Original source · versioned page text
Protected Plant Survey
Attached to the e-mail SWMP & Protected Plant Survey - 3 of 4 MCU16/0081.
The original of this document is very large (11.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
J000206-003-R-Rev0 June 2016
8.0 FIELD SURVEY RESULTS
8.1 Vegetation Communities
Two vegetation communities were present within the survey area and are detailed in Table 4, below and
presented on Figure 1.
Table 4 - Vegetation Communities Summary
Vegetation / RE ID Description
Acacia leiocalyx subsp. Leiocalyx, Allocasuarina littoralis, Alphitonia excels,
Corymbia intermedia, Eucalyptus resinifera, Lophostemon suaveolens,
Regrowth vegetation Melaleuca quinquenervia and Syncarpia glomulifera regrowth to
approximately between 6 to 10 m (Refer Photograph 1, above) with sparse
emergent individuals.
Dense grassland dominated by Setaria sphacelata var. sericea, Pteridium
Powerline easement - esculentum, Imperata cylindrical, Melinis minutiflora and Cymbopogon
Slashed / Cleared area refractus to 1.5 m. Wetter areas contained sedges (Refer Photograph 2,
above)
8.2 Flora Survey
A total 129 flora species were identified within the survey area and are presented in Appendix H. No species
considered endangered, vulnerable or near threatened under the VM act were identified. Additionally, no
species considered protected under the EPBC act were identified. Vegetation encountered during the survey
was highly disturbed and modified within the powerline easement. The remainder of the Site surveyed
contained regrowth Eucalyptus vegetation.
9.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of this assessment indicated that the entire Survey Area had previously been cleared and is
considered non remnant vegetation by Regional Ecosystem mapping. An aerial photograph review of the
survey area confirmed clearing occurred between 1979 and 1993.
The field survey confirmed this Regional Ecosystem mapping, however two vegetation associations were
identified within the Survey Area. These vegetation associations were not based on Regional Ecosystem
mapping as the entire area is considered non remnant. A total of four meandering transects were undertaken
across the Survey Area in accordance with The Guidelines.
The desktop assessment identified a total of 25 significant flora species from the data base searches. Of these
a total of 13 were identified as potentially occurring on the site based on habitat suitability within the Site and
immediate surrounding area.
No species considered endangered, vulnerable or near threatened (EVNT) under the VM act were identified.
Additionally, no species considered protected under the EPBC act were identified. It should be noted that
discussions with DEHP outlined:
There is no requirement to conduct a flora survey within that section of a buffer zone area that is protected
area estate (Noosa National Park); and consequently,
A client is NOT required to seek reduced buffer approval from EHP to survey only that reduced buffer zone
area that is outside the protected estate.
It is recommended that this report is submitted to the EHP outlining that the proposed clearing activity is exempt
under section 261ZA – No EVNT species were identified on site or immediate surrounding area.
10.0 CLOSURE
Should you require any further information please contact the undersigned. We draw your attention to the
document, Limitations, which is included in Appendix H.
13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.