Council archive · source document
Properly made submission (object) Ivan & Josee Ballin MCU13/0092
,
’,.
SCC CORRESPONDENCE
Coast Regional Strategy and Planning
ISunshine
Council 1111111111111111111111111 Notice of Submission
X0009192 .
.
...... .j ,
,
1. Application details
i File No MCU 13/0092
! Postal address of Land(;;;d~~d)5~-7’R~fu-~’~ St:y-~~gi~~"B~~~-hQId4573i~t’94-SP’13-7431---’---’--’------)
I N~ture of Proposed Development Development Permit for Material cha~ge of use of premises
-
2. Submitter details
Ivan Edwin Ballin and Josee Marie Ballin
! Full name of Submitter
l Postal address (Residential ad 278 David Low Way, Peregian Beach Q 4573)
,
PO Box 327
---j
!
~and iPo~code 4573
~bn:res -=,=~:--~ 28th August 2013
j Date of Submission
~
i N.B. This form has been designed for the convenience of the public, n
! Pursuant to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, We, the unde signed make the following submission: We strongly object to ,
ttii ommercial us fthe Peregf n Bow Is CIu b’areaZ: nedOpe "space7r crea’tT "I ’anI eg’i:ateds ppT g-,--;
!Complex development. We live at 278 David Low Way Peregian Beach because of the village atmosphere, and j
jand the quality of life commensal with that. The proposal to rezone/sell/redevelop the site concerned will change j
j
[adversely,the things enjoy about Peregian Beach. Currently we can walk to the beach with just the
we love and
~’normal" vehicle traffic passing by on the David Low Way. There will be, without question, many more vehiclesj
iusing this road to access any new shopping facilities. In the past, where shopping centres have sprung up, it has
!Been to the detriment ofthe existing businesses. The Peregian Village shopping centre would become deserted. !
iWe have already seen the impact the Coles Supermarket has had in Coolum the Newsagency has closed there -
Coles. So I
!because their business could not compete with Coles, because people could purchase magazines etc at
jit is clear the same process would occur within Peregian Village. Look around the Sunshine Coast there are
-
have shopping centres at
Ifew "niche"villages that do not have Supermarkets, and they flourish. We
just minutes away. We do not ne (f need to retain our
~eregian Springs, Noosa and Coolum ...
e.
Ivaluable recreation areas. Please do not allow our quality of life to be ch ged f. ,
r com nec..~al interests.
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SUMMARY OF POINTS
"
11t:~h ’-..,,_ l
To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that: ----------;’----’-C11(", C"Oz,,-,---,,--J
ter f
1, It is in writing and is signed by each person who made the submission; and 84U6
2. Is received on or before the last day; and fivl 20’J
3, States the name and address of each person; and rOOe I
4, States the grounds of the submission and the facts and circumstances relied on in sup ~ft~erAs
Please note that all submissions, including individual submitter’s particulars, are published on
co? il!.s~1J (PO
e
of
Online) and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines, All submissions are published, irrespeCf
whether or not they are properly made,
Privacy
is
Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you, Council
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts, Your personal
information’
with in accordance with council’s privacy policy, ~
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt
www.aunlhinecoaat.qld.gcw.aulmailgsunshinecoast.qld.gov.auIT 0754757272 F 07 54757’XT7
Locted Bag 72 Sunshine Coast Mal Centre aid 4560 I ABN 37876 973913
Cndl1l offt 1 Omrah Avenue Caloundra QId 4551 I IIIroochydcre ofIk;e 11-f3Ocean Street Marooc;hydoro Old 04
Nllnbollr office Qlr Currie .-.d Bury Streets Nanbour Qld 4560 I Tewantin oIIice 9 Pelican Strt Tawantil Qld 4565
Regional Strategy and Planning Notice of Submission
1 of 1
I I q :< FM1303/3-2~~2~12
Go< d..52f.>.J R.dPu] x:
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
.’ Attachment to support Regional Strategy and Planning Notice of Submission
Summary of points that are important to us:
The development will have an adverse effect on existing facilities which are currently enjoying usage consistent with the
and the Community House, to name
proper zoning of the area: Tennis Courts, Kindergarten, Di Hurst Oval, Veggie Village
most of them.
The development proposal is not consistent with the intent for the area, as expressed in The Noosa Plan(ning) scheme.
Current access is adequate only for the volume of traffic accessing existing zoned facilities. Major disruption to residents
and adjoining properties must occur to provide for high-flow traffic volume facilities to access and new supermarkets
and shops.
Currently traffic is minimal after normal hours, but a shopping complex in this area would necessitate continuing
vehicular traffic, trucks and delivery vehicles and increased waste-removal vehicles servicing the complex.
The Sunshine Coast Open Space Strategy 2011 identifies that "peregian Beach locality is generally under provided for
with recreational parks" (2011:35)and we object to loss of this recreational land for the current and future residents of
Peregian Beach and wider catchment, to Commercial development.
A shopping complex in this area is by its nature disruptive to the natural environment, and by no measure could it be
said that this proposed shopping complex could possibly "protect AND ENHANCE the natural environment.
On 18th June 2013, Council stated in its "Information Request" response to Multi Span Australia:
The site is zoned Open Space Recreation and the proposed retail and commercial use are inconsistent within the zone.
Council wishes to refer you to the Pre-lodgement Meeting held on 2July 2012, where the applicant was advised that
the proposal presents a serious conflict with The Noosa Plan.
We do not believe anything has changed, or could possible change, to correct this anomaly. Council is correct in
supporting its own The Noosa Plan. The current zoning of this area should not change purely for commercial reasons,
when the commercial needs of Peregian Beach (Village)are already more than catered for, by adjacent commercial
facilities.
We are living in our chosen area -
Peregian Beach (Village) purely for lifestyle reasons. Our area enjoys low traffic
volume except for the David Low Way, and has a low crime rate, and low noise impact after hours. None of these things
can be improved by the addition of a redundant commercial enterprise, that can only rob us of this quality of life.
Current businesses do not deserve to have their livelihood placed under further stress, which must happen if business
volume is transferred to any new shopping complex. This is unfair on the residents who patronize these businesses on a
daily/weekly basis, and unfair on the businesses who have committed to remain in the area, despite competing interests
in Noosa and Coolum and Peregian Springs.
Change is never easy, but change forced upon a community out of commercial interest is just wrong. If the community
needs new facilities, then natural forces will move to provide that need. It should not be done at the expense of our
recreational reserves, which add quality to life in the area. It is pleasant to be able to walk down to the sporting and
recreational area, as it is at present. There is nothing pleasant about walking down the road to a shopping centre where
the quiet and peaceful area "used to be." Once gone it can never be restored.
Page 3
We further refer, in our submission, the rest ofthe content of the response by council to Multi Span Australia, and note
that they can not meet these requests as the current Noosa Plan stands. Namely:
"The proposed use and site layout has the potential to denigrate the amenity of existing adjacent residential
properties, and the land to the east which is zoned Semi-attached Housing Zone. The application has not made an
assessment of the potential nuisance impacts associated with the proposal, as required under Specific Outcome 020of
II
the Business Uses Code of The Noosa Plan.
In short, the letter from Council to Multi Span Australia of 18th June 2013 says everything needed, and is in support of,
and consistent with The Noosa Plan, and congruent with the views held by us, and we believe, with a majority of the
Peregian Community.
We therefore implore the Council, to accept our submission, based on quality of life issues, The Noosa Plan intent and
purpose, and natural common sense, when seen in the light of the needs of our community, as opposed to the
imposition of an unwanted, and high impact facility, that will have a destructive effect on business, recreational and
community life in our chosen home village.
Thank you.
J~:~:.-?:::’i’/./ :l
Ivan Ballin Josee Ballin
Ivan and Josee Ballin
278 David Low Way
Peregian Beach Q 4573
Used in these records
Properly made submission (object) Ivan & Josee Ballin MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.