06/0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published] · 132006.823

17.

18.

18.

19,

19.

20.

20.

The response provided for Item 16 details the operation of the remaining ‘1 space per 10
accommodation units’ spaces. As noted in this response, not all individual uses comply with
the Driveways and Carparking Code requirements. However, it is stressed that the
development should be considered as a ‘holistic’ resort rather than a compilation of
component uses.

Please provide clarification regarding the availability of car spaces associated with Blocks E,
K, M, N &V. For instance, please detail whether each unit will be designated a specific
space (i.e. through line marking), and if so, please detail how staff and service providers will
be aware of the spaces not being utilised by guests.

Villa Buildings A (B), B (C), C (D), E (G), F (J) and J (Q) will be allocated specific car parking
spaces as will the resort's penthouse units.

As identified in Item 16, each of the 6 penthouse units and 1 of the non-penthouse units
within Buildings G (K), H (M) and i (N) will be provided with a permanently allocated tandem
parking space (ie. for parking for two cars).

The remaining accommodation units in Buildings D (E), G (K), H (M) and | (N) will be
allocated a parking space on arrival (ie. at check-in), with this parking space remaining
allocated for the unit guests entire duration of stay.

Resort management will operate a suitable ‘car park allocation/booking’ system similar to that
used in other resorts to coordinate and manage car park allocation for guests.

Resort staff will be allocated car parking, by resort management, which will be provided within
the remaining 10 tandem car parking spaces (ie. parking for up to 20 cars).

It is noted that there is a discrepancy between accommodation unit numbers and spaces
available in the main residential Blocks (i.e. K, M & N). Please provide justification with
regard to the functionality of this operation.

As detailed previously in Items 16 and 18, the number of penthouse units and one of the non-
penthouse units will be provided with a tandem parking space (ie. car parking for 2 cars).
The remaining 138 units will be allocated a single space each. It is noted that the numbers of
single spaces available in each basement does not directly correlate with the number of
apartments in the associated building. However due to the proximity of the buildings to each
other and luggage drop-off facilities provided, it is considered these circumstances are able to
be successfully managed by the resort operator.

Table 3.1 of the Traffic Impact Assessment expresses a ‘surplus’ of car parking. However it
is noted that this calculation includes the double garages servicing the self-contained ‘villas’.
As the additional space attributed to each villa will not reasonably be able to accommodate
the shortfall of car parking from the main accommodation and central facilities blocks, it is
considered these should not be included in the on-site car parking calculations.

A summary of the carparking requirements, separating the Villa accommodation from the
Apartments and Central Facilities is provided in Item 16 of this Response.

Based on the assessment of the resort as an integrated development, it is considered that

there is ample parking provided for the larger accommodation buildings and other ancillary
activities.

Page 14