Council archive · source document
07/1259 - Referral Agency Response (Concurrence) - EPA [As Published] · 132007.1259
Applicant: Scanlon Property Group Description: Material Change of Use 2087 here: Oo | 2 IDAS C-6 Concurrence agency response Integrated Planning Act 1997 ss3.3.16 and 3.3.18 C/- PMM Group Pty Ltd PO Box 1559 FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006 [: 4 RECEIVED Application no.: 2007/1259 fo o- 1 AUG 2007 Date received by EPA: 17 July 2007 ee HOOSA Jurisdiction: Environmental Protection Act 1994 A Sante COUNCIL ‘Role: Concurrence 4 215, 215A, 217 & 219 David Low Way, PEREGIAN BEACH Lot no.: 8 ‘Registered Plan no.: RP9315 Lot no.: 9 Registered Plan no.: RP9315 Lotno.:10 Registered Plan no.: RP9315 Lot no.: 76 Registered Plan no.: MCH2969 Type of development Material change of use Reconfiguration of a Lot the existing use of the land is, or if the land is vacant land with no existing use the most recent use of the land was, for a notifiable activity under the Environmental Protection Act 1994, : the proposed use of the land is for child care, educational, recreational, residential or similar purposes and the existing use of the land is, or if the land is vacant land with no existing use the most recent use of the land was, for an industrial activity. the land is on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register under the Environmental Protection Act 1994. the land is wholly or partly within an area for which an Area Management Advice for industrial activity or natural mineralisation has been issued and the proposed use of the land is for child care, educational, recreational, residential or similar purposes. the land is wholly or partly in an area for which an Area Management Advice for unexploded ordnance (UXO) has been issued. Response to development application The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), acting as a concurrence agency under the /ntegrated Planning Act 1997, provides the following response to the application detailed above - OOoOoOg 3 conditions must attach to any approval of the development any approval must be for part only of the development any approval must be a preliminary approval only there are no concurrence agency requirements the application must be refused Reasons for including condition(s) or refusal The site (the subject lot/s) is part of an area of land within which the Department of Defence (Defence) has assessed a ‘substantial’ risk of residual UXO contamination exists. Visit the Defence website ht //www.defence.gov.au/uxo for details. VER2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/1259 - Referral Agency Response (Concurrence) - EPA [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 264 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.