Original source · versioned page text
2018-02-06 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 FEBRUARY 2018
The proposed stormwater infrastructure also does not satisfy the criteria for a conversion from
“non-trunk” to “trunk” classification and therefore an offset against the infrastructure charges is
not warranted. While the proposed stormwater detention basin will result in some improvements
to stormwater management in the area for the 2 direct neighbours and overland flow for the area,
it does so simply because the site is the lowest point in the catchment, with the basin designed
and sized to meet the requirements for their development only. Further, Civil Operations advise
that since 3 stormwater pits have been replaced in the last 5 years, there have been no callouts
to this area due to any stormwater management issues.
It is therefore recommended that no offset be granted given the stormwater detention basin is
required to manage stormwater for this development and there are no identified stormwater
management issues for this area.
Notably, the infrastructure charge should also be amended to align with the revised staging plan
now being proposed.
4. CONSULTATION
4.1. Other Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers:
Environment Officer
Coordinator, Operational Works
Infrastructure Assessment Coordinator
Manager Civil Operations
5. CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
It is concluded that the amended staging plan is acceptable. However, the proposal to remove
the requirement for an alternative access to lots 7 & 8 and associated roadworks is not
acceptable as it is desirable that these lots have road frontage. Further, it is not recommended
that Council offset the infrastructure charges payable for the development given the stormwater
detention basin is required to serve the subject development and does not serve a trunk purpose.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer Community Development Financial Services
Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Services x Environment & Sustainable Development x Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service x Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development x Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 40 of 86
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.