Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Theme 3: Managing the Shire PERFORMANCE
TOTAL RANK Very Good Fair Poor Very Don't Not Mean LGAQ
Good Only Poor Know Appli 2017 2015
cable
Town Planning 400 6 15.3% 41.3% 24.5% 11.5% 1.0% 6.5% 0.0% 3.62 3.54
Building Control 400 4 16.3% 42.8% 23.0% 9.8% 1.0% 7.3% 0.0% 3.68 3.57
Economic 400 4.3% 28.3% 40.0% 13.3% 3.0% 11.3% 0.0% 3.20 3.46
Development &
Local Employment 8
Development of 400 18.8% 49.5% 22.3% 3.5% 2.0% 4.0% 0.0% 3.83 3.46
Tourism 2
Financial 401 16.3% 35.5% 28.0% 2.5% 1.8% 16.0% 0.3% 3.74 3.56
Management 3
Revenue-raising 400 5 11.0% 43.0% 27.3% 4.5% 1.8% 12.5% 0.0% 3.65 3.57
Staff Management 400 7 7.0% 37.3% 21.5% 4.3% 2.0% 28.0% 0.0% 3.60 3.57
Disaster 400 18.8% 48.3% 18.5% 1.8% 1.5% 11.3% 0.0% 3.91 3.57
Management 1
AVERAGE FOR THEME AS A 3.65 3.53
WHOLE
The average performance rating for this Theme is 3.65.
The top performers were:
Disaster Management (3.91)
Development of Tourism (3.83)
Financial Management (3.74)
The poorest performing areas were Economic Development & Local Employment
(3.20).
Significant variances from the sample averages are also shown, below each graph, for
each responsibility area.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 68
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.