Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach - Attachment D MCU13/0092
Very large file (23.1 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
@ 1 "1~l iliI~l ~il~il ijI ~I~I~I~r
X0040511
Attachment D
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of pages 2 to 46 (of 50)
Page 2
Consultants in Acoustics, Vibration & Structural Dynamics
~~~@ u@~D~
[]]
..:; .
. ., @[KQ QD [lY[ID[S~
email: [email protected]
website: www.renzotonin.com.au
iiM$fPitroJd to achi@v@
PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTRE, RUFOUS STREET,
PEREGIAN
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Q9554-01F02 (REV 3) PEREGIAN SHOPPING CENTRE.DOC
5 AUGUST 2013
Prepared for:
Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
PO Box 294 Salisbury Qld 4107
Attention: David Hood
Brisbane Sydney (Head Office)
QO Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble ,
Melbourne
QC’J.-.’’’’’
4<:~~
r~Itrr.)
A Division of Renzo Tonin & Associates (QLD)pty Ltd
ABN 16 123 509 884 Gold Coast
96 Petrie Terrace
PO Box 820 SPRING HILL, QLD 4004 Kuwait
Ph (07)3367 3131 Fax (07)3367 3121
Page 3
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Non- Reviewed &
Issued Prepared By Instructed By
Date Revision History Issued Authorised by
Revision (initials) (initials)
Revision (initials)
29/07/2013 Issue 0 0 DR PJ PJ
01/08/2013 Issue 1 1 DR PJ PJ
01/08/2013 Issue 2 2 DR PJ PJ
05/08/2013 Issue 3 3 DR PJ PJ
The work presented in this document was carried out in accordance with the Renzo Tonin & Associates Quality Assurance System,
which is based on Australian Standard /NZS ISO 9001.
This document is issued subject to review and authorisation by the Team Leader noted by the initials printed in the last column above.
If no initials appear, this document shall be considered as preliminary or draft only and no reliance shall be placed upon it other than
for information to be verified later.
This document is prepared for our Client’s particular requirements which are based on a specific brief with limitations as agreed to with
the Client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by a third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party
without prior consent provided by Renzo Tonin & Associates. The information herein should not be reproduced, presented or reviewed
except in full. Prior to passing on to a third party, the Client is to fully inform the third party of the specific brief and limitations
associated with the commission.
The information contained herein is for the purpose of acoustics only. No claims are made and no liability is accepted in respect of
design and construction issues falling outside of the specialist field of acoustics engineering including and not limited to structural
integrity, fire rating, architectural buildability and fit-for-purpose, waterproofing and the like. Supplementary professional advice should
be sought in respect of these issues.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 2
Page 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd is proposing to develop a shopping centre at Rufous Street and
Woodland Drive, Peregian Beach. The real property description is Lot 94 on SP137431. The local authority
is the Sunshine Coast Regional Council.
Council has issued an Information Request on 18th June 2013, requiring an assessment of noise emissions
from the development to neighbouring noise sensitive premises (Ref: MCU13/0092).
Based upon the analysis presented in this report, the following conclusions have been drawn:
. The proposed shopping centre would have the following noise impacts on residential areas located
to the northwest, north and east -
car park noise, noise from delivery and services trucks, noise
from increased traffic along Rufous Street and Woodland Drive and noise from mechanical plant;
.
Existing ambient noise levels were monitored over a week period. Based on the results of the
noise monitoring and conditions stipulated in the Environmental Protection Act 1994,
Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008 and the Environmental Protection Regulation 2008,
relevant noise limits for car park noise, delivery and services vehicles noise, and mechanical plant
were determined and presented in Section 7 of the report;
. To minimise potential noise nuisance from the supermarket loading dock, the developer proposes
to construct 2.5m and 3.5m high acoustic barriers as shown in Figure 4. For the noise barriers to
provide adequate noise reduction, they are required to have a minimum superficial density of
14kg/m2 and a maximum leakage of 1%. This may be achieved using materials such as concrete
tilt panel, masonry block wall, 35mm thick CCA treated lapped and capped timber palings or
75mm Hebel Power Panel. The northern end of the barrier will consist of a solid and gap-free gate
for ingress of service and delivery vehicles;
. With the noise barriers constructed, noise from typical transient events in the car park are
predicted and demonstrated to comply with the daytime, evening and night time noise limits at
surrounding residential properties;
. With the noise barriers constructed, modelling and assessment of noise from most loading and
services transient events within the site are demonstrated to comply with the daytime and
evening noise limits. Exceedances of the transient noise limits are predicted, as described in
Section 9.2.
.
Modelling and assessment of quasi-continuous noise for some loading events within the site
demonstrated that:
o Noise emissions from trucks with small refrigeration units at the nominated loading
docks are predicted to be lower than the representative daytime, evening and night
time ambient noise levels.
. Based on the modelling results, the following recommendations for loading and service activities
within the site are made:
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3)Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 3
Page 5
o Use of the shopping centre loading dock to the west should be restricted to day-time
periods, between 7:00am to 6:00pm;
o Usage of HRVs accessing the shopping centre loading dock to the west should be
restricted to day-time periods, between 7:00am to 6:00pm;
o Refuse waste collection activities should be restricted to day time periods only,
between 7:00am to 6:00pm; and
o Usage of MRVs for loading and service activities for speciality shops to the east should
be restricted to daytime and evening periods, between 7:00am to 10:00pm every day.
.
Generally our assessment shows that some loading activities can potentially exceed the
nominated noise lmits. It should be noted that the assessment is based on typical noise source
emissions that were measured for previous projects. The calculations are generally conservative
in nature and indicate that there may be some vehicle manoeuvring activities that may exceed
noise limits from time to time. The duration of the individual noise events are expected to be
brief.
. However should quieter loading/services vehicles be nominated for the commercial site, additional
measurements and assessment could be made of the quieter vehicles, and the above
recommendations can be revisited and reassessed.
. The exact uses and tenancies are unknown at this stage, therefore the types of mechanical plant
to be installed at the site could not be determined. We recommend that all new proposed plant
are checked for compliance by a qualified acoustical consultant before installation and certified for
compliance by testing prior to the commencement of use.
.
Generally the combined component noise level due to mechanical plant within the site should not
exceed the final component noise limits stipulated in Section 7.3 at residential areas.
. Traffic noise from David Low Way is expected to increase by approximately 1dBA and for
Woodland Drive and Rufous Street by SdBA to 7dBA above current levels after the construction of
the shopping centre. The increase of noise levels due to the increase in traffic volumes will likely
be noticeable at the residences along Woodland Drive and Rufous Street.
. The possible noise control treatment is provision of acoustic upgrades to existing residential
buildings, but it is understood that this option is not feasible. A reduction of noise impacts is
expected if an alternate access to the shopping centre via David Low Way is provided. It is
understood that the alternate access option may be explored by the Client and a separate
application may be made to Council to that effect.
. The site currently contains a sports and recreational use (Lawn Bowls Club with Clubhouse) which
has not been operational for a number of years. The Client has stated that if the Bowls Club was
in operation, it would likely have generated additional traffic flows along Woodland Drive and
servicing requirements greater than the Current Daily Traffic Volume and Composition values
presented in Table 12. In other words, the Client suggests that the residential properties along
Woodland Drive and Rufous Street were previously affected by traffic noise from vehicles
travelling to and from the Bowls Club when it was in operation.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 4
Page 6
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
1 INTRODUCTION 7
2 SURROUNDING AREA AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE 7
3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 8
4 NOISE SENSITIVE PREMISES 9
5 NOISE ISSUES 9
6 AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS 9
7 NOISE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 11
7.2 Limits for service and delivery vehicle noise 13
7.3 Limits of mechanical plant noise 14
8 NOISE FROM CARPARKING 16
8.1 Source data for car park noise 16
8.2 Assessment for car park noise 17
9 DELIVERY AND SERVICE ACTIVITIES 18
9.1 Source data for service and delivery vehicle noise 18
9.2 Assessment of service and delivery vehicles 20
10 MECHANICAL PLANT NOISE 25
10.1 Assessment of mechanical plant noise 25
11 NOISE FROM INCREASED ROAD TRAFFIC 25
11.1 Traffic noise assessment 25
12 CONCLUSIONS 27
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Site location (Picture courtesy of Google Maps) 30
Figure 2: Aerial of site and surroundings (Picture courtesy of Google Maps) 31
Figure 3: Site plan 32
Figure 4: Acoustic barrier locations -
2m and 3.5m high 33
Figure 5: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
06/07/13 34
Figure 6: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
07/07/13 35
Figure 7: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
08/07/13 36
Figure 8: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
09/07/13 37
Figure 9: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
10/07/13 38
Figure 10: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
11/07/13 39
Figure 11: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
12/07/13 40
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 5
Page 7
Figure 12: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
13/07/13 41
Figure 13: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
06/07/13 42
Figure 14: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
07/07/13 43
Figure 15: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
08/07/13 44
Figure 16: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
09/07/13 45
Figure 17: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
10/07/13 46
Figure 18: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
11/07/13 47
Figure 19: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
12/07/13 48
Figure 20: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
13/07/13 49
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 6
Page 8
1 INTRODUCTION
Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd is proposing to develop a shopping centre at Rufous Street and
Woodland Drive, Peregian Beach. The site location is shown in Figure 1. The real property
description is Lot 94 on SP137431. The local authority is the Sunshine Coast Regional Council.
Council has issued an Information Request on 18th June 2013, requiring an assessment of noise
emissions from the development to neighbouring noise sensitive premises (Ref: MCU13j0092).
The IR states:
The car parking areas increased traffic in the local street, loading bay service area and
operation of commercial plant and equipment (after hours deliveries, air conditioning and
refrigeration units, waste collection and vehicle noise), has the potential to denigrate the
amenity of the adjacent properties to the north west and east of the site. A noise impact
assessment is required addressing the potential noise impacts that may be generated by
the use. Where potential impacts are identified, which can be viably controlled, the
assessment should provide recommendations for noise amelioration. This assessment is
to be prepared by a suitably qualified person and in accordance with the, Environmental
Protection (Noise)Policy 2008, and relevant Australian Standards, e.g. AS1055 series.
This report presents an assessment of the potential noise impacts due to commercial activities
and mechanical plant. Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble has been commissioned by Multi Span Australia
Group pty Ltd to undertake the assessment.
2 SURROUNDING AREA AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE
An aerial photograph of the site and surrounding area is presented in Figure 2. The site is
bounded by Woodland Drive to the north, Rufous Street to the west and David Low Way to the
east. There is an existing sports oval to the west. To the north of the site is an existing Telstra
exchange facility and a vacant site. There is a community hall to the northeast. There are existing
commercial and office buildings to the southeast. Residential dwellings are located to the
northwest, north, southeast and east of the site.
The site currently contains a sports and recreational use (Lawn Bowls club with Clubhouse) which
is no longer in use. It is understood that the Clubhouse has not been operational for a number of
years.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 7
Page 9
3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed site layout for the shopping centre is shown in Figure 3. The development will
replace the Bowls Club. It will consist of an IGA Supermarket in the main building and speciality
shops to the south and east. At this stage, Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble has been informed by Multi
Span Australia Pty Ltd that the exact uses and tenancies for speciality shops are unknown.
The loading area and service for the supermarket will be located to the west of the building.
Delivery trucks will enter the loading area along a one-way driveway off Rufous Street to the
northwest (Entry A -
see Figure 3) and exit on Rufous Street to the southwest (Entry B). There is
a small service bay area located to the east. Vehicles accessing the small service bay area will
enter and exit the site via Entry B.
Access to the proposed carparking areas will be via Entry B. There are approximately 100
carparking spaces provided on the site.
As the exact uses and tenancies for the commercial buildings are unknown at this stage, the
locations, capacities and sizes of mechanical/building services plant could not be determined at
the time of this assessment.
Typical delivery times for deliveries at the centre have been obtained from the proposed IGA
operator who operates other IGA stores within the Sunshine Coast area (information obtained via
David Hood, Architect). The operator has stated that Heavy Rigid Vehicle (HRV)deliveries from
IGA warehouses would occur once a day, typically between Sam and noon on week days only.
HRV deliveries will not occur during evening and night periods (6pm to 7am).
To minimise potential noise nuisance, it is proposed to construct 2.5m and 3.5m high acoustic
barriers as shown in Figure 4. For the noise barriers to provide adequate noise reduction, they
are required to have a minimum superficial density of 14kg/m2 and a maximum leakage of 1%.
This may be achieved using materials such as concrete tilt panel, masonry block wall, 35mm thick
CCA treated lapped and capped timber palings or 75mm Hebel Power Panel. The northern end of
the barrier will consist of a solid and gap-free gate for ingress of service and delivery vehicles.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 8
Page 10
4 NOISE SENSITIVE PREMISES
Based on our understanding of the site and surroundings, we anticipate that the most affected
noise sensitive uses surrounding the proposed shopping centre development include:
. Existing highset residential property located at approximately 4Sm to the northwest;
.
Existing highset residential properties along Woodland Drive located at approximately
6Sm to the north; and
.
Existing highset and lowset residential properties along David Low Way located at
approximately 6Sm to the east.
. Existing residential apartments to the southwest at 241 David Low Way.
5 NOISE ISSUES
Based on the information provided regarding the proposed development, the following noise
sources have been identified:
. Noise from the car parks;
. Noise from delivery and service activities at the loading docks;
. Noise from mechanical plant; and
. Noise from increased road traffic along Rufous Street and Woodland Drive.
6 AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS
In order to determine the typical ambient noise levels in the area, environmental noise logging
was carried out at two locations between Saturday 6th July and Saturday 13th July 2013. The
measurements were conducted at Logger 1 and 2 locations, indicated in Figure 2.
The test instrumentation consisted of:
. Logger 1: NTi-XL2 RTA-OOS portable noise logger: serial # A2A-02422-DO,FW2.S1
.
Logger 2: NTi-XL2 RTA-OOS portable noise logger: serial # A2A-02713-D1,FW2.S1
. Rion NC-73 sound-level calibrator: serial # 10813189
The noise results for Logger 1 are presented in Figure 5 to Figure 12 and the results for Logger 2 are
presented in Figure 13 to Figure 20 and summarised in Table 1 and
Table 2.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 9
Page 11
The existing ambient results include values for the LA011, LA102, LAeq3, LAmax4 and LA90S averages for
each of the day, evening and night periods.
Table 1: Existing ambient noise levels for Logger 1 (Free-Field)
Average6 Noise Levels
Time of Day L,.Ol LAi0 LA90 LAeq LAmax
:
(dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA)
Day (7am-6pm) 62 57 48 55 69
Evening (6pm-10pm) 59 55 48 53 65
Night (10pm-7am) 56 52 47 52 62
Table 2: Existing ambient noise levels for Logger 2 (Free-Field)
Average Noise Levels
Time of Day L,.Ol LAi0 LA90 LAeq LAmaX’
(dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA)
Day (7am-6pm) 72 69 52 65 78
Evening (6pm-10pm) 70 64 45 60 75
Night (lOpm-7am) 67 56 45 58 74
From observations made during separate site visits in the day-time, the noise levels at the logger
locations were influenced by:
. Surf noise from Peregian Beach (dominant noise source during the day time and evening
time);
. Domestic noise from the surrounding residences, traffic noise and commercial activity
noise in the area; and
. Occasional light aircraft flyovers.
Based on the noise logger results in Figure 7 to Figure 12 and analysis of the data, it was concluded that
background noise was mostly dominated by surf noise. There were instances during the logging when surf
noise levels were lower. It can be seen in Table 1 and
Table 2 that the lowest background levels measured between the two measurement locations
were 48dBA during the day, 4SdBA in the evening and 4SdBA at night. These levels included a
component of surf noise and using these values as design parameters for future plant and
equipment may result in noise issues at the residences. In this instance, a slightly lower
background level than measured is recommended (SdBA less).
The recommended noise level (LA90) for future plant would be:-
t
LAOt is the A-weighted sound pressure level exceeded for 1% of the time.
2
LAtO is the A-weighted sound pressure level exceeded for 10% of the time.
3
LAeq is the equivalent or energy-averaged A-weighted sound pressure level.
4
~m.x is the average of the maximum A-weighted sound pressure levels occurring within the consecutive 15 minute
samples.
5
LA90 is the A-weighted sound pressure level exceeded for 90% of the time.
6
Averages are presented as the arithmetic means of the measured parameters over consecutive 15 minute intervals
throughout each period of the day, evening and night, apart from LAeq data which is calculated as a logarithmic
average and ~90, which is the average of the data set below the median in accordance with instructions from the
QLD EPA.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 10
Page 12
.
Day: 43dBA
.
Evening: 40dBA
.
Night: 40dBA
7 NOISE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
7.1 Car Park Noise Criteria
Environmental Protection (Noise)Policy 2008 (EPP (Noise)2008)
Schedule 1 of the EPP (Noise) 2008 presents outdoor and indoor acoustical quality objectives
during the day, evening and night-time periods. These objectives apply to all forms of noise
experienced by a receptor.
The acoustical quality objectives for dwellings are reproduced in Table 3. It can be seen in this
table that the objectives are presented in terms of the adjusted LAeq, LAlO and LAO! noise levels
measured over a 1-hour time period.
Table 3: EPP (Noise)acoustic quality objectives
Acoustic Quality Objectives (dBA)
Sensitive Receptor Time of Day
LAeq, adj, thr L.uo, adj, 1h. LA01, adj, thr
Dwelling (for outdoors) Daytime and Evening 50 55 65
Daytime and Evening 35 40 45
Dwelling (for indoors)
Night-time 30 35 40
Transient Limits for Vehicle Noise Emissions
Even though EPP (Noise) 2008 has nominated noise criteria as presented in Table 3, they have
not been adopted in the assessment of transient noises due to the short duration of events such
as car park noise (including doors slamming, engines starting and vehicles manoeuvring on-site).
Comparing noise emissions from transient short duration events to limits imposed over an hour
long period can be misleading, due to the very short duration of the individual events7. In most
instances, an event will not impact upon the LA01,adJ,lhr or LAlO,adj,lhr parameters, while the LAeq,adj,lhr
parameter will not be significantly affected. As the transient events associated within the site are
expected to be intermittent, applying the acoustic quality objectives will not ensure amenity is
achieved for nearby residents.
7
Supporting this argument, the Explanatory Notes for the Environmental Protection (Noise)Policy 2008 state that "the
acoustic quality objectives are not individual point source emission standards but are total levels of noise in the
surrounding environment" and "meeting the objectives does not always mean that the environmental values are
protected"
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 11
Page 13
Statutory documents such as the Environmental Protection Act 1994 or the Environmental
Protection Regulation 2008 do not present any noise criteria for transient noise events. In the
absence of specific criteria, appropriate limits have been derived which take into account the
recommendations contained in the EPP 2008.
The aim of the EPP (Noise)2008 is to protect or enhance the qualities of the acoustic environment
that are conducive to:
. Protecting the health and biodiversity of ecosystems;
Human health and wellbeing, including by ensuring a suitable acoustic environment for
sleeping, studying / learning, and / or recreation (including relaxation and
conversation); and
. Protecting the amenity of the community.
In the case of transient noise such as those due to vehicle activities in the car park, the existing
amenity of the receptor would be protected if the noise associated with use of the car park is
to the normal ambient noise that would otherwise occur in the area. The
comparable
comparability should encompass features such as loudness, character, time of occurrence and
rate of occurrence.
Comparison of like parameters is a methodology that compares the characteristics of the noise
from the proposed development with the existing ambient noise at the site. This methodology
evaluates the receiving environment without the influence of the development using one or more
noise exposure parameters and compares this with the noise characteristics resulting from the
development. The chosen parameters must realistically reflect the character of the ambient noise
and the character of noise emitting from the development.
Using this approach, intruding noise is considered to be acceptable if it does not change the
character and level of the existing ambient noise environment by more than 3dBA, measured
using the relevant noise parameter(s). In other words, the overall noise contribution of the
proposed commercial development (or the commercial development component noise levels) at
the noise-sensitive receiver locations must not exceed the existing noise levels at these receiver
locations. This methodology complies with the environmental values to be enhanced or protected
under the EPP (Noise) 2008 and has been adopted by a number of Councils8.
For the very short duration events, the appropriate acoustic parameter to quantify such events
would be the adjusted average maximum noise level LAmax.adj’ These levels are compared against
the average LAmax noise levels during the daytime and evening-time periods, with the resulting
noise limits for transient noise as shown in Table 4.
Another key feature of the legislation is the need to ensure a suitable acoustic environment for
sleep, study and recreation. Of these, sleep preservation is generally considered to be the most
8
Brisbane City Council (NIAPSP)and Sunshine Coast Regional Council (Maroochy Plan 2000) are two examples.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc
5August 2013 Page 12
Page 14
important and most demanding requirement. Research has determined that the maximum noise
level inside a bedroom or sleeping area due to short duration transient events should not exceed
4SdBA LAmax for nil sleep disturbances9. This value corresponds to the World Health Organization
(WHO)guideline internal LAmax noise level of 4SdBA for transient noise events in order to prevent
sleep disturbancelO.
By historical convention, the sleep criteria are applied only during the "normal"sleep period which
extends from lOpm to 7am.
To convert the criterion for sleep disturbance from a limit measured inside a bedroom to an
outdoor limit, adjustments between SdBA and lOdBA are suggested by various authorities to
account for fa ade attenuation provided by a normal, naturally-ventilated dwelling. This results in
an outdoor noise limit ranging from SOdBA to SSdBA (LAmax)’
Table 4: LAm.x Noise Criteria for car park noise emissions at residences
Transient Noise Criteria,
Time Period
LAm.x,.dj (dBA)
Day (7am to 6pm) 69
Evening (6pm to lOpm) 65
Night (lOpm to 7am) 50 to 55 (sleep disturbance)
It can be seen in Table 4 that the most stringent noise limits are during the night-time period.
7.2 Limits for service and delivery vehicle noise
Loading activities involving noise from vehicle refrigeration plant and engine idling can be
characterised as being intermittent or quasi-continuous in nature. However, activities such as
vehicle reversing (i.e. reverse beeping nOise), starting of vehicle engine, vehicle door slamming,
vehicle acceleration, dropping of boxes (stock) onto the floor, etc. can be characterised as being
transient in nature.
Therefore, the appropriate measurement parameters to quantify noise events associated with
loading activities would be LAmax (for transient noise events) and LAeq (for intermittent or quasi-
continuous noise events). The applicable noise limit for the LAmax noise descriptor would be those
presented in Table 4 derived for carparking.
The LAeq noise limits for the residences near the proposed shopping centre development site due
to refrigerated truck noise (i.e. from refrigeration plant on trucks loading / unloading at the site)
are determined based on the comparison of like parameters methodology (details regarding this
9
Bullen, R., Hede, A. & Williams, T. (1996),’Sleep Disturbance Due to Environmental Noise: A Proposed Assessment
Index’, Acoustics Australia, vol. 24(3), pp. 91-96. This paper was previously referenced in the Users Guide to
Queensland’s Environmental Protection (Noise)Policy 1997.
Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., Schwela, D. (1999)’World Health Organization: Guidelines for Community Noise’, pp. 44-
10
46.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 13
Page 15
methodology) are explained in Section 7.1. In summary, component LAeq noise from refrigeration
plant on trucks loading / unloading at the commercial site during stipulated loading times, when
predicted at the nearest residences, should not exceed the existing LAeq noise levels at the
residential areas during that time. The existing noise levels applicable at the residential areas
near the commercial site are indicated in the logging results (please refer to Figure 5 to Figure 12
attached at the end of the report).
The quasi-continuous noise limits are presented in Table 5. Similar to the transient noise
emissions, an adjustment of 2dBA has been made for quasi-continuous noise emissions.
Table 5: Noise limits for quasi-continuous emissions
Noise Limits LAeq, adj (dBA)
7am to 6pm 6pm to 10pm 10pm to 7am
55 53 52
7.3 Limits of mechanical plant noise
In determining the appropriate noise emission limits for continuous mechanical plant noise,
reference has been made to the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008 and the
Environmental Protection Act 1994.
For continuous noise, the acoustic quality objectives for outdoors as presented in Table 3 would
apply at all noise sensitive receptors. In addition to these long-term goals, controlling background
creep must be achieved as described in Section 10 of the EPP (Noise). To the extent that it is
reasonable to do so, noise from an activity must not be:
a) For noise that is continuous and measured using the LA90, Tll parameter, more than nil
dBA greater than the existing acoustic environment measured by the LA90, T; or
b) For noise that varies over time measured by LAeq, adj, T more than 5dBA greater than
the existing acoustic environment measured by LA90, T.
For air-conditioning equipment, Section 440U of the Act states that an occupier of a premises (at
or for which there is air-conditioning equipment) must not use, or permit the use of, equipment
on any day:
a) Before 7am, if it makes a noise of more than 3dBA above the background level; or
b) From 7am to 10pm, if it makes a noise of more than 5dBA above the background
level; or
c) After 10pm, if it makes a noise of more than 3dBA above the background level.
11
This criterion is impossible to achieve, as any additional noise, no matter how small, will result in an increase of the
LA90, T noise level. Since it is impossible to fulfil the specified requirement, the statement has been re-interpreted to
mean that the component noise levels due to the continuous noise must be equal to or less than the existing
ambient LA90 noise level.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 14
Page 16
For refrigeration equipment, Section 440V of the Act states that an occupier of a premises (at or
for which there is refrigeration equipment) or an owner of refrigeration equipment must not use,
or permit the use of, equipment on any day:
a) Before 7am, if it makes a noise of more than 3dBA above the background level; or
b) From 7am to lOpm, if it makes a noise of more than SdBA above the background
level; or
c) After lOpm, if it makes a noise of more than 3dBA above the background level.
The above limits apply to air conditioning equipment and refrigeration equipment that would be
installed within the proposed commercial development site. We note that there is possibility that a
supermarket could be developed at the site, which could result in refrigeration plant operating
continuously for 24-hours. Therefore noise emission limits should be determined for day, evening
and night time periods.
The Act does not specify the noise measurement parameter which is represented by the default
noise standard limits. When measuring continuous noise from mechanical plant, the parameter
which is usually used is the LAeq noise level.
The LA90 noise levels associated with the existing acoustic environment are presented in Table 1 and
Table 2. From these levels, the corresponding limits for mechanical and refrigeration plant can be
derived for surrounding residences as presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Criteria for mechanical plant noise emissions at residences
Noise Emission Limits
,
Noise Criteria
DaV Evening Night
.
6pm) (6pm -lOpm) (10pm -7am)
^
(7am -
Acoustic Quality Objectives (EPP(Noise))
Outdoors: LAeq, adJ, 1hr SOdBA SOdBA -
410,adj, 1hr SSdBA SSdBA -
LA01, adJ, lhr 6SdBA 6SdBA -
Resulting strictest component limits, LAeq, adj, lhr SOdBA SOdBA -
Background Creep Considerations (EPP(Noise))
For noise that is continuous:
Measured LA90 43dBA 40dBA 40dBA
Allowable exceedence of existing LA90 value OdBA OdBA OdBA
Resulting component noise limits LA90 43dBA 40dBA 40dBA
For noise that varies over time:
Measured LA90 43dBA 40dBA 40dBA
Allowable exceedence of existing LA90 value SdBA SdBA SdBA
Resulting component noise limits LAeq, adj 48dBA 4SdBA 4SdBA
Default Noise Standard (Act)
Measured 490 43dBA 40dBA 40dBA
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 15
Page 17
Noise Emission Limits
Noise Criteria
Day Evening Night
(7am 6pm) (6pm 10pm) (10pm 7am)
- - -
Allowable exceedence of existing LA90 value 5dBA 5dBA 3dBA
Resulting measured noise limits, LAeq 48dBA 45dBA 43dBA
Final component noise limits LA90 43dBA 40dBA 40dBA
Examining the noise limits presented in Table 6, it can be seen that the strictest component noise
limits would be:
.
Day time: 43dBA LA90
. Evening time: 40dBA LA90
. Night time: 40dBA LA90
8 NOISE FROM CARPARKING
Car park noise consists of short duration transient events such as doors slamming, cars starting,
accelerating from rest and moving slowly at constant speed. As the proposed shopping centre
includes speciality shops, which may include some fast food outlets, the car park areas may be
used anytime during the day, evening and night periods.
Noise from the car park can potentially affect the amenity of the residential areas, located to the
northwest, north and northeast of the shopping centre site.
8.1 Source data for car park noise
Vehicles using the car parks will consist of passenger cars, utilities and vans. Noise emissions
from such vehicles have been measured at a number of sites over a number of low-speed
manoeuvres. The typical noise emissions are summarised in Table 7.
Table 7: Noise levels from low-speed manoeuvres
~max @ 10m
Activity
(dBA)
Doors closing (slamming) 65
Cars starting and accelerating 62
Cars moving slowly at constant speed 62
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 16
Page 18
8.2 Assessment for car park noise
Using the source data from Table 7, the noise emissions at the existing residential properties have
been calculated and presented in Table 8. Calculations have considered:
Worst case noise emissions from car park would be 65dBA LAmax at 10m, typical of a car
door closing;
. Worst case locations for various vehicle manoeuvres within the car park;
. Distance attenuation; and
. Adjustment of +2dBA for annoying characteristics (i.e. tonality, impulsiveness) that are
just detectable, and +5dBA for annoying characteristics that are prominent / clearly
audible.
Table 8: Car park noise assessment
LAmax,adj LAmax,adj
Predicted L...max
complies complies
Adjust L...max IL...max.adi complies
Vehicle with with
Worst-case location ment, Noise Level with 50dBA
Manoeuvre 69dBA 65dBA
dBA @ Receiver, to 55dBA
daytime evening
dBA night limit?
limit? limit?
Northwest residence (Approximately 108m from Car park)
Door slam Car park Lot 74 +5 44/49 Yes Yes Yes
Car starting and
Car park Lot 74 +5 41/46 Yes Yes Yes
accelerating
Cars moving slowly
Car park Lot 74 +2 41/43 Yes Yes Yes
(constant speed)
Eastern residences (Approximately 65m from Car park) -
Screened by Office Buildings
Door slam Car park Lot 1 +5 44/49 Yes Yes Yes
Car starting and
Car park Lot 1 +5 41/46 Yes Yes Yes
accelerating
Cars moving slowly
Car park Lot 1 +2 41/43 Yes Yes Yes
(constant speed)
Southeast residence (Approximately 15m from Car park) Screening provided by proposed acoustic fence and
-
exiting barriers between residential property and laneway access for offices
Door slam Car park Lot 100 +5 50/55 Yes Yes Yes
Car starting and
Car park Lot 100 +5 47/52 Yes Yes Yes
accelerating
Cars moving slowly
Car park Lot 100 +2 47/49 Yes Yes Yes
(constant speed)
It can be seen in Table 8 that the noise due to usage of the proposed car park for the commercial
development complies with the daytime, evening and night limits for residential areas adjoining
the site.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3)Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 17
Page 19
9 DELIVERY AND SERVICE ACTIVITIES
As the proposed shopping centre would comprise of an IGA supermarket and speciality stores,
noise from delivery and service activities would need to be considered. The developer proposed
site plan shows location of the loading dock for the supermarket and speciality stores (please
refer to Figure 3).
Typical delivery times for deliveries at the centre have been obtained from the proposed IGA
operator who operates other IGA stores within the Sunshine Coast area (information obtained via
David Hood, Architect). The operator has stated that Heavy Rigid Vehicle (HRV)deliveries from
IGA warehouses would occur once a day, typically between 8am and noon on week days only.
HRV deliveries will not occur during evening and night periods (6pm to 7am).
The operator has also confirmed that the local bulk deliveries are done via body trucks, up the
size of a Medium Rigid Vehicle (MRV)with cold rooms on the back for bread and milk etc. These
deliveries are frequent and mostly during the week and may deliver on weekends. These
deliveries are proposed at anytime during the day evening and night periods.
It is anticipated that Refuse collection vehicles will also assess the site for rubbish collection.
Service and Refuse collection vehicles will enter the loading area a one-way driveway off Rufous
Street to the northwest -
Entry A and exist on Rufous Street to the southwest -
Entry B. Vehicles
accessing the small service bay areas will enter and exit the site via the southwest entry -
Entry
B.
It is understood that HRVs and Refuse collection vehicles will not use reversing beepers at the
Service bay area. Reversing beepers may be used by forklifts or by vehicles accessing the
Speciality shop service bay.
It should be noted that any deliveries conducted between lOpm and 12am Monday to Friday fall
into the shoulder night time period (10pm to 7am). Any waste management conducted between
6am and 7am Monday to Sunday would also fall within the shoulder night time period.
9.1 Source data for service and delivery vehicle noise
The noise levels associated with vehicle manoeuvres have been tested by this office at a number
of shopping centres, service stations and fast food outlets. These levels are summarised in Table
9.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 18
Page 20
Table 9: Noise levels from low-speed vehicle manoeuvres
Noise Level @ 10m Noise Level @ 10m
Vehicle Type/Manoeuvre
(~m.x) (~eq)
(a)SRV -
Small Rigid Vehicle
Door slam 64dBA -
Engine start 62dBA -
Accelerate from rest 62dBA -
Travel constant speed 56dBA -
(b)MRV -
Medium Rigid Vehicle
Door slam 64dBA -
Engine start 70dBA -
Accelerate from rest 70dBA -
Airbrakes and reversing (with beepers) 75dBA -
Travel constant speed 64dBA -
(c)AV -
Articulated Vehicle (similar to HRV)
Door slam 64dBA
Engine start 78dBA
Accelerate from rest 82dBA
Airbrakes and reversing (with beepers) 85dBA
Travel constant speed 78dBA
(d)RCV -
Refuse Collection Vehicle
Waste handling 88dBA -
(e)Refrigeration Units
Small (SRU) -
60dBA
(f) Forklifts
lifting 80dBA -
Reversing 75dBA -
(g)LPG tanker
LPG tanker refilling 75dBA 70dBA
Accelerate from rest 82dBA
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 19
Page 21
9.2 Assessment of service and delivery vehicles
Noise emissions have been determined by modelling the noise sources, receiver locations,
intervening structures and topographical features of the area using the SoundPLAN12 computer
programme. The program calculates the contribution of each noise source at each specified
receptor point and allows for the prediction of the total noise from a site.
The noise prediction takes into account of:
. Location of noise sources and receivers;
. Height of sources and receivers;
.
Separation distances between sources and receivers;
. Screening provided by the proposed 3.5m high acoustic barriers;
. Time duration for each noise event;
. Ground type between sources and receivers;
. Intervening buildings / structures between sources and receivers; and
. Adjustment of +2dBA for annoying characteristics (i.e. tonality, impulsiveness) that are
just detectable, and +5dBA for annoying characteristics that are prominent / clearly
audible.
Point calculations have also been conducted for loading dock activities and truck movements to
assess the noise impacts at the residential areas to the northwest, north and east of the site. The
results for the worse-affected residence to the northwest and east are summarized in Table 10.
Table 10: Vehicle noise assessment to residential areas -
Transient Events
Corrections Noise
Typical Level @ Complies
Source (dBA) Complies Complies
Noise with
Vehicle Locations Receptor with 69dBA with SOdBA
65dBA
Manoeuvre Level at Distan- Premises daytime to SSdBA
(Refer to Adj- evening
10m ce Scree- limit? night limit?
Figure 3) ustm LAmax I limit?
(4max) attenua ning -ent
-tion LAmax, adj
Northwest residence
-16dBA +5
SRVengine B 62dBA -8dBA 38/43dBA Yes Yes Yes
start (60m) dBA
12
SoundPlAN is anintegrated software package for noise and air pollution evaluation developed in Germany by
Braunstein + Berndt GmbH. It has been configured to predict the extent of (i) road traffic noise intrusion by
application of the CRTN ’88 algorithms and (ii) industrial noise emission using the CONCAWE algorithms. It is in
use in more than 30 countries and has had widespread application throughout Australia.
It is endorsed by
Department of Main Roads, Brisbane City Council, Queensland EPA and most other State environmental authorities.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc
5August 2013 Page 20
Page 22
.
Corrections Noise
Typical Level @ Complies
Source (dBA) Complies Complies
Noise with
Vehicle Locations Receptor with 69dBA with SOdBA
6SdBA
Manoeuvre Level at Distan- daytime to 5SdBA
(Refer to Adj- Premises
10m ce Scree- evening
Figure 3) limit? night limit?
ustm LAmaxl limit?
,
(LAma.) attenua ning -ent
-tion LAmax, adj
"
Yes -
complies with
55dBA
criterion with
residential
windows
+2
partially open;
-lOdBA
SRV accelerate A 62dBA OdBA 52/54dBA Yes Yes but
(30m) dBA
No -
exceed
50dBA
criterion by
2dBA with
residential
windows
fully open
-16dBA +2
SRV travel B 56dBA -8dBA 32/34dBA Yes Yes Yes
(60m) dBA
MRVengine -16dBA +5
B 70dBA -8dBA 46/51dBA Yes Yes Yes
start (60m) dBA
MRV -lOdBA +2
A 70dBA OdBA 60/62dBA Yes Yes No
accelerate (30m) dBA
-16dBA +2
MRV travel B 64dBA -8dBA 48/50dBA Yes Yes Yes
(60m) dBA
Yes -
complies with
55dBA
criterion with
residential
windows
partially open;
HRVengine -16dBA +5
B 78dBA -8dBA 54/59dBA Yes Yes but
start (60m) dBA
No -
exceed
50dBA
criterion by
4dBA with
residential
windows
fully open
-lOdBA +2 No, by No, by
HRV accelerate A 82dBA OdBA 72/74dBA No
(30m) dBA 5dBA 9dBA
Yes -
complies with
55dBA
criterion with
residential
windows
partially open;
-16dBA +2
HRV travel B 78dBA -8dBA 54/56dBA Yes Yes but
(60m) dBA
No -
exceed
50dBA
criterion by
4dBA with
residential
windows
fully open
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3)Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 21
Page 23
Corrections Noise
Typical Level @ Complies
Source (dBA) Complies Complies
Noise with
Vehicle Locations Receptor with 69dBA with SOdBA
Level at Distan-
65dBA
Manoeuvre Premises daytime to 55dBA
(Refer to Adj- evening
10m ce Scree- limit?
Figure 3) ustm limit?
night limit?
LAm.x I
(LAm.x) attenua ning -ent
-tion LAm.x. adj
-16dBA +5
Air brakes B 85dBA -8dBA 61/66dBA Yes No No
(60m) dBA
ReV waste -16dBA +5
B 88dBA -8dBA 64/69dBA Yes No No
handling (60m) dBA
-16dBA +5
Forklift lifting B 80dBA -8dBA 56/61dBA Yes Yes No
(60m) dBA
-16dBA +5
Forklift reverse B 75dBA -8dBA 51/56dBA Yes Yes No
(60m) dBA
Eastern Residences
-17dBA +5
SRVengine Yes
e 62dBA OdBA 45/50dBA Yes Yes
start (70m) dBA
-18dBA +2
SRV accelerate e 62dBA OdBA 44/46dBA Yes Yes Yes
(80m) dBA
-17dBA +2
SRV travel e 56dBA OdBA 39/41dBA Yes Yes Yes
(70m) dBA
Yes -
complies with
55dBA
criterion with
residential
windows
partially open;
MRVengine -17dBA +5
e 70dBA OdBA 53/58dBA Yes Yes but
start (70m) dBA
No -
exceed
50dBA
criterion by
3dBA with
residential
windows
fully open
Yes -
complies with
55dBA
criterion with
residential
windows
partially open;
MRV -18dBA +2
e 70dBA OdBA 52/54dBA Yes Yes but
accelerate (80m) dBA
No -
exceed
50dBA
criterion by
2dBA with
residential
windows
fully open
It can be seen in Table 10 that compliance is achieved for a number of transient short duration
noise events occurring during the daytime, evening and night.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 22
Page 24
As detailed in Section 7.1, the outdoor noise limit can range between SOdBA LAmax and SSdBA
LAmax depending on the fa ade attenuation provided by a normal and naturally-ventilated dwelling
(i.e. open windows). For this assessment, an outside noise limit range of SOdBA to SSdBA has
been adopted, i.e. a SdBA-10dBA noise reduction from outside to inside.
There are some exceedences predicted over the transient noise limits, particularly for:
. SRV travel at Area B (exceedance of the SOdBA criterion by 2dBA, but complies with the
SSdBA criterion);
. MRV accelerate at Area A (exceedance of the SOdBA criterion by 10dBA);
. MRV accelerate at Area C (exceedance of the SOdBA criterion by 3dBA, but complies with
the SSdBA criterion);
MRV accelerate at Area C (exceedance of the SOdBA criterion by 2dBA, but complies with
the SSdBA criterion);
HRV engine start at Area B (exceedance of the SOdBA criterion by 4dBA, but complies with
the SSdBA criterion);
. HRV accelerating at Area A (exceedance during the day, evening, and night);
. HRV travel at Area B (exceedance of the SOdBA criterion by 4BA);
. Air brakes at Area B (exceedence during the evening and night);
. RCV Waste handling at Area B (exceedence during the evening and night); and
. Forklift use at Area B (exceedance of the SOdBA criterion by 6dBA)
We noted that where there are exceedances of the SOdBA criterion by up to SdBA, these
exceedances will still comply with the SSdBA criterion with residential windows partially open.
It can be seen that there is an exceedence of SdBA during the day and 9dBA during the evening
for HRVs accelerating at the entrance of the service and loading to the west. The noise
exceedence at night is approximately 22dBA. These exceedences are also expected to occur at
northern residences along Woodland Drive with HRVs pass-bys.
The IGA Supermarket operator has stated that HRV deliveries from IGA warehouses would occur
once a day, typically between 8am and noon on week days only. HRV deliveries will not occur
during evening and night periods (6pm to 7am).
An exceedence of SdBA during the daytime can be considered to be insignificant. A truck passby
is expected to only occur over a brief period of approximately 5 to 10 seconds and would be
similar to normal occasional truck passbys along the local Council roads.
Transient noise activities exceeding noise limits during the evening are Air brake use and RCV
Waste handling activities. Activities at the service and loading bay area will only occur during the
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 23
Page 25
daytime (7am to 6pm). In this instance, the evening and other exceedences occurring at night
would not be applicable.
In order to achieve the criteria and protect the amenity of the area, we recommend that:
. Use of the loading dock to the west should be restricted to day-time periods, between
7:00am. to 6:00pm;
.
Usage of HRVs accessing the loading dock to the west should be restricted to day-time
periods, between 7:00am. to 6:00pm;
. Refuse waste collection activities should be restricted to day time periods only, between
7:00am to 6:00pm; and
.
Usage of MRVs for loading and service activities to speciality shops to the east should be
restricted to daytime and evening periods, between 7:00a.m to 10:00p.m every day.
Quieter reversing beepers and minimal use of air brakes at night can minimise the risks of noise
complaints from the adjoining residences. In this instance, conditions should be imposed on the
site such as ’quaker beepers’ are used instead of conventional beepers and that the use of air
brakes at night are minimised as far as practicable.
Noise predictions of quasi-continuous sources at the commercial site, and comparison with the
minimum logged LAeq noise levels are summarized in Table 11.
Table 11: Vehicle noise assessment -
Quasi -
Continuous (Northwest residences)
Typical Corrections Noise Level
Complies Complies Complies
@ with
Noise with with
Vehicle Source 52dBA
Distance Receptor 55dBA 53dBA
Manoeuvre Locations Level at Scree- Adjust
Attenuati daytime evening night
10m ning -ment Premises
-on limit? limit? limit?
(~eq) LAeq/ LAeq, adj
Northwest residence
Large -16dBA +2
Refrigeration 70dBA -8dBA 46j48dBA Yes Yes Yes
Unit
(60m) dBA
B
Small +2
-16dBA
Refrigeration 60dBA -8dBA 36j38dBA Yes Yes Yes
Unit
(60m) dBA
Eastern Residences
Small +2
-17dBA
Refrigeration C 60dBA 0 43j45dBA Yes Yes Yes
(70m)) dBA
Unit
It can be seen in Table 11 that compliance is achieved for trucks mounted with small refrigeration
units during the daytime, evening and night.
Our assessment shows that some loading activities can potentially exceed the nominated noise
limits. It should be noted that the assessment is based on typical noise source emissions that
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 24
Page 26
were measured in previous projects. The calculations are generally conservative in nature and
indicate that there may be some vehicle manoeuvring activities that may exceed noise limits from
time to time. The duration of the individual noise events are expected to be brief.
However should quieter loading/services vehicles be nominated for the commercial site, additional
measurements and assessment could be made of the quieter vehicles, and the above
recommendations can be revisited and reassessed.
10 MECHANICAL PLANT NOISE
Noise from mechanical plant associated with the air-conditioning, refrigeration units, exhaust fans
etc. has the potential to impact upon nearby noise sensitive premises.
10.1 Assessment of mechanical plant noise
As the exact uses and tenancies for the buildings within the shopping centre are unknown at this
stage, the types of mechanical plant could not be determined. In this instance, it is recommended
that all new proposed plant are checked for compliance by a qualified acoustical consultant before
installation and certified for compliance by testing prior to the commencement of use. Generally
the combined component noise level due to mechanical plant within the site should not exceed
the final component noise limits stipulated in Section 7.3 at residential areas.
11 NOISE FROM INCREASED ROAD TRAFFIC
It is anticipated that traffic along Woodland Drive, Rufous Street and David Low Way are expected
to increase with the development of the shopping centre. Due to the increase in traffic conditions,
a change in traffic noise levels from these local roads is also expected. An assessment of the
impact of road traffic noise is presented in this section.
11.1 Traffic noise assessment
The current and future daily traffic volumes for Woodland Drive and Rufous Street provided by the
traffic engineer -
Pekol Traffic and Transport (Chris Bull) and are presented in Table 12.
Table 12: Traffic volumes for Woodland Drive, Rufous Street and David Low Way
Current Daily Future Daily Traffic Volume
Road Traffic Volume and Composition
and Composition (With Development)
Woodland Drive 970vpd /1% CV 3,093vpd /1% CV
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 25
Page 27
-
Current Daily Future Daily Traffic Volume
Road Traffic Volume and Composition
and Composition (With Development)
Rufous Street 700vpd / 1% CV 3,131vpd / 1% CV
David Low Way 11,380vpd /3% CV 12,718vpd / 3% CV
The data shown in Table 12 together with the geometry data obtained from drawings have been
used in the preparation of the computer model using the Sound PLAN software. This software
uses the CoRTN 198813 algorithms endorsed by Council.
The model has been calibrated using the existing 2013 noise measurements. The model has then
been used to predict the traffic noise level at the nearby residences for future traffic conditions. A
comparison between current and future noise levels has been made to ascertain the noise impacts
at the residences.
The model has included the following assumptions:
. The 18 hour traffic count will be 94% of the daily volume
Road surfaces in the future will be identical to the existing road;
.
Average speed of SOkm/hr for Wooodland Drive and Rufous Street;
.
Average speed of 60km/hr for David Low Way and;
. Lowset receivers are located at L8m above ground level, highset receivers at 4.6m
above ground level.
A comparison between the current and future corresponding traffic noise levels at the most
affected fa ade of dwellings adjoining the roads are presented in Table 13.
Table 13: Traffic volumes for roads Woodland Drive, Rufous Street and David Low Way -
LAID IShr
Current noise Future noise Noise
Road
levels levels Increase
Woodland Drive 61dBA 66dBA +5dBA
Rufous Street 57dBA 64dBA +7dBA
David Low Way 68dBA 69dBA +ldBA
It can be seen in Table 13 that there will be a traffic noise increase of approximately 1dBA along
David Low Way and between SdBA to 7dBA along Woodland Drive and Rufous Street. Woodland
Drive and Rufous Street currently carry low traffic volumes and hence low traffic noise levels. The
increase of noise levels from SdBA to 7dBA above current levels due to the increase in traffic
volumes will likely be noticeable at the residences.
The possible noise control treatment is provision of acoustic upgrades to existing residential
buildings, but it is understood that this option is not feasible. A reduction of noise impacts is
expected if an alternate access to the shopping centre via David Low Way is provided. It is
13
CoRTN 1988 -
Calculation of Road Traffic Noise UK Department of Transport HMSO.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 26
Page 28
understood that the alternate access option will be explored by the Client and a separate
application will be made to Council to that effect.
As stated in Section 2.0, the site currently contains a sports and recreational use (Lawn Bowls
Club with Clubhouse) which has not been operational for a number of years. The Client has stated
that if the Bowls Club was in operation, it would likely have generated additional traffic flows
along Woodland Drive and servicing requirements greater than the Current Daily Traffic Volume
and Composition values presented in Table 12. In other words, the Client suggests that the
residential properties along Woodland Drive and Rufous Street were previously affected by traffic
noise from vehicles travelling to and from the Bowls Club when it was in operation.
12 CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the analysis presented in this report, the following conclusions have been drawn:
The proposed shopping centre would have the following noise impacts on residential areas
located to the northwest, north and east -
car park noise, noise from delivery and
services trucks, noise from increased traffic along Rufous Street and Woodland Drive and
noise from mechanical plant;
.
Existing ambient noise levels were monitored over a week period. Based on the results of
the noise monitoring and conditions stipulated in the Environmental Protection Act 1994,
Environmental Protection (Noise)Policy 2008 and the Environmental Protection Regulation
2008, relevant noise limits for car park noise, delivery and services vehicles noise, and
mechanical plant were determined and presented in Section 7 of the report;
. Noise from typical transient events in the car park are predicted and demonstrated to
comply with the daytime, evening and night time noise limits at surrounding residential
properties;
. To minimise potential noise nuisance from the supermarket loading dock, the developer
proposes to construct 2.sm and 3.5m high acoustic barriers as shown in Figure 4. For the
noise barriers to provide adequate noise reduction, they are required to have a minimum
superficial density of 14kg/m2 and a maximum leakage of 1%. This may be achieved
using materials such as concrete tilt panel, masonry block wall, 35mm thick CCA treated
lapped and capped timber palings or 75mm Hebel Power Panel. The northern end of the
barrier will consist of a solid and gap-free gate for ingress of service and delivery vehicles;
. With the noise barriers constructed, modelling and assessment of noise from most loading
and services transient events within the site are demonstrated to comply with the daytime
and evening noise limits. Exceedances of the transient noise limits are predicted for the
following transient events:
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 27
Page 29
o HRV engine start (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by 5dBA, but
complies with the 55dBA criterion),
o SRV travel at Area B (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by 2dBA, but
complies with the 55dBA criterion);
o MRV accelerate at Area A (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by lOdBA);
o MRV accelerate at Area C (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by 3dBA,
but complies with the 55dBA criterion);
o MRV accelerate at Area C (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by 2dBA,
but complies with the 55dBA criterion);
o HRV engine start at Area B (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by 4dBA,
but complies with the 55dBA criterion);
o HRV accelerating at Area A (exceedance during the day, evening, and night);
o HRV travel at Area B (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by 4BA);
o Air brakes at Area B (exceedence during the evening and night);
o RCV Waste handling at Area B (exceedence during the evening and night); and
o Forklift use at Area B (exceedance of the night 50dBA criterion by 6dBA)
. Modelling and assessment of quasi-continuous noise for some loading events within the
site demonstrated that:
o Noise emissions from trucks with small refrigeration units at the nominated
loading docks are predicted to be lower than the representative daytime,
evening and night time ambient noise levels.
. Based on the modelling results, the following recommendations for loading and service
activities within the site are made:
o Use of the shopping centre loading dock to the west should be restricted to
day-time periods, between 7:00am to 6:00pm;
o Usage of HRVs accessing the shopping centre loading dock to the west should
be restricted to day-time periods, between 7:00am to 6:00pm;
o Refuse waste collection activities should be restricted to day time periods only,
between 7:00am to 6:00pm; and
o Usage of MRVs for loading and service activities for speciality shops to the east
should be restricted to daytime and evening periods, between 7:00am to
lO:OOpm every day.
. Generally our assessment shows that some loading activities can potentially exceed the
nominated noise limits. It should be noted that the assessment is based on typical noise
source emissions that were measured for previous projects. The calculations are generally
conservative in nature and indicate that there may be some vehicle manoeuvring activities
that may exceed noise limits from time to time. The duration of the individual noise
events are expected to be brief.
. However should quieter loading/services vehicles be nominated for the commercial site,
additional measurements and assessment could be made of the quieter vehicles, and the
above recommendations can be revisited and reassessed.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 28
Page 30
. The exact uses and tenancies are unknown at this stage, therefore the types of
mechanical plant to be installed at the site could not be determined. We recommend that
all new proposed plant are checked for compliance by a qualified acoustical consultant
before installation and certified for compliance by testing prior to the commencement of
use.
.
Generally the combined component noise level due to mechanical plant within the site
should not exceed the final component noise limits stipulated in Section 7.3 at residential
areas.
. Traffic noise from David Low Way is expected to increase by approximately 1dBA and for
Woodland Drive and Rufous Street by SdBA to 7dBA above current levels after the
construction of the shopping centre. The increase of noise levels due to the increase in
traffic volumes will likely be noticeable at the residences along Woodland Drive and
Rufous Street.
. The possible noise control treatment is provision of acoustic upgrades to existing
residential buildings, but it is understood that this option is not feasible. A reduction of
noise impacts is expected if an alternate access to the shopping centre via David Low Way
is provided. It is understood that the alternate access option may be explored by the
Client and a separate application may be made to Council to that effect.
. The site currently contains a sports and recreational use (Lawn Bowls Club with
Clubhouse) which has not been operational for a number of years. The Client has stated
that if the Bowls Club was in operation, it would likely have generated additional traffic
flows along Woodland Drive and servicing requirements greater than the Current Daily
Traffic Volume and Composition values presented in Table 12. In other words, the Client
suggests that the residential properties along Woodland Drive and Rufous Street were
previously affected by traffic noise from vehicles travelling to and from the Bowls Club
when it was in operation.
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group pty Ltd
5August 2013 Page 29
Page 31
0
\’
"
r-r.s.-... \ "F’PunkLoglt Pty
_^
\ ~
I
jj
-’’’St~
/:’~
C ~nl.Or~
I ’"
~fad~
1-
t5
~ ~ <( 1 ",1
11.1,Iter ~II~ ~
I J i.
’’’’PC),
~Iter J I’
.:
~
!
., ":~
r;::1,- ,rd.:.~,
.,.~:
f .
’.
’.3 ..
’."
’.~-
~
J I ~
"..-
\ ~ 11:mSI
.
,
\.\n"l(IO~ ~t. .~ ~
~~\l:
~~~ ....’":till !
II}j
~
.. ,<I <!J,
V ill
~Ctfll.:-....0,.(1
/.~,q.
"i’~’f{,
(j~ <tr.
F_.
~J),.
....""Iter
~’l...,. ~
’" "!.
0$’
,.
3>
\’</,
~~a
~
~( ~ ct’
’
r
f
"
~"I,Q...t I ,) f t:~~
~ (flit; .
’’J
.tc"
~ I~ .
’iR’’’’ I
f 1:’ I
..
F gure 1: Site location (Picture courtesy of Google Maps)
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble
Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre,doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 30
Page 32
"
I’
’I
,
.t ",
1
~
1
,
’) ,-
_--.J
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 31
Page 33
.-
"
La’.
’\.:..,1
.............~
DAVID
lOW’, --
----
---
------
........
1
.,.
C
(
".
....I ’!I ,~.,.:,)
’~~ 1
{--_.,..,.~
;p;-~~
.............
-------
w
\ ./
./
;(. -
-
------.
>
’/:;:.;./
0::
o
o
toiroouUoI!,,....:.
FJ.:...N.".DoI,I)
--
I
1
I ././~; ./
~
..:;./ LOT 95
":;,;:’:
C
/@-~/’..
L
’
........-
,.’
I,
Speciality shops loading area
-....._ ..
..
t f
~/./.,
:
__.
z ’"
’y’ ,. . . /~7~
.
,..,r~ ::..r"’,r-.J’"’-,.r- ~’;’’:"’’\J-. ,.
w"
hj !
/
~.
’
"’--’, I.’
<I:
:~.I,
"
r.: .’
UfClAllY ~~
..
’. ~ . "
~"
/
/
~ l. I
...
-,
--
.
/
...tfJJ_.:......
o ’.’~;:~t~"’l. I
,I
~
) ’-’: ~.
l.OT94
I
.
I
~.",..,
~....
--’"’
~...., I’C
~/?#,’?!
11.1’- 1111
".’
_.
, ,
,
/,
....
,
~ ,,4, /
.....
r!;j-.... f " ~
’~
-"....... ,...
~:
,
,~~~i-t;/r~
~
J../ I
1~~!2’
.:. ’-,
~
,
>.,..
...
+ .
r
-;.~
I’"
--
.
-,..,>>~-
I
o-..~",... f1~
1 ,r.;;. ’i-../
r~~~~
"".,. I~,
or-.:.r
~I...
"
,. ~.,.
,_
-: ~~..
......:......
t,.--’f.;;.’i.,J
""..~
: : - ~. -I.(:.’WJ?-’.~ ’ I
,
....
~~~
-1 ~t
"!-r "3:~’" ~_
/....
.
I
...,
/
----
E:E:i
Shopping centre loading area
t.-;,....:s~......................-::",...
Figure 3: Site plan
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 32
[OCR of page images]
WOODLAND DRIVE
Figure 3: Site plan
© Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 32
Page 34
....
,.
6 ’-.
.
DAVID -~._-
lOW --.-.;
........
"’--, ........
~,
"-1. : bJ -~
(----
-- ~
(
’i --
., ,
"\>1;+1.....’
""
.-:::-
:-
1-=
/’
~- ~
)~>- .............
w " If_-
> /’/
Qi:
~,~’
r~If"lU.QNI~ ~/ L.9T95
C /\.~:....- ., ’. ....’-
I
1
/’ J
/~~.:t;..-!’~...
c ",,’
~-y
~1/k. J
...
Z
<I:
V~""’;=--_Jr:L.I~’=U-;..~"’, -’:’~
I
....,t’:’
J-. ’
,
-’
INCl.t.lT’t.HOn":.
_.
. ~
~
~Vl {.,," ~~~: _
.~.
o L rttOfJONO.....&.()IIIrtG /
~ ’I’ ,. .
,
<
.,.
’.....,
~n: _._< ~~:}o.:;;
~
/~lJ~-J..,l1.~h1
I
/
J. 1 l
_~!1}i/!J..’l::h.~
+.
~~;
+.
r
"7J:’.:,’ 1 t.-’......
__’ .
t
~ .
Jlll- "~’’’~,(:l.iJi........
~
..
’#.
.
~"
’"
.,
.~
._~~~ ~...
k"
,~_
~f,..17*~~{~’
"1"1
~’,.)o_
x..
...1:/:,_
-’1<,..
.....
e T
--
_.~:
--;.-L .
---’:.._"
!
-
~."I’ _.
-
.
-
-___________
---
f~~ ----
..~:.......)o...~!I....aA.".~
~
Figure 4: Acoustic barrier locations -
2m and 3.5m high
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 33
[OCR of page images]
WOODLAND DRIVE
Figure 4: Acoustic barrier locations - 2m and 3.5m high
© Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 33
Page 35
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Saturday, 6 July 2013
100
15
-- L90 --
Leq -- Ll0 L1
-- -
Lmax -<>- Wind
Speed and Direction :E
5’
0.
90
10
i, !/)
~
(1)
(1)
80 Q.
<’ 5 .....
""
10
3
......
~ 1/1
""
"i 70
o
>
GI
...I
GI
... 60
::I
1/1
1/1
1!:!
0. 50
~
c:
::I
~ 40
, !
,
i
30
II
!,
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Repr...ntatlve Noll. level. Note.: OMR Summary
DesCriptor Lmax L, LlO L90 DesCriptor
Leg 1. Grey areas indicate periods of time Lmax Leg 491hour LlO Max L,o
lh Lgo
Day 67.8 611 55.6 448 52.8 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 541 56.4
Evening 64.7 56.9 55.4 48.2 533 other extraneous factors
Night 62.6 54.2 558
Night 62.9 55.8 503 407 49.8 8Hour 445
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 55.6 56.4
In free-field
’BHour 55.2 47.8
3. Night period is taken from 10pm in the 24 Hour 517
Data File 2O’-07-06_SLM_OOO_t23_Rpt_Report txt first day to lam the next day
Template aTE~258 (rev 38)OLD Logger Graphs
Figure 5: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
06/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble
Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 34
Page 36
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Sunday, 7 July 2013
100
15
---L90 ~
Leq --- L10 ---L1 -
Lmax -<>-Wind Speed and Direction ~
::I
Q.
90
10
Ul
’tl
(1)
(1)
80 Q.
;c- ~
3
.......
’tl
..
.....
’ii 70
o
>
~
~ 60
::I
..
..
~
II. 50
’tl
c
::I
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
R.pr...nt.tI.... Nol.. level, Notes: OM R Summary
Descriptor Lmax L, LlO Lgo Descriptor
4. 1. Grey areas Indicate periods of time Lmax Le9 Le9 lhoU!’" L,o Max L’Qlh Lgo
O’Y 69.6 6\4 56.2 459 53.9 that are either affected by rain,wind or O.Y 55.9 57.
Evening 65.. 563 527 467 5t6 other extraneous factors
Night 60’ 52.7 53.9
Night 60S 55.3 52.9 48.8 5’. SHour 49.6
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12Hour 55.8 57.8
In free-field
’
Hour 546 47.
3. Night period is taken from lOpm in the 24 Hour 52.8
Data File 2013-07..Q6_SLM_OOO_123_Rpt_Report t)(l: first day to tam the next day
Templale: QTE-258 (reY 38)OlO logger Graphs
Figure 6: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
07/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble
Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 35
Page 37
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Monday, 8 July 2013
100
15
-- L90 --
Leq --- LlO Ll
-- -
Lmax -0--- Wind Speed and Direction ~
5’
0.
90
10
UI
j
(I)
0.
.... 80
5
4( ....
3
......
’tJ III
’""
Qj 70
o
>
~
~ 60
::J
III
III
~
II. 50
’tJ
c:
::J
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Repre..ntatlve Nols. Leval. Notes: OM R Summary
Descriptor Lmax L, LlO L90 Descrlplor
LI!l9 1, Grey areas indicate periods of time Lm x 4. Leg lhour LlO Max L’Olb Loa
Day 691 615 564 464 543 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 56.1 57.9
Evening 65.2 56.9 54.3 48.6 52.5 other extraneous factors
Night 614 540 552
Night 616 56.3 53.6 SO.O 527 8HoUf S07
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 564 579
in free-field
1!Hour 556 497
3, Night period is taken from Wpm In the 24Hour 535
Oala File 2O’7..Q6_SU..1_000_123_Rpt_Report txt first day to tam the next day
Template QTE-258 (rev 38)OLD Logger Graphs
Figure 7: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
08/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble
Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 36
Page 38
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Tuesday, 9 July 2013
100 15
-- L90 --
Leq --- L10 L1
--- -
Lmax ~Wind Speed and Direction ~
5’
Co.
90 10
UI
’i
ID
Co.
80 5
<’ ....
3
......
"0 .,
......
70 0
>
~
e! 60
::I
.,
.,
e!
Q. 50
"0
c:
::I
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Repre.entatlve Nolle Levels Notea: OM R Summary
Oescnptor Lmall L, LlO L90 Oescr
Leg 1. Grey areas Indicate periods of time or
Lmax Leg LI!!91hour LlO Max L’Qlb L90
Day 69.4 622 577 509 556 that are either affected by raln,wlnd or Day 56.B sa.7
Evening 659 60.3 56.6 50.9 549 other extraneous factors NIght B16 52.2 53.7
Night 624 559 52B 4B7 SIB 8Hour 497
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12Hour 574 5B.7
in free-field
’BHour 56B 515
3. Night period Is taken from lOpm in the 24 Hour 544
Data File 2O’-07.06_SU"_OOO_123_R~_Report hd first day to tam the next day
Template QTE.2SB (rev 38)QLO logger Graphs
Figure 8: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
09/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 37
Page 39
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Wednesday, 10 July 2013
100 15
-- L90 -- Leq -- L10 L1
-- -
Lmax ~Wind Speed and Direction
:IE
:’
Q.
90 10
III
j
(I)
Q.
80 5
<’ ,....
3
.......
’tI III
’"’"
’ii 70 o
>
CP
...
!!! 60
:::J
III
III
!!!
Q. 50
’tI
C
:::J
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Representative Noise Levels Notos: OM R Summary
Descnptor Lmax L, LlO L90 Descriptor
Leg 1. Grey areas indicate periods of time LmslC Leg Leg lhour LlO Max LID
lb L90
Day 68.2 627 58.0 491 555 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 57.0 598
Evernng 65.2 594 53.9 460 518 other extraneous factors Night 620 52.5 543
Night 627 563 52.2 463 513 8Hour 477
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 578 59.8
In free-field
’SHour 563 491
3. Night period Is taken from 10pm In the 24 Hour 537
Data File 201l-07-06_SLM_OOO_123_Rpt_Repart txt first day to tam the next day
Template QTE-258 (rev 38)QLO Logger Graphs
Figure 9: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
10/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3)Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 38
Page 40
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Thursday, 11 July 2013
100
15
-- L90 --
Leq -- LlO --L1 -
Lmax ~Wind Speed and Direction ~
5’
Q.
90 10
III
j
II)
Q,
,...... 80 5
<(
....
III
’3
......
’0 1/1
....
70 0
>
S
~ 60
:::J
1/1
1/1
~
Q. 50
’0
c:
:::J
r5! 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Repre.entatlve Nol.. Levels Notes: OM R Summary
DesCriptor Lmax L, LlO Lgo Descriptor
Leg 1. Grey areas indicate periods of time Lmax Leg Leg Ihour LlO ~L’0!h Lgo
Day 684 620 57.2 49.8 550 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 563 560
Evemng 642 56.9 55.2 496 53.6 other extraneous factors
Night 614 527 541
Night 624 564 52.8 48.5 518 8Hour 491
2, Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 57.2 56.0
in free-field
’
Hour 563 506
3. Night period is taken from lOpm in the 24 Hour 53.8
Data File 2013-07-06_SlM_CXXl_123_Rpt_Report Ixt first day to tam the next day
Template OTE-25B (rev 38)OLD logger Graphs
Figure 10: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
11/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5August 2013
Page 39
Page 41
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Friday, 12 July 2013
100
15
-- L90 ---
Leq --- LlO Ll
-- -
Lmax -Wind Speed and Direction ~
5’
0..
90
10
VI
~
CD
""
C
80 5 !
3
......
" 1ft
.....
Qj 70 o
>
~
Qj
... 60
:::I
1ft
1ft
Qj
...
Q. 50
"
c::
:::I
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Repr..entatlve Nolae Levels Notes: OM R Summary
OescrlJi,or Lmax L, LlO L90 Descriptor
Leg 1. Grey areas Indicate periods of time Lmax Leg Leg 1hour LlO fv\ax L,O
Ih L9Q
Day 714 63.5 58.0 494 56.1 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 58.3 602
Evening 647 591 540 446 519 other extraneous factors Night 620 517 528
Noght 63.0 561 522 479 514 8Hour 487
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 580 60.2
in free-field
13 Hour 56.5 492
3. Night period is taken from Wpm In the 24 Hour 54.2
Data File. 20tl-07-06_SLM lO_123_RI’l_Repo rt.txt first day to tam the next day
Temptale’ QTE.258 (rev 38)QLD logger Graphs
Figure 11: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
12/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 40
Page 42
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Noise Logger 1
Saturday, 13 July 2013
100 15
-- L90 --
Leq --- LlO L1
-- -
Lmax ~Wind Speed and Direction
~
S’
a.
90 10
VI
~
I
a.
80 5
<’ .....
3
.....
’tI OIl
.....
Qj 70 o
>
QI
...I
l!! 60
::I
OIl
OIl
l!!
D. 50
’tI
C
::I
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Representative Nol.. Levels Notes: OMR Summary
Descriptor Lm.x L, LlO L90 Descriptor
Leg I, Grey areas indicate periods of time Lmax Leg 4g lhour LlO Max L,p
Ib L90
Day 68.9 618 564 472 543 that are either affected by raln,wlnd or Day 579 579
Evening other extraneous factors Nigh’
Nigh’ 8Hour
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 56.2 579
in free-field
’SHOUf 562 489
24 Hour 54.3
3. Night period Is taken from Wpm In the
Data F e 2O’G-07-06_SLM_OOO_123_Rpt_Report txt first day to tam the next day
Template QTE.25B (rev 38)OLD Logger Graphs
Figure 12: Logging results -
Logger 1 -
13/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3)Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013 Page 41
Page 43
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Logger 2
Saturday, 6 July 2013
100
15
---- L90 --
Leq -- LlO ---- Ll -
Lmax ~Wind Speed and Direction ~
::I
C.
90 10
1/1
-g
CD
C.
80 5
’3
......
’tJ VI
.....
’ii 70 o
>
cu
...I
!!! 60
::I
VI
VI
~
_ 50
~
::I
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Representative Nol.. Level_ Notes: OM R Summary
DesCriptor Lm.x L, L,o Lgo DeSCriptor
Leg 1. Grey areas Indicate periods of time Lm.x Leg Leg thour LlO ~x
L,p!h Lgo
Day 759 70.5 67’ 489 633 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 635 676
Evening 73.4 69.3 635 448 59. other extraneous factors Night 73.7 587 62.8
Night 738 671 547 412 557 8Hour .32
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 67.5 676
in free-field
’8 Hour 63.6 466
3. Night period Is taken from 10pm in the 24 Hour 58’
Data File 20tl.07-06_SLM XU/3_Rpt_Report txl first day to tam the next day
Template QTE-25B (rev 38)QLO Logger Graphs
Figure 13: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
06/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 42
Page 44
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Per gian Shopping Centre -
Logger 2
Sunday, 7 July 2013
100 15
-- L90 ---
Leq -- UO --L1 -
Lmax --<>- Wind Speed and Direction ~
:i"
Co
90 10
III
~
I
Co
80
<- ......
..... 3
10 .......
’0 0/1
.....
70 0
>
~
2! 60
~
0/1
0/1
2!
Q. 50
’0
c::
~
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Repre.entatlve Nol.. Level. Notes: OM R Summary
Descriptor Lmax L, LID L9Q Descriptor
Leg 1. Grey areas Indicate periods of time Lmax Leg Leg lhour LID fv\ax L’Ol" L90
Day 177 713 677 49.0 639 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 650 68.6
Evening 75.2 69.2 622 432 593 other extraneous factors Night 720 59.4 634
Night 72.5 65.5 541 45.6 564 8HoUl’ 462
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12 Hour 673 68.6
in free-field
13 Hour 646 488
3. Night period Is taken from lOpm In the 24Hour 616
Data File 2013-07-06_SLM_OOO_123_Rpt_Report.txt first day to tam the next day
Template QTE.258 (rev 38)OLD Logger Graphs
Figure 14: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
07/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 43
Page 45
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Logger 2
Monday, 8 July 2013
100 15
==
5’
a.
90 10
III
-g
I
a.
80 5
<’ .-.
~ 3
......
’tl III
"""
1i 70 0
>
QI
..I
~ 60
:I
III
III
~
Q. 50
’tl
C
:I
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
ReprenntaUve Noln levell Notes: OM R Summary
Descriptor Lm.n L1 LlO L90 Descrior
Leg 1. Grey areas Indicate periods of time Lmax Leg Leg lhour LlO Max L101h Loa
Day 78.2 719 681 SO.8 644 that are either affected by rain,wind or Day 65.8 69.2
Evel’llng 746 69.0 626 433 592 other extraneous factors 72.2 59.9
NIghI 63.5
Nlghl 72.6 652 54.4 46.1 566 8Hour 46.8
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
llHour 680 69.2
in free-field
"Hour 653 S01
3. Night period Is taken from lOpm in the 24 Hour 620
Data File 2013-07-06_SLM_OOO_ t23_R _Report IXl first day to tam the ne"t day
Template QTE-258 (rev 38)OLD Logger Graphs
Figure 15: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
08/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 44
Page 46
EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Perigian Shopping Centre -
Logger 2
Tuesday, 9 July 2013
100
15
--L90 --
Leq -- Ll0 Ll
-- -
Lmax -0-Wind
Speed and Direction :e
:i’
Co
90
10
CII
j
/1)
Co
80
<’ 5 ......
’""
III
3
.......
’tI VI
’""
’i 70
0
>
!l
2! 60
!l
VI
VI
~
_ 50
’tI
C
!l
~ 40
30
20
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00
Time of Day
Repre..ntatlve Nol.. Leval, Not..: OM R Summary
De9crlptor Lmax L, LlO L90 DesCriptor
Leg 1. Grey areas indicate periods of time Lmax Leg Leg thour LlO Max LtQ lh Loo
Day 78.3 72.0 68.4 529 648 that are either affected by raln,wlnd or Day 660 69.5
Evening 75.8 705 641 463 605 other extraneous factors
Night 72.8 604 64.3
Night 73.6 66.3 55.3 460 579 SHaUf 46.5
2. Graphed & tabulated data measured
12Hour 663 69.5
in free-field
1JHour 661 515
3. Night period Is taken from 10pm in the 24 Hour 626
Data File 2O’-07..Q6_SLM_OOO_123_Rpt_Report tXl first day to lam the next day
Template CTE-258 (rev 38)OLD Logger Graphs
Figure 16: Logging results -
Logger 2 -
09/07/13
@ Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Proposed Shopping Centre, Rufous Street, Peregian
Noise Impact Assessment
Q9554-01F02 (Rev 3) Peregian Shopping Centre.doc Multi Span Australia Group Pty Ltd
5 August 2013
Page 45
The text continues on page 47.
Used in these records
Response to Information Request 5-7 Rufous Street Peregian Beach - Attachment D MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 23.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.