Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

07/1993 - Op Works - landscaping, carparking, access, frontage works, stormwater, erosion & sediment control [As Published] · 142007.1993

of 34

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

‘

~ INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 20, 2 April 2007

 

State-controfied road matters 2. The application involves: (tick applicable box/es)

For more Information refer to Guide 3, [1 (i) development on tand contiguous’ to a State controlled road and for -
Unless you answered "none of the above” to Q2, . . .

the application triggers referral to the Department KI (a) material change of use assessable against the planning scheme;

of Main Roads (DMR) as a referral agency.

nfiguri fot un! -
incon DMR wi be an C0 (b) reconfiguring a fot unless

agency, while in other circumstances DMR wit « the total number of lots is not increased; and

be a concurrence agency. « the total number of lots abutting the State-controlled road is not increased;
Schele 2 of the F Reautation wil . tyou t Oo operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the
concurrence agency for the application. planning scheme or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in (b) above)—

associated with access to a State-controlled road; or

© for filling or excavation; or

e involving the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land, through a
pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625 cm? that directs stormwater to a
State-controlled road.

LC (ii) development on land not contiguous to a State-controlled road and -
(1 (a) material change of use —
* assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
« mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by
that schedule;
(CJ (b) reconfiguring a lot for a purpose mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP regulation
and exceeding the thresholds set by that schedule;
[1 (c) operational work (not associated with a material change of use assessable against the
planning scheme or reconfiguring a fot mentioned in (b) above)—
« assessable against the local government's planning scheme; and
mentioned in schedule 5 of the IP Regulation and exceeding the thresholds set by

 

that schedule.

EK (iii) none of the above
Clearing vegetation 3. The application involves: (tick applicable box/es)
For more information refer to Guide 12. Oo (i) material change of use -
Unless answered “none of the above” to Q3, . .
the appreatin requires assessment by the (a) assessable against the planning scheme;
Pannen ot Natal Resoures and Water (b) on alot containing -
ifan agency other than NRW is the assessment * acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of assessable vegetation; or
manager for the application, NRW is a ; « ifthere is no property map of assessable vegetation for the lot - remnant vegetation;
onurence agency fr the application In relation (c)_ where the existing use of the land is a rural or environmental use; and
ifyou ticked Q3() oF (I), your application requires {d) where the size of the land is 2 hectares or larger - complete Part J of Form 1
feferrat to NRW for assessment regardless of C(ii) reconfiguring a lot -

whether vegetation clearing is proposed or not. .

(a) on alot containing a category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a property map of
assessable vegetation or, if there is no property map of assessable vegetation for
the lot, remnant vegetation;

(b) where the size of the lot before the reconfiguration is 2 hectares or larger;
(c) where 2 or more lots are created; and
(d) where the size of any lot created is 25 hectares or smaller - complete Part J of Form 1
Didi) operational work -
(a) for the clearing of native vegetation where the vegetation clearing is made
assessable under Schedule 8 of the IPA; and
(b) not associated with a material change of use assessable against the planning

scheme mentioned in (i) or reconfiguring a lot mentioned in {ii) - complete Part J of
Form?

(iv) none of the above.

 

Strategic port land 4, The application involves:

1 vey) te en wish [1 (i) development on strategic port land as defined in the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (TI
you i} - the relevant Por Authonty is the
assessment manager for the application, Act) - complete Part lof Form 1

Ifyou ticked (i) Queensland Transport Is a (1 (ii) a material change of use that is inconsistent with the land use plan approved under the
concurrence agency for the application. TI Act for the strategic port !and - complete Part! of Form 1

LX] (iii) none of the above

 

 

4 Land contiguous to a State-contolted road is defined in schedule 14 of the IP Regulation to mean tand - if part of the land is within 100m of the State-controlted road; or that Is pari of a future State-
controlled road.

Page 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.1 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_1993 - Op Works - landscaping, carparking, access, frontage works, stormwater, erosion & sediment control [As Published].pdf · 3.1 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.