Council archive · source document
Minor_Change_Req · 51988.2764.01
Figure 2 Proposed streetscape perspective (Source: Essess Building Design 2022)
Despite the proposed carport seeking a front setback that is less than what has been approved, the proposed
change is suitable on the following basis:
• The Orient Drive streetscape is dominated by high solid fences and walls that contribute to the
overall presence of built form in the streetscape;
• The proposed carport will adjoin the vehicle maneuvering area of the adjoining premises to the
north, rather than their open space or living areas. As such, the carport preserves the amenity
afforded to the adjoining premises and will not compromise their visual or acoustic privacy, or their
access to sunlight and breezes;
• The carport has an overall height of 2.9 metres, being relatively small in scale compared to the
Duplex building onsite;
• The carport will not obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or the habitable
areas of adjoining premises;
• It is not proposed to remove any vegetation in the site’s frontage, which currently buffers or screens
the Duplex development from the street;
• The proposed alteration to the vehicle maneuvering hardstand areas onsite allow the expansion of
the front garden bed, such that the proposed change will allow greater landscaping provision
between the building and the street;
• The proposed carport will not form a dominant feature of the streetscape, given that it is an
unenclosed structure with the most visible feature being 150mm wide guttering/roof fascia; and,
• The proposed carport structure has been carefully designed to integrate into the existing façade of
the Duplex development, so as not to dominate the site’s frontage in any way.
In addition to the above, the proposed carport is consistent with the existing character of the surrounding area,
given that a number of sites along Orient Drive in particular contain enclosed garages and carport structures
directly on the front boundary. Please refer to Figure 3 below, which highlights the location of a range of
buildings and structures that are built to the street frontage, and are therefore similar to or more dominant, in
terms of streetscape appearance, than the proposal.
Page 3 of 8
Our ref: 220325
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor_Change_Req.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.9 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.