Original source · versioned page text
Noel Pearson-Submission to Noosa Shire Council (Good Shepherd College)
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Noel Pearson.
good conscience not want for future children and their parents the same amenity and peace of mind | enjoyed in the use and enjoyment of GSLC’s facilities? This tawdry deal which the current school leaders have led the college into, is a violation of their trusteeship to Good Shepherd Lutheran College as an institution of learning. Right in the middle of the school precinct. At the very corner of its two street frontages. This will mean that neither from the Eumundi-Noosa Road aspect, nor from the Walter Hay Drive aspect, will one’s view of the college not be compromised by the incompatible and quite frankly, ugly, view of a service station as the frontage for the school. Service stations are essential and welcome in appropriate places. In the middle of a school precinct is not an appropriate space, no matter the potential commercial opportunity of its situation for the proponent developers. 2. No other school in the Shire has such an incompatible land use affronting its visual amenity and clear set-aside as a school There is no other school in the region which has such an inappropriate commercial development in the middle of its school precinct: Tewantin, Sunshine Beach, Noosaville — it is inconceivable that those holding these schools in trust would put their schools in such a situation. Would Matthew Flinders school expose their institution to such a foolish prospect as the current school leaders of GSLC are doing? They too deal in real estate and have fiscal challenges they need to resolve: but would they sell their trust for a mess of pottage? The technical basis for the objection to this kind of ugly intrusion into the frontage of a school is visual amenity, but the amenity goes deeper beneath the surface, as | have sought to argue in the first section of this submission. The Noosa community needs good schooling institutions over the next century. Why could not Good Shepherd be as esteemed as my old alma mater, St Peters, in time? Noosa needs first-tier schools for the future: with the capacity to educate children to the highest standards of achievement and social justice. To allow the current school leadership to make a tawdry, short-term, real estate transaction, because of some shortsighted fiscal imperatives, and compromise the long-term vision of the school as one of Noosa’s network of fine schools — is something the Shire Council should step in and avoid. To show a vision which the current school leadership does not. To show a sense of trusteeship which they have failed to uphold. 3. GSLC leaders should not be allowed to make a windfall out of land which it gained from the Shire Council because of its school purposes
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original