Original source · versioned page text
Response to Information Request - MCU12/0184
The original of this document is very large (122 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 183, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
AUSTRALIAN GEOGUIDE LR7 (LANDSLIDE RISK)
I LANDSLIDE RISK landslide risk assessment for
should expect to receive
particular site you
a
report prepared in
a
Concept of Risk accordance with current professional guidelines and in
a form that is acceptable to your local council, or
Risk is a familiar term, but what does it really mean? It
planning authority.
can be defi ned as "a measure of the probability and
Risk to Property
severity of an adverse effect to health, property, or the
"
environment. This definition may seem a bit
Table 1 indicates the terms used to describe risk to
complicated. In relation to landslides, geotechnical
property. Each risk level depends on an assessment of
practitioners (GeoGuide LR1) are required to assess how likely a landslide is to occur and its consequences
risk in terms of the likelihood that a particular landslide
in dollar terms. "Likelihood" is the chance of it
will occur and the possible consequences. This is called
happening in anyone year, as indicated in Table 2.
landslide risk assessment. The consequences of a
"Consequences" are related to the cost of repairs and
landslide are many and varied, but our concerns
temporary loss of use if a landslide occurs. These two
normally focus on loss of, or damage to, property and factors are combined by the geotechnical practitioner to
loss of life.
determine the Qualitative Risk.
Landslide Risk Assessment
TABLE 2: LIKELIHOOD
Some local councils in Australia are aware of the
Likelihood Annual Probability
potential for landslides within their jurisdiction and have Almost Certain 1:10
responded by designating specific "landslide hazard
Likely 1:100
zones". Development in these areas is often covered
Possible 1:1,000
by special regulations. If you are contemplating
building, or buying an existing house, particularly in a Unlikely 1:10,000
Rare 1:100,000
hilly area, or near diffs, go first for information to your
local council. Barely credible 1:1,000,000
The terms "unacceptable", "may be tolerated", etc. in
Landslide risk assessment must be undertaken by
Table 1 indicate how most people react to an assessed
a geotechnical practitioner. It may involve visual risk level.However, some people will always be more
inspection, geological mapping, geotechnical
prepared, or better able, to tolerate a higher risk level
investigation and monitoring to identify: than others.
.
potential landslides (there may be more than
Some local councils and planning authorities stipulate a
one that couldimpact on your site) maximum tolerable level of risk to property for
. the likelihood that they will occur
developments within their jurisdictions. In these
. the damage that could result situations the risk must be assessed by a geotechnical
. the cost of disruption and
repairs and practitioner. If stabilisation works are needed to meet
. the extent to which lives could be lost. the stipulated requirements these will normally have to
be carried out as part of the development, or consent
Risk assessment is a predictive exercise, but since the
will be withheld.
ground and the processes involved are complex,
prediction tends to lack precision. If you commission a
TABLE 1. RISK TO PROPERTY
Qualitative Risk Significance Geotechnical engineering requirements
-
Very high VH Unacceptable without treatment. Extensive detailed investigation and research, pl~nning and
implementation of treatment options essential to reduce risk to Low. May be too expensive and not
practical. Work likely to cost more than the value of the property.
High H Unacceptable without treatment. Detailed investigation, planning and implementation ?f treatment
options required to reduce risk to acceptable level. Work would cost a substantial sum In relation to
the val ue of the property.
Moderate M May be tolerated in certain circumstances (subject to regulator’s approval) but requires
investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options to reduce. the risk to Low.
Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be implemented as soon as pOSSible.
Low L Usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been needed to reduce the risk to this
level, ongoing maintenance is required.
Very Low VL Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.
172 Australian Geomechanics Vol 42 No 1 March 2007
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.