Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

Minor Change Report 132004 240022 3 (As Published) · 132004.240022.3

of 11

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

               APPLICATION FOR A MINOR CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
               Author                   Development Planner, Matthew Pinese
                                        Development Assessment



                  APPLICATION DETAILS

                  Application No.                    132004.240022.3

                  Development Approval               23693 DA - Resort Hotel Complex

                  Applicant                          KL Noosa Properties P/L

                  Request Received On                22 July 2025

                  Report Reviewed By                 Patrick Murphy
                                                     10.10.2025


                  PROPERTY DETAILS

                  Property Address                   Sofitel Noosa Pacific Resort
                                                     14 Hastings Street Noosa Heads

                  RP Description                     Lot 7 on RP802632

                  Land Area                          9,937m2

                  Existing Use of Land               Sofitel Hotel


                  STATUTORY DETAILS

                  SEQRP Designation                  Urban Footprint

                  Zone                               Tourist Accommodation Zone

                  Precinct                           Hastings Street Mixed Use Precinct

                  Local Area Plan                    Noosa Heads

                  Overlays                           Land Subject to Acid Sulfate Soils Overlay
                                                     Flood Hazard Overlay
                                                     Landslide Hazard Overlay

                  Assessment Type                    Minor Change to Town Planning Consent Permit




                                                                                                    Page 1 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025
Full text of the other 10 pages

Page 2

               1.     PROPOSAL
               The applicant seeks approval to change the existing Town Planning Consent (TPC) as follows:
               •    the provision of bathroom amenities in the north-eastern corner of the basement;
               •    the removal and relocation of five (5) existing car parking spaces within this area of the
                    basement, to provide the space for these amenities;
               •    the relocation of the five (5) car parking spaces to within the existing porte-cochere on Level
                    1;
               •    the addition of 4 new car parking spaces within existing basement;
               •    the removal of the existing louvres from the eleven (11) overhead bay windows;
               •    the replacement with eleven (11) new fixed windows within the existing opening extent;
               •    the removal of 1 existing window glazing and replaced with new glazing, solid block work
                    externally and FC sheet lining internally to increase the sill height of this window that
                    interfaces with a banquette area within the restaurant;
               •    the addition of a curtain hung within the extent of an existing window that is being maintained;
               •    the removal of the existing glass entry door, which is being replaced with new timber finish
                    doors with framed glazing; and
               •    the requested amendment to Condition 3.1 of the TPC.
               The locality and proposal plan are included below.




                                                         Figure 1 – Locality




                                                                                                      Page 2 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 3

               Figure 2 – Extract of proposed Basement Plan showing the removal of the five (5) car parking spaces to allow
                     for the construction of the proposed toilets/amenities and stairs from the lobby to the basement.




                  Figure 3 – Extract from the Level 1 Floor Plan showing the proposed relocation of the five (5) car parking
                                                       spaces within the porte-cochere




               Figure 4 – Extract from the Site Plan showing the proposed relocation of the five (5) car parking spaces within
               the porte-cochere



                                                                                                               Page 3 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 4

                                                               Change 2
                                                               Report.pdf




               Figure 5 – Elevations/Façade plans showing proposed removal of existing louvers to be removed and replaced
                                          with new fixed windows within existing opening extent


               2.     BACKGROUND
               The Sofitel Noosa Pacific Resort (previously known as the Sheraton Noosa) was not the subject
               of an existing town planning approval, as it was developed by Suncorp, as an agency of the State
               Government. Those circumstances have changed and the hotel is now subject to the Planning
               Scheme and relevant provisions affecting the Tourist Accommodation Zone that apply to the site.
               Since the development of the site for a resort a range of approvals have been given for
               modifications to the Hotel, with the more recent approvals relevant to this application including:
               02382 – Conversion of the Chart House Restaurant to a day spa and changes relating to the first
               floor level involving the reception area, shops and lounge bar, which was approved 16 March 2000.
               02382 – Further amendments to the Day Spa and coffee lounge, which were approved August
               2000.
               Further amendments were approved in May 2004 which included some façade changes,
               remodelling the meeting and games rooms and restaurant areas.
               A further change was approved in November 2016 permitting a cabana located to the northern
               side of the pool podium between 2 existing buildings.
               In April 2025, a Minor Change to the Town Planning Consent Permit (Ref: 132004.240022.2 -
               23693 DA) was approved. The change involved converting an existing terrace—previously used

                                                                                                          Page 4 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 5

               for private dining and functions—into additional restaurant dining space. It also included removing
               a private dining room and incorporating that area into the main restaurant. Internally, the works
               included installing a new staircase connecting Level 1 of the restaurant to the basement car park.
               3.     ASSESSMENT
               3.1. Instruments for Statutory Assessment
               Under the Planning Act 2016 the application must be assessed against each of the following
               statutory planning instruments to the extent they are relevant to the development:
               •    State Planning Policy;
               •    South East Queensland Regional Plan;
               •    Planning Regulation 2017; and
               •    Noosa Plan 2020 (25 September 2020).
               3.2. Statutory Process
               The applicant has requested to make a minor change to a development approval under s78 of the
               Planning Act 2016. An application for a minor change to a development approval can only be made
               in circumstances where a change would constitute a ‘minor change’.
               The proposed change to the development approval requested by the applicant is determined to
               constitute a minor change on the grounds that:
               •    the development would not result in substantially different development as the proposal does
                    not:
                      o     dramatically change the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance; or
                      o     change the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended; or
                      o     remove a component that is integral to the operation of the development; or
                      o     significantly impact on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic
                            to the site; or
                      o     introduce new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts; or
               •    the change does not include prohibited development;
               •    the change would not require the application to be referred to an additional referral agency or
                    cause a referral agency to have regard to new matters prescribed by regulation;
               •    where the original application was code assessable, the change would not cause the
                    application to become impact assessable.
               3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
               The original application was lodged and assessed under the now superseded 1990 planning
               scheme. Pursuant to s81 of the Planning Act 2017, Council must consider the planning scheme in
               effect when the original development application was lodged, however Council may give weight to
               Noosa Plan 2020 as the planning scheme in effect at the time of the minor change application
               being lodged.
               The following codes from Noosa Plan 2020 are applicable to this development:
               •    Tourist Accommodation Zone Code;
               •    Noosa Heads Local Plan Code;
               •    Business Activities Code;
               •    Entertainment Activities Code
               •    Works Codes;
               •    Land Subject to Acid Sulfate Soils Overlay Code
               •    Flood Hazard Overlay Code
               •    Landslide Hazard Overlay Code


                                                                                                        Page 5 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 6

               The application has been found to generally comply with all applicable statutory instruments. The
               pertinent issues arising out of the assessment are discussed below,
               The proposed removal and relocation of five (5) car parking spaces
               The applicant’s ‘Further Advice’ submission supports the proposed reconfiguration of the
               basement level, which involves the installation of new amenities within the north-eastern corner,
               the removal of five (5) existing car parking spaces from this area, the relocation of these five (5)
               spaces to the existing porte-cochere, and the delineation of four (4) new car parking spaces within
               the basement.
               From a planning perspective, the proposed changes result in a net reduction of one (1) car parking
               space within the basement. This reduction is offset by the provision of five (5) short-term car
               parking spaces within the porte-cochere, which are to be managed under a dedicated
               concierge/valet service operated by Sofitel staff. Given the operational nature of the porte-cochere
               and the proposed managed parking arrangement, the reallocation of spaces is considered to be
               acceptable and consistent with the intended function of the development.
               The applicant’s ‘Further Advice’ response includes:
               •   a Traffic Engineering Response prepared by Ason Group and RPEQ signed by the Ason
                   Group State Manager, Henry Strachan (RPEQ 10634). This response addresses each matter
                   raised in Items 1-4 of the Further Advice;
               •   a Site Plan showing the porte-cochere and a Swept Path Analysis for B85 and B99 vehicles;
                   and
               •   a Car Park Management Plan prepared by Sofitel Noosa Pacific Resort to provide the
                   operational strategy for how the 5 car parking spaces will be managed through a valet
                   parking service between the porte-cochere and basement carpark.
               As detailed in Council’s Development Engineers referral response in Section 4.2 of the report, the
               proposed changes are supported from a technical engineering perspective. It is confirmed in the
               Traffic Engineering response that the function of the 5 porte-cochere parking bays is for short-term
               set down parking only.
               A key issue identified in Council’s Further Advice was the need to enhance pedestrian safety within
               the porte cochere area. In response, the applicant submitted a Signage and Line Marking Plan to
               demonstrate how the proposed modifications will prioritise pedestrian movement and improve
               safety outcomes. This plan is proposed to be included as a conditionally approved plan to ensure
               the intended pedestrian safety improvements are implemented and maintained.
               Proposed changes to the windows on the Hastings Street façade of the building
               As shown on the submitted Building Elevations – Hasting Street, the changes to the façade include
               the following:
               •   removal of the existing louvres from the eleven (11) overhead bay windows
               •   replacement with eleven (11) new fixed windows within the existing opening extent
               •   removal of 1 existing window glazing and replaced with new glazing, solid block work
                   externally and FC sheet lining internally to increase the sill height of this window that
                   interfaces with a banquette area within the restaurant
               •   Internally there will be a curtain hung within the extent of the adjoining window that is being
                   maintained
               •   removal of the existing glass entry door, which is being replaced with new timber finish doors
                   with framed glazing.
               The proposed changes to the building facade fronting Hasting Street are supported by the
               applicant’s response to the Further Advice, which included:
               •   an Architectural Statement completed by CE Architects; and
               •   an email from Dr Noel Robinson, confirming that his moral rights have been appropriately
                   considered and that he supports the proposed modifications to his original design.
                                                                                                     Page 6 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 7

               The proposed alterations to the front façade windows and front door are consistent with the
               established character of Hastings Street, which functions as a vibrant, contemporary, and
               pedestrian-oriented centre catering to both locals and visitors. The introduction of new fixed glazing
               will enhance natural light penetration into the restaurant and bar, while also contributing to
               improved street-level activation and passive surveillance. The modifications do not substantially
               change or materially alter the architectural integrity of the existing façade. The proposed design
               reflects a high standard of architectural treatment that is compatible with the prevailing streetscape
               character, maintaining a well-articulated window rhythm consistent with Figure 7.2.5.6 –
               Streetscape character – Hasting Street of the Noosa Plan 2020 and other buildings fronting
               Hastings Street.




               Figure 4 – Extract of Figure 7.2.5.6 – Streetscape character – Hasting Street of the Noosa Plan 2020


               These proposed changes have been referred to and reviewed by the original Architect responsible
               for the building’s design, to ensure that their moral rights have been appropriately acknowledged
               and respected. The revised window and front door design have been assessed by the Architect as
               being sympathetic to their original architectural intent and consistent with the building’s established
               design.
               Requested change to Condition 3.1 of the TPC
               The assessment of the applicant’s request to amend condition 3.1 of the TPC, which is reproduced
               below, is as follows:
               Existing Condition 3.1

                The developer shall provide a minimum of 174 parking bays (with a maximum of 22 bays in
                tandem configuration) and 3 loading bays on site. Each car parking space shall not be less than
                5. 5 metres in length and not less than 2.6 metres in clear width.
                Aisle widths are desirable 6.5m width but shall not be less than 6.0 metres as detailed, on
                Council’ s Standard Drawing No. 9515. For blind aisles an aisle extension of 2m is to be provided
                to permit vehicle manoeuvre out of the end bays. Extra width is required on the end bay adjoining
                a blind aisle. Aisle widths are to be in accordance with the above.
                Areas on which vehicles will be driven and/or parked are to be provided with a flexible or other
                pavement surfaced with bitumen seal coat, asphaltic or other concrete properly constructed and
                maintained to good engineering standards to the satisfaction of the Council’s Engineer. Plans
                and specifications for such areas including footpath crossings are to be submitted for approval
                prior to issue of a Building Permit. Vehicular access to and from the site is to be designed so as
                to ensure that sufficient area is available for manoeuvring and turning to permit forward
                movement to and from the road.
                The entrance to the car park shall have a minimum clearance of 2.1m as defined in Australian
                Standard A.S. 2890.1-1986 Car Parking Facilities. Allowance shall be made for required height
                of service vehicles, where applicable.



                                                                                                               Page 7 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 8

                The car park shall be available for use by members of the public. Signposting shall be provided
                in accordance with the requirements of the Shire Engineer at the access point. Parking spaces
                available for public use inside the building shall be clearly marked. Car Park entry may be subject
                to payment of a fee.

               Applicant’s Request
               The applicant has requested existing condition 3.1 be amended to include additional details
               specifying that alternative car parking bay dimensions and aisle widths must be in accordance with
               the above, unless supported in writing by an RPEQ.

                The developer shall provide a minimum of 174 parking bays (with a maximum of 22 bays in
                tandem configuration) and 3 loading bays on site. Each car parking space shall not be less than
                5. 5 metres in length and not less than 2.6 metres in clear width. Parking bay dimensions are
                to be in accordance with the above, unless otherwise supported in writing by an RPEQ.
                Aisle widths are desirable 6.5m width but shall not be less than 6.0 metres as detailed, on
                Council’ s Standard Drawing No. 9515. For blind aisles an aisle extension of 2m is to be provided
                to permit vehicle manoeuvre out of the end bays. Extra width is required on the end bay adjoining
                a blind aisle. Aisle widths are to be in accordance with the above, unless otherwise supported
                in writing by an RPEQ.
                Areas on which vehicles will be driven and/or parked are to be provided with a flexible or other
                pavement surfaced with bitumen seal coat, asphaltic or other concrete properly constructed and
                maintained to good engineering standards to the satisfaction of the Council’s Engineer. Plans
                and specifications for such areas including footpath crossings are to be submitted for approval
                prior to issue of a Building Permit. Vehicular access to and from the site is to be designed so as
                to ensure that sufficient area is available for manoeuvring and turning to permit forward
                movement to and from the road.
                The entrance to the car park shall have a minimum clearance of 2.1m as defined in Australian
                Standard A.S. 2890.1-1986 Car Parking Facilities. Allowance shall be made for required height
                of service vehicles, where applicable.
                The car park shall be available for use by members of the public. Signposting shall be provided
                in accordance with the requirements of the Shire Engineer at the access point. Parking spaces
                available for public use inside the building shall be clearly marked. Car Park entry may be subject
                to payment of a fee.

               Assessment of Request
               The requested amendments to the condition wording are supported, as they are underpinned by a
               Traffic Engineering Response certified by a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland
               (RPEQ). This response has been reviewed and endorsed by Council’s Development Engineering
               team. The revised condition wording facilitates the adoption of alternative car parking dimensions,
               which have been formally certified by an RPEQ and are considered to comply with relevant
               engineering standards and performance outcomes.
               Recommendation
               It is recommended existing condition 3.1 be amended to read as follows:

                The developer shall provide a minimum of 174 parking bays (with a maximum of 22 bays in
                tandem configuration) and 3 loading bays on site. Each car parking space shall not be less than
                5. 5 metres in length and not less than 2.6 metres in clear width. Parking bay dimensions are
                to be in accordance with the above, unless otherwise supported in writing by an RPEQ.
                Aisle widths are desirable 6.5m width but shall not be less than 6.0 metres as detailed, on
                Council’ s Standard Drawing No. 9515. For blind aisles an aisle extension of 2m is to be provided
                to permit vehicle manoeuvre out of the end bays. Extra width is required on the end bay adjoining



                                                                                                      Page 8 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 9

                   a blind aisle. Aisle widths are to be in accordance with the above., unless otherwise supported
                   in writing by an RPEQ.
                   Areas on which vehicles will be driven and/or parked are to be provided with a flexible or other
                   pavement surfaced with bitumen seal coat, asphaltic or other concrete properly constructed and
                   maintained to good engineering standards to the satisfaction of the Council’s Engineer. Plans
                   and specifications for such areas including footpath crossings are to be submitted for approval
                   prior to issue of a Building Permit. Vehicular access to and from the site is to be designed so as
                   to ensure that sufficient area is available for manoeuvring and turning to permit forward
                   movement to and from the road.
                   The entrance to the car park shall have a minimum clearance of 2.1m as defined in Australian
                   Standard A.S. 2890.1-1986 Car Parking Facilities. Allowance shall be made for required height
                   of service vehicles, where applicable.
                   The car park shall be available for use by members of the public. Signposting shall be provided
                   in accordance with the requirements of the Shire Engineer at the access point. Parking spaces
                   available for public use inside the building shall be clearly marked. Car Park entry may be subject
                   to payment of a fee.


               Add Condition 7 to include the plans showing the works approved by this change
               application
               7.      Works approved by change application 132004.240022.3 are to be in accordance with the
                       following plans.

                         Plan No.             Rev.    Plan/Document Name                             Date

                         53.025.B01           A       Level 1 prepared by DesignInc Brisbane Pty 04.03.2004
                                                      Ltd
                         WD.03.01

                         250137               A       Site Plan prepared by Richmond and Ross        08.09.2025
                         CO10

                         P3275                01      Signage and Linemarking Plan prepared by 09.09.2025
                                                      ASON Group
                         AG01

                         241424               24      Building Elevations – Hasting          Street 03.09.2025
                                                      prepared by CE Architects
                         WD.04.06
                                                      Annotated by Council


               4.      CONSULTATION
               4.1. Referral Agencies
               Not applicable
               4.2. Internal Council Referrals
               The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers for review and/or comment:
               •     Development Engineer, Development Assessment
               The proposal includes the removal of five existing basement carparks and modification and
               formalisation of the existing porte-cochere to include additional temporary parks / drop off bays. A
               standard operating procedure will ensure that concierge staff will manage traffic flow.
               A reduction in long term parking has been justified by the typical transport demands of guests,
               approximately 75% of guests arriving without a private vehicle. Due to the guest parking behaviour,
                                                                                                         Page 9 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 10

               it is not expected a reduction in long term parking will increase the demand of street parking.
               Service vehicles access will remain as existing, utilising the service / loading area adjacent to the
               porte-cochere.
               Swept path analysis of a B85 and B99 vehicle demonstrate the porte-cochere has sufficient
               circulation area including the proposed parking arrangements. Signs and line markings have been
               included for increased pedestrian safety.
               5.     CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
               The proposed development generally complies with the requirements of the planning scheme and
               does not raise any significant issues that cannot be addressed by reasonable and relevant
               conditions. The application is therefore recommended for approval. The report is provided in
               accordance with Section 83(9) of the Planning Act 2016.
               RECOMMENDATION
               With regard to Application No. 132004.240022.3 to make a minor change to an existing approval
               situated at Sofitel Noosa Pacific Resort 14 Hastings Street Noosa Heads and described as Lot 7
               RP 802632, Council on 2 October 2025 decided to:
               A.     Approve the change.
               B.     Agree to add additional Condition 27 & 28 to read as follows:
               27     Works approved by change application 132004.240022.3 are to be in accordance with the
                      following plans.

                        Plan No.            Rev.   Plan/Document Name                             Date

                        53.025.B01          A      Level 1 prepared by DesignInc Brisbane Pty 04.03.2004
                                                   Ltd
                        WD.03.01

                        250137              A      Site Plan prepared by Richmond and Ross        08.09.2025
                        CO10

                        P3275               01     Signage and Linemarking Plan prepared by 09.09.2025
                                                   ASON Group
                        AG01

                        241424              24     Building Elevations – Hasting          Street 03.09.2025
                                                   prepared by CE Architects
                        WD.04.06
                                                   Annotated by Council


               28. The developer shall provide a minimum of 174 parking bays (with a maximum of 22 bays in
               tandem configuration) and 3 loading bays on site. Each car parking space shall not be less than 5.
               5 metres in length and not less than 2.6 metres in clear width. Parking bay dimensions are to be
               in accordance with the above, unless otherwise supported in writing by an RPEQ.
               Aisle widths are desirable 6.5m width but shall not be less than 6.0 metres as detailed, on Council’
               s Standard Drawing No. 9515. For blind aisles an aisle extension of 2m is to be provided to permit
               vehicle manoeuvre out of the end bays. Extra width is required on the end bay adjoining a blind
               aisle. Aisle widths are to be in accordance with the above., unless otherwise supported in writing
               by an RPEQ.




                                                                                                    Page 10 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Page 11

               Areas on which vehicles will be driven and/or parked are to be provided with a flexible or other
               pavement surfaced with bitumen seal coat, asphaltic or other concrete properly constructed and
               maintained to good engineering standards to the satisfaction of the Council’s Engineer. Plans and
               specifications for such areas including footpath crossings are to be submitted for approval prior to
               issue of a Building Permit. Vehicular access to and from the site is to be designed so as to ensure
               that sufficient area is available for manoeuvring and turning to permit forward movement to and
               from the road.
               The entrance to the car park shall have a minimum clearance of 2.1m as defined in Australian
               Standard A.S. 2890.1-1986 Car Parking Facilities. Allowance shall be made for required height of
               service vehicles, where applicable.
               The car park shall be available for use by members of the public. Signposting shall be provided in
               accordance with the requirements of the Shire Engineer at the access point. Parking spaces
               available for public use inside the building shall be clearly marked. Car Park entry may be subject
               to payment of a fee.
               C.     Correct the numbering of the conditions to ensure clarity and consistency.




                                                                                                    Page 11 of 11

Document Set ID: 24127425
Version: 11, Version Date: 14/10/2025

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.7 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Report 132004 240022 3 (As Published).pdf · 2.7 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.