Original source · versioned page text
Response to Information Request - MCU12/0184
The original of this document is very large (122 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 179, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
APPENDIX D -
Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS2007).
-
l!ll
"1;, ,,’id"~’:,:
~ ..,
" =~:~ J’, ."z.
Assessed Risk 111 J~ i’J "
~
Assessed Risk at ~~ i~
1,
~’::~~~
~ Hazard Likelihood Consequence with Design "
,~
Comments ;1,. "
1~’1
j;
;;’
Existing Condition J
,L~~ I""
.’
.,,, 1 ..
’,~ "
.
Recommendations
r,o-, ..
i~
:~>
..
’.’
’.
,..
.-
"
’;/
,
’\:’ ,
,
,i’
i1
l"=
....
The likelihood of Unlikely is assessed for the potentiallandsliding or creep movement of the residual material.
Consequences of Medium are assessed as the failure of these soils could potentially cause some structural
I 1: Shallow failure in the
footing zone of the future Unlikely Medium Low Low
damage to the structure. The assessed risk for the site in the current condition is thus Low as per AGS 2007.
The assessed risk would remain Low if fill material used on the site is benched into all slopes and is placed,
structure
treated and compacted in accordance with AS3798-2007 "Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and
Residential Developments".
The likelihood of Rare is assessed for the potentiallandsliding or creep movement of through the weathered rock
2: Deep failure through the
material below the proposed structures. Consequences of Medium are assessed as the failure of these soils
weathered rock below the Rare Medium Low Low
could potentially cause structural damage to some of the property. The assessed risk for the site in the current
future structure
condition is thus Low as per AGS 2007.
Possible (Unlikely if Assuming that all retaining structures would be designed appropriately, in accordance with Section 7.8, and with
3: Failure of engineered appropriately appropriate drainage, designed drainage by a professional engineer, the likelihood of failure was assessed to be
retaining structures or cut and designed by Minor to Medium Moderate Low Unlikely. Consequences of engineered retaining structures or batters failing would be Minor to Medium. The
fill batters on the site. professional assessed risk is Low providing retaining walls and batters are designed by a suitably qualified engineer as
engineer) outlined in this report and that all mitigation recommendations for batters are followed.
Coffey Geotechnics
GEOTKPAR01945AAlA
19April2013
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.