Original source · versioned page text
PM Submission - Kathleen Passenger - MCU21/0110
Subject: MCU21/0110 NOOSA SPRINGS From: Kay Passenger Date: 2021-12-15T02:11:56+00:00 To: Mailbox Council Mail You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important<http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> External sender. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual or impersonates staff. Attention Assessment Manager. Attached please find submission in protest against the above development. [Attachment: IMG_20211215_120507__01.jpg (image text)] Notice of Submission fo) NOOSA COUNCIL | um ure that your submiseion 18 properly made you muat ens To ensure y a made electronically 14. be made to the nasesement manager 2 be in writing aa i by each person who made the eubmiasion unless the submi , cet pat itp! ; a submis and residential or business address of each person who made th yur support of Oppose and why a 4. state the name % state what aspects of the plan or proposed development yc & be received by Council during the formal public notification period wor ' , i Council's website 016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on ae acta oop earch engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of w As required by the Planning Act z and therefore will be accessible to internet & they are properly made Meee - - . ; I € WIGS drive Noam Heads File No. YY\ CLAAI/OIIO Postal address of Land (as advertised) Z/No 05a < y J ; of Use-Aesort laripletx (a uncts) Nature of Proposed Development Ma tera | Chas v4 Cc 2. Submitter details asseng Cr Full name of Submitter K A thl ee nN Email address (preferable) ky 5aS5S enae cH gona i { ~COWNS : « Postal address |S 2 4] / hakey 1Eu9 R\ se State Qid Postcode 1+ 5-4 7 Suburb MNlag sa tHeadSs ‘ned for the convenience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to Signature(s a ‘ ignature(s) Al ade N.BThis form has been desi use this form 3. Details of Submission | (tte), make the following submission: This development, if approved, will severely impact my quality of life with increase of traffic noise. Development is immediately opposite my residence. We were told at a meeting at Noosa Springs that no traffic during construction and upon completion, would be undertaken from Resort Drive. According to the development map, this is not true with the only entry to the new development being at the bottom of Resort Drive, using the existing back entrance to Noosa Springs Resort Complex. The traffic that now uses Resort Drive is continuous and Parkridge is still not yet fully occupied and the new restaurant is due to open shortly. This road is narrow and needs a speed reduction and speed reduction ramps at 30KPH as speeding is already a problem. Ife scooters and e bikes are to be used from this entrance a very dangerous situation will occur as the road is steep and is our only pedestrian access to the lower resort. It is used continually with walkers and dog walkers. A statement in the development application "the likel us situation already exists with the narrow entrance/exit road - Links the road would be completely concern" is completely wrong as a dangero Drive. In the event of an accident/stalled car on this road there is no other exit and blocked. In an emergency situation, such as a bush fire with many cars trying to exit, any delay could be Pe catastrophic. This narrow road does not seem to have been considered under the DA. additional accommodation using Resort Drive, Kathleen Passenger
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (PM Submission - Kathleen Passenger - MCU21_0110.msg)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.