Council archive · source document
11089_Council_Representation_060711 · REC11/0045
Attached to the e-mail REC11/0045 Representations on decision notice.
Wednesday, 6 July 2011
Our Ref: 11089 / Office: Sunshine Coast
Council Ref: REC11/0045
SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL
LOCKED BAG 72
SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 4560
ATTENTION: Mr Glen Conforti
Dear Glen
REPRESENTATIONS ON DECISION NOTICE
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT
44 THE ANCHORAGE, NOOSAVILLE
LOT 1 SP223013
Further to Council’s Decision Notice issued for the above development application, we make the
following representations in regards to Council’s approval:
Condition 10
This condition requires a building certifier to certify setbacks prior to endorsement of the plan of
survey. Certification by a building certifier seems unnecessary and is typically something that is
provided by a surveyor, given that a survey is required to confirm the setbacks.
Accordingly, we request that Condition 10 be amended to delete reference to ‘building certifier’ and
replacement with ‘surveyor’.
Condition 13
This condition requires payment of infrastructure contributions. The infrastructure charges notices
attached require payment of $6,514 for water & sewer, $3,144 for road network and $4,145 for open
space and pathways. While this would be standard and reasonable for most 1 into 2 lot subdivisions,
no account has been made of the fact that the site was originally developed as 2 lots prior to
amalgamation in 1999. The original lots were created as part of the Noosa Waters Estate and which
provided for water and sewer connections, road infrastructure, open space dedication and pathways
connections. It is noted that separate water connections and meters and sewer connections exist for
each approved lot. The proposed reconfiguration is essentially the reinstatement of 2 lots created
with a relatively new estate and which will have no impact upon existing infrastructure. In these
circumstances the imposition of additional infrastructure contributions is an unreasonable and
irrelevant condition.
Accordingly, we request that Condition 13 be deleted.
Brisbane Sunshine Coast North Queensland
p f p f
p f
Sunshine Coast
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Item 8 Advisory Notes Consistent with the representation and details included for condition 13 above, sub items 2 – 6 of the advisory notes are not considered reasonable or relevant in this instance. Deletion of items 2 – 6 together with the accompanying infrastructure charges notices for Coastal Major Road Network and Water Supply and Wastewater is requested. Item 9 Property Notes This item indicates that a property notation shall be placed on the rates records for Lot 4 regarding special access requirements. If a driveway is required to be constructed to the lot prior to endorsement of the plan of survey, this seems unnecessary. In any event there does not appear to be any reason to restrict access position, provided it is constructed in accordance with Councils standard driveway design and compliance with the Detached House Code is achieved for development. This property notation is an unreasonable and irrelevant imposition. Deletion of the property note is requested. Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct. Yours faithfully KHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Scott Sobey DIRECTOR
Used in these records
11089_Council_Representation_060711.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 254 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.