Council archive · source document
Properly made submission (object) Ivan & Josee Ballin MCU13/0092
We further refer, in our submission, the rest ofthe content of the response by council to Multi Span Australia, and note
that they can not meet these requests as the current Noosa Plan stands. Namely:
"The proposed use and site layout has the potential to denigrate the amenity of existing adjacent residential
properties, and the land to the east which is zoned Semi-attached Housing Zone. The application has not made an
assessment of the potential nuisance impacts associated with the proposal, as required under Specific Outcome 020of
II
the Business Uses Code of The Noosa Plan.
In short, the letter from Council to Multi Span Australia of 18th June 2013 says everything needed, and is in support of,
and consistent with The Noosa Plan, and congruent with the views held by us, and we believe, with a majority of the
Peregian Community.
We therefore implore the Council, to accept our submission, based on quality of life issues, The Noosa Plan intent and
purpose, and natural common sense, when seen in the light of the needs of our community, as opposed to the
imposition of an unwanted, and high impact facility, that will have a destructive effect on business, recreational and
community life in our chosen home village.
Thank you.
J~:~:.-?:::’i’/./ :l
Ivan Ballin Josee Ballin
Ivan and Josee Ballin
278 David Low Way
Peregian Beach Q 4573
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Properly made submission (object) Ivan & Josee Ballin MCU13/0092Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.