Original source · versioned page text
2017-08-08 S&O - Attachment 1 to Item 6 - Noosa Community Satisfaction Benchmarking Research Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Areas of Least Importance
Only 7 of the 41 Responsibility Areas have not been considered in formulating the
previous three lists (Highest Performers, Lowest Performers and Average Performers)
because they did not have an Importance rating greater than 3.96, or 4 when rounded
(i.e.= ‘Important’).
Nevertheless they do exist, and are listed below - ranked by their Performance score,
as used in the previous three tables.
Despite their Importance rating being regarded as fairly low by the Community at large,
Councils cannot avoid expending resources upon them, as they are very Important to
some members of the community (e.g. Sporting & Recreational Facilities is rated as
‘important’ by 55.5% of respondents). Hence, the detailed data on these particular
areas has to be examined to formulate priorities - as these show the proportions of the
community who have varying priorities.
Least Important (Mean <3.96)
Street Lighting 3.76
Shopping Facilities 3.79
Cultural & Entertainment Facilities 3.82
Footpaths, Kerbing, Guttering 3.87
Community Development 3.92
Heritage Protection 3.93
Public Transport 3.94
3.65 3.70 3.75 3.80 3.85 3.90 3.95 4.00
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 95
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.