Council archive · source document
Properly Made submission (support) - Glenn Ainsworth - MCU12.0023 · MCU12/0023
liliiiiiiii
80478684 L
date 14th May 2012
reference
Chief Executive Officer
Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Locked Bag 72
.
Sunshine Coast Mail Centre Q 4560
attention Development Officer in Charge
re Letter of Support . Deve.lopment Counter
Essencia of Peregian Beach ’
Peregian Beach’ -
6 JUN 2012
Council Development: MCU 12/0023 .
215-219 David Low Way Peregian Beach
Tewantin
To Whom It May Concern:
.1 write in support of the abovementioned development and object to the views o~ the Peregian
Beach Community Association. After viewing the advertised plans displayed at the development.
site and reading previous media articles surrounding the development I am perplexed at the
reasoning’s behind the objections to the planned amendments. I am also part of the Peregian
Beach community and offer the following:
I
. The proposed balconies provide flow through ventilation for the units and reduce the need
for mechanical ventilation. This sustainable alternative is enough in itself to mitigate any
possible ’noise’ pollution that would be caused by users of the balconies.
.
. The balconies are eastfacing on to. David Low Way. Traffic using this roadway generates
_a...higher decibel of noise than would be expected from residents of the proposed
develo"pment.
. The noise produced by the residents of the propos d development would be of arguably
less volume than that produced by the previous caravan park residents.
. The outdool dining proposed for Essencia of Peregian Beach has a landscaping buffer as
well as what seems to’ b a floor level lower th~n the existing roadway. Both these
mitigating factors will work as acoustic barriers to any noise produced by restaurant
activiti.es.
. All the restaurants in the village have outdoor dining. It is one of the great pleasures that
makes Peregian Village what it is. I am sure even members of the. community association
have divulged in this very popular past time enjoyed by both tourists and locals most
nights of the week.
. The development will be adjacent to another popular venue being the Peregian Beach
Hotel. It is widely. understood’ that noise from a hotel is one of the biggest factors of
complaints against them. From rrlY experience the noise generated from the hotel is
negligible. During the proposed hpurs of dining that Essimcia of PefJ n ~ea ould
offer I can’t see why the same responsible management of noise w ula.
the community.
~6 JUN 2012
Il’\"2-
r SeRe
! ?:LD~. R’ ""~....
Tewantin
OJ
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
\,
,
Essencia of Peregian
Page 2
14/05/2012
I tender the above reasoning without prejudice and am unaware of the circumstances behind the
complaints and objections provided by the Peregian Beach Community Association. I feel their
complaints are hypocritical and baseless not to mention being a significant time and financial
burden to both the developer and council. The objections raised to the above development may
be the views of the Peregian Beach Community Association but are not the views of the Peregian
Beach community.
Used in these records
Properly Made submission (support) - Glenn Ainsworth - MCU12.0023Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 846 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.