Original source · versioned page text
Response to Information Request - MCU12/0184
The original of this document is very large (122 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 186, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
AUSTRALIAN GEOGUIDE LR8 (CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE)
EXAMPLES OF POOR HILLSIDE CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE
Vegetation removed
Steep unsupported cut fails
Discharges of roofwater soak away rather than
conducted Qffsite or to ’secure storage for re-use
Structure unable to tolerate
settlement and
Inadequate w lling unable
to support
Inadequately
supported cut fails
Dwelling not founded in
bedrock
Loose, saturated fill slides and
possibly flows downslope
Ponded water enters slope and activates landslida
@AGS(2007)
travel downslope which impacts other development downhill See .Iso AGS (2000)Appendix J
...
WHY ARE THESE PRACTICES POOR?
Roadways and parking areas -
are unsurfaced and lack proper table drains (gutters)causing surface water to pond and
soak into the ground.
Cut and fill has been used to balance earthworks quantities and level the site leaving unstable cut faces and added
-
large surface loads to the ground. Failure to compact the fill properly has led to settlement, which will probably continue
for several years after completion. The house and pool have been built on the fill and have settled with it and cracked.
Leakage from the cracked pool and the applied surface loads from the fill have combined to cause landslides.
Retaining walls have been avoided, to minimise cost, and hand placed rock walls used instead. Without applying
-
engineering design principles, the walls have failed to provide the required support to the ground and have failed,
creating a very dangerous situation.
A heavy, rigid, house -
has been built on shallow, conventional, footings. Not only has the brickwork cracked because
of the resulting ground movements, but it has also become involved in a man-made landslide.
Soak-away drainage has been used for sewage and surface water run-off from roofs and pavements. This water
-
soaks into the ground and raises the water table (GeoGuide LR5). Subsoil drains that run along the contours should be
avoided for the same reason. If felt necessary, subsoil drains should run steeply downhill in a chevron, or herring bone,
pattern. This may conflict with the requirements for effluent and surface water disposal (GeoGuide LR9) and if so, you
will need to seek professional advice.
Rock debris from landslides higher up on the slope seems likely to pass through the site. Such locations are often
-
referred to by geotechnical practitioners as "debris flow paths". Rock is normally even denser than ordinary fill, so even
quite modest boulders are likely to weigh many tonnes and do a lot of damage once they start to roll. Boulders have
been known to travel hundreds of metres downhill leaving behind a trail of destruction.
Vegetation has been completely cleared, leading to a possible rise in the water table and increased landslide risk
-
(GeoGuide LR5).
DON’T CUT CORNERS ON HILLSIDE SITES - OBTAIN ADVICE FROM A GEOTECHNICAL PRACTITIONER
More information relevant to your particular situation may be found in other Australian GeoGuides:
GeoGuide LR1 -
Introduction GeoGuide LR6 -
Retaining Walls
GeoGuide LR2 -
Landslides GeoGuide LR7 -
Landslide Risk
GeoGuide LR3 -
Landslides in Soil GeoGuide LR9 -
Effluent & Surface Water Disposal
GeoGuide LR4 -
Landslides in Rock GeoGuide LR10 -
Coastal Landslides
GeoGuide LR5 -
Water & Drainage GeoGuide LR11 -
Record Keeping
The Australian GeoGuides (LR series) are a set of publications intended for property owners; local councils; planning authorities;
developers; insurers; lawyers and, in fact, anyone who lives with, or has an interest in, a natural or engineered slope, a cutting, or an
excavation. They are intended to help you understand why slopes and retaining structures can be a hazard and what can be done with
appropriate professional advice and local council approval (if required) to remove, reduce, or minimise the risk they represent. The
GeoGuides have been prepared by the Australian Geomechanics Society, a specialist technical society within Engineers Australia, the
national peak body for all engineering disciplines in Australia, whose members are professional geotechnical engineers and engineering
geologists with a particular interest in ground engineering. The GeoGuides have been funded under the Australian governments’
National Disaster Mitigation Program.
Australian Geomechanics Vol 42 No 1 March 2007 175
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.