Original source · versioned page text
Appendix F- State Code 1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road
environment
State Development Assessment Provisions guideline - State Code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment. This guideline provides direction on how to
address State Code 1.
Table 1.1 Development in general
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Buildings, structures, infrastructure, services and utilities
PO1 The location of the development does not AO1.1 Development is not located in a state- Complies.
create a safety hazard for users of the state- controlled road.
controlled road. The proposal is not within a state controlled road.
AND
AO1.2 Development can be maintained without
requiring access to a state-controlled road.
PO2 The design and construction of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
development does not adversely impact the
structural integrity or physical condition of the No works along the state controlled road are proposed.
state-controlled road or road transport
infrastructure.
PO3 The location of the development does not No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
obstruct road transport infrastructure or No works along the state controlled road are proposed.
adversely impact the operating performance of
the state-controlled road.
PO4 The location, placement, design and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable.
operation of advertising devices, visible from
the state-controlled road, do not create a No advertising devices proposed.
safety hazard for users of the state-controlled
road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 1 of 18
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 17 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO5 The design and construction of buildings AO5.1 Facades of buildings and structures Complies.
and structures does not create a safety hazard fronting the state-controlled road are made of
by distracting users of the state-controlled non-reflective materials. No built form is proposed.
road.
AND
AO5.2 Facades of buildings and structures do
not direct or reflect point light sources into the
face of oncoming traffic on the state-controlled
road.
AND
AO5.3 External lighting of buildings and
structures is not directed into the face of
oncoming traffic on the state-controlled road.
AND
AO5.4 External lighting of buildings and
structures does not involve flashing or laser
lights.
PO6 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges AO6.1 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges Not applicable.
over a state-controlled road are designed and over the state-controlled road include throw
constructed to prevent projectiles from being protection screens in accordance with section
thrown onto the state-controlled road. 4.11 of the Design Criteria for Bridges and
Other Structures Manual, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2020.
Landscaping
PO7 The location of landscaping does not AO7.1 Landscaping is not located in a state- Not applicable.
create a safety hazard for users of the state- controlled road.
controlled road.
AND
AO7.2 Landscaping can be maintained without
requiring access to a state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 2 of 18
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO7.3 Landscaping does not block or obscure
the sight lines for vehicular access to a state-
controlled road.
Stormwater and overland flow
PO8 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. No stormwater will be directed to the state-controlled
the development site does not create or road.
exacerbate a safety hazard for users of the
state-controlled road.
PO9 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. No stormwater will be directed to the state-controlled
the development site does not result in a road.
material worsening of the operating
performance of the state-controlled road or
road transport infrastructure.
PO10 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. No stormwater will be directed to the state-controlled
the development site does not adversely impact road.
the structural integrity or physical condition of
the state-controlled road or road transport
infrastructure.
PO11 Development ensures that stormwater is AO11.1 Development does not create any new No stormwater will be directed to the state-controlled
lawfully discharged. points of discharge to a state-controlled road. road.
AND
AO11.2 Development does not concentrate
flows to a state-controlled road.
AND
AO11.3 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 3 of 18
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO11.4 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of
discharge to the state-controlled road.
Flooding
PO12 Development does not result in a AO12.1 For all flood events up to 1% annual Not applicable.
material worsening of flooding impacts within a exceedance probability, development results
state-controlled road. in negligible impacts (within +/- 10mm) to The proposed development will result in no change to
existing flood levels within a state-controlled the flood levels within he state-controlled road. The
road. areas subject to flood hazard remain un-changed.
AND
AO12.2 For all flood events up to 1% annual
exceedance probability, development results
in negligible impacts (up to a 10% increase) to
existing peak velocities within a state-
controlled road.
AND
AO12.3 For all flood events up to 1% annual
exceedance probability, development results
in negligible impacts (up to a 10% increase) to
existing time of submergence of a state-
controlled road.
Drainage Infrastructure
PO13 Drainage infrastructure does not create a AO13.1 Drainage infrastructure is wholly No drainage infrastructure is required for the proposed
safety hazard for users in the state-controlled contained within the development site, except development.
road. at the lawful point of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 4 of 18
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO13.2 Drainage infrastructure can be
maintained without requiring access to a state-
controlled road.
PO14 Drainage infrastructure associated with, No acceptable outcome is prescribed. No drainage infrastructure is required for the proposed
or within, a state-controlled road is development.
constructed, and designed to ensure the
structural integrity and physical condition of
existing drainage infrastructure and the
surrounding drainage network.
Table 1.2 Vehicular access, road layout and local roads
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Vehicular access to a state-controlled road or within 100 metres of a state-controlled road intersection
PO15 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
new or changed access to a state-controlled
road does not compromise the safety of users of The new access crossover is from Pearsons Rd.
the state-controlled road. No access is proposed from the State Controlled
Road and as the proposal does not compromise
the safety of the users of the State Controlled
Road.
PO16 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
new or changed access does not adversely
impact the functional requirements of the state- The new access crossover is from Pearsons Rd.
controlled road. No access is proposed from the State Controlled
Road and as the proposal will not adversely affect
traffic flows along the State Controlled Road.
PO17 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
new or changed access is consistent with the
future intent of the state-controlled road. The proposed access points will not adversely
affect traffic flows given its’ low density nature.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 5 of 18
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO18 New or changed access is consistent with No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
the access for the relevant limited access road
policy: Pearsons Road is not a limited access rd.
1. LAR 1 where direct access is prohibited; or
2. LAR 2 where access may be permitted,
subject to assessment.
PO19 New or changed access to a local road No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-
controlled road does not compromise the safety See response to PO17.
of users of the state-controlled road.
PO20 New or changed access to a local road No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-
controlled road does not adversely impact on the See response to PO17.
operating performance of the intersection.
Public passenger transport and active transport
PO21 Development does not compromise the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
safety of users of public passenger transport
infrastructure, public passenger services and No public transport infrastructure at frontage
active transport infrastructure. where new driveways will be constructed, or
within 100m.
PO22 Development maintains the ability for No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
people to access public passenger transport
infrastructure, public passenger services and No public transport infrastructure at frontage
active transport infrastructure. where new driveways will be constructed, or
within 100m.
PO23 Development does not adversely impact the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
operating performance of public passenger
transport infrastructure, public passenger No public transport infrastructure at frontage
services and active transport infrastructure. where new driveways will be constructed, or
within 100m.
PO24 Development does not adversely impact No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
the structural integrity or physical condition of
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 6 of 18
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
public passenger transport infrastructure and No public transport infrastructure at frontage
active transport infrastructure. where new driveways will be constructed, or
within 100m.
Table 1.3 Network impacts
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO25 Development does not compromise the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
safety of users of the state-controlled road
network. Refer to response to PO1.
PO26 Development ensures no net worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
the operating performance of the state-controlled
road network. Refer to response to PO1.
PO27 Traffic movements are not directed onto a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
state-controlled road where they can be
accommodated on the local road network. Refer to response to PO1.
PO28 Development involving haulage exceeding No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
10,000 tonnes per year does not adversely impact
the pavement of a state-controlled road. Refer to response to PO1.
PO29 Development does not impede delivery of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
planned upgrades of state-controlled roads.
Refer to response to PO1.
PO30 Development does not impede delivery of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
corridor improvements located entirely within
the state-controlled road corridor. Refer to response to PO1.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 18
Page 8
Table 1.4 Filling, excavation, building foundations and retaining structures
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO31 Development does not create a safety No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable.
hazard for users of the state-controlled road or
road transport infrastructure. No earthworks or built form proposed.
PO32 Development does not adversely impact the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
operating performance of the state-controlled
road. Refer to response to PO1 and PO31.
PO33 Development does not undermine, damage No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
or cause subsidence of a state-controlled road.
Refer to response to PO1 and PO31.
PO34 Development does not cause ground water No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
disturbance in a state-controlled road.
Refer to response to PO1 and PO31.
PO35 Excavation, boring, piling, blasting and fill No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
compaction do not adversely impact the physical
condition or structural integrity of a state- Refer to response to PO1 and PO31.
controlled road or road transport
infrastructure.
PO36 Filling and excavation associated with the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies.
construction of new or changed access do not
compromise the operation or capacity of existing Refer to response to PO1 and PO31.
drainage infrastructure for a state-controlled
road.
Table 1.5 Environmental emissions
Statutory note: Where a state-controlled road is co-located in the same transport corridor as a railway, the development should instead comply with Environmental emissions in State code 2:
Development in a railway environment.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Reconfiguring a lot
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 18
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Involving the creation of 5 or fewer new residential lots adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO37 Development minimises free field noise AO37.1 Development provides a noise barrier or Complies.
intrusion from a state-controlled road. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed: The new lot is within a compliant noise impact
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic area (category 0).
levels in reference table 2 (item 2.1);
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO37.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic levels in reference table 2 (item
2.1) by alternative noise attenuation measures
where it is not practical to provide a noise barrier
or earth mound.
OR
AO37.3 Development provides a solid gap-free
fence or other solid gap-free structure along the
full extent of the boundary closest to the state-
controlled road.
Involving the creation of 6 or more new residential lots adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 9 of 18
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO38 Reconfiguring a lot minimises free field AO38.1 Development provides noise barrier or Not applicable.
noise intrusion from a state-controlled road. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item 2.1);
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO38.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic levels in reference table 2 (item
2.1) by alternative noise attenuation measures
where it is not practical to provide a noise barrier
or earth mound.
Material change of use (accommodation activity)
Ground floor level requirements adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO39 Development minimises noise intrusion from AO39.1 Development provides a noise barrier or Not applicable.
a state-controlled road in private open space. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item
2.2) for private open space at the ground
floor level;
2. in accordance with:
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 10 of 18
Page 11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO39.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic level in reference table 2 (item
2.2) for private open space by alternative noise
attenuation measures where it is not practical to
provide a noise barrier or earth mound.
PO40 Development (excluding a relevant AO40.1 Development (excluding a relevant Not applicable.
residential building or relocated residential building or relocated building)
building) minimises noise intrusion from a state- provides a noise barrier or earth mound which is
controlled road in habitable rooms at the designed, sited and constructed:
facade. 1. to achieve the maximum building façade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item 1.1)
for habitable rooms;
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 11 of 18
Page 12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO40.2 Development (excluding a relevant
residential building or relocated building)
achieves the maximum building façade acoustic
level in reference table 1 (item 1.1) for habitable
rooms by alternative noise attenuation
measures where it is not practical to provide a
noise barrier or earth mound.
PO41 Habitable rooms (excluding a relevant No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable.
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials to
achieve the maximum internal acoustic level in
reference table 3 (item 3.1).
Above ground floor level requirements (accommodation activity) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO42 Balconies, podiums, and roof decks include: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable.
1. a continuous solid gap-free structure or
balustrade (excluding gaps required for
drainage purposes to comply with the Building
Code of Australia);
2. highly acoustically absorbent material
treatment for the total area of the soffit above
balconies, podiums, and roof decks.
PO43 Habitable rooms (excluding a relevant No acceptable outcome is provided.
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials
to achieve the maximum internal acoustic level in
reference table 3 (item 3.1).
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 12 of 18
Page 13
Material change of use (other uses)
Ground floor level requirements (childcare centre, educational establishment, hospital) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor
PO44 Development: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable.
1. provides a noise barrier or earth mound that
is designed, sited and constructed:
a. to achieve the maximum free field
acoustic level in reference table 2 (item
2.3) for all outdoor education areas and
outdoor play areas;
b. in accordance with:
i. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier
design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice:
Volume 1 (Road Traffic Noise),
Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013;
ii. Technical Specification-MRTS15
Noise Fences, Transport and Main
Roads, 2019;
iii. Technical Specification-MRTS04
General Earthworks, Transport
and Main Roads, 2020; or
2. achieves the maximum free field acoustic
level in reference table 2 (item 2.3) for all
outdoor education areas and outdoor
play areas by alternative noise
attenuation measures where it is not
practical to provide a noise barrier or earth
mound.
PO45 Development involving a childcare centre No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable.
or educational establishment:
1. provides a noise barrier or earth mound that
is designed, sited and constructed:
2. to achieve the maximum building facade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item
1.2);
3. in accordance with:
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 13 of 18
Page 14
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020; or
4. achieves the maximum building facade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item
1.2) by alternative noise attenuation
measures where it is not practical to provide
a noise barrier or earth mound.
PO46 Development involving: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable.
1. indoor education areas and indoor play
areas; or
2. sleeping rooms in a childcare centre; or
3. patient care areas in a hospital achieves the
maximum internal acoustic level in reference
table 3 (items 3.2-3.4).
Above ground floor level requirements (childcare centre, educational establishment, hospital) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor
PO47 Development involving a childcare centre No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable.
or educational establishment which have
balconies, podiums or elevated outdoor play
areas predicted to exceed the maximum free
field acoustic level in reference table 2 (item 2.3)
due to noise from a state-controlled road are
provided with:
1. a continuous solid gap-free structure or
balustrade (excluding gaps required for
drainage purposes to comply with the Building
Code of Australia);
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 14 of 18
Page 15
2. highly acoustically absorbent material
treatment for the total area of the soffit above
balconies or elevated outdoor play areas.
PO48 Development including: No acceptable outcome is provided. Not applicable.
1. indoor education areas and indoor play
areas in a childcare centre or educational
establishment; or
2. sleeping rooms in a childcare centre; or
3. patient care areas in a hospital located
above ground level, is designed and
constructed to achieve the maximum internal
acoustic level in reference table 3 (items 3.2-
3.4).
Air, light and vibration
PO49 Private open space, outdoor education AO49.1 Each dwelling or unit has access to a Not applicable.
areas and outdoor play areas are protected private open space which is shielded from a
from air quality impacts from a state-controlled state-controlled road by a building, solid gap-
road. free fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
OR
AO49.2 Each outdoor education area and
outdoor play area is shielded from a state-
controlled road by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
PO50 Patient care areas within hospitals are AO50.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed Not applicable.
protected from vibration impacts from a state- to ensure vibration in the patient treatment area
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor. does not exceed a vibration dose value of
0.1m/s1.75.
AND
AO50.2 Hospitals are designed and constructed
to ensure vibration in the ward of a patient care
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 15 of 18
Page 16
area does not exceed a vibration dose value of
0.4m/s1.75.
PO51 Development is designed and sited to No acceptable outcomes are prescribed. Not applicable.
ensure light from infrastructure within, and from
users of, a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor, does not:
1. intrude into buildings during night hours (10pm
to 6am);
2. create unreasonable disturbance during
evening hours (6pm to 10pm).
Table 1.6: Development in a future state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO52 Development does not impede delivery of a AO52.1 Development is not located in a future Not applicable.
future state-controlled road. state-controlled road.
OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:
AO52.2 Development does not involve filling and
excavation of, or material changes to, a future
state-controlled road.
AND
AO52.3 The intensification of lots does not occur
within a future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 16 of 18
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO52.4 Development does not result in the
landlocking of parcels once a future state-
controlled road is delivered.
PO53 The location and design of new or AO53.1 Development does not include new or Not applicable.
changed access does not create a safety hazard changed access to a future state-controlled
for users of a future state-controlled road. road.
PO54 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable.
retaining structures do not undermine, damage
or cause subsidence of a future state-controlled
road.
PO55 Development does not result in a material No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable.
worsening of stormwater, flooding, overland flow
or drainage impacts in a future state-controlled
road or road transport infrastructure.
PO56 Development ensures that stormwater is AO56.1 Development does not create any new Not applicable.
lawfully discharged. points of discharge to a future state-controlled
road.
AND
AO56.2 Development does not concentrate flows
to a future state-controlled road.
AND
AO56.3 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 17 of 18
Page 18
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO56.4 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge
to the future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 18 of 18