Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Theme 5: Quality of Council PERFORMANCE
TOTAL RANK Very Good Fair Poor Very Don't Not Mean LGAQ
Good Only Poor Know App. 2017 2015
Quality of Elected Council 400 4 15.0% 47.8% 26.0% 6.3% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 3.75 3.40
Quality of Councillor(s) 400 13.5% 27.3% 16.3% 3.3% 1.0% 38.8% 0.0% 3.80 3.42
Dealt with 3
Managerial & Supervisory 400 6.5% 38.3% 23.3% 3.0% 1.8% 27.3% 0.0% 3.62 3.44
Officers 5
Quality/Performance of 400 21.3% 50.5% 19.5% 3.3% 0.8% 4.8% 0.0% 3.93 3.49
Outdoor Workers 1
Quality/Performance of 400 17.3% 45.5% 17.5% 2.8% 0.3% 16.8% 0.0% 3.92 3.49
Indoor Staff 2
AVERAGE FOR THEME AS A WHOLE 3.80 3.45
The average performance rating for this Theme is 3.80.
The top performers were Quality/Performance of Outdoor Staff and Indoor Staff with
3.93 and 3.92 respectively.
The poorest performing area for this theme was the Managerial & Supervisory Officers
(3.62).
Significant variances from the sample averages are also shown, below each graph, for
each responsibility area.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 78
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.