Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Phillip Egan - MCU25/0118
7. Poor social planning outcomes
The creation of concentrated housing estates—particularly where rental or social housing is
involved—is widely recognised as poor planning practice. Such concentrations can lead to social
segregation, reduced integration, and long-term community disadvantage.
Best-practice policy is clear: social and affordable housing should be dispersed and integrated
throughout established communities and located within convenient walking distance of town
centres and services. This proposal fails to satisfy these basic planning principles.
8. Amenity impacts on existing residents
New development should be sympathetic to its surroundings and impose minimal amenity impacts.
This proposal would introduce increased noise, traffic and visual bulk into a neighbourhood that has
been planned and built for low-intensity residential living. These impacts are unavoidable given the
scale and layout of the proposal and represent a significant and unacceptable loss of amenity for
nearby residents.
Conclusion
For the reasons outlined above, the proposal is inconsistent with the site’s intended purpose,
incompatible with the surrounding neighbourhood, out of scale with local character, poorly located in
relation to essential services, and likely to result in adverse social and amenity impacts.
I therefore request that Council refuse the development application.
Yours sincerely,
Submitter Name: Phil Egan
Address: 8 Dianella Court, Cooroy
Postcode:4563_______
Email Address: (optional)
Document Set ID: 24329347
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission - Phillip Egan - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 226 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.