Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

06/0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published] · 132006.823

of 107

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (42.4 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

29. Please confirm the proposed width of access roads throughout the proposed development.
29. The proposed width of all access roads throughout the development is 5.5 metres.

30. Please provide details regarding the intemal pathway network, including linkages to the
existing pathways/boardwalks outside the site.

30. A Linkages Plan prepared by Edaw AECOM is included as Attachment 14.

Traffic

31. Please provide a complete Traffic and Transport Impact Assessment of the proposed
development. The report should address (but not be limited to):-

31.1 Guest and short-stay visitors access throughout the site;

31.2 Forecasting regarding access modes to the site (for both guests and short-stay
visitors).

31.3 possible pedestrian movements, bicycle traffic and bus movements.

it is advised that this information should reference similar resort operations in South-East
Queensland.

31. A Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by Adam Pekol Consulting was provided in Volume III
of the original development application and therefore an additional Impact Assessment it is
not required. With regard to the issues raised:

31.1& A review of two resorts located within close proximity to the development site was
31.2 undertaken. The following observations were made:

+ 60% of guests staying at Noosa Blue arrive by coach/shuttle bus,
and the remaining 40% arrive by private car.

+ 70% of guests staying at the Sebe/ Resort Noosa arrive by private
car, and the remaining 30% arrived by coach/shuttle bus.

The marked differences in the access mode percentages is contributed to the
star rating of the resorts. The Sebel Resort Noosa has a 4% star rating, whereas
Noosa Blue has a 3 star rating. This difference in quality and price is considered
to attract differing tourist types, with the ‘higher end’ tourist more likely to hire a
car for the duration of their stay in Noosa.

The proposed resort will offer a similar 4% star facility as the Sebel Resort
Noosa. Accordingly, it is anticipated that approximately 70% of guests will
require on-site parking for the length of their stay. The proposed development
provides ample parking facilities to service to estimated demand.

31.3 A Linkages Plan prepared by Edaw AECOM is included as Attachment 14. This

pathway network is anticipated to support both pedestrians and bicycles through
the development.

Page 18

Used in these records

About this file

File size
42.4 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

06_0823 - Applicant's Response to Information Request including Attachments [As Published].pdf · 42.4 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.