Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PERFORMANCE
Theme 1: Basic Services & Infrastructure PERFORMANCE
Sample RANK Very Good Fair Poor Very Don't Not Mean LGAQ
Size Good Only Poor Know App. 2017 2015
Road Construction 400 5 11.5% 43.8% 28.5% 8.8% 5.0% 2.5% 0.0% 3.49 3.54
Road Maintenance 400 7 11.0% 40.0% 32.0% 12.3% 3.5% 1.3% 0.0% 3.43 3.52
Footpaths, Kerbing & 400 11.3% 38.0% 31.5% 6.3% 5.8% 7.3% 0.0% 3.46 3.49
Guttering 6
Street Lighting 400 4= 14.3% 36.5% 30.0% 4.0% 4.3% 11.0% 0.0% 3.59 3.57
Traffic Management 400 3 18.0% 39.3% 25.3% 9.0% 4.5% 4.0% 0.0% 3.60 3.71
Parking Facilities 400 9 6.3% 25.3% 33.8% 22.0% 8.5% 4.3% 0.0% 2.99 3.72
Public Transport 400 8 6.8% 25.3% 22.8% 15.0% 9.0% 21.3% 0.0% 3.07 3.79
Drainage & Flood 400 12.8% 47.8% 22.8% 6.0% 5.8% 5.0% 0.0% 3.59 3.54
Mitigation 4=
Waste Management 400 1 31.8% 46.8% 16.8% 2.3% 1.5% 1.0% 0.0% 4.06 3.60
Community Health 400 2 9.3% 42.5% 25.3% 4.5% 2.3% 16.3% 0.0% 3.62 3.61
AVERAGE FOR THEME AS A 3.49 3.63
WHOLE
The average performance rating for this Theme is 3.49.
The top performers were:
Waste Management (4.06)
Community Health (3.62)
The poorest performing area was Parking Facilities (2.99).
Significant variances from the sample averages are also shown, below each graph, for
each responsibility area.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 55
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.