal width of the parking spaces shall be measured from the centre-line of the pair of marked lines bounding the space. Accordingly, the car parking space widths as proposed are considered acceptable. Please provide separate A3 plans of each building at an appropriate scale to check consistency with requirements of AS/NZS2890. 1.2004. Due to the significant amendments of the development, a full set of amended plans have been resubmitted. This submission includes separate A3 plans of each building at an appropriate scale to check consistency with requirements of AS/NZS2890. 1.2004. Page 17
Page 16
29. Please confirm the proposed width of access roads throughout the proposed development. 29. The proposed width of all access roads throughout the development is 5.5 metres. 30. Please provide details regarding the intemal pathway network, including linkages to the existing pathways/boardwalks outside the site. 30. A Linkages Plan prepared by Edaw AECOM is included as Attachment 14. Traffic 31. Please provide a complete Traffic and Transport Impact Assessment of the proposed development. The report should address (but not be limited to):- 31.1 Guest and short-stay visitors access throughout the site; 31.2 Forecasting regarding access modes to the site (for both guests and short-stay visitors). 31.3 possible pedestrian movements, bicycle traffic and bus movements. it is advised that this information should reference similar resort operations in South-East Queensland. 31. A Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by Adam Pekol Consulting was provided in Volume III of the original development application and therefore an additional Impact Assessment it is not required. With regard to the issues raised: 31.1& A review of two resorts located within close proximity to the development site was 31.2 undertaken. The following observations were made: + 60% of guests staying at Noosa Blue arrive by coach/shuttle bus, and the remaining 40% arrive by private car. + 70% of guests staying at the Sebe/ Resort Noosa arrive by private car, and the remaining 30% arrived by coach/shuttle bus. The marked differences in the access mode percentages is contributed to the star rating of the resorts. The Sebel Resort Noosa has a 4% star rating, whereas Noosa Blue has a 3 star rating. This difference in quality and price is considered to attract differing tourist types, with the ‘higher end’ tourist more likely to hire a car for the duration of their stay in Noosa. The proposed resort will offer a similar 4% star facility as the Sebel Resort Noosa. Accordingly, it is anticipated that approximately 70% of guests will require on-site parking for the length of their stay. The proposed development provides ample parking facilities to service to estimated demand. 31.3 A Linkages Plan prepared by Edaw AECOM is included as Attachment 14. This pathway network is anticipated to support both pedestrians and bicycles through the development. Page 18
Page 17
32. 32. 33. 33. It is not anticipated larger buses will access with site, with bus set-down and manoeuvring area catering for a 22 seater mini bus. Should guests require the services of a larger bus, this vehicle would utilise the bus depot facilities at the intersection of Noosa Drive and Noosa Parade, and a smaller private shuttle bus would operate between the resort and the depot. Please detail how buses returning from tours will deal with constricted movements along roundabouts on Hastings Street. A bus depot is located at the intersection of Noosa Parade and Noosa Drive. Should guests of the resort utilise larger tour buses which are unable to negotiate the constricted movements around Hasting Street roundabouts, a smaller shuttle bus (ie. 16 seats) will be on-call to ferry guests between the depot and the site. It is noted however that No. 1 in Hastings Street offers short-term accommodation and is accessed via Morwong Drive. The location of this visitor accommodation facility does not impede tour transport access nor create an amenity or safety nuisance for the users of Hastings Street or Morwong Drive. Council staff express concem regarding the operation and management of the extemal vehicle access to the site. Please provide details of signage and management of the changing entry point to the site and how will it be obvious which entry point is functioning to ensure congestion at critical times (i.e. 6.45pm or 7.15am) does not happen. What way finding signs are proposed or other techniques to minimise confusion to enter the site for both guests and short-stay visitors? It is noted that the proposed operation of vehicle access to the site accords with Council’s requirements of the CAS. The details regarding the signage proposed for each entryway will be submitted as part of an Operational Works application to Council. However concept details for these signs are included as Attachment 15. In addition to signage, management techniques will be adopted to ensure guests arriving to the site (both short-stay and long-stay) will be informed of the access operations when booking. Conference & Restaurant Facility 34. 34. 35. Please provide details regarding the maximum capacity (staff & patrons) of the conference and restaurant facilities. Please refer to Appendix 2 of the Architectural Design Report prepared by JMA Architects. Please provide details regarding the operation of the restaurant and conference facilities. Such details shall include (but not be limited to):- 35.1 ‘s the restaurant to operate independently of the conference facility? 35.2 Where will conference attendees be serviced with moming/aftemoon tea? 35.3 Is any partitioning proposed between the conference overflow area and the restaurant outdoor dining area? Page 19
Page 18
35. The operational details of the restaurant and conference facilities have yet to be finalised, however the following can be confirmed: 36. 36. 37. 37. 38. 38. 35.1 35.2 35.3 The restaurant will operate independently of the conference facility. However it is noted that if a large conference group required the private use of the restaurant, this may able to be accommodated. The conference attendees are served morning tea either inside the conference area itself, or outside on the conference area overflow deck. Further, as mentioned previously in Item 35.1, the restaurant area may be requested to cater for large conference groups. Demountable petitions are proposed between the conference overflow area and the outdoor dining area to enable the conference space to remain a flexible as possible. Please provide details regarding the functionality of the restaurant. It is noted that there is no direct access between the kitchen and restaurant storage area located in the basement. This oversight has now been addressed and a stair access is provided between the kitchen and basement storage area. Please refer to the amended plans for additional details. Please provide details regarding any noise reduction methods proposed between the conference area and surrounding accommodation units and restaurant seating. It is considered that some units contained within Building | (N) and C (D) may be effected by noise resulting from either the conference area or restaurant facility. These units wilt incorporate noise attenuation measures as required. Should Council require additional treatment conditions may be recommended accordingly. Please provide a comparison of the proposal and CAS with regard to the floor areas of the:~ 38.1 Conference Facility; 38.2 Restaurant; 38.3 Residential; 38.4 Health Spa; 38.5 Reception/Foyer/Lobby; and 38.6 Shop. Following is a table summarising the comparative use areas of the current proposal to the CAS: Use - - CAS “Current Proposal Conference Internal 629.8m? 423.2m Total 1105.3m? 1039m? Restaurant Kitchen 239.6m 210m? Page 20
Page 19
39, 39. 40. 40. Dining 391.7m? 427m Tota! 631.3m? 637m" Visitor Accommodation | Keys 192 keys 192 keys Bedrooms 246 bedrooms 320 bedrooms Health Spa Area 473.5m? 685m" Rooms 7 treatment rooms 14 treatment rooms Lobby Area 258.6m? 90m? Shop Area 65.9m 57m? As detailed in Item 10, the increase in the bedroom numbers achieves a population density of 60.5 persons per hectare which complies with the requirements of the Noosa Heads Locality Code (100 persons per hectare). As detail in Item 12, the reduction in the lobby area is a direct result of a detailed economic assessment and review of tourist preferences in the Noosa Region. Please provide a comparison of the employment generation of the proposal versus that of the CAS. It is recommended that this comparison be provided for both the overall schemes, as well as the individual components as detailed in Item 37 of this Information Request. It is anticipated that the proposed development will employ a similar number of staff as the CAS as there is no change in unit numbers. In this regard, it is estimated 96 full time, part time and contract employees will be employed on site in shifts. These figures do not include the Health Spa facility staffing, which is anticipated to be approximately 14 persons. It is noted that the proposal will further contribute to the local economy of Noosa as a number of everyday services will be contracted out, including all laundry work and automotive repairs. Please provide detail regarding the proposed way-finding strategy for the restaurant and conference facilities both intemal and extemal to the site. As previously detailed the internal and external way-finding strategy will be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. It is noted that a Linkages Plan prepared by Edaw AECOM is included as Attachment 14. Health Spa 41. 41. 42. Please provide detailed plans of the Health Spa. These plans should clearly indicate the purpose of all rooms within the facility. Detailed plans of the Health Spa are included in the amended plan, titled D Block — Health Spa 1013 DA-03-D-06. Please provide details regarding the relationship of the theatrette and lower floor meeting rooms to the Health Spa operations. Page 21
Page 20
42. The theatrette and lower level meeting rooms are to be operated by the Conference facility 43. 43. management. management. The Health Spa will have access to these rooms at the discretion of Please provide details regarding the compliance of the Health Spa facility with Outcome 7 of the Business Uses Code. It is noted that Council staff express concem that pedestrian access to the facility will be via the carpark driveway. Following is an assessment of the proposal against Probable Solutions $7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 and Specific Outcome O7 contained within the Business Uses Code. $7.1 The number of entrances and exits are fimited and main building entrances/exits are located at the front of the site, in view of the street. Where this is not possible, due to site or existing building constraints, a well defined path is provided to the entrance/exit; and $7.2 All entrances/exits to buildings, are lit and signed, and signage includes hours of operation; and $7.3 Entrances/exits are tocated to provide a direct link to driveways and carparking areas; and $7.4 Recessed doorways are avoided where the recess is of sufficient size to conceal a person. Where fecessed doorways are unavoidable, measures are used to enhance safety, as follows- a) good lighting installed; b) strategically ptaced mirrors installed; ¢) angled approaches provided; or d) gates which restrict access. v - The proposed entrance to the Health Spa is located on the basement level of Building D (E) adjacent to the entryway of the penthouse style units. Aithough recessed from the street front, this entryway is directly visible from Little Hastings Street. This area of Little Hastings Street is anticipated to be a shared vehicle/pedestrian zone, and a well defined path is proposed across the driveway. Sketches of this entryway are included as Attachment 18. ¥ - As the Health Spa and the Residential component of Building D (E) share a common entry point, appropriate lighting and signage will be provided. A condition may be recommended accordingly. v - The entryway is located to provide a direct link to the driveway and carparking area. ¥ - Although the entryway is recessed in the basement level, the entrance does not provide a opportunity to conceal a person. Nonetheless good lighting it proposed within this area. 07 All building entries are designed to be obvious and easily identifiable. ¥ - The building entrance wiil be well lit and signed, and as such will be obvious and easily identifiable from Little Hastings Street. Setbacks 44. Please peg out all building footprints on site. 44. Jim Toovey from JFP has surveyed and pegged out all proposed building footprints. Please note, Jim has located both the building footprints submitted as part of the original application, and the amended locations submitted in conjunction with this Response. Plans detailing the location of survey pegs will be provided to Council Officers upon inspection of the site. Page 22
Page 21
45. Please detail building setbacks to the northern boundary, and provide information regarding any future proposed boundary modifications. The Viridian Noosa Residences (Morwong Villas) Body Corporate has agreed to the boundary realignment sought by the applicant. An application ensuring all northern building setbacks comply with the provisions contained within Schedule 1 of The Noosa Plan will be lodged with Council's Land Development Section. Jim Toovey of JFP will lodge this application. Confirmation of this agreement can be provided upon request. Gross Floor Area 46. Please justify the 22% increase in GFA between the CAS and proposal. 46. 013 of the Noosa Heads Locality Code states: For the Attached Housing Zone buildings have a bulk and architectural scale that has a maximum plot ratio of 0.5:1 up to 1.0ha of site area and 0.3:1 for that part of the site area above 1.0ha. Therefore, based on the revised lot size of 7.025ha The Noosa Plan requires a maximum GFA of 23,075m”. The proposal has a GFA of approximately 21,972m?. The applicant has lodged a new Material Change of Use application and therefore the relevance of the comparison of the CAS GFA and proposed GFA is questioned. Site Cover 47. Please amend site cover calculations for Blocks B, D & Q. It is noted that all open decks located greater than 1 metre above natural ground level are considered to contribute to site cover. 47. The site cover calculations for Buildings A (B), C (D) and J (Q) have been amended. Plans detailing this have been included in the amended plans. Environmental Health Noise 48. Please provide an acoustic report prepared by a registered professional Acoustic Consultant. The report should assess all potential noise sources from the construction and commercial operational development phases and demonstrate how the development will not cause:- 48.1 Excessive noise under Council's Local Law No. 12 — Control of Nuisances. Page 23
Page 22
48.2 Unlawful environmental nuisance under the Environmental Protection Regulation 1998. 48. Please refer to Part 2, Section 2 of the Preliminary Environmental Management Plan. Waste 49. In relation to the waste management for the site, additional details are required for: - 49. 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.4 49.5 49.6 Dimensions of the recyclable storage area and proposed storage layout. Area must be sufficient in size to store all recycle bins for the commercial and residential components of this site; Dimensions of a typical compactor bin for the site and details of the proposed roofing; Details of collection and truck manoeuvrability for the pick-up of the yellow top recycle bins for the residential components of the site; Details of the storage location for the in-house waste collection vehicles; Details of the access to the grease arrestor by Council’s contractor, Suitable access approval/documentation must be put in place to allow access on Private roads by Council’s Waste vehicles. Please note the compactus must be connected to the sewer via a pre-treatment device. Please find following additional details: 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.4 Recyclable bin storage areas are nominated on the amended plans within screen bin enclosures for both the commercial and accommodation components of the site. It is noted that the Restaurant has additional area to stored ‘oversized’ recyclable items (ie. boxes, oils etc). Dimensions of these areas are provided on the amended plans. Dimensions of a typical compactor bin is included in Attachment 17. Details of the proposed roofing and screening treatments of this area are included in Attachment 8. The resort operator will be responsible for the transportation of individual refuse and recycling bins from all accommodation unit buildings to the centra! refuse storage area (adjacent to the Central Facilities Building). This area will then be serviced by Council's contract Waste Vehicle. Plans detailing the Waste Vehicle manoeuvrability in this area are included in Attachment 17. In house waste collection vehicles shall be stored in the Refuse Collection area located in the basement of Building H (M). Page 24
Page 23
49.5 A grease arrestor trap is required for the Central Facilities Building. There is adequate room to provide a 2000 litre facility between this building and Little Hastings Street. Access to maintain the grease arrestor trap would be provided directly from Little Hastings Street. Plan 05B320 SKO1 included in Attachment 18 provide additional details. 49.6 Suitable access approval/documentation shall be put in place to allow access on private roads by Council's Waste vehicles. A condition may be recommended accordingly. The compactus shall be connected to the sewer via a pre-treatment device. A condition may be recommended accordingly. Food 50. Please provide details of maximum number of diners on-site and areas provided for kitchen food preparation and storage to determine compliance with the Food Safety Standards. 50. The amended plans enable a maximum restaurant capacity of approximately 150 diners. Further details relating to seating capacity, food preparation and food storage areas will be made as part of any future licensing application, and will comply with the relevant Food Safety Standards. A condition may be recommended accordingly. Environmental Services 51. Section 4 of Volume Il denotes interference with vegetation within the Environmental 51, Protection overlay (see 01 and 02 of biodiversity codes). The applicant's response indicates the proposal will be limited generally to areas committed to development in the CAS. Please supply a site plan that shows the flora to be retained and the flora to be removed. All flora specified shall detail genus and species names. Further, please clearly define “limited generally”. The small area of overlap between the area of the site mapped by Council as Environmental Protection, but within the development site includes little native vegetation. It is noted that the edge of the hillside forest has a band of re-growth vegetation (dominated by Cheese Tree (Glochidion ferdinandi)) corresponding approximately with the edge of the Overlay mapping. As identified in Item 9 of this Response some of this regrowth vegetation will be removed for construction of vehicle turning bays for ‘Quondong Lane’ and ‘Sheoak Lane’ and the gabion wall extension. A table of tree species and sizes to be removed in included in Attachment 9. The term fimited generally indicates that some vegetation will require removal within the development area and some individual trees will be retained. Further, as detailed in Item 9 of this request, some limb and root pruning of Quandong species will be required as a result of previously approved stormwater works. Page 25
Page 24
52. Please provide supporting information that documents the effects of the Blocks N, M, J and K 52. on the riparian zone. Information is to include (inter alia) the impacts of shading, plant growth, water harvesting, impacts of construction, impacts of lighting on fauna movement, bank stability, noise impacts on fauna movements and the maintenance of the ecosystem Services the riparian zone provides. Prior to addressing the issues of concern raised in this Request Item, Council's reference to a ‘tiparian zone’ is questioned. The Noosa Heads Biodiversity Overlay maps the watercourse through the site as a ‘Waterway and Drainage Line’ with no attributed ‘Riparian Buffer Area’. Accordingly, Council has recognised that the catchment of the gully through the subject site is of a relatively insignificant area when compared to other catchments/gullies identified under the Biodiversity Overlay. Nonetheless an assessment of the buildings impact upon a the waterway is provided below. Native vegetation and habitat on the subject site is generally limited to a narrow strip adjacent to the existing watercourse. The remainder of the site had been almost entirely cleared as a result of previous rural activities. The watercourse banks and a band of associated vegetation is protected by a proposed buffer zone (10 m wide on the north-eastern side, measured from the watercourse centreline) in which no building or guest activity will take place, and construction activities will be excluded. The watercourse buffer is much wider on the south-western side, extending 10 to 40 metres to Alma Way, creating a buffer and corridor totalling 20 to 50 metres in width. As previously discussed Buildings | (N), H (M), F (J) and G (K) have been redesigned to improve the setback to this buffer zone. The construction benefits of this improved setback are identified in Items 70 and 71 of this Response. The potential ‘edge effects’ normally associated with development close to a protected watercourses and vegetation are not applicable in this situation, or will be mitigated by environmental management, as follows: Weed and domestic animal impacts The previous weed infestations in the watercourse have been cleared and it is proposed to replant the banks with native species. The landscaping proposed for development areas close to the watercourse include no weed species, and it is noted that domestic animals are excluded from the proposed development. Direct human disturbance (trampling, litter etc) The watercourse is located at the rear of the proposed accommodation units, and accordingly will be ‘used’ only as an attractive outlook from balconies and vegetation setting for the development. There will be no access tracks or steps through the protected area and the buildings will provide an effective barrier between the human activity of Little Hastings Street and the buffer zone for almost its entire length upstream of the Alma Way bridge. It is noted that the CAS creek-side walking trail has been deleted from this proposal. Solar access Page 26
Page 25
53. In its natural condition (prior to farming), the watercourse would have been shaded by tall trees along its north-eastem side. Although this buffering forest was removed decades ago, exposing this side of the riparian zone to sunlight and other edge effects (such as weed invasion), the native vegetation adjacent to the watercourse remains a shade-tolerant mixture of species. The existing canopy trees, vines, ferns and other understorey species are adapted to germination and growth in shade, as are the proposed species to be used for revegetation in existing gaps. The proposed buildings will provide additional shade during the morning, but to no greater extent than the original natural conditions of the valley. Noise and lighting impacts on fauna In its natural condition, the narrow intermittent watercourse and its associated vegetation probably provided habitat and movement corridor route for a range of fauna, although not as many as a wide permanent stream. Some of the species originally present may have been sensitive to construction noise, night-time lighting and human activity. However decades of clearing, grazing and rural activity in the valley appear to have reduced the faunal diversity of the watercourse area, and the species which currently use the corridor are generally tolerant of nearby disturbance. There will be no high-intensity street lights or security lighting shining into this area, and although there will be some low-level light spill from the adjacent unit windows and balconies, there is no evidence that any of the fauna using the corridor will be affected. The 20 to 50 metre forested corridor along the watercourse will still allow a wide dark band of habitat at night-time. Water harvestin Most of the flows in the watercourse are from the upstream catchment, with only a minor proportion from overland flows and runoff across the valley floor. While the proposed development will intercept flows from the hillslope and from within the developed area, these will be redirected to discharge to the watercourse at controlled outfall points. The watercourse is naturally adapted to variability in flows, and the hydrological inputs to the watercourse will not be changed to any significant degree likely to affect riparian ecology. Construction activity and bank stability All construction activity will be excluded from the riparian buffer zone, the banks will be retained with their current landform and vegetation (plus additional rehabilitation planting) and no uncontrolled stormwater discharge will take place. Please refer to Items 70 and 71 of this Response for further detail regarding the impact of construction activity. . Please provide confirmation that the Cryptocarya foetida protection area on Fig. 1- Habitat Protection Area is not to be impacted on by the adjacent development. The proposed Villa accommodation units are no closer to the Cryptocarya habitat area than those in the CAS, which included buffers to protect this species. Areas likely to be affected by the proposed gabion wall extension and new roads along the north-western edge of the subject site have been surveyed and no additional Cryptocarya have been found. Page 27
Page 26
Land Development Earthworks 54. 55. The earthworks for the new proposal shail be less than the CAS as it was evident that the level of earthworks previously approved was not sustainable due to the impacts caused by the loss of sediments from the site and the problems encountered with uncovering boulders. Please provide details of how earthworks will be reduced in the new proposal. . The amount of disturbance caused by earthworks is made up of works as follows: a. Excavation for underground services; b. Cut and fill for building platforms; c. Cut and fill for roadways; and d. Excavation for building foundations. Item a would be expected to be similar to the CAS. Item b is estimated to be less that the CAS as all the Villas are designed to sit upon the land as lightweight structures. It is therefore envisaged only minor earthworks to allow access for excavation of pad footings and incoming services will be carried out to the areas of the associated with these accommodation types. The larger apartment buildings have been designed with only one level of carparking below the units. It is expected that these units will be generally in cut with any excess fill being used to fill the current excavation under Building | (N). It is noted that prior to construction commencement the contaminated fill area (estimated at 5000m") will be removed from site. The accommodation buildings in this area are expected to require only minor cut and fill in the area of the current contaminated soil cell. Item c is expected to be similar to the CAS. With regard to Item d, as hillside Villas are expected to site on pad footings and the larger apartment buildings are expected to be found in piles or pier footings the amount of excavation is likely to be similar to the CAS. Therefore considering the work that has recently been completed in stabilising the site and the new design of all buildings it is expected that disturbance of the site be earthworks will be less, if not substantially less, than the CAS, which has included substantial excavation for up to 3 levels of basement carparking. Preliminary earthwork plans showing the amount of cut and fill across the site are provided as Attachment 19. It is noted that these plans still reflect the original building design, with updated plans to be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. Please provide details of the earthworks for the site. An A3 plan for each cross-section should be provided showing the amount of cut and fill and clearly showing the existing natural surface level (N.S.L). It appears in some of the cross-sections provided that the N.S.L being Shown is not the current stabilised N.S.L on site. Page 28
Page 27
55. 56. 56. Drawings have been prepared for the preliminary bulk earthworks based on the amended Architectural plans. These plans are included in Attachment 19 and reflect the stabilised surface level. Due to the conceptual nature of a Material Change of Use of Premises application, the request for this level of detail is considered excessive. This information will be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. There appears to be cuts of up to 6 metres below natural surface level. Provide details as to how this level of cut complies with Overall Outcome 14.136.2 of the Earthworks Code. As detailed in Item 54, due to the lightweight construction of the Villa units and reduction in basement parking within the larger buildings, the development does not propose significant cuts across the site. Generally, the proposed level of cut does not exceed 2 metres, with only one cut of 6 metres are proposed. This cut is located at the rear of the compactus unit adjacent to Building V. Overall Outcome 14.136.2 of the Earthworks Code seeks: a) To ensure that earthworks do not unreasonably impact on the natural environment or other properties with regard to- i land stability (including differential settlement or expansion in reactive soils; ii. contamination of land: iii. flooding and drainage; iv. groundwater, watercourses and wetlands; v. loss of native remnant or regrowth vegetation; and b) Earthworks are designed and constructed to be structurally sound. It is considered that this area to the rear of the Central Facilities Building will not unreasonably impact on the natural environment or other properties as it is located:- + towards the centre of the site; + clear of the contaminated cell (which is proposed to be removed prior to earthworks being undertaken); + in an area not anticipated to experience flooding and/or drainage concerns; * — clear of the creek buffer area; + within an area already cleared for development. All works associated with this area will be structurally sound, with further detail to be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. Page 29
Page 28
57. An estimate of volumes of earth to be removed for each building or roadway should also be provided in tabular format. This table could have a comparison to the CAS earthworks requirements. It is recommended an indication of staging of earthworks also be given in this tabular format. 57. Due to the conceptual nature of a Material Change of Use of Premises application, the request for volumes of earth to be removed for each building and roadway is considered excessive. This information will be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. However, it can be confirmed that the volume of earthwork proposed for the current proposal, is significantly less than that proposed for the CAS. Due to the lightweight construction of the Villa units and reduction in basement excavation, it is anticipated that no fill will be required to the brought onto, or removed from the subject site. Instead preliminary earthwork investigations reveal that the proposed levels of cut and fill across the site will enable earth to be ‘pushed around’. With regard to Council’s request for a indication of Earthworks staging, it is confirmed that the development will be undertaken in four stages: 1. Excavation for underground services; 2. Cut and fill for building platforms; 3. Cut and fill for roadways; and 4. Excavation for building foundations. The regime to control this work will be as was recently successful on the site stabilisation work. The applicant's on-site representative will hold a weekly review meeting with Council Officers and will then instruct the Contractor on any issues that the Council has raised. 58. Please detail any risks associated with slip across the subject site. 58. Previous investigations of the subject site by Golder Associates found that there is a Low Risk of instability across existing natural slopes. During earthworks for the CAS Central Facilities basement, instability was encountered within steep cuttings (ie. man-made slopes) greater than 3 m deep that intersected clays of low strength. These cuttings were located in areas of deeper soil across the flatter parts of the subject site. Although there is a High Risk of instability associated with uncontrolled earthworks in this area, the level of risk will be reduced to an acceptable level to enable the proposed development, subject to the implementation of engineering measures as outlined in Section 6.0 of Golder Associates report titled Geotechnical Investigation, Viridian Noosa, Stage 3, Noosa Heads Queenstand. A copy of this report can be provided upon request. Stormwater Management Page 30
Page 29
59. 59. Reference is made to the Bayview Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan prepared by WBM Oceanics Australia and that the strategies contained in this report, regarding water quality and quantity of the runoff leaving the site, will still be adopted for the proposed development. There is concem that the percentage of impervious area on the site has been increased since the CAS and it is requested that this be investigated to ensure the proposed strategies are sufficient to handle any increases in quantity of runoff and any deterioration in quality of runoff. in this regard, please submit a copy of the Bayview Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan prepared by WBM Oceanics Australia for this application with any relevant amendments to ensure the current proposal will have no detrimental impacts from the quantity or quality of runoff leaving the site. The previously prepared report, titled Bayview Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan, has been entirely revised to ensure that it specific to the proposed development. In relation to water quality, there have been some changes in the proposed stormwater treatment train for the site. The revised treatment train is shown in Figure 2-1 of the updated report, titled Viridian Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan. The current proposed stormwater treatment train is described below: « Upslope runoff (i.e. above the gabion walls) will be either diverted around the development, or captured and piped under the development directly to the creek, where it will be released via appropriately designed outlets (includes energy dissipation devices); + All areas external to the site have been extensively revegetated, the revegetation works will be monitored and managed to ensure the program is successful; + Within the site, rainwater tanks will be attached to the Resort Villas, water from the tanks will be reused for toilet flushing and landscaping; + Roof drainage (not going to the tank) and tank overflows will be piped directly to the ephemeral creek; : There will be some use of swales on site; and + The majority of road and open space areas within the resort will be captured in a piped stormwater system and treated via gross pollutant traps prior to discharge to the ephemeral creek. Pollutant export from the site was assessed using MUSIC Version 3. The results of the pollutant export modelling indicate that pollutant loads exported from the site (including the already constructed Stages 1 and 2 and the current proposal) do not worsen when going from the undeveloped site scenario to the fully developed site scenario. This was the result demonstrated in the previous, Bayview Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan prepared in 2003. These results are however, reliant on the success of the revegetation strategies in the undeveloped portions of the site. Page 31
Page 30
60. 60. 61, 61. 62. 62. 63. 63. In relation to the site's hydrology, the already constructed Stages 1 and 2 and proposed development were modelled using the RAFTS-XP hydrologic package. The results of this modelling indicate that the peak flows from the site (for a range of critical storms ranging from a 1 year through to a 100yr event) do not increase the peak flows at the main site outlet. The reason for this is that despite there being an increase in the total flows from the catchment, the flows from the developed portions of the catchment are discharged faster than flows that come from the upslope areas (e.g. the National Park). As such the larger flow volume is better distributed and does not result in a lumping effect which would have seen increases in the peak flow rates. The revised report Viridian Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan can be provided to Council Officers upon request. Please provide a plan showing locations of rainwater tanks for each dwelling unit. Schedule 8 of The Noosa Plan shows the site as being located in a Rainwater Tank Area and as such needs to comply with the requirements of this schedule. The amended plans detail the provision of 3000 litre rainwater tanks for all Villa accommodation units. The tanks are proposed to be located within the building undercroft areas, and will be supported by the Villa structure. It is noted that these tanks will be plumbed into service the surrounding landscaping and toilets of each Villa. Please provide site details as to how stormwater outlets will be designed to ensure flows are not concentrated and will not cause erosion. Stormwater outlets will be designed similar to the existing construction outlets using both pipe work, gabions or ‘rip rap’ basins to prevent scouring. Plans detailing these stormwater outlets are included in Attachment 20. It is proposed to review each outlet on site with Council and amend construction techniques to suit individual outlet issues that may arise. As detailed in Item 57 of this Response, The applicant’s on-site representative will hold a weekly review meeting with Council Officers, and will then instruct the Head Contractor to the reviewed design (ie. if any changes are required). Please provide details on the Stormwater Treatment Train proposed for the site when in operation. The revised treatment train is shown in Figure 2-1 of the updated report, titled Viridian Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan. This revised report can be provided upon request. Council requires all basement carparks to be gravity drained. Please provide details of the drainage plan for the site. It is acknowledged that all basement carparks are to be gravity drained. Detailed drainage plans will be submitted as part of the Operational Works application to Council. Stormwater outlets are shown on plans included in Attachment 20. These plans show the drainage outlet levels, drainage line levels and lowest building floor levels. All outlet levels are well below the level of adjacent building basements. Ail buildings will be connected to the proposed new drainage systems except Building | (N). The basement of Building | (N) will be connected to the existing drainage system that runs to the north. Invert level of the existing drain is RL 24.71 and the basement level is RL 27.00. Page 32
Page 31
Erosion & Sediment Controf 64. 65. 65. Please provide a month by month plan of works detailing the level of disturbance for each stage/month. It is recommended that plans showing the progressive development of the site and the controls that will be in place for each stage be submitted. Details on the decommissioning of sediment basins as stages are completed should also be provided. . The earthworks sequence has been developed between the applicant and its consultants QANTEC McWILLIAM. The basis of the design is that in the four areas of work, a sequence will be established whereby all underground services for drainage, water and electrical mains will be installed prior to general bulk earthworks to that zone. The bulk earthworks component of the earthworks package will include cut and fill (where required) to that zone with immediate installation of basecourse to building platforms and on road ways basecourse, kerbs and one coat seal. This will give all weather access to building platform and allow clean removal of foundation spoil. This regime of construction should result in minimising silt runoff into silt retention ponds. The earthworks will be sequential and disturbance of existing surface will not occur until previous areas have been stabilised with basecourse and/or hydromulch or turfing as may be required. Attachment 21 contains plans detailing the staging of Civil Works. The regime to control this work will be as was recently successful on the site stabilisation work. The applicant's on-site representative will hold a weekly review meeting with Council Officers and will then instruct the Contractor on any issues that the Council has raised. The strategies proposed in the Bayview Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan prepared by WBM Oceanics Australia were not sufficient to contro! the level of sediment leaving the site in small rain events and water quality objectives were not always achieved. Please detail any further measures that are proposed for the new proposal. It is noted that WBM’s report, titled Bayview Noosa Hydrology and Stormwater Management Plan was not prepared to manage construction stage erosion and sediment control. Rather, erosion and sediment control was to be effected under the Sediment and Erosion Control Implementation Management Plan. Nonetheless it is acknowledged that the construction contractor (Hollands) did not undertaken work in accordance with the recommendations of this report. Upon reflection of this previous shortcoming, a revised set of Erosion and Sediment Control drawings have been prepared for the current proposal. It is expected that controls tepresented within these drawings will result in better outcomes for the following reasons: + There will be 5 phases of bulk earthworks and civil works to ensure that works are focused within a defined site extent. This will limit the extent of works occurring on site at any on time. This will have benefits in limiting the amount of exposed ground as well. + All upslope runoff will be either diverted or piped under the development area Prior to majority of the bulk earthworks and civil works occurring. Page 33
Page 32
There are generally lower slopes and more areas suitable for the implementation of sediment ponds and diversion channels on site. It is noted that correctly sized sediment ponds were not utilised during construction of Stages 1 and 2. There will be extensive use of sediment fencing, diversion channels, sediment ponds during the construction of Stage 3 works. It is expected that Council representatives will be invited to inspect works on an agreed frequency to ensure that all works are acceptable. The site superintendent will be responsible for the ongoing checking and deployment of sediment controls as the bulk earthworks and civil works progress. Exposed areas will be hydromulched as soon as practicable after bulk earthworks and civil works to stabilise exposed areas. Hydromulching will occur no later than 7 days after completion of works in an area. Bulk earthworks and civil works will be completed and the site will be left stabilised, with all erosion and sediment controls left in place, prior to any building contracts commencing. A pluviometer will be installed on site (with telemetry link) to accurately record rainfall and send alerts (via SMS) to site staff when high levels of rainfall occur. Water quality equipment will be installed on site to enable checking of performance of the erosion and sediment control equipment. Preliminary EMP 65.1 65.2 65.3 65.4 65.5 65.6 it is noted there are two differing Figure 4.1A (i). The figure on page 22 is different to the figure included in the Sediment & Erosion Control MP. Please ensure that this plan is consistent and please show existing cutoff drains that are proposed to remain and any further cutoff drains to be constructed. There does not appear to be any E&SC measures for Phase 1 Figure 4.2A other than rock check dams in the permanent cutoff drains. Please ensure all line types are detailed within the Legend. Further, please highlight which areas will be disturbed during Phase 1. Please check that all other drawings are current and that the Legends show what all line types are denoting. It is noted that Figures 4.1 to 4.5 do not currently Show ail line types. Please provide drawings that clearly demonstrate the stage of works being undertaken and what measures are in place to control these works. Clearly indicate what works are occurring during Phase 1, 2, 3, & 4 on the plans and show the E&SC measures for each of these phases. Please provide details on sizing of proposed sediment basins for the site as shown on Figure 4. 1A(iii). Please provide details of the size of the proposed cutoff drains. Further, please indicate what storm event will they be able to cope with. 65.1 ~ 65.6 The inconsistency between these plans has been resolved and cutoff drains are now indicated on the amended plans. Page 34
Page 33
A revised Preliminary Environmental Management Plan will be submitted separately to this Response. Gas Pill 66. 66. Please confirm the proposed gas pill does not require an ERA. Please provide details of screening of the gas storage facility to nearby buildings and safety precautions and size of the storage facility. QANTEC McWILLIAM has advised that the proposed gas pill has a capacity of 3 tonnes and is approximately 7 metres x 1 metre. Accordingly, an ERA is not required. Sketches of the proposed screening measures are included as Attachment 22. It is noted that AS1596 requires the a gas pill of this size to provide open access along the length of at least one side, with no barrier on this side for a minimum of 14 meters. The gas pill has a length of 7 metres and accordingly it must be separated from adjacent walls by a minimum of 7 metres. Furthermore, it is noted that the wail adjacent to the adjoining duplex dwelling is required to have a 4.5 hr fire rating. Contaminated Area 67. Please provide details on the removal of contaminated material from the site. The timing of 67. these works as well as the management requirements needed to them should be detailed. The applicant has liaised with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the removal of the contaminated material from the site. Currently, the Draft Remediation Action Plan (RAP) has been submitted to the third party reviewer, and the applicant is awaiting a decision from the EPA. It is anticipated that the contaminated cell shall be removed prior to the commencement of any works associated with this application. Removal of this material shall be done in accordance with the conditions of the approval given by the EPA. Freshwater Habitat 68. Please detail the proposed distance between the edge of the water mark and Block C. The 68. freshwater habitat has requirements for plantings of shrubs and tufted grasses around its edge for a minimum width of 3 metres. The Environmental Management Plan also notes that Native trees surrounding the pond will provide perches for birds and shade over part of the water body. The proximity of the C Block would appear to inhibit the growth of trees and Shrubs. The CAS did not include a condition requiring a 3 metre setback from the Freshwater Habitat. Page 35
Page 34
69. 69. The CAS allowance of a 3 metre buffer was incorporated in order to restrict peoples access to the water edge. This area has been now been re-designed, and therefore the provision of a 3 metre setback is no longer a requirement. Pedestrians will be restricted to a timber boardwalk and viewing deck constructed to provide adjacent access and viewing opportunities without damaging the habitat surrounds. It is also noted that the position of Building B (C) will itself block direct human access to the waters edge. Building B (C) will also provide the desired shading to this area. This shading will inhibit the growth of plant species already established in a small area of the pond bank, but this area will be replanted with more shade-tolerant species. It is noted that the proposal maintains a 3 metre vertical separation between the habitat area and nearby Villas. Attachment 23 includes sketches and sections of this area. Please provide a copy of the Freshwater Habitat — Landscape Sketch showing the proposed relative location of C Block. This plan shall ensure that all vegetation shown on the landscape sketch is maintained in its original location with at least a 3 metre setback from any vegetation to the closest edge of any projection from the C Block. It is noted that it may be necessary to relocate C Block to achieve this setback. Please refer to Attachment 23 which includes sketches and sections of the Freshwater Habitat including the relative location of Building B (C). It is noted that the CAS did not require a 3 metre building setback from the Freshwater Habitat, however the proposed development still maintains a 3 metre vertical separation. Creek k 70. 70. Please provide plans showing the 10 metre setback from the centreline of the creek. These plans shall show details ensuring that there is no encroachment into the 10 metre creek Setback zone. It is noted that this requires that no construction works can occur in this 10 metre setback, for example no batters, no excavations, no pipelines, no silt fences or sediment controls, no diversion drains, no stormwater outlets, no foundations, no retaining walls, no access for construction etc. are permitted within the 10 metre setback. This may require certain buildings to be setback further from the creek to ensure construction activities can be excluded from this area. Please provide plans showing all infrastructure and buildings Proposed along the creekline and the setbacks achieved from these works. The amended plans detail the 10 metre setback from the centreline of the creek. The larger buildings fronting this buffer area have been redesigned and repositioned so as to achieve a an even greater setback. The building setbacks are summaries as follows: + Building F — Building fagade interfaces with 10 metre buffer zone + Building G ~ Setback a minimum of 1 metre from 10 metre buffer zone * Building H - Setback 2 metres from 10 metre buffer zone + Building | - Setback 6 metres from 10 metre buffer zone Page 36
Page 35
71. Where buildings do directly interface with the buffer zone, they have been designed so that only the balcony edges ‘kiss’ the buffer. This fagade approach results in minimum scaffolding (if any) being required as pre-assembled balustrades can be detailed to be installed from the balcony. Of the infrastructure/construction items listed, only two stormwater outlets are proposed to be located within the 10 metre buffer zone. These outlets are of a similar scale to the approved outlets located elsewhere along the creek line and the Council owned outlet on the opposite side of creek edge. It is important to note that the building design has been done with detailed attention to the top of bank location. With regards to this, all buildings are located a minimum of 1 metre from the top of bank. To further ensure the integrity of the creek bank is protected, conditions will be included within the Head Contractor's contract guaranteeing no work will be undertaken in this area, and appropriate fencing will be established along the 10 metre buffer line to restrict access for persons or construction material. A regime will be established on site with all the subcontractors whereby their personnel will be inducted in both safety and environmental issues before starting on site. These issues will be reinforced by ‘toolbox talks’ held once a week. The buffer zone will be fully fenced and will be adequately signed that no entry is permitted. With the revised setback, the design of all external scaffold will be outside the buffer zone. This scaffold will be fully enclosed in ‘shade cloth’ to prevent rubbish or items falling of blowing into the protection zone. Please provide details on the shading effect of the buildings proposed along the 10 metre setback line, on the riparian vegetation. There is expected to be impacts on this vegetation from compaction through construction, loss of infiltration of natural rainwater etc. Please detail management techniques required to ensure no detrimental impacts to the riparian vegetation is experienced throughout the construction and operation of the development. Please refer to Item 52 of this Response with regard to the shading effects of Buildings F (J), G (K), H (M) and I (N). This response details that the potential ‘edge effects’ normally associated with development close to a protected watercourses are not applicable in this situation or will be mitigated by appropriate environmental management as previously detailed. Management techniques identified in Item 70 of this Response will ensure no detrimental impacts to the riparian vegetation is experience throughout the construction and operation of the development. Page 37
Page 36
In accordance with Section 3.3.8 of the Integrated Planning Act this completes our response to the information request and would you please proceed with assessment of the application. If you have any queries in response to the above please contact our Sunshine Coast office. Yours faithfully Greg Martoo Director Martoo Consulting Page 38
Page 37
Attachment Attachment 1: Original & Amended Building Descriptions Page 39
Page 38
14OS34¥ VSOON
|| Sey REP PURUND eT
ame ROY TOE TIEN ISP]
— —NYid—™
UBLSVW ASTIVA aru |
SNVTd UBLSWN onuvaa |
' € 3OWLS NVICINIA
avo, 193/0¥d YSOON N¥TdniIA
S0eist ds U0 90119700 weg
611 Ad YSOON NWIOnaA
O11 Ald GNVISNZ3ND
SLoOZLerHauyv
“ddV LN3WdO13A50
ees ragele oy eouepIOny ents EA) eS Ey
ALN FL 8Z¥t SY s8p00 AepaO PUR Sea7>y -
Some Sy iaueg ppm”
sBapeens perme |
‘Baste SOUVONYLS NVTTYULSITY ARE ME Age
Prieur queues Ras Ut ITF COON
sapmo wens sage Lue 20 Crmcgo cy hed
OF Ate TO Sizaipeny yee
SOAR SOUS Be TNE,
LHORUADI ONY SOU g
susp
pots Kun 0 souaayerd 4 eomumUp panston om
> Sumer days 1 coogesays "yom uoRONEsLD vau AUTO |
PRODI at ORES PE UO TTR Ae |
18310
SAWOH OaHIVL3Q
ssad
NOLLW301 THid /
V9 G3SOddud
ones
Gy Swie O89 2a
ZyLNINd
Page 39
Z,LNIOd
SSa99V --
S4WOH G3HOVL3G 133uLS YATIONV
I]AOVLS NVIGIMIA
oa ;
4
! “a
3
/
1 { 4
7 \
vo .
yf i _
c
‘I,
oH Nvionina aanoviad Gy” ries ‘
}AOVLS NVIGRIIA
re aasod
. |-88300% ‘
Page 40
Attachment Attachment 2: Proposed Development & CAS Encroachment within Biodiversity Overlay Page 40
Page 41
~
Page 42
We f Dy ; a en yacenee
Page 43
Attachment Attachment 3: Correspondence from Noosa Shire Council regarding Biodiversity Overlay Page 41
Page 44
CHOOSING FUTURES: Report on Submissions to The Noosa Plan 237 555, Unclear implications of Biodiversity Overlay, should be removed until community has further opportunity to study the plan remnant vegetation exists based on satellite and aerial photography. The overlay has no effect on the current use of the land. As per the current planning scheme, should you make an development application for a new use or building works and need to clear vegetation as a result, Council will carry out a site inspection of the land and make a determination of whether the trees can be removed. Aiternatively, you can make a separate application under Council's existing Vegetation Management Local Law to remove the vegetation. The overlay maps simply trigger the need for code assessment: that is, the application for a house for instance would need to come to Council for assessment rather than a private certifier in order for Council to assess whether the vegetation can be removed. As is currently the case, Council may then request that the vegetation to be removed be replaced by native vegetation in another location on the site so that there is no net loss of vegetation across the site. Alternatively, Council may request that the building be located in another area on the land to minimise the loss of vegetation. The draft Noosa Plan was placed on exhibition for 3 months to allow property owners opportunity to study the contents of the scheme and during this time Council staff were made available to answer specific questions and run public displays at locations around the Shire. It is not intended that the Biodiversity Overlays be removed to allow for further consultation. The Biodiversity Overlay maps give an indication of where | Council resolved that no amendment Is | necessary as a result of this submission. 362,654, A\planning scheme\planning studies\submissions on draft Scheme\veport_on_submissions.doc The Overlay does not include all relevant lands for the Viridian in the Environmental categories. Should include what is existing and approved. All jand shown as "Open Space Conservation” on the attached plan should be included in “Environmental Protection”. Agree, need Biodiversity overlay should reflect recent development and land allocations. Printed 19/6/2006 Council resolved to amend Biodiversity Overlay mapping for the Viridian development in accordance with the approved plans to show areas: - to be dedicated to Council for environmental reserve as ‘Environmental Protection’ on Overlay Maps OM6.1; and - Subject to revegetation as ‘Environmental Enhancement’ on Overlay Map OM6.1.
Page 45
Attachment Attachment 4: Colour Perspectives Page 42
Page 46
Page 47
Ne — ear ~ oe as nA = ) a SS
Page 48
Attachment Attachment 5: Photograph from Central Groyne Page 43
Page 49
Page 50
Attachment Attachment 6: Undercroft Screening Page 44
Page 51
Landscaping to screen building undercroft areas
Page 52
Attachment Attachment 7: Refuse Storage Area Screening & Compactus Storage Area Sketches Page 45
Page 53
Screening for Villa refuse storage areas
Page 54
| o WEEEERseeore:s TOS ee cae WOodav | MV M3IA3uY AYOLS NI “ € SDVLS VSOON NVICIdIA WOL S 0 [ I — ] 2 NOILVAS13 SAILVSIGNI . ( Skauunay “Jadad) @Alinay aid) Srna SIN -FANSIONNG ~ Dytend Qh ee ) : ; / Bey 2 : BL Pyisomg TF al ssn ‘341-7 ws Hsnrd BT TSW nono | a = - re) = j fo eer a 2 x | a | \ Be aft umatds i} Sai SAINI ‘ NV1d Aa» al Sv aad orm yomd) -Geunnay ala) “ay 22d). ait bNuisyg + -anniag LL yin
Page 55
GREsibiag omer oe! Ue MalAay SHOLS Nid « € SDVLS VSOON NVICIYIA a HL ee: ALis wo woihey Ww al qathhe aneis- Tm qin / Ta i \walsks me" / - — mn ‘Qaaimeay Aad) wav as WIN & any niyo) NaBKIOS oo Younvad aad
Page 56
Attachment Attachment 8: Morwong Villas Gabion Wall Construction Page 46
Page 57
Photographs detailing gabion wall and protection of vegetation
Page 58
Attachment Attachment 9: Photographs of Existing Vegetation Adjacent to Villa Construction Page 47
Page 59
Construction within proximity of significant trees
Page 60
Attachment Attachment 10: Directional Signage Page 48
Page 61
Photographs of Signage
4 nil f ~
ay ae tec
Meh =m 7
}
-
>
e
Page 62
Attachment Attachment 11: Golden Door Correspondence Page 49
Page 63
CYPRESS LAKES GROUP LIMITED Your Reference: 2006/0823 | September 2006 Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council P.O. Box 14! Tewantin Qid 4565 Attention: Land Use Department - Tracy Arthur Dear Tracy, RE: Carparking to Health Spa Facility associated with proposed VIRIDIAN RESORT, Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads. The Golden Door is a leader in the spa and health retreat industry, and has now expanded into several other locations offering relaxation, rejuvenation, health and lifestyle programs. We currently operate several Spa Facilities at resorts across South East Queensland and New South Wales including Marina Mirage on the Gold Coast, and Salt Village in South Kingscliff. For a facility the size of the one proposed at the Viridian Resort at Noosa (ie. one with |4 treatment rooms), we would find the provision of 19 dedicated carparking spaces together with the other spaces in the immediate vicinity to be adequate . It is anticipated that a significant proportion of the clientele to visit the Health Spa, would arrive on foot; either from within the resort, or from other accommodation facilities in the surrounding area. In summary, having reviewed the usage profile, we consider that the proposed carparking arrangements for the Health Spa Facility associated with proposed Viridian Resort (i.e. 19 carparks with several on grade carparks available in the immediate vicinity) to be satisfactory. We trust this meets your approval. Yours sincerely _E®_Cia00 Ernie Hall Group Development Manager «4H DOOR OWNERS AND OPFRATORS OF CYPRESS LAKES RESORT AND THE GOLDEN DOOR SPAS AND RETREATS LEVEL 18, 2 PARK STREET, SYDNEY NSW 2000 TELEPHONE (02) 9264 7272 FAX (02)9264 1872 EMAIL [email protected] AU
Page 64
Attachment Attachment 12: Long Sections of Basement Carpark Entrances Page 50
Page 65
|
t
zd ZL 4-02£990 "QLT Ald GNVISNI33N SLIBLINIUY VAI] newermrebgarann ES UL ON Fp ee 7S CSS
= el - “np iemorenresnmymarsaemeee [—|
sa pymenra BIA DOA HOH ODOT GLY Ad VSOGN NVIORIA| ogy pe! wh Leer, van [ wire use aneee 2 a Raia SC
SOON ~ JAIC ONVIMSIA @ AVM VWI1V sass sn oar ¢ Bee nieces |_|
SNOILD3S €3DV1S ~ ae NVIGISIA siaauiBua Sunnsuos eee, ato
oTaAa wmoetian cama aires |
TWNIGNLISNOT AVMIAYIG ABING AN3Wd d gasodoud WYITIMOW 23LNVD some ;
, BONSUAS NVIUSH
HCILOMYISHOD WOF LON AUWRIRITSUd OTL 'dS NVIOINIH HSH 1° ALNNOD VEAIM J HSINYE
2spaetds UO t 197 F OS9GR "SS UO ELL 407 Sunarve)
{esvereg) ett 7 (523) Ayadozg voutwe) 7°) bam
Ald:
|
|
wath
y01g 9 TOYLNOI NOILISS TWNIGNLIONOT M3018 GQ IOYLNOD NOILIIS IVNIGALIONO)
|
wre ABLINOID WINOZISOH we “8 A¥I3HOID WINOZIKOH
Pere telalSialelele le [3 39DVNIVH) & JOWNIVH)
SSSR |" a3093d 03993d
BISIEIS/SlEIS/SIS)S |S (8 ONILSIXE OL ONILSIXS OL Le
ayy * Hidad Td 7 LN) H1d30 Tid 7 109
Ee seeleeelee |e |e 3NI1 10YLNO3 BNI TOYLNOD
aesyyeer ier el PVSNNS WANLYN 3VSUNS TWANLVN
SEES EERE (FE BNI TOULNOD 3NIT T0YLNO)
SSPayeyeyeyey™ [eS 3V4UNS NOISAC JDV4YNS NDIS3O
OOo EE TY wNYDD OOO'EE TY wNyOg
NY
0" 0} HLONIT JANN WILYIA (©) HLON37 JAUND WILLYRA
E224 (wy SmOve JAYND TWIILdIA (@] SAIDYY 3ABND TWILYIA
ers ]
* wze'9H : (4] HISN3T 30VeD WILYIA 401 HLONZT 3OVYS TWILW3IA +e
agere Ase'e| ee (%) JOVSD AYLZHOID TWOIILYIA (%) JOVYD AYLIWOID IWIILYIA >
% [. i an
a
La
BETH TIAI1 LAIMISVE F AYING | > Let —
q Wore JINVEY:
‘Ore JINVENET YO7 TY WYIG_JO WOLLOS
: 3
47 WY: wOi108 ’ a $s 2
te s
TUT BOO tsa =f
233 2 ea
2 s&
a E & 25 200TH @ INT TOULNO? KOULDIS ONO}
zag 3 a®
#357 z
SWEET GUE IUD al
32
ge
BE
ge
a3
Page 66
Vm] _e0 U-00E 850 CET Ae oy SO SUE] eG ee — ea memes Severe
euuxsu pon “U3A OO "YOH OooL:t 1 “QL1 "Aid ¥SOON NVIOWIAT — sagy oo i as « wea 0d ma Sy Treat aE ee ppeniinemnin 1
SOON - 3A1NC ONV,IMGIA 3 AVM VHIV ouzimnene cet MAD cages
SNOILIIS € 39V1S ~ VSOON NVIGISIA susouysie Bupnsuo> [et 2a
TWNIGNLIONOT AVMIAINO AULNA IN3Hd073A30 03S0d08d] wyiTTIMoW 9aNVO . weer
Taw ma Tae aes
WOILONULSHOD WO LOM AUWNIRITHd
AMLNS SALIVdWO) 43018
i
A NOILDSS IWNICNLISNO)
AMLN] LNSW3SVE 401d A NOILISS IWNIGALIONOT
BOTISI'dS ‘NVI
201S'dS NYIOIW HOUYH 5° ALNNOD "YEAIM 1° HSI
Z5988h'dS UO} 497 *F OS9RAGS UO ELL 407 Bunparuey
(erveyeg) EU 8 (51) Aysedosg voeraoy z ‘1
AMINA INSWASVE YIOT8 | NOILIIS TYNIGALISNOT
wae AMLIHOI TY LNOZIYOH 4813039 TWLNOZRIOH wee ASLINOID WLNOZINOH
EES Elsieleslele |e 3DVNIVHD Sle ]s 3/312 JOVNIVHD SISlSlSlsleislslzlalsie JOVNIVHD
myer rye a3993d 03993¢' “ee a3993d
fle/Misislelé/slelale |g ONILSIX] OL SlElS|S|8 ONILSIX3 OL alslelslslalsisieisisl" ONILSIX] OL
3)3/212)8|3 Hidaq Td 7 Ln) Hid30 Tid 7 Ln) ary ye Hld3d Tid 7 LD
alee ae eelalclle 3NIT TOS1NO) Sle \lale ANI) TONINOD SE EREREREEEE INIT TOYLNOD
Ble/S/S/2)s]2/S|SS}2 1s WVAYNS TWYALYN ays 3V4YNS WaNLYN ay persyey pees rsye IVINS WYNLVN
BUEIPIEIEIEIE/"/EIEIE |G INI TOYLNOD slslelels INIT TONLNOD see EEE SS SEs 3NIT TOYLNOD
APSE eye yaaa je VIYNS NOISIO eee 3)VdYNS NDISIG ee PP PEPE PPE JIVANNS NOISIA
Q0OOE Te wNyOG eoo'se' Ty wAyog O00°E2" TY UNyOg
A LU LL . UI
[249"9 eo (W) H1NZ7 JAUND WILYIA (0) HLONIT 3AYNI TWIILEIA (WW) H1ON3D 3AMND TILIA
Leer {2} SMIOVS AUN WILYIA (@) SMIOVY ABN TWILYIA (@) SNIGVY JAYND WILYIA
H r= wth N atti
wye't¢ 1S'6 (2) HLONIT 30V89 TWILLYIA wee wOS"S} {) HLON37 30VHO TWIILNRA woE'9| {%) HLONTT JOVNO TWIHYIA
%S7 E f BIST (%) JOVED A¥L3W0ID TWILYIA etary 400" {%) 30VYD AYLIHDID IWINIA , (%) 30V89 AYLIWOID TWILYIA
i
| ] _ tans hu uy
H ; - : = i
/ =| / it N i
' 4 i a e2°74_13A37_ANBWASVE rl
/ 3% im : LJ len
! ee ed -f 3 Ss
’ eae OSZ°0E"TY 13A37 AMINA a a] vA
i a
i obec = “sore Tease | jz 942 FINVEVID iS
Hi aoe Ss 2 in ct
: wn 2 wy
} 4 MOET INVES = 3 76278 WY3G 40 WO1L0E Ss
/ Fs é Ff
i 7 . COE BOTs LSaIs a3 duseq [4
/ — ZEW WIA 30 WO1108 > ae Saatis —
: iE —— 5 ile
! le EE WE BOOT 15a a 2a zevge iS
ok ig Bs cueee i
BEER: IB
|B iS “3 le
io
Ee \
\
\
\
\
\ \
\ \
\\ @
=
\ Ze
\ . ao
ASIN 9DOTE A 3NTT TONLNOD (NO6LI3S 5NO1-
\ a
Vv \
\ g
\
\
\ ¢ ;
\ >
»> \ a 5
\ 7 2
a \
1
JS i
i
Page 67
Vv wn FL YH-OZE DSO. ere ‘a11Ald ONY ISN335ND SLORLHOUY VE newer noubieurassa at SUALYNDS YJJON suse} ue — wus ee Pe eed
sumer aA Or eH "OLY ALEVSOONNVIORIA| sayy putas busts ce ogg Came ee) ar wine S|
WSOON GARG GNVINGIA @ AVM Vay] asec AVIS Mae nee
SNOILI3S € 39VLS - VSOON NVICIUIA ssaoujtus aunmeuas [ae eamaabeeinaianiald.
TWNICRLISNOT AV M3A1N0 AMINA AN3Nd073A30 G3s0d0ud WVITTIMOW OaLNVO Un Pe aoe ma
NOILONYLSMOD HOS LOM = AMWAOMITIUd
|
AYMLN3 LNIWSSVE AIOTE DO NOILIIS IVNIGNLIONO)
ors-a AMLIWNOID WANOZEOH
FREE GegGce 3OVNIVHD
ae 03993d
SSlStSiSlelS/a/al& |S |S ONILSIX3 OL
Hid3d Tid / 1nd
See ele FREE |e [E 3NIT TOYLNOD
aT PP 3IVSYNS WANLYN
dg AS ee 3NIT TO¥LNOI
JIVIUNS NOISID
QE"TH_13A37 LNIW3SVO SAYING | . en
+
Wor" JINVAV3T.
TUT W398 JO WOLLOG L
Fee HOO Sed
od
eg
Eg
23
29
zE
up
Be
a3
OOOEE TY wnyOQ
(w) HLONAT JAN) TILIA,
(a) SMOVe ABNF TWI1LYaA
(W) HLONIT IOVED WILYIA
I%t 30VHO AYLINOID WILYIA
AYLNS LNSW3SVE 43018 OC NOILISS WNICALIDNO)
OBETY_ 13A37 INIHISVE 3 AYINI
e
a
=
=
a
iad
€
rs
ua
wore JINVEVI1)-
*09'18 WIE JO WOLLOE
TSHR SS Wd
MELE SEHD at
TLE SNS dt
MCLE CATED dl
SIT LR Wd
OTETS THD
SHLD,
00'°S-¥ AYLIKO3D WANOZIOH
ere ete Elsie lslelslels le 39VNIVH)
SPE PEPEEL g3003d
slate lstsleletele|stale |g DNILSIXA OL
SEEPEEPLP H1ld3G Td / 109
serelslelslstelslelelele |e 3NIT TOMLNOD
A RS ear |e 3VdsNS “TWYNLYN
eee lal sielslalalols |e 3NIT JOYLNOD
“Preyer aT te | 30VJYNS NDIS3G
OOOEE TY wnyOg
(Ww) HLONIT BAY TWIN
Ww) SMOVY JAYND TWILYIA
(W) HLON3) JOVED WINLYIA
(%) JOVYD AYLAHOID WILAIA
BONS dS ‘NVIGHIH
20419 dS ‘NVIOLIIW HONYH 1° ALNNOD ‘VBAIM 49 HSI
TS9RAYES UO L 107 F OS9BRL'dS YO EL 107 Gunje2uey
(eaueyeg) ELL 4 (522) Atvadoug uowsa) Z"t
NoiT@nays30 ATuzdoud Wad
Page 68
Ve wx] SLY OZESDSO pre “G1 Ald QNVISN32390 SLO3LMDBY VE] newernrbercect yon = a aan test ieee] Sobesosesaeaees
"U3A O01 “YOH 00014 “11 °Ald YSOON NVIGRIA tata Looe (L4) sven ee rir ass avened| ta | Say Renee kee
ure van mm ID 007 PID TRH Busts 66 xo Od wy [were ISMO73 NOLYKUO#E TDNNGD| ¥ Leased
cor pio muses JANE] mots en SE en naan ees
€ 30 € 133HS|VSOON - 3ARIGONVIMGIA 8 AVM vHTy| eu eeaeeecent AUANUTE eee
SNOILI3S € 3DV1S + VSOON NVICIHIA susoujaen umnsuos [oa] eee ee eee te
TWNIGNLIDNO] AVM3AINC AXLN3 AN3Nd013A30 G3SOdOYd) wyiTTIMOW O3LNVO mmumaneer Se =
TUlt DeRvED 1170ud
BOTS dS “NVIOUIW
ll ms un Auveenriaid BONS S NVICIUIW HIUWN $° ALNNO) “VEAIM 1° HSI
| ZS9BE'AS UO 1 407 Z OSNBAL dS UO ELL 407 Sunparuey
(22ur Tg) £1 F 15.19} Aqvadoag woenn0) Zt
A¥LN3 INIWASVE M3018 H NOILISS TWWNIGNLIONO
a) AYL3WO3D TVINOZINOH
5/5/5218] é za |E JOVNIVH)
g3993d
ONILSIX] OL
Hid3d T1ld / LN)
B/B/8/R/8/3/5)2 INIT TOYLNOD
JIVAUNS TWANLYN
3NIT 10¥LNO3,
JIVIYNS NOISIO}
oo Te wNIDG f \ \ \ \
\ a“
(a) HL9N37 3AuND WoHABA / Le “ SA \ SIPIGIAS
(™) splays 3Aund IoHLAaA VN Faogn
rm \ d : we
\ \ oe
(@) HLONZT 30¥YD TWIILWIA \
™
(%) AOVYD AYLIWOIO TIILYIA
aN
eNO
t VL
Wore FINVYYID.
1 a ae
(
° :
©
: \
| >
a
AN LD
| V
ago.
LUSHS LV =P
Page 69
Attachment Attachment 13: Turning Circles Page 51
Page 70
“QL Ald ONY ISN393ND SLI3LIHIUY VAT] neworn:
souney TSMR MOLVA WHNOD] ¥
V_ went LOLA 02E GS Onsen
f11 “Ald VSOON NVICIMIA
Pi)
mmnag ey barrel comtomen be my OUR
SOON - JANG ONY IMJIA 8 AVM VWI1V
€ 40 LagH$ € 3DV1S ~ VSOON NVIGIUIA
NV1d LOAOAVT ONINUNL JWDIHIA INaWd0713A30 g3sod0ud
t
MOILONULSHOD HOS LON AWYAIR!
Doyen
Wud SO91St'dS NVIGUIH
BOYISH YS "NVIORIN HOUVH 4° AINNOD "YOA3A JO HSRVE
{S9BALSS LOL 197 F OSIRATGS UO ELL 407 BuNe2ueD
3
<
\
(22ueyeg) E11 3 (S19) Apvedorg vownte z ‘1
AGT GEISIO ATGIOGT WIT
ZOLA OZEASO OMG O1 YIIIA SNOISNINIO FIJINGA YOd *
=]
av) Sag
a Zt MALSYO)
NL IVEY
LJ «(J
= |
wale
LASHS bY ae
Page 71
Vas COLA OZEBS Ow mne "OLT Ald GN¥ISN333ND SLIMY VHF] new EROLy wiry van, ooe4 jen “Ald VSOON NVICIUA. sins 2 € 40 @ 139HS NV 1d LNOAVT ONINUAL JTIIHIA Tun were, IWSOON - 3AINO ONY AGIA AVM VWI € JOVLS - VSOON NVICIUIA AN3Wd013A30 d3s0d0ud Tose 2 THANE) 90 1snonv| REN WNDIS WO“ OFdy INCE ND INN ; a [Hak RS] ‘Ot WYITIMOW oaLnvo er ames Lanier) Ie A oy es DO mayer ene eogpads man estan ates Bore Sriang Qqrmasoen ores = Dem mu es peu owe MOILINULSNOD YOS LOM AUWRIRITIUd ‘ | 201A O2ESSO OMO O1 YF2IA SNOISNINIG FINHIA HOI * UY) S8d 4 UL UALS¥OD ow uv) S89 T=) sin Y ZL w3alsvop Lr | B20" sin MINEE JOVEYVD woo wos e magne LISHS LY “HE
Page 72
v
ED LA OZEGS 0 rwrre
4
“O11 Ald GN¥1SN333N0 SLDLIHIBY VHE | newornseb@auegsig —-HeH-3
: SaLboR
va
DOR Daan [aH ap a pipny an RONDO Oa nea
zest ——— Zale LODE LLG aMmEszes wy [sree Exo hain wee] ¥ Wks rwateaum eres |_|
ww sywots vor age jOLVALd SOON NVIORIA] soy mo in ts Wt ores mateo ania rae
1 TARTS TVG aT Liptiga hippo apiedk va
SOON - 3ARI0 GNVTM3IA 8 AVM VWI¥ seisomenne Eat BP cv isnong ness |_|
€ 40 € 133HS| £ 3DV1S - VSOON NVIGIMIA sisaujBua Bunynsu0 ee: 2g ZS a
NV 1d LNOAY1 ONINYAL 3T3IH3A IN3Wd013A30 03S0d04d) wyitllMoW O3LNYD Bo cmrgmniemnalt aurre permed man on reenest [|
__ pay aye, } ies ary Tara tooo om inom arpa ny hemo = oe F
BONS dS ‘NVIGUIN
HOILINBLSHOD WOA LOW AWYEREITEUd A0NSIdS NVIOUIN HIEVH 50 ALNNOD VEAIM Jo HST —
TSPBEAS YOL 497 7 OS9BI'SS UO EL 107 SuMe2UEZ
(a2uejeg) ett (S19) Ayradorg uoware Z “| -—
AOMTRGISIO ATSTdOT WIT
i
i
| |_|
\ 7
A
\ ua fo
¢ /
\ \ A 43018 ty ~ +e
\ ‘ \, /
o y ‘y Ms,
\ r
\
\
\
/ \
f \
\,
. / \
. onl 430198 J \
| — \
, \ 43078 A Ly
f \ 5
/ \ >
\ wv
\ mm
soe ceee o
NA
N, cL
SK OM |
70078 ¥
fo
ZOLA OZEGSO OMG OL Y34IX SNOISNIWIO 313IHIA YOs *
uy TL wLSVO)
NAL AVEUVD
Page 73
Attachment Attachment 14: Linkages Plan Page 52
Page 74
NOILVINOYID NVIPLSAG3Ad “ € 4DV1S VSOON NVIGIYIA rey : - * “¥ ee hy ss Be a ad, c fa NOILONAL VSOON
Page 75
asec. ro TO NOOSA NATIONAL PARK VIRIDIAN gat AAU Soya eony
Page 76
Attachment Attachment 15: Entryway Signage Page 53
Page 77
Unless otherwise noted all dimensions
in millimetres, Use figured dimensions in
preference to scaling. Contractor to
confirm all dimensions and details
‘on site prior to manutacture.
Attention
Bue to this reproduction process the
colours in this image are not exact
TOP VIEW representations of the final product.
NOTE:
Final graphics and colours to be
confirmed.
All structural members, fixings and
footings to be confirmed and certified by
~ sign maker's engineer,
<4 }*———- SNA aluminium blade, fixed to post
nner re norrilluminated *
Access from +———-— Mask and sprayed graphics with antigraffiti Laguna
7:000m coating over. Lookout
to Ip NB: logo indicative only Walkway
7:00am ~~ 6omm cap x height
Daytime 18m viewing distance
access via+— 40mm cap x height
Viewland 12m viewing distance
Drive
<
Laguna
Lookout
Walkway
Structural aluminium post, cap welded on top,
base plate welded on base. Powdarcoated blue
Jf ‘Stainless steel acorn nuts.
-
ie Ec)
£5 Ne Cont Nin
— —_ _ oan? . - - if
nin nin a :
| {| Recessed footing to suit site conditions | | a a
|| atm oe .
| U I | to engineer's specification | { I | 43 i.
FRONT VIEW BACK VIEW a \ Tem -
SG ; ee
Sign 3 - Details Sign Location Plan
Scale 1:20 Scale 1:500
I
{
j
i
John Holland » Bayview Noosa | ' SIGN TYPE DRAWINGS ¢ Sign 3 - Access Hours Sign
r
© Do:Dash Pr Lid ACN 010.951 443 Telephone “+617 38966600 Facsimile ~617 3896 6620 " Drawing Sze | Dato 7 4 Status Orawing No Shoot
dotdash s6iytion Road POBox 7400 Fast Brisbane Quoonsland 4169 Austraka Printed at A3118.09.03 1D ' Concept only not for production [eae¥'to3 1ofi
Page 78
Attachment Attachment 16: Health Spa Entryway Sketch Page 54
Page 79
ce wl “MalASY ALN WdS « € JOVLS VSOON NVICIYIA ES woL S 0 NV1d HOLLINS NV1d Ady
Page 80
Attachment Attachment 17: Dimensions of Compactor & Waste Vehicle Manoeuvrability Page 55
Page 81
Technical Specifications
1. 50mm insulation 7. Tank chassis and front or rear lifting frame for
2. Mesh fan unit guard transportation
3. Refrigeration fan unit 8. 19m3 insulated steel tank (optional sizes built to
4. Refrigeration unit individual requirements)
5. Tank packer and power pack 9. 240 or 120 litre plastic wheelie bin
6.
Lifter and Refrigeration unit controls and 10. Safety cage attachment (cage not shown)
curaway o 2 Q2@ © OF
PERSPECTIVE VIEW
[
“\
_
a] |
Rear Front Elevation
ven
sot
0 U
® Power - 415V, 3
phase with one
neutral & earth
@ 19 cum. tank
_ 6350
Plan View
| |
:
|
le
> —— +.
capacity :
® Detachable | 50 Shao
safety cage for and 2 ~
wheelie bin ;
roading ~ J J Richards
& SONS PTY LTD
Page 82
[ano aw] ¢ | aw] 2a/ii/e | ana | annoy vou [nme] ooiisy oe = - turin | Seay [uo] nacim — Juern] noleaoS0 > -rA [onaoe 108s tere: ve0 rey | ow Rea/ano aad TH OO 620-920 - EV oe gay | Swit | Fas] wows ome | ae FO SNOISNIMIC TIVUIAO SAALINeTIA We SRORGNG ANNOL LHOTIM WAWIXVIN YONUL OOH #X 8 Tut acer ne | SNS SSO sore WS? HLGIM WOWLXVAN ts aud ONTAYPANIONG |__ yeu | Ce ee Wr6 HLONST WOAIXVA — STUFHOTA LT Be aS ae | WOS IHS ONLLYaadO WAWIXVN NN nated WEY LHOIH TAAVL WAWIXVAN WS> ACOMACISNI WOO! MII OL aay WOU TIVM OL TIVM “GV ONINUAL Ly 7 : (CxO) __ (Oy 8Ily I O O; Ln 4 O16 S26 Sem Tuol emi [Ragi| wou wean [onoox wo rau |W Rva/ona au SYUNE _® SI907 devs Tv ZAOWIY ASV 19NOG Ni tt — SING FWIS LON OG
Page 83
Seger?
td pH
|
1
CATE
rr.
OR REPRODUCED
PART WATHOUT THE WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF THE
COMPANY
AWA ABOATECTS QLD PTY LTD
\Verdy al orrrennione on ste before the corimencemient
work,
(Camply fo tie folowing oF any ober robevant cos
= Bulking Goda of Aucirata
+ AGee and Mobility Codes AS 1428.1 8 1478.2
(Lage Scale Drawings Taka Precedknce to crates socte
he
itl
’ NOTE
\
iment
a
a
Trucks jn - Compactus 1:190 on A1/ $:200 on AS.
V BLOCK
ATONE
Forward turning template shown is that of a 10n
Refuse collection vehicle with a turning
circle of 12.5m R. Template obtained from
- BCC City Plan.
Reverse manouvre template shown that of a HF
obtained fram AS 2890.2 (2002)
NOOSA PROJECT PATE
ARCHITECTS
QUEENSLAND PTY LTO
Laval 436 Viyendea St, Wemsdeed, Od 4005
PO. Ben 300 Spring Hal 4004 OLD AUST
Proposed Lot 113 on SP 196498 ‘
grave Y BLOCK &
ORAHNG REFUSE TRUCK IN 5
ee 4013 DA03-V-05 =
ISSUE 3 a
>
PRI 29/00/2006 w
Page 84
' | 00zONZ Nik wor wood nowswosad o ava Ope saga of eovepacery oe) SUMED OOS SOT) N62 2OZE 20 WS Corr 22t 20 BL hn , TURHL 2 Beri Sy sS00D EON Due ssa - a * goveat ds vo eit 207 pesodong — inaacss | 1258 OO Mey, 17S La ay I NVICIMIA TO SE clans sietanoo oa 30 peneiiiael im c asa qu NM ISM GO aoe PKBIHMS O@¢ BGR eeu SORMONVISTMULSRY Oe Nana a anoHUM v4 oO - ior ‘SOON POUL SUSURACO BEAOPI GOGH ES00N - (Ease GaN SB LOM STM OW az NOMWOOU soe MO penser YS CRON oe 1 RAT 7 Pur Sern 01 (a0 EIEN 3S LOM LST OY = SOAtOVO esol onus wes AVE 3 eee emery Popng upang- 30 ADE3S08d BAL Sv MERE HID. asnoussuiumeed | sows] ¢ 2 ino £ 3OWIS NVORIA 041 Aid ON¥ISN33N0 eee Sapam prepa go Aue 1 Somos 8 ff ssro.d00 Ob SMCS HAD NOUVONdavINGHGOTEASO | sore] z Ss yonul asnsay Tw $0 190 ve, 40370Ud VSOON NVIORIA er |/slLORLtHoaUyY y ee : popes tween mpd snscup sane “sNos30 HD | SNSSTOMLESW INSNESOOERG SN | eotoe| 1 2 uae ; v W r " a - staan dors 2 See RIE ox wore suo0 MEH KE LHOIMAdOD 9 8 0376S "NoUaOSSG_[ —alwo | “ABH 3 WOOTA A ownn €L0L = -engor, «= PN. Aid SOON NYTIORAA aro ‘ aseninas in sinaup pen SLNSWONaWY 2078 A 40078 A Fw OO DOE T EY U5 COT Wy NO SHV SHPEGWOD - INO SHOU tw bs BET TT 30 COVE ‘uetg AUD 908 mo . ~ jpoumg Meda, "wis" r | , . J pot tmmnnnennemenncinnnce aces > — | | ee
Page 85
“dd¥ LNAWdO1SA30 ava ¢ sa LrAatova elo aSn4zyuOs SNOLLO3S W130 oaavan WOOTS A mina oN SNAG $0150 ctor } B6YSBt dS UO £4) 307 Pasodord wand ise ¥SOON AAW : € 30V1S NVKOMIA avd ©1037 0td SOON NVIGRIA wee B11 Ad VSOON NVIOIGIA 1 NoawaSsa «| Meee Ys OMe est 07 L258 LO NEY LEZ EO OY Anadoad | WP iitewteeot tess ASM MO yor FR OeMS Ont ~99'C9 TURNS ATG TP IPA NOULYOOT | soon rio 'seeseey 1S eruenSe 1 AT O11 Ald ONVISN33NO er jslLaaliHayuyv v NW c “Nan (OFS ZBAELUIS Of cOUMpEOe LY aye] SHUN oS BHT ZWD FLEE SW SAND hago DUE SEO Vosee Sy Pug ome] - ereery p crop fupmg- sepc0 pase tego foe 1 Buca aug oki suosuEup apes Ae a ecueed th SRL LID PA ITSoR Oe + SOUWED cous 10 sOREENR ‘LOM VoRTESUCO MOU AE SEO UELLNUOD 8Ul 810,00 E75 UD SUORSURLLID FE AYA S310N Ee to Doz. T TW UO GOL O27 Aid GVO si2aumOtY Ye ANNEOD HL 30 WALI 3H INOHIMA Id M1BO.ATIONMA CBINGOEE YO (EAg00 “2ST 3 108 1S ONY G1) Ald OTD SLD3UHOUY ver SO MUUOUI THE BY MERGE HAD BNoussULNMITEd | soos} € eee GbtY SHOUWILIO3ES, AD NOLLWONddY LNSIOTRASO some z BL HAS | 3NSS) ONG INSR2000TSHd ISN SOLOUE t 4HOIMAdOD 9 1a GNSS Nouanos30_[ aivo | “Aaa SLN3WONaWY 4207s A UONDIS WSL oos'ce+ | er a te . . ] zas'ee+ “oP SONILSVH SIL epesB [eUIWON - WaYV JOIANSS x SNLOWIWOS HOO1d A _ TY WO O02 7 FY YO DOLL YOHasS L/S. Y alt i Peenrt, 2:4 - LH3YLS SONILSWH STL x SMLSVdWOS StL AMINA SDIAN3S: XX stb LSaeLS SONISVH SILL X= Zt - 133415 SONLLSVH SLL x < INVUNVISSY
Page 86
Attachment Attachment 18: Access to Grease Arrestor Page 56
Page 87
LEGEND NOTE:- “
¢
n———— COLO WATER MAIN - HIGH LEVEL SUPPLY Ree eee eM MNTRACTOR .
(S$ TO ENSURE THAT ALL LID‘S To ,
1 ——— COLD WATER MAIN - LOW LEVEL SUPPLY MANHOLES ARE FLUSH WITH THE
PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE. ao
F————— FIRE SUPPLY MAIN - Lo
kK STREET UGHT SETOUT NOTE
FOR CIVR. SETOUT, CONTACT QANTEC
—--——--— NOMINAL FACE OF KERB McWILLIAM CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND
AN AUTOCAD ORAWING FILE WILL BE
nat -4— PROPOSED ELECTRICAL ISSUED FOR SITE SETOUT.
—_-- + SW PROPOSED STORMWATER
PROPOSED HOUSE DRAINAGE NOTE:
‘ALL WATER AND HOUSE DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION WORK
MH2g/08 HOUSE DRAINAGE MANHOLE NUMBER UNDERTAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COMPLY WITH
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE QUEENSLAND WORKPLACE
CL41,785 COVER LEVEL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT 1995.
CONTACT YOUR NEAREST OFFICE OF THE DIVISION OF
MH29/08 EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE NUMBER WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY FOR INFORMATION.
NOTE
FOR HOUSE DRAINAGE NOTES p77
REFER TO DRAWING 05B320 - \ \
5.03. -4 4
{ q . LS
LL Leon HOB TYPE Pr
~~ \_ 4 Scere t ~ ws t SL35.489 &
~ / suy7.cg1 MB TYPE , a
? /7 . . $137,231 KB TYPE a
/ 7& / . Fy $L37.068
J &,
co / SLY MHBI/03 D3Se a7
$L37.385,
Ny wane $138.272 in . a H29 705:
SL38.711 508 tHH31/02_
Hee TYPE “A spahae SL36,689
$L38.898
MH31/04
$136,698
fia TYPE ‘P*
> cx SL33.191
QMH29704 e\
SL31.902 Ce
a
LN
4
4 ‘\ 7
7 Vw ¢
7 \
N 7
N 7 HOB TYPE “A*
Vv $132.367 30/02 L
an ot 129.12 a
\
; \
HOB IYPE aan
$134,593 — ww
iN
\ HOB TYPE P*
— 128.786
pat
xk _
“7s 7 7 2 SONS 2“ “
° Mnio703 . ee
ES SM . <q Ee $U99.387 < oo uO “ : a oo —
5 a X . “
A
ava wk Nae “7 No et
29/02 \ ve 7
SL26-058S. \ U7 2 vo
‘SITE BENCHMARK NX “se
1, 2GimmmaarPPappety JCA 13 tBa titanic) PSH.158979 ° s 0 Gan 2 A Ss a L muss - . nn ,
Cancelling ttaft 11330 GPSPESB8050 UbtLbbn!SeuigsR5B8652 MINIMARK {BOLT @ WASHER) IN CONCRETE DRIVEWAY beer —— + J} < Ny a cA a #7 ss VIRIDIAN HI
PARISH af WEES CCOMBT Wifdt ASERCMEMERORAH? GRUBIGO8 RLES.112 AH DERIVED (4:250 UNREDUCED } : - *
1023.003E, 1336.655N {SITE SPECIFIC COOROWATE SYSTEM)
[
QANTEC McWILLIAM |PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
consulting engineers
sen meioaas VIRIDIAN NOOSA - STAGE 3
Levet 3, 200 Creek Street ALMA WAY & VIEWLAND DRIVE - NOOSA
Spring Hil Old 4009
i d oat =
FO Be 69 Soring es’ | VIRIDIAN NOOSA PTY. LTD, |
beabanegigucw come SMA ARCHITECTS QUEEENSE AND PTY. LTD. “05 B 32 0 S$ K : 0 3
PROPOSED SITE OF G-IT
2000 LT TANK
+:250
Page 88
Attachment Attachment 19: Earthworks Plan Page 57
Page 89
PROPOSED PLATFORM LEVEL
PROPOSED BULK EARTHWORKS CUT AREA
PROPOSED BULK EARTHWORKS FILL AREA
EXISTING CONTOUR (1.0m INTERVALS)
SPOT LEVELS (100mm BELOW FSL|
TOP OF THE WALL
BOTTOM OF THE WALL
TEMPORARY CUT/ALL BATTER [U.N.0})
| eat 335007
~
7 10-101a
ZF {UL 30.500
SG SPS
. Zoi_27500 7 7ye 30500
SO 5 iy gusto RE
. 8s
70,
ay &
‘>
4 NS87
N-
EAL PROPERTY DESCRIBTION
1, 2 Common Property (CTS) & 113 (Balance)
Cancelling Lot 113 on SP.188650 & Lot 1 on SP.188652
PARISH of WEYBA, COUNTY of MARCH. MERIDIAN: SP.151403.
s T_NOTE
FOR CIVL SETOUT. CONTACT QANTEC
McWILLIAM CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND
AN AUTOCAD ORAWING FILE WiLL BE
ISSUED FOR SITE SETOUT.
NOTE.
REFER TO PLAN 056320 EW.03.
1, FOR PROPOSED BULKEARTH WORKS GENERAL NOTES
Exisitng Gabeons
ae exci
NAME: BOURKE RPEO. 2020 PO Box 99 Spring Hall Otd 4004
187) 3007 8181
FacsiaRe: (07) 3007 2187
E-Hal: bri Ms,
QANTEC McWILLIAM
consulting engineers
APRIL. 06 Q tee 0 Cenk Street
Bai Sitgiat ata toe
1
SIGNATURE. coma
SWIMMING POOL
(£2250 UNREDUCED 1
\
PROeiT >
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
VIRIDIAN NOOSA!- STAGE 3
ALMA WAY & VIEWLAND DRIVE - NOOSA
£ ue 3 900
6008,
LL a3 /
FOR CONTINUATION REFER To PLAN 05B320 - EW.02
PRELIMINARY WOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED BULKEARTH WORKS
LAYOUT PLAN - SHEET 1 OF 3
Test t
VIRIDIAN NOOSA PTY. LTD.
Sas TEXT PRET om,
5250
TATE 7
JMA ARCHITECTS QUEEENSLAND PTY. LTO.
="95B320-EW.01) 2
Page 90
= — —— = smi] uve can snipes) man ADO
Td mC MS-00E 050 cme OFT AGW BHD SANDY | Ba] YON a ed
uimraa ure oszt ‘L1"Ald ¥SOON NVIGRIIA 2008 PID int baat 6 08 og ty Wa Rosey Sawn YaH | wie BASS ABYNBATRd | te serel cmon gs ma soca sere
Hh St STAT soe | |
WSOON - JAIN GNVIM3IA 8 AVM VWIV 1994S 40D 007 E 19477 u 0 Pp 90 “Tlud¥ rt Sn eR eraser art
. sve Zyt 990 6 UY [are o=_ mean nl =
€ JO Z L33HS - NVId LNOAV) € JOV1S % VSOON NVIGIUIA sieaurfua 2uyyjnsu0s "ate my Lggrtr on cgttn Lane] Sar TAD TO
S¥Y0 SOdQUd WdO13A30 Leite soos memes = coger ey |_
YOM HLYVINING G3 bd0ud INI 1 g3s0d0ud WYITTIMOW O3LNve L a ~cumiiariiee sea = |
WOILINYISNOD YOF LOW AUWNINITSHd | 807s NYKUEN 3
’ | S0SK'dS ‘NVIOIUIN HOMVH J° ALNNOD "VEAIM #° HSIN¥ |
TAMIR IEA ee TS9RALES VOL 107 FOSIRA'AS HO ELL 107 SUMED
(eouereg) Eb 2 (S19) Ayradosg yout Z ‘4 F—-]
mae a ” , RONERISIO ALUIdONd WIT
ma ;
_
°
a 3
a fF
z
=
=
<€
>
=a
Ss
z
x
om
a
m
a
com
°
uU
c
>
“40135. 3415 Yoa Gans! = ty
38 THM 31d ONIMVYO OVIOLNY NY 3 i
ONY SU33NONJ ONL WASNOD WYITIMIH a r
JBANVO LOVANOD 'LNOL3S WAI 4Ds yw x
TION NOLS °c 1%
' mi
m |S
=
=
“EO'M3 OZERSO NVTd D4 M9498
S3LON TVY3NID SHYOM HLBVINING GISOdOUd UOJ 1
“SION
(ON HILLVO WNd/ LAI AYVOdW3L
TWA 3H 30 HOLLOB ye
WM FL 40 401 »
Rs)
($4 MOVRE WOOL) $13N97 Logs oe
(STVAM3LNI WO) YNDINOD ONILSIXI
VISY Tid SHYOMHLYYS NING O3ISOdoud
W3UY LN) SHAOMHLBVA ANG AISOddud
WAI) WAAL Id GISOdDYd 006°0Z Id
ON3941
Page 91
ziten A1 SHEET
FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO PLAN 05B320 - EW.02
iL
4,2 Common Property {CTS} & 113 (Balance)
Cancelling Lot 113 on SP.188650 & Lot 1 on SP.188652
PARISH of WEYBA. COUNTY of MARCH. MERIDIAN: SP. 151408
MERIDIAN: SP.151408.
FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL LEVEL
Zo See
1.6m. NOMINATED
|
VARIES:
COMPACTED FALL MATERIAL / 1.0m
AS SPECIFIED. DEPTH TO. HIN
SUIT SLAB THICKNESS
BUILDING PLATFORM DETAIL
NTS
NOTE:
REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS DRAWINGS FOR
SLAB THICKNESS AND FOOTING DETAILS.
/
PROPOSED PLATFORM LEVEL
PROPOSED BULK EARTHWORKS CUT AREA
PROPOSED BULK EARTHWORKS FILL AREA
EXISTING CONTOUR (1.0m INTERVALSI
SPOT LEVELS (100mm BELOW FSL)
TOP OF TRE WALL
BOTTOM OF THE WALL
TEMPORARY CUT/FILL BATTER (U.N.O)
NOTES
1,GRASS AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED TO A DEPTH
QF 100 MILLIMETRES OVER THE ENTIRE SITE OF THE
WORKS.
2. CLEAR THE SITE OF ALL DEBRIS INCLUOING EXISTING
BUILDING RUBBLE AND CONCRETE SLABS, TREES
EXCEPTING THOSE TO BE RETAINED, GRASS AND
VEGETATION. EXCAVATE TREE ROOTS WHERE REQUIRED,
AND REMOVE FRON SITE, STRIP ALL TOPSOIL FROM ALL
AREAS AND STOCKPILE FOR FUTURE USE IF REQUIREO,
‘OR REMOVE FROM SITE.
}. COMPACT THE EXPOSED SUBGRADE OR LOOSE TOP
LEVEL MATERIAL TO A MINIMUM 100% STANDARD
MAXIMUM ORY OENSITY TO AS12689 5.1.1. ANY ‘SOFT SPOTS”
WOENTIFIEO BY THE PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE
REMOVED AND REPLACEO WITH A COMPACTEO
IMPORTED GENERAL FILL MATERIAL TO THE
ABOVE COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS.
EARTHWORKS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY CUT AND
FILL OPERATIONS TO ACHIEVE LEVELS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE FINISHEO SURFACE LEVELS AND MINIMUM
PAVEMENT DEPTHS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT
EXCEEDING 225mm LOOSE THICKNESS AND SHALL BE
COMPACTED AT NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TO
ACHIEVE THE SPECIFIED COMPACTION STANDARDS.
EXCAVATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT WHERE
NECESSARY, TO OBTAIN SUBGRADE LEVEL.
IMPORTED GENERAL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE
SUPPLIED AND COMPACTED WHERE NECESSARY TO
OBTAIN SUBGRADE LEVEL.IMPORTED GENERAL FILL
MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEAN GRADED MATERIAL FREE
OF ORGANIC MATTER AND STONES GREATER THAN
150mm AND CAPABLE OF BEING COMPACTED INTO
COHERENT FALLING TO THE SPECIFED STANDARD.
THE MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A LINEAR SHRINKAGE
NOT GREATER THAN 8% AND A MINIMUM
CBR. OF 10%,
ALL EARTHWORKS FILL AND EXCAVATED AREAS
SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% STANDARD
HAXIMUM ORY DENSITY {AS 1289 5.1.1} IN LAYERS
NOT EXCEEDING 150na COMPACTED THICKNESS,
8. COMPACTION TEST RESULTS AND TEST LOCATIONS FOR
SUBGRADE AND EARTHWORKS FILL TESTING SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO ANO APPROVED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT
PRIOR TO PLACING PAVEMENT MATERIALS.
9. SPOIL FROM STRIPPING AND EXCAVATION SHALL BE
STOCKPILEO ON SITE WHERE DIRECTED BY THE
‘SUPERINTENDENT. q
5
2
A
0 s* 0 Se
{ £250 UNREQUCED }
10, ALLOWANCE SHALL BE MADE FOR QUALITY TESTING
{INCLUDING SGAKEO CBR) FOR EACH TYPE OF IMPORTED
FILL MATERIAL, TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED
REQUIREMENTS.
12, COMPACTION TESTS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE
TRENCHES AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AT THE RATE
OF ONE TEST PER SO METRES OF TRENCH OR PART
THEREOF,
13, NO ALLOWANCE HAS BEEN MADE FOR WORKING AREAS FOR
CONSTRUCTION SURROUNDING THE SITE GF WORKS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSESS AND MAKE NECESSARY
ALLOWANCES,
14. EARTHWORKS PAD MATERIAL TO HAVE A MINIMUM SAFE
BEARING CAPACITY OF 150kPa ¥O THE SATISFACTION OF THE
‘SUPERVISING GEQTECHINICAL ENGINEER.
15. FOR SET OUT REFER TO THE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS.
16. DUE CARE SHALL BE TAKEN WHEN EXCAVATING
ADJACENT TO EXISTING SERVICES WHICH TRAVERSE
THE SITE. THE SERVKES SHALL BE LOCATED, PROBED,
AND EXACT INFORMATION AS TO THE LOCATION, SIZE,
NUMBER, AND LEVEL OF SUCH SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
THE SUPERINTENDENT AS MODIFICATION OR RELOCATION
MAY BE REQUIRED,
SETOUT NOTE
FOR CIVIL SETOUT, CONTACT QANTEC
McWILLIAM CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND
AN AUTOCAD ORAWING FILE WILL BE
(SUED FOR SITE SETOUT.
PIAL
PRELIMINARY BOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Daas TITLE
etn ie nant 7
ORE reese sie GANTEC McWILLIAM | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED BULKEARTH WORKS
consulting engineers VIRIDIAN NOOSA + STAGE 3
ABH TAM 2 MS LAYOUT PLAN & GENERAL NOTES
a ohn Level 3, 200 Creek Street ALMA WAY & VIEWLAND DRIVE - NOOSA] - SHEET 3 OF 3
Spring Fall Qld 4000 _
‘ faa ~
Poser ee erfcensies | VIRIDIAN NOOSA PTY. L1D. 1250
“""05B320-EW.03/" P2
Telephone: (07)
Facsiane: (07) 3007 8182
caret
SIGNATURE: E-Hat: brisbane@gnewcomau | IMA ARCHITECTS QUEEENSLAND PTY. LTD.
Page 92
Attachment Attachment 20: Stormwater Outlets Page 58
Page 93
SLMS 0ZEPSO. ser
x55
“QLT Ald ONVISN333ND S1I9LIHDYY VE
¥ smu
oszt
Sos
41370W DoD.
yout “Ald YSOON NYIOIMIA
D
‘700% PID TEH 66 X0G Od
SOON
NV1d LNOAV1 T1VMOV3H
YILVMNNOLS d3SOd0Yd
aabags 1292) 007 “E1487
$8 Zk sm St WHY
‘s199u)Sua Buyqynsues
WYITTIMIW J3LNVD
~ BANC GNVTM3IA 8 AVM YH1V
€ 39V1S - VSOON NVIGI¥IA
ANaWdO13AI0 a3sod0ud
2007 81D NaH Buss WATTS
oo]
U0]
uve
Merny erp) ae 2 CNT om wr a
aq a wae leengeats rege ney FRR
ry
WHote
«
TSHR MOLVRGOI TOMO) Sw on CaeenspOn Pts pepe MO fee 0 NON
gry SDS em NSA AN SAMO
‘Panes aang wt jm ware yey
nucneg na heipen eocumete bn mj a Dia Gh
asap re nae aipmen TN Tee,
Tin perso,
MOLLONULSHOS HOS LON = AUYAIAITSHd
( Ga9AdTBNN OSZ" }
wol aL $ 0
“S1N
ULI NOIWVS WIIdAL
TWAGv3H bY TIVADNIM
30 AHOITH OL 43382 L¥ 0 HOY Sava
DAd HLM ssmuun
we
ONY O3LWOD INIZ:
“SN
AWLIG TWMOV3H WOIdAL
wo’s
bt TWA OV3H-
zt TIVM Gd
V3H
000" ‘9f 4
N 90'6E 1S
ur ‘1X3 #9051
Z2 TIVM GV3H
\
ws
{ G3n0sENN ooCIA +
a
ov
ag
BOTS dS (NVIGUIN
POSS INVICIUIN HIXVH 4° ALNNO) VBAIM 49 HSV:
2598a1'dS UO 4 $97 -B OS9REI'GS UO ELE 407 6umjaouey
(@2UE 18g) E1L 2 (S19) Apsadosd vounyo Z
oz oh 9 NOWERISIO ATSIAONS WIE
“PVIENS CIXSINS GISOdDYd
JHL HLM HSA 38 SIOHNYH
OL 5.011 T1¥ LVHt JYNSN3 OL SI
SOLIVINOD 3HL “AINO BAILYDIGNI
2a¥ NMOHS $13A37 39¥IUNS
=JLON
“1013S F1IS 404 CaNSs!
30 TM 311d ONIAVEO OVIOLNY NY
ONY SU33NENI ONILINSNOD WYITTIAIW
JELNVO LIVLNOD ‘INOLIS WAN aod
SION LNOLIS
wz WV
LV JD¥NIVEO
ONILSIXS
Ol LN3IWIS¥O
493NN0)
|__| 3 0N
NS oN 40078 H
AN
ba9*006
leone St <A
Y N
80/0MH
8/E1S
83°92 /
7 60S:9% 6
009°1X3 0051
8/80HW
“7
“suuvn30
\ g04 2100-0 9M OLS YIM OL
43434 “STOHNVH YILYMHYOLS 007
Q30NALX3 VIC 00S! 19NYLSNO>
a7 \
000°L ke
~ 018 |
\
tT ™
wO'l XDUdd¥ Y
98H 40 LUZANT [~~ Pn.
vy 7 S
SS3ULLYW Mw / K € TIVM OVI
oad 9904 fo oS yf /~ ovicras
. / Ha
o's XOddEY ony
“000° ‘g€ we l
/%078 >
SS
ange #Nva \ on oso, “NX tEES E Se, = a /
04 DNIHDLId NOLS oe Sosm cf faa) Oy NY
E/QHH X yee 2
}—=— E TIVM RIMES TTIW GV3H
> o\ Ne “\ “ \ cosa 15 ™~ 900%
ce NN 0s'8z 1S BOSE
an s woLadIsHiiy @00% 9/60HH corse 1
sos -~\ QOSEE 44 a0z"ee 1s
TOMS O7ES0)
43d3Y SALON YILVMNYOLS 1W83NI9 YOJ|
I
I
T
wou
LaSHS by “ee
> I0On}
a9vNIvEd TiOsAns a3sodo¥s = =—§ <—- —_.. €—
¥alVA 1337 MOT | ————1—__
Arddns 38td 3
Mamas ONILSIXI $----—
YBLWAHYOLS ONILSIX3 mS
TIVMOV3H 313Y2NO2 GISOdOs = Z/OMH ZN
NOLdIISHNH G3SOdoyd = 8S. ©
(0100-0 9MO OLS V3Mdl Y343Y) TTOHNYW G3ISOdoyd = E/ZOHN
ASW O31¥ED so0st G3sodoud alvin (I)
loseo-a DMO OLS V3Md! UIST AVM NIVHO O3SOd0Yd =a LOM EE
(nS00-a DMO OLS V3Mdt _43J3U)
(21) ATIND Tals 006x006 G3SOdoNe =» S400 EY
(9s00-0 DMO OLS VIMat 239} Egy
(Nous¥ 31382ND) (11) ATIND aTaIz 096x006 GISOdO¥s =
(o900- 9G OLS V3Mal 4343ub
lid ATIND aasodgUa $720d9 Bey
(9900-0 OMG OLS ¥3Mdl 4333
lid ATIND ONINOG-LNY aaSOdO¥e .
UBLYMHYOLS O3SOa04d
aNaoa1
Page 94
“SIN WLIO TIVMOV3H WotdAl ore wot XOUddY 334) 40 LYIANI SS3ULLVW 037113 4108 wos XOUdd¥ VWMGY3H 3A0¥ XNVS 1 ONIHD1d INOLS q “SLN TW13d NOV IWIIdAT TIVMOVIH LY TIVMONIM 30 LHOGH O1 4338) Lv 0 WOYs S21VA BELEE JAd HLM SS3U1LVH ONIS G3L¥OD INIZ:
Page 95
Attachment Attachment 21: Staging of Civil Works Page 59
Page 96
LEGEND EXCAVATE CONTAHINATED MATERIAL ANO PROPOSED DIVERSI . REMOVE FROM SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SED DIVERSION DRAIN : APPROVED EHP, LEAVE EXCAVATION TO FORM SEDIMENT POND. PROPOSED SEDIMENT FENCE DO NOT FILL. PHASE Ot EXCAVATE CONTAMINATED MATERIAL AND REMOVE FROM NOTES : SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVEO EMP. AFTER EROSION . AND SEOIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE, FILL . , WITH COMPACTEO FILL MATERIAL BACK TO NATURAL TEMPORARY STOCKPILE OF STRIPPED TOPSOIL AND NON . . SURFACE LEVEL. COMPLY WITH STABILISING REQUIREMENTS CONTAMINATED CAPPING MATERIAL tN AREA BELOW | BLOCK, OF PHASE 02 ON COMPLETION. PROVIDE SEDIMENT FENCES AROUND STOCKPILE . | | EXCAVATE CONTAMINATED MATERIAL AND REMOVE | FROM SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED EMP. AFTER EROSION AND SEOIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE, FILL WITH COMPACTEO FILL MATERIAL TO RL37,800, COMPLY WITH STABILISING REQUIREMENTS OF PHASE 02 ON COMPLETION. \ \ sotan A1 SHEET SP/I88650 : 5 w REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBTION 4, 2 Comaon Property (CTS) & 113 (Balance) Cancelling Lot 113 on SP.1B8650 & Lot 11an SP.188652 PARISH of WEYBA. COUNTY of MARCH. MERIDIAN: SP.151408 MERIDIAN: SP.151408 ee PRORT ORAWING TITLE z ees pe QANTEC McWILLIAM | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STAGING OF CIVIL WORKS Sereno ome ecu 2 consulting engineers VIRIDIAN NOOSA | STAGE 3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL aoe = = [K28 oe (APRS Level 3,200 Creek Street ALMA WAY & VIEWLAND DRIVE - NOOSA|PHASE 01 ‘PAs eemicaleal bard capy lee bp WATE PEL = os O Spring Hel Old 6000 i ———— [J DATE Cer 3 Jeomas 1A [COUNCL FORMATION REQUEST aioa.eea] AWA ME:_KEN BOURKE RPE, BO Box $9 Spring Hill Qtd 6008 oer a ScaES Teeeezcmittant dene sees —(r7 Lonel Rona tue ‘wate | Wwe MN RPEQ._2020— Tetephene i oar east VIRIDIAN NOOSA PTY. LTD. 1250 - te PI | PRELIMINARY ISSUE 2,07,06 SV! Facsimile: (07) 3007 6182 TORTIE ata = a pati nt] pOCrENT aye SIGNATURE:_ E-Mad: — [email protected] 0 5B 320 ER. 02
Page 97
Vv EO US OZE GSO nmcrre “OL V/Ald GNV1SN393N0 SLIBLIHIUY VHE | mewornoabgouegsing ae SRA WHOS JO Smee} ue Lepemcae [zs] sire} _2070] RaENDY [aes yee naa ent ation toy trey
~ sz “OUT Ald ¥SOON NIONEIA soot is oa) ese —qa—3 68 EET aN Sn [re Fe Shee
mimes ase kata : ae Say ae ae ae
20 3SVHdWVSOON- SARO.ONVIMSIA BAVA vay] mseoercms MAMIYR Sota aH a ce a Era
TOYLNOD LNIWIOZS 8 NOISOUA € 39V1S> VSOGN NVIOIUIA suaauyaun auyynsue> ar ar craeeihgiiieaaaialig
SOM TIA JO SNIDVIS 1NaHdO1IA30 02S0d04d} yaw OFLNVD Tae =e more men steers
ML Sa ave han iy SS ORs pO ed ye iy ems
WOLLONULSHOD YWOd LOW AUYRERITIUd BOTS aS “NYIGRI
BOTISY'dS “NVIGLUIN HIUYH 3° ALND? VGAIM $9 HSI
ZS9SBU'dS YOU 107 F OSES UO ELL 407 GaTERD
(aaveveg) ett (S13) Kisadosg woorme) Z "|
NOITSRDSIO ATEN TIE
( GIMGTHNN OZ" J
‘ust oO $ a ‘
3 V38Y Tid SHMOMHLeVa ING G3SAd0Nd
Vau¥ iN) SXHOMHLEVa HAG OISOd0ud
(ON) HdLL¥a THA/ INI ANVEOdWIL
{ TWAMRINI } S8NO1NOD
SONS INIWIO3S AUVUCCWIL
NIVHO J40 LN) AY¥AOdWAL
"GORE SONYNALMYH
40 ONG TINT BO CERANOGY UIDNOT OM TNT 3HAID NY LAT ! SANYE 1908
“OMVHYSIO OL BORA $F - S940 ZONE HL
HAA 78 1S0W 2B1YM CUVINIIOW FL OHI WL \
TALYHETS WAT) HNsdAd $1 0350 38 OL NSV@ INGWIO3S AUVUOCHIL
INIDY OMLYWAIION FA RANT Wad SHVESTIT OS NYE
‘S831 20 INILNO} 40 (SSI? GOS OXNISNS TYLOL ¥
SyaLlND SMMOTION FHL ASSILYS LSA
3UIS FHL NOUd G2OUVHISD BILVM JO ALITND IHL "ISYNORILYA Deven NIV8O 340. LO) ONILSIXA
WYRUSNACO 3H1 OLN ONOUVHISIC OL NOR OALYL ONY O31SI1 ood paws |!
“O3BDLINOH 38 TIYHS GNOd LNZHO3S 3HI Mi Y3L¥A 094297702 NIVHC 440 1 LNINYWUId O3S0d0ud
“NBLYORHO
SUILLYB ONY ONOd OL JOVHYO UNOIS ANY BI¥d3y
“SLNBROAS OGLVVIRNDDY 40 SLSISNO) ONOd JOVNIVEC HALYMHYOLS OISOdONd
BML dO AMDWAY) FHL JO %OS NIHA STYRGLYH GIVMINDIY IACHTE
ONY SIN2A3NIVY WILEY GY ATHIM SCNOd NOILYLARAO3S 123dSHt- TNOHNYN UFLYANYOIS O3S0d0ud
“RANTVS FL 30 DAVADN-F DOAY OL
NIAVL WOLLIY JAILIRRIOD CNY A T21VIOZHHL ALYHO YILYMNYOLS O3S0d0ud
SYIUY ANS ONY SLITS HOYJ TINYIT) 26 02 SINVY GLY LTS- | gone DWNIGLNYW
“ATBLYIDHH! 14193441 78 OTNOHS GRUNOTE Suivday ANY
*SQOWId MY UGLIY ONY ADI9IM GU1D94SNI 38 OL JUV SINR LTS TH2- ‘3FUL ONILSIXE
“ORSIAVIS ATING S¥T4Y Tht 0319943 38 OL SIDNId LUS-
“SVTUY JIS CIBUNLSIG GIS ONY “WOSdOL-
“SLid ATIND OVS CNNOUNS SDE GHYS-
“ORMAON 30-01 NOLLIALONd 13H GUI SmomcrON
“0919392 39 01 SG LIS-
“SOMIL THY AY 99 3G TIVHS HONIUL N3d0 30 HLDNT] HNHDCYH
*GSNOISSTHHOIN 38 01 SLIT OL SOVE ARVs:
"SHY 1d JOWNIYRO BILYMHDIS NO NMONS S¥ $1310 OL SNOIBYD
YOY ONY 120Y OIHND THA TTLSM "O3131dWOD 3e¥ SHO THY 32HO-
“TIONNYH UBLYMWYOLS HDI 40 1311N0 O1 HDI OML SD¥G ONVS~
“WOLDNHLSNO) SOVNIVHO USLVAJOOY | STMAWES/USLYAMWOLS.
ONLI1dHOD UILAY ATSLYKIGHM SYIUY HOTOWOUOAN ONY ToSdol- | AWGLYAUOOU/UAZS
“SHOLLYAWIX3
WOU AVAY TISLYH TWINS 19280 ONY HOM Jeld 130%
OL QHY HONZUL 30 20S HOW NO O3D¥Td 38 O1 TYRELYN DALVAYIX3"
"SHOMMLAYS NING 40 NOTCH
MALY SAVGL NELLA CGH WIHOWIAH 79 OL S¥SEY OZGHISIO TI¥-
“SHROMHLEY] NING 20 NOISSTDOYI
ANS Of ORM ATAMSTOOAd 19 OL SYTEY OL SINR 17S~
“ONONTHHO) SHYOMHLYVA OL
Old OFLINYLSNO) FH 01 JOWNIVEO BILYMRUOLS CNY Gund ewO3s- ROME na
PNONZHWOD 340478 YAY OBLYNINON AINIIM SNIVYO NOISHIAID 313 1d0):
NOLLARDS30 35¥ld
WVU90Ud LNIWIDVNVH TIS
“QISTHGYLS ATING S¥RV
TAL SRDMHLBVA NVNG 30 UNI IHL VY 2IVId Ni MYHIY D1 SONOd ANBACIS TY “St
“NOLLITELSNOD
JO SAYO 31 MHLUA O20 1RONTAH ORY O3710N VEL 38 OL
FAV STEALS WOS OMONTIM ‘SHMNLMLLS HLAWT AMWADaNAL THY “Th
“sovNvaO.
RALVMAYOLS JO HOLITIWOD LY ADWTd NI JA OL NOWISLOUd did ATIND “E}}
"SMOMHLEV] TG dO ONG LY 3IV%d WI 3B OL SIINH ATS TY “Zi
“WREY TWENOIS NOSdOL LY NOWLITLOUd JONAS 21S TWNOLIOGY 2GAOd “1
“NTH TWN 320
SA¥O NIAZS NHLUM “ORNIGdS SY "ORHITIHOUAN 20 TIVHS S¥ABY THY “OH
“INJONBLNRISETS JHA AG 919980 SY 80 NMOHS SHOULYIO} LY W130
NOUI3L0¥d LITA GYIN HLM DNYOYODIY AI NOLLIILTUd LWS BAYH O1 S13TH °6|
“SLT ATI CNY NOLLIISLSHO) WYRILSNMOG ANY 19110¥d ONY SHOLMINOD
HGHAVIM OWTUVARYd FHL BOLINCH TIVHS HOLDWALNOD HL SIML TV lY W)
“LTLNO NY 01 30VED
JALUSOd OBLANAAILNNN JAVH TIS SMVMO TIVAS/ANVO BO1BIREd THY “Z|
“GAMLON YO CANIS SI IOV NGHA ATILYIOMH CIAVdIY 3d TIVHS S3TIA3d
“4WWH AG JHARD FDWYOLS Bi 4O ALWdY) IHL SAMOTY INTIS
Q3LYTNNNDI YIAINIHM OFVIT 3A TVHS SIIAIO BL “SINGAI TIVANVO
MULIY ONY ATI GRLOLINGH 74 TIVHS SIXA30 TOBLNO) INFHIORS TY “9
“DORE S2NVHAIMYN JML SNON TIN NOWITHLSHOD
JO S3OV1S TIY OMRING NOILYINSHIGIS HYRSLSNMOO ONY NOSOUS
TOUINDD OL SNOILAYIR AUYSSIDIN TY DIVI O1 St YOLIVHINOD TL
“Slid TT¥ MO G3SN 39 OL MOLLIZLGYd LIS lid ATMO”
“UG JAIN GAYA LY AIWOVE
NACOHSYM NUISKXA IS1 “SOVOY WIGNd NO TAVYL O1 UORid SITHHIA
NOLLDNYSNOD HOI TYAOHEY GNYS/10 YO4 FIVH 30 01 NOISACY *€]
“STIVAQYI 13110 SOLVAWHOIS 1¥
GIQAOYd 39 O1 SIBASYIN ANINIOYNYN LIS CNY NOILIIONd BNODS -Z
“RIND SANIWRANOIY
WAHING 2UY ONIMWAG SIH. NO NMOHS STUASWIN * WYHIOUd NAO KO LNVONAdIO ’
ANJONSLNPISEIS IHL HII NOILWLWASNOD NO 2115 NO C3NHYIL30 38 01 SIUNSYIH
JOYLNOD NOILYLUS OVE GNYS GNY 32NI5 LUS 40 NOISOd GAY IN3IX} + iY
S3LON TONLNOD LNIWIG3S ONY NOISONZ
sgoz
T
LAJHS LY 2
Page 98
. “OL Ald ONY ISNI3IND S1IARIHIUY VE TUNLYNOIS sture| 20 waar [res[swim] avo Deon [rss anag pepees men eienon aaa eee |
Vaal 70°US 02E9S0 nse at soe YIJON was [LTH REhennfe| Loose reoeeeaaes
sz “O11 Ald YSOON NVIOIMIA . . yaa [902069 SS Awwnea tad | Za “ahean NaeUT Oras ee Canta ee NON
vane 190 S08 nD 66 x0g Od TR rds “WOT Navn ae Lover iSnom re — aoe error
“eprravs rer fe pone Soe pn pore na:
590 Cyt 900 6L TY
£0 ISVHd|¥SOON - 3AIN0 GNVIMJIA 8 AVM VWI waste can RAG
TOYLNO LNAWIGAS % NOISON2 £ JOVLS - VSOON NVIGINIA sis9u/8ua Sujyinsuo> top atoe uantareapemniemwanons ||
SHHOM TIAN 40 ONIDVIS ANIWd013A30 G3sod0Yd retin » restart ngreestamatey ||
tat wonton ; tee WYITHIMOW DFLNVD aricept arent ate |
“CRSTREVIS ATI SVaBV aT 3
MOLLINULSKOD YOI LOM AUWAINITSUd VIL SeMQHLEVA NVI 40 ONG FAL LY Dd M NANG OL SONOd AHIMORS THY “SI . BONS ‘NVIOUIH 2
“MOLLY SNC? BOTSLdS ‘NYKOYIN 'HOUVH 5° ALNNDD “VOARM JOHSRd -__
{ a:DNGRNN OSz4 } 4 40 SAVO 1 RLS GD IAHONOAN ONY CATION NIVEL 9.02 ZS98BN'dS UO § 107 4 OSORALTAS Uo Et 107 Sunaoue)
SO BY STHODOLS WS OMIM 'SRAUIOULS HIEVD LAER TY “mt)- A . oO ‘ _. : ley . (2948Teg} £41 4 (S19) k1sadoug wows z "| -—
ws a s ® ALVANOAS 40 HOULIISHOD LY TOVId MTG OL MOLIIUCHE 1d ATIND “CO \ . o Le” ' NOTGRISIO ATIOGS WHE | |
“SMROMHLIVE NG 30 GHA LY BDYTd MH 3d OL SINE LHS THY “a XN . - 7
WROV TWODOIS WSK! 1¥ NOUDTCYd 2H WS TNOUNY IDA Th IN - _
‘OMMNRL THE 20. ™~\ . Y 4a” + ~— ee
SAVO NIAIS NIHLIM “ORA03dS SY ‘OOWMOKUH 38 TVHS SVREV THY “th N NX : = an ei + 2
“UNQONINRISGNS IHL AG OGLIRA S¥ BO KACHS SNOILYIOT LY YVL30 “\N \ st “ ys ate Ne _ Lp ae HF
MOMLIRL0€d LT WEA HLUN DAYOWODIV Mi MOLLIALOAd 17S BAVH OL SLI “6 ae ON . : : N _ ou _ a _|?
“SLI ATID GHY NOH MILSHOD HYSY1SHMOG ANY 131084 GHY SNOILIONDD ae \ Gy Lote, a“
MIMLVIM ONTVARId FHL YOLUNOW TIVHS YOLIYYINOD 3H SIH TIV IY BE 4 me N NN . ,
“LTUNO KY 01 VU we dee
> TALNSOd G3LGNUAGININN ZAVH TIVHS SHIVEO JIWMS/NYE UB12MR3d TV “Uh ¢ ~
“CRAIN 40 OIAUGS@O 1 FOYHVO NIHM ATILVIOINM CREVdTY 70 TTYHS S3MAI0 7
“ATVH AG JAI FIVSOIS BL YO ALVEY) FAL S2N0IY LNBWOTS
QUIV WENDY BIATNHA ORVIT 39 TIVES SIMAIT ML ‘SLNGAI TIVANIVE
YGLdV CNY ATGOM GGHOUNGH 3 TIVHS $3MA30 TOYLNOD LNSMCRS THY *9)
“QORId JNYNIINYH HL ONONTON NOLLNELSNOD — fT
JO S3OV1S TTY NANO NOLLVININOIS HVFUISNMOG GNY NOISOUI
‘VOYINOD O1 SHOLL/IVDIUd ANVSSIIIN TI DIV1 OL SI MOLIVELNOD IML ‘S|
"Sia IV NO 0350 28 OL NOWIIONd LHS Ld ATMO “y
VAY Vd SHYOMHINW NING OISOdded
/
7
F/
Sf
\
_\
\
6)
™ \
t
:
—— |
STARTI
VadY LAD SHHOMHLUV] 4918 AISdddYd
“1002 FARGO ORWIMGIA LY ALTDYA
NMOOHSYM OMLISDG 3Sf1 ‘SAVOY WNGNd NO TIAVEL O1 BORd SIDAGA
NOLLXIYLSNO) HOY TYAOH ONVYS/180 40d OVW 30 01 NoISAONd
“STIWACVIH 1JUNO ULVANYOLS LY
QFOADd 29 OL SRMSVIN INBVZYNYH LES ONY NOHLD310Nd BOIS *
(ONDE MALLVE TWI/ IND AYVAOdWIL
PHASE 5
1 WAUZINE OY) SBNOLNOD
INAS LNIWIORS AYYYOd “ATND SANTHRENDSY 7”
x 3 ANaHAC: Wa x HOHIN 3YW OMMYHO SIH1 NO NAOHS SFENSVIN ” NYSDOYd HYOM NO INYCNId30
ANOBLERERAS SAL HUM NOLLYA'ISNOD Ni 31IS NO O3MRI130 39 OL SRINSVIH 3
MIVYO 430 LN) ANYOdHaL a =a oa ‘YOUANOD NOLLYLES DVG GNYS ONY TINTS LS 40 ROLLISOd ONY INILXI ' s [3
SuNVO ¥D0u I | S3LON T0YLNO2 1N3HIOIS ONY NOISOU3 ~
NISWB IN3WIO3S ANYYOEM3L Cy ' S Lo , ; 4
NIVUG 440 1) ONILSIX3 * . yt “
: €0 3SVHd
ae
: la} a
\\ Od — ee are
NIVH 440199 ININVHYAd O3SOd0dd aoa -_
BOVNVYO YILVMHYOLS O3SOddud
BTOHNYH YRLVMHYOLS 3SOd0d @
ALVYD YBLVMWYOIS GISOddd Ep
3381 ONIASIXE & bE:
QN3951
AJJHS Ly “ee
“QOWd AINYNBLNIV
LIS IML WOYS ODSVHDSIG U3.
WV38LSNMOG FHL OLN! ONDUVH:
"Q3YOLINOWN 38 TIVHS GND: aTIOD
“ATALYIONK
$U311¥@ GNY CNOd OL 3DYW¥O WNOIS ANY dIvdaH-
"SIN3MIO3S OILY WAND 40 S1SISNOD CNOd
JHA JO ALIA) JHL dO %0S NIHM STVIGGLYN ORLY INHNDIY 3AONIY
ONY SLNJARMIVY MALY ONY ATNZIM SONOd NOLLYINIHIOGS 1)3dSHt*
“RIN JHL 40 INYBNDIO-TI GAY O1
NOXVL NOUIY JANLD3H402 ONY ATRLYIOIMH
SVIY JUS ONY S13RI1S WOU! CANVTDD 38 OL SIMYY 831ZY 1TS- | gone NVGINYH
“ATRLMOIH 02192409 38 GWIOHS ORNUR! SMYdIY ANY
“SO0W]d MVE U21g¥ ONY ATMGIM 039193dSN 70 OL BY S99N2 11S ZHI
*OISIWAVAS AVINS SVIAY TTL 6319389 34 OL SIOMId LTS*
“SVR 3115 O3MNN1SIG 0335 GNY ToSdOL-
“Std ATING D¥S GNNOWNS $O¥E GHYS-
“ORMAONE 7a OL NONLDILOXd LTT BARN SMAAVON
*cai7aaa 74 01 S3DNId 1S-
“SBA TV LY #09 78 TYHS HONIL Nd 40 HUONG RIWOCWH
“CEMOSSITHOIO Fa 01 SLTULNO 01 SOVE ONS
“SHVTd JOVMVUC GLYAWYOLS NO NMOS SW SATTLNO OL SNOCWD
YOY GAY OH CIAO FHL TIVISN “CLTTIEHO) RY SAO THY DNO-
“TORNYH BALVAHYOLS HOW 40 LTTLNO O1 HOH OAL So¥® ONVS~
"NOLLINALSNOD JOVMIVAD UILVAI003 | SIMARTS/AALVAKIOS
OMELITEHOD UALSY ATELVITINM! SYTUY IO THONAH ONY WoSdOl- | ARLYAARGARS
“SHOLLWAYIG.
MOU AVAY TYRIZIWH 20¥JUNS 1970 GNY YOM Juld 17910ed
01 ONY HONT#L 40 20S HOH NO GFDWId 39 01 TVI9LYH G3LVAYIXG-
“SeMOMHAMA AWE JG MOU TTERO}
MALAY SAVOL MHJIN O37 NHOULAH 39 01 SVRUV C2G8N1SK TV"
“SMOMHLYYT NWT 40 NOISSTODEd
AIMS OL CRRILTY AIJAISSTUDON 78 GL SYTEY OL S302 17HS-
“OMONIHHOD SYHOMHLSYS OL
WOfMs ORLINGASHOD 79 C4 TOVMVHO LALVAHEOLS ONY os wannas- a
OMINTHHOD 240.36 VEY O31 YNWON NHLIM SMIVHO NOISU3AM] 31770HO2-
noUaOs30 BVH
WV890Ud INIHIOVNWYW 11S
Page 99
UNL YNOIS stun _aivo rss strum} _31¥a TO
Ed ns| S0°US OZEGS0 anne “OLT Ald ONYTSNI23N0 S1RLHDaY | aca Ga aa a. UJON a poe SS, See ees ||
we nmrau nero sie GIN'ALa VSOON NVIGUIA| sees ib ides se od : var TEMS EE] enna
70 3SVHd|VSOON ~ 3AIN0 ONVIMIA 8 AVM WHI¥ eatmooncen MAWES P 90d earl eons |_|
OYLNOD LNIHIGIS % NOISONI € 39V1S ~ VSOON NYVIGIIA suszuyfue Suniasv09 | aR) weg Ta eaten ||
SYM TAI JO ONIDVLS LN3Wd0139A30 adasod0ud WVITTMOW OFLNYD wenn el eee 5
MOJLONULSHOD Od LON AUVAIAITSUd ToTsras wma
. . . BONSHdS “NVIQUIN HUYNH 1° ANNO) VOAIM JO HSRI¥d —__
[ o32nG7uHN OSz4 }
oc a $ 4
“GOR JONWNBLNIVH
#0 ONG TLNN 80 OFSNOB 2ONOT ON TUNA SHAR) IVAN
“HRIVHDSHD DL BOR St ~ $9 40 JONYY BAL
HLS 39 LSM U3LVM CAYTDIOTS BL OHO HL
SGLYHEINS WANT! KMSdAD SI O3SN_ 38 OL
ANQOY ONILYWII0H FHL “RIT Bid SHYLOLTE OS NYHL
‘S577 gO ANJINOD 20 ISS1) OOS O20NIdSNS TWI01 ¥
FYRELUMD OMMOTIOA HL AISUYS LSM
AMIS 3HL HOSS O2OSYHISH BALWA JD ALITYND 3HL “3SHNODUILYM
WYJQISNMOO 3H1 OLM SNOUYHISIO OL HONd OULVIAL ONY CILS3t
*G2UOLNOM 39 TIVHS CMOd LNGWO3S JHA M U3LYA 3193710)
*ATRLVIOZMHD SVULLY@ ONY CNOd DL JOWNW wNOIS ANY wi¥dTH-
“SENTHIOS ORLY NNI 40 SLSISNOI ONOd
HL 40 ALDYAY? JL JO %0S NIM STYRGIVH GALYTNNTODY JANIE
ONY SLNIAZNIVE UBL ONY ATHIIM SCNDd NOLLYINIRID3S LI9CSNI*
SY TTI
INOMYON
“RINTYA 3HL 40 DNYYN)DO-RI GICAY OL
NOVEL NOTLOY BAUITNNO) ONY AT2.L¥TO2WHI
SVIYY I1IS ONY SLAMS HOUS CINVID 3d 02 S} NYY YILIY L1S~
“ATALWIO3HM 09129447 70 QINOHS OIHNDIN SHIVdTY ANY
*SOOIN3d NVA AAL4¥ ONY ATAJIM CALIRdSNI FA OL FYV SINT LS 3HL-
“QUSTISVAS ATIM S¥THY TIL G34I283 38 OL $39N3I LTIS-
“S.VIUY 2105 GIGANASIO GIIS ONY TosdoL:
“Slld ATIND DYS GNNOMUNS SOYA GHYS~
“ORUIADYd 38 01 NOWLIILOAG 1TTN SUDA
“URIDINE FO OL SIINH LTS:
“SIWIL TIV £¥ GOS) 70 TVHS HONTEL HISNT] RANIXYH >
“SHV JOYNVEO UBLYMNUOLS NO KAOHS SY SLIUNO OL SHOIBYD
220d GAY 9008 O3EHNO FHL TIVLSH) 'G9L3%GHO) 3B¥ SHAM Tie ZKO-
“TIONNYH YALYANYOLS HOV 40 17110 OL HOH OMI SOV GNYS~
NY ESNOD JOWNTWYT YILVMIOOY
DNUZWHOD U319¥ ATALYKGHIA SYTKY HO TNTYOAH ONY WOSdOL+
*SNDULYAYIX3
LA3HS by “ee
HOW AVAY TWRELYN 3DYsHNS 1270 ONY XHOM 2dld 1231080
OL ONY HONZAL 40 3615 HOH NO CHDV1d 29 01 TYRGIYH O21YAYIXG-
“SHUOMHLSYA NG 30 NOLIN?
WGLAY SAGE HUA OJNDINHOUOAH 20 OL S¥FAY CaMUNISIO V¥-
“SHNOMHLAY2 YING 40 NOSSO
AMS OL ORALIY ATAASSIUDOAd Fd OL SYR 01 SINGS LS-
“DNONINHD] SHBOMHLUV3 OL
wORSd CILWISHOD 7A OL IOVMIVED UPLVAHYOLS ONY GNOd INIIOS-
“SUOMI
OMDNIHHOD IOITT VIEW COLYNWON NUM SHTYEO NOISH3AIO 3177RHOD-
HOLLEDSO Bird
HY90Ud LNSHEDYNVH LTS:
“QaSIHGY 1S ATI S¥Ta¥
TUL SYRBOMHIAYS 3G JO OND JHE AY SVTd MU NIVHY OL SONOd INFMADIS T1¥ “S|
“NOLL NHSHO
30 SAYO 4 NAUIIN CLO WINOMOAH CNY G3110N OYEL 78 OL
RW STOOLS WS OMENDM "SRMLIMNGS WAV] ABVEDEWAL TW “Hh
“YN
WULYMHLOLS 30 NOLTIHOD LY FOV MI 28 OL NOILIALOSd Lid ATIND “El
“SJOMHLW YN 40 GNA 1¥ 39V1d WO 3d OL SIN LIS TY
“YOY FUANIOLS WOSAIL LY NOUITLOYd DNI4 11S TWHOILOCY 300K 44]
“OMINHL TYNE 40
SAYO NGAIS NIKLIM “UBI0DIdS SW “OFHITINOMCA 78 FIVHS SVRIY T1¥ “OU
“LNGONDANAIIANS FHL AB OALTTG SY BO NMOHS SHOULY301 LY F130
NORLD310Nd LIT GAG HLUM INVOYODDY ME NOLIALOd 10S JAVH OL SL31M “6
“SLBA ATINO GAY HOLLINULSNOD WYZAISHMDG ANY 42310%d CNY SNOSLICNDD
RGHAVIM ONTIVARHd ZH. BOLINON TIVNS BOLIVHLNOD FHL SIL WV yO]
1 TWAUMZINI SL | SYROLNOD
te
DDN LNIWIOS AdYuOdHaL
Niv8 440 10) ANWeD?WaL OD BD Dm
SWY¥O 3D3H) 90H
NIS¥@ LNINIDIS AYVEOdWIL CX
YILVMWYOIS G3S0dddd
“171LNO KY 01 3089
JALLISOd CALUNEINND JAYH TIYHS SHIVEO JIVAS/RNVE BULINIId TY *t
“GGIZLON 2D DAAGISEO $1 IOVHYO NIH ATIAMOMNI TITY 38 TKS S3HAIO ‘
“EIWH AG 30IN90 JOWEDIS IHL 4O ALIVAY) IHL S320:
NI¥aQ 330 LN ONILSIX
NIVAG 440 LN) ININVHIId G3S0dDYd = —&= <—
STOHNYN UBLYMAYOLS 03S0d0ud @
40 Sz0vES
"UN BARU ONY TAGIA LY ALIMIVS
NMOCHSWA OMILSIX] 351 “SOVOY WTA NO TIAVYL OL dled SITAHIA
NOILINGLSNOD WO WAGHTY ONYS/1NI0 YC4 JOVW IB OL NOIStAOY '€]
“STIYMOVGH 1FTND URLYMHOLS LY
Q30AOHd 39 OL S3UNSYIN INTHIDVNWH LIS ONY NONIBO¥d BOIS “Z|
“ATNO SLNSHPHNDIE
WINNIN 32¥ ONIMYED SIHL NO NMOHS SIUNSWIW * NYUOONd WHOM NO INVONEdIO
ANJONLINRISANS: IMA HIM NOILYLINSNOD Nb LIS NO GANAEIO 30 OL SAUNSYIH
OUND) NOLLYLTS DYB ONS GNY 3N3d LIS 30 NOIISOd CNY INBLX3 4}
VIN¥ Td SHMOMHLYY] XING dasodded
vaud¥ AN? SHYOMHLYYI XING 13SQd0ed
ALVY YRLYMWHOLS 03S0d0ud cp
3381 ONILSIXG &3
(ON) BBLLVA WNS/1N) ANVROdWAL
S3L0N TOYINO) INIWID3S ONY NOISOUI
Page 100
Vel 90'UF OCE ESO nnn
“QLT Ald ONY 1SN333N0 S102LIHUY VAT
wey
oset
sa tore OD ST
G11 Ald VSOON NVIQIIA
b a)
S0 3SVHd|¥SOON - JAIN ONY IM3IA 8 AVM YWIV
TOULNOD LN3WIGIS 8 NOISOY3
SMYOM TIAID JO ONIDVLS
Fun sean
€ DVS ~ VSOON NVIGIUIA
LNAWd013A30 G3SO0d0ud
- A370
FNLYNAS:
TR vrs4 Teo a aN
Y4JON
iv)
Insane [SS “Tanap Ant pm) aes A] ae aod BS
myeyen enoe lgengoeh rm wapeeg Poe eee
MSS AsvenaTR | id Tee ident dagasbabibeolthontee’
3S) AuvewaTzua | 2d hanan ta ta peiese) nee SREY
AS30073 NOLYHUOS_ WAND:
iz
“sata pemcin ie age LAD
NES are tee sere nt pgs oe)
EN DOTTY DT
WOILSNYLSNOD HOF LOM AXWNIAITSUd
1 Q3NGIYNN OST +
N
{O'N'A) UBLLY¥E Tw1M) AUYaOdW3L
(-wasawa of) sunoino9
ON3d INIWIG3S AUYYOGHIL
mivu 440 1) AUVEOgNaL am]
'
‘SANVE 130"
VIQY Td SABOMHIYVA HWA GIsoddUd
I
MSV@ INTHIOIS AgvaOdHL
VIMY 1M) SXYOMHLYWA NINE ISOddYd
NIV8G 40 LN) ONISIXE
{ONT MILLWE THA/ LN} AYVAOWAL SUL
)
NEO 440! 10) ANINVWYId GISOdOYd
“GORE JNYNGLNIYH
40 ONG WLAN 40 ORMNOR! Y2ONO1 ON WLAN 3DA30 NVINIH
“POMWHISH OL BORId ST ~ SY 90 JONVY HL
MHLUM 39 LSM 3LVA 031VINII01T/ 341 40 HO ML.
ABLVHENS WHDTVH WASAAD SI ISA 30 OL
AN3DY_DNILYTNDI01S FHL “THLNT W3d SHVUONTIH 0S NVHL
‘SS71 40 INUINDD JO SSA] ONOS GIGWIESNS T¥LOL ¥
FYRGIRD DHNOTIOS IHL
BUS 31 KOM OF9YVHISIO UALVA JO ALMYND IML
WV2Y1SNMOO THL OLN) OMDSYHDSIG 01 YORd OFLVINL ONY CHESRL
“Q3YOLMON 39 TIS GNOd INGHIORS 3H1 NI Y31¥M O3L93110)
“SULNOIN
SULLYA ONY ONOd OL JOYHYO BNOIS ANY xIVaTY-
“SLNIWOIS 03 40 SASISNOD COG
BML JO ALDYd¥? 2H4 40 %0S NIH STVUZIYN OILY WHTDIV IAOHIE
GUY SINBAINVY B3LJ¥ ONY ATOM
JOVNIVY YILYMWYOLS GISOdddd
TIOHNYH YILVMWYDIS G3ISOdDUd
JLV89 WILYMHNOLS GISddOYd
FFIL ONILSIXI
“TUN WYd JHL 40 2VHNIIO-TY OKAY OL
NODIVL NOUIY 3ALLIZWNO ONY ADLVIOINM
SVASY ALS ONY STRAUS OYA OINVIT) 3G Ob SI NIVE UILIV LTS:
*ATALVIGN 03193449 79 OMOHS GIUNDIG SMIVdTY ANY
"SCORES HIVE ABLAY ONY ATHI9N 09193dSM 30 OL SUV S3INI LWS IHL
“OYSHHUVIS ATI SVIEV THA C3L9IU9 FB OL SMG 175-
“S.WRIV 31S 03010 0335 ONY WOSdOL~
“$id ATIND OVS ONNOUNS SOB GNYS~
“SIMA TTY L¥ 90S) 30 TTYHS HON:
"OIMOIS SIMHOI30
“SHY Td JOVRIVED YALYMHYOLS HO NMOHS SY
¥90Y ONY 109 G3dWNG IHL TIVISN C3L7%HO? 3
“TOUNWH UFLYMRYOIS HOV3 40177190 OL HOM
04 ONY HONGUL 30 30S HOM NO 0:
UOLav SAVOL NIMLIM 0342
“OMINIHHOD SXYOMHIEVI OL
BORId GL NYLSNO) 20 OL IOVNIVET BILYMHYOLS ONY ONDE INGKIOIS-
*SHMOMHLUVD
ONTDNBHHO) 340430 VIUY OFLYNINON NHLIM SNYUO NOISYIAIO 3131¢H02-
OUaOs30
WV8D0Nd ININZDVNVW LTS
“OISNUBVLS ATING SVREY
S3L0N TOYLNO) LN3WIGIS ONY NOISCYI
BONS dS NVIOYIN
BOTISHdS *NVIGIU3N HOUWN 3° ALNNOD “WOAIM 5° HSV
Ne
S98R'dS UO 4 107 7 OS9BBLaS VO ELL 107 SuNazue]
(22unqeg) EU (S19) Aqsedosg uowaro) Z “4
ROISEISHO ALesaoud Waa
wage
LIGHS LY He
Page 101
Attachment Attachment 22: Gas Pill Screening Page 60
Page 102
Landscaping to screen gas pill
Page 103
og AMNGE) | | AYLN]A GNVIMGIA « € 390VLS VSOON NVIQIYIA NV1d HDLAaNS
Page 104
Attachment Attachment 23: Freshwater Habitat Sketch & Sections Page 61
Page 105
a 06 OER) ee.
LO M3lA3¥ LVLIGVH DOYS “ © FDVLS YSOON NVICIXIA
NV1d HOLINS
» ~\
Yo Nwomedy
ob Wlsval uvmpy ANSHa* —
ua) sink Swany
‘Ube ol TW
\wt “aexonod byisya\
“AAD -Dho avneng oa ;
Veli RBA
45) Dia ~aon fof uaa
4
Moe
iia
é L_. Gawindy
cary aM
Yting 40 4A
ae
Joop: Feiws"
.\
——
YW ob
NV 1d Aa»
Page 106
BERR Oe wooav | Mwaa M3IAaY LVLISVH DOYS “ € SDVIS YVSOON NVICIYIA Vv NOILI3S [ _ NW1d Ady
Page 107
IMM aBSisss sores: RB Re ee ee eee MalAaY LVLISWH DOU “ © SDVIS YSOON NVICIYIA WOL S 0 §-8 NOILD3S [ Co 7 Tad bye Jo sang —— NVW1d Aad
Used in these records
About this file
- File size
- 42.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.