Planning-report-12 Figbird Court 1 Dec 2021 Final

           Performance outcomes                      Acceptable Outcomes                             Response
the Agricultural Land Overlay Maps in                                                unlikely to be viable for productive
Schedule 2                                                                           agriculture of a scale that would be
                                                                                     expected to have an adverse impact on
                                                                                     existing residential uses and the
                                                                                     proposed development.

                                                                                     The mapped area is also located on a
                                                                                     south facing slope with forest on its
                                                                                     northern boundary, whereas the
                                                                                     existing and proposed dwellings are
                                                                                     on a ridge line above the mapped area
                                                                                     and have a north, north-easterly
                                                                                     aspect.

                                                                                     The proposal does not result in the
                                                                                     loss or diminished productive capacity
                                                                                     of the Agricultural land conservation
                                                                                     area.




Setbacks                                     AO8.4                                   AO8.4
PO8                                          In addition to the circumstances of     1. The proposed building has a
Notwithstanding that intensive rural         AO8.1, to AO8.3 above, buildings and       minimum 200 metre set back from
activities may need greater separation       structures meet the following minimum      the closest Environmental
distances, buildings and other structures    boundary setbacks:                         management and conservation
are appropriately sited and designed to:                                                zone to the south around Lake
                                        1. 20 metres from a property boundary           MacDonald.
 1. avoid environmental harm or            of adjoining land in the Environmental
    nuisance to sensitive land uses,       management and conservation zone; 2.         The proposed building is located
    including adverse impacts on        2. a distance greater than the width of         partly within the Riparian buffer
    amenity values, over and above         the riparian buffer area shown on            zone. Notwithstanding the non-
    what could reasonably be expected      Biodiversity, Waterways                      compliance of the proposed
    in the rural zone;                     and Wetland Overlay maps;                    building with the Acceptable
 2. avoid adverse impact                3. 10 metres from a road frontage; and          outcome:
    on ecologically important           4. 10 metres from the side and rear
    areas including National Parks,        boundaries or 6 metres where the lot         a. The building is located at the
    watercourses, and wetlands;            area does not exceed 1 hectare, with            outer edge of the buffer zone
 3. mitigate risks associated with the     the exception that if the height of             and is 230 metres from Lake
    use of chemicals or air pollutants;    the building or structure exceeds 9             Macdonald;
    and                                    metres the setback to the side and           b. the proposed development will
 4. avoid conflict with rural uses and     rear boundaries is equal to twice its           connect to an existing 10 EP
    activities on adjoining properties.    height in metres.                               advanced waste water
                                                                                           treatment system (HSTP).
Editor's note- For uses that are subject
to impact assessment,
required setback and separation
distances will vary with the scale and
type of rural activity. Relevant factors
that will be taken into account when
determining appropriate distances
include the type and scale of buildings
and structures proposed, the use of
buildings and structures, construction
methods, level of containment and
ventilation, potential noise, odour or air
pollutant nuisance, topography, climatic
variables, existing vegetation between
land uses, and a range of management
practices that can be employed to
mitigate off-site impacts.




DA forms guide: Planning report template | July 2017                                                                Page 13 of 48