Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Meeting papers

of 320

Original PDF page 122, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING                                                   11 JULY 2023



     2. The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO8.1 and corresponding
     Performance Outcome PO8 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as it:
           i. Exceeds site cover requirements of 50% for one storey and 30% for the other storey or
           40% for both storeys;
           ii.    Is not of a scale that is compatible with surrounding development;
           iii.   Has not included the opportunity for soft landscaping between buildings; and
           iv.    Presents an appearance of bulk to adjacent properties.


     3. The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO9.3 and corresponding
     Performance Outcome PO9 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as:
           i. The northern side boundary setback does not comply with minimum side setback
           requirements;
           ii. The built to boundary garage and bin structures do not comply with minimum side
           setback requirements;
           iii.   Will impact on the visual and acoustic amenity of adjoining premises;
           iv. Has the capacity to cause issues of overlooking of private open space of adjoining
           premises; and
           v.     Does not provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses.


     4. The proposal does not comply with Acceptable Outcome AO16.3 and corresponding
     Performance Outcome PO16 of the Low Density Residential Zone Code as the proposed rooftop
     terrace will have the potential to obstruct views of dwellings within proximity of the site and create
     issues of overlooking to neighbouring properties. the privacy walls associated with the proposed
     roof top terrace will also create excessive bulk to neighbouring properties.

B.    Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.




                                                                                                  Page 122 of 310

Log in to download the original (ca3d9e722f.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.