Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

prelodge

of 4

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Noosa Council documents




                                                                                  Mark Lewis, Coordinator Engineering -
                 Comments
                 13.     The boundaries indicated in red on the submitted plan are not correct. During discussion
                         Jodie indicated that she was aware that the boundaries were not correct and explained
                         some background to the linework. Any plan submitted as part of an application will need
                         to include correct boundaries.
                 14.     The site has significant areas subject to the Flooding overlay map. It was suggested that
                         development of the site within the mapped flood hazard area would be unlikely to be
                         supported. The flooding impacts on the access road to Kin Kin Township were also
                         discussed. It was suggested that any application would need to acknowledge the
                         flooding impacts and include an Emergency Management Plan for residents, staff and
                         guests.
                 15.     The standard of the existing access was also discussed. Depending on the scale/type
                         of the proposed development improvements may be required to the existing access
                         (widening, sealing etc) and to the road formation (widening, linemarking etc).It was
                         suggested that the applicant engage a civil engineer to assess the access and make
                         recommendations on any necessary improvements for the specific development.
                 16.     Depending on the scale/type of development proposed improvements to the existing site
                         effluent disposal system may be required. It was discussed that this issue would need
                         to be considered with any application.
                 17.     It was also noted that parts of the site are also mapped as being in a Landslide Hazard
                         Area. Any proposed development within the mapped parts of the site would need to
                         address the hazard in accordance with the relevant code.
                 6.      INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES

                 A Development Permit for the proposal will trigger Infrastructure Changes.
                 A request for written advice for an Infrastructure Charges Contribution Estimate relevant to
                 your        proposal         may          be        obtained         for       a        fee.
                 https://www.noosa.qld.gov.au/downloads/file/2539/noosa-shire-council-charges-resolution-
                 no-5-1-2020-effective-16-oct-2020
                 7.      FURTHER ADVICE TO BE SOUGHT

                 You are advised to contact Unitywater and any relevant Queensland Government Agencies
                 for their specific requirements in respect of your proposal.
                 Yours faithfully,



                  This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
                  discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
                  applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to
                  an approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
                  development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
                  assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
Document Set ID: 21281347
Version: 5, Version Date: 06/11/2020                                                                                          Print Date: 6 November 2020, 4:04 PM
Log in to download the original file

prelodge.pdf · 149 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.