Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Kelly Gerber - MCU18/0019
•. JIII
."11 NOOSAcouNcnJ Notice of Submission
----_.
To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:
1. be made to the assessment manager
2 be In writing
. 3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made el
I. 4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submi
5.. state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why
6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period
As required by the Pfanning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website
and therefore will be accessible to Intemet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not
they are properly made.
1. Application details I
I File No. MCU18/0019 . ;
. Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Nooseville
I Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Al1.edCare Facility)
I Full name of Submitter
I Postal addre~ - ------1
Suburb
--- [State O?I~ ~Lb~..5-=JI F'()~tcode
i Signature(s) ~~----
3. Details of Submission
il(yVe), make the following submission:
I _ __
1. I object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which is I
Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which Is basically one continuous building
•taking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses. ;
l2. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished In nature as a result of the development. J
'13.This site Is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site is in direct conflict with
the Noose Plan. The Noose Plan was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects that
I
.
the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed
I
. development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 lots, ;
i which is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial in nature. I
i4. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site. I
5. I understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however, they shO.-u-ld-be-l-oca-ted-1
I in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such a development.
i 6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car
. parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility directiy
across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this problem I
I with more and more people parking on Goodchap SI, Val Crescent and nearby side streets. .
r
l ----'
Pr1vacy
Council will use any penlonallnlormatlon provided lor the Intended purpose only and lor remaining In contact with you. Council Is authorised to collect
this information In accordance with the Local G<>vemment Act 2009 and other local Govemment Acts. Your P9n1onallnlormation Is only accessed by
peBOn. authortsed to do '0. Your pel1lOnallnlormatlon 10d.a~ with in accordance with council'. prtvacy policy.
www.noosa.gld..gov.au I [email protected] T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewanlin Old 4565
I ABN 97 969 214121
Page 1 of 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Kelly Gerber - MCU18/0019Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 631 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.