Original source · versioned page text
Development Application part 2 Report and Plans MCU13/0053
The original of this document is very large (117 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn ,... "
~ ~ ~--
-,.,.~
~l_" ’~ . ~., ~
""~ "’ <.
.,_,-~.
,
- ,)
4,5,6 or 7; facility within the
Boreen Point
f) Education; locality. Of the three (3)candidates
g) Emergency service Type which were investigated for the
1.
, facility, the current site was
h) Open space Type 1; determined to be most appropriate
i) Wellbeing; given it’s minimal potential visual
j) All Infrastructure Uses; and amenity impacts whilst
k) Multiple housing Types 2, ensuring there are no detrimental
3,4 or 5; and effects to use of the land and
I) Visitor accommodation surrounds as outlines below:
Type 4. . The proposed facility has been
appropriately sited on the
periphery of the township
(approximately 1 km)
. Provides an adequate
separation distance from
community sensitive land uses
and residential dwellings
(setback more than 240m from
the closest residential dwelling
and within proximity to only
three residential dwellings
within a 500m radius)
. Located a sufficient buffer
distance from environmentally
sensitive locations and no
vegetation removal will be
required;
. Significant areas of mature
vegetation also exist on site and
within the surrounding area
which will help to further
mitigate potential visual impacts
associated with the
development.
Therefore although identified as an
inconsistent land use, the proposed
facility is
considered compatible
with development in the
surrounding area and is
appropriate in this location.
4.32 Effects of Use
Sloping sites & ridgelines S55.1 Buildings and 055 - Not applicable.
055 Development on sloping associated The development is not located on
sites- accessways are not a sloping site or ridgeline.
a) is responsive to the natural constructed on land with a
topography of the site and slope greater than 1 in 4 056 -
Complies.
minimises the need for cut (25%); The proposed development will not
and fill adversely affect the
landscape
b) does not visually dominate AND character and visual
amenity
the hill slope or interrupt the quality of hill slopes and ridgelines
skyline; S55.2 Buildings present no as the proposed development will
c) is integrated with the more than 2 storeys at anyone not be located within the vicinity of
natural site characteristics point when viewed from the these elevated areas.
including vegetation; road or other public space; and
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.