Council archive · source document
Geotech Inestigation · MCU22/0192
Unearthed Geotechnical P/L ABN 78 808 074 271 Site Investigation Report 022-164 Lot 199 SP233184. #79 Gympie Kin Kin Road Kin Kin Noosa Council August 2022 For all geotechnical requirements Unearthed Geotechnical P/L mobile 0417 132 300 PO Box 1204 [email protected] Gympie Q 4570
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 10 pages
Page 2
INTRODUCTION Unearthed Geotechnical P/L was commissioned to undertake a Site Investigation in the Noosa Council at Lot 199 SP233184 (*79) Gympie Kin Kin Road, Kin Kin. (GPS coordinates 26°15’35"s, 152°52’48"e), for the four proposed one-bedroom cabins on this 38 hectare allotment. Our site investigation fieldwork was performed on 8/08/2022 after some rain activity in the course of the preceding weeks. This report does not include an assessment of slope stability or landslide risk. The standards and references used in compiling or referred to in this report are, The Queensland Building & Construction Commission, AS 1289 Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes, AS 2870 Residential Slabs and Footings, AS 3798 Guidelines earthworks commercial & residential developments, AS 1726 Geotechnical Site Investigations. Copyright in the whole and every part of the drawings, specifications and other documents provided by Unearthed Geotechnical P/L remain the property of the Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. Upon receipt of full payment for our service the client is licensed to use the drawings, specifications and other documents for the work/s for which they were commissioned. They shall not be used for any other work except by agreement with Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. 1 Site Investigation Report 022-164
Page 3
SITE INVESTIGATION As with all site investigations we assume that the fundamental principles of good construction will not be overlooked, and will be carried out with the consistent application of ‘best practice’ techniques across the site and at each stage as these factors are of great consequence. The fieldwork undertaken for our site investigation included the following; detailed subsoil investigation recording characteristics and limitations, a comprehensive site assessment to record topography, geography and geology, soil observation boreholes (75-100 mm dia. Jarret style hand augers), penetrometer testing with 9kg Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), classification and testing of hand collected soil samples, and the collation and evaluation of the results from the above studies. BB Ge Se G (The test locations were not professionally surveyed and should be considered approximate) (All fieldwork performed in accordance with the relevant Australian Standards and Codes) (All boreholes backfilled in accordance with Occupational Health and Safety regulations) FIELD TEST LIMITATIONS The soil profiles reported should generally be representative of the soil conditions across this site. In some cases soil conditions can change dramatically, and can change over short distances. If site works reveal soil conditions that are different from those shown in the attached data, the evaluator must be informed immediately as changes may be necessary. CLIENT SUPPLIED INFORMATION This site investigation and classification has been undertaken in accordance with AS 2870 ‘Residential Slabs and Footings'. The Queensland Building & Construction Commission's (QBCC) ‘Rectification of Building Work Policy’ has a requirement for the following information to be supplied to us, and that we consider this information in determining the site classification. This information includes, but is not limited to; 30 Property description and site address, Evidence to ensure site is correct (e.g. Survey Plan, Registered Plan, etc), Survey plan delineating contours, trees, existing developments, etc, Land searches, including such information as flood lines, easements, covenants, underground services and infrastructure, etc, Any previous geotechnical work, e.g. original contour survey, and the limits of prior subdivisional or developmental cutting and filling, service lines etc. & The known extent of further developmental or construction earthworks Se Be Se Be @ In this instance and at the time of our commission, we have considered the information supplied to us by the client. Should the client or his agent have omitted to supply us with the QBCC required information or supplied us with incorrect information our assessment may be irrelevant and/or inappropriate. However, should this information become available we would be pleased to amend our report accordingly, if, and as necessary. We do not take responsibility for the consequences in such cases and may incur additional costs if as a result; more testing or re-writing is necessary. Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. 2 Site Investigation Report 022-164
Page 4
FINDINGS All the field information and test results collected during our site investigation and detailed in this report, including any site plans, log and data sheets together form the basis of our recommendations. The soil profile encountered during our investigations, and as reported, was reasonably and acceptably consistent across the proposed development, and within our expectations from regional experience and correlation with The Qld Dept of Mines/Energy Geology Sheet 9445/1999 (Gympie). The Qld Dept Mines/Energy Geology Sheet 9445/1999 describes the geology as Early-Middle Triassic, Kin Kin Beds, arenite, argillite or phyllite. The susceptibility to flooding from groundwater is low and site drainage was recorded as poor. No water table was encountered on the day of our site investigation. However, during and for some time after periods of seasonal, heavy or extended rainfall water seepage on the sand/clay interface may cause a loss of bearing capacity at this level. Seepage may also cause collapse of excavations, which may increase concrete volumes significantly above those normally anticipated. Cobbles and/or boulders in soil profiles are sometimes common and unfortunately we cannot predict their size or frequency. It has also been our experience that these floaters can be extremely difficult to excavate with conventional equipment. However, experience in this area has shown that beneath any floaters the soil grades into stable weathered rock at relatively shallow depths. Moderately weathered excavatable rock was encountered at, and is expected at, relatively shallow depths across the proposed site. Cabin 4 (existing dwelling) The proposed site for Cabin 1 is on a partially exposed 0-3% eastern slope with neighbouring vegetation consisting of grasses and trees. We recorded a few shrubs/small trees within, or adjacent to, the proposed cabin site that are likely to be removed. Slope configuration across the proposed site is determined to be linear planar. The landform was recorded as natural and partially disturbed. Cabins 1,2 &3 The proposed site for Cabins 2, 3 & 4 are on an exposed 15-30% northwestern slope with neighbouring vegetation consisting of grasses. Slope configuration across the proposed site is determined to be waxing planar. The landform was recorded as natural and partially disturbed. The resistance of the soil encountered was tested with an approved 9kg Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and the results recorded at the appropriate levels on the attached log sections. Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. 3 Site Investigation Report 022-164
Page 5
The samples hand collected and classified on site from BH 2 at a depth of 600 mm and BH 4 at a depth of 600 mm below the existing surface level returned a linear shrinkage result of 12.6%. The expected surface movement (Ys), due to seasonal moisture changes in the soil encountered, is as follows Ys Value = 21 mm Predicted Surface Movement Class Ys= < 20mm S Ys =>20-< 40 mm M Ys => 40-< 60 Hl Ys => 60 ~e 75 mm H2 Ys=>75 mm E Problem sites P Note: The proximity of trees and their effect on foundations should be considered when determining specific engineering assessments, and for foundation/footing design. Appendix B of AS 2870-2011 indicates that to reduce, but not eliminate, the possibility of damage to the footings, trees should be restricted to the following distance from the building (where rows or groups of trees are present the distance nominated below must be increased, and similarly the Ys Value listed above may need to be increased) : 75% of the mature tree height, for class “M” sites, 100% of the mature tree height, for class “H 1” sites, and 150% of the mature tree height, for class “E” sites. Note: This classification above has been derived from test work performed on the soil profile encountered on the day of our fieldwork. Any further filling of the site or excavation into the soil profile, may result in a different classification. Temporary Excavations. Where temporary excavations are performed for footing or services up to 600mm deep, natural soils may have minor or no stability problems, however deeper excavations have a possibility of collapse more readily and shoring of vertical excavation may be required. Where an existing excavation has been filled with uncontrolled fill, all locations above a line 30 degrees for sands and 45 degrees for clays above the horizontal may be unstable and may not support any structure — see attached critical depth line diagram. Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. 4 Site Investigation Report 022-164
Page 6
LEGEND Soil description (AS1726 — The Geotechnical Site Investigation Code) GW — Well graded gravels, little or no fines GP — Poorly graded gravels, little or no fines GM - Silty gravels GC - Clayey gravels SW -— Well graded sands, little or no fines SP — Poorly graded sands, little or no fines SM -— Silty sands SC — Clayey sands ML - Inorganic silts and very fine sands OL — Organic silts and organic silty clays CL — Inorganic clays of low plasticity CI — Inorganic clays of medium plasticity CH - Inorganic clays of high plasticity OH — Organic clays medium/high plasticity Pt — Peat and other highly organic material Ls — Linear Shrinkage % Note The stratifications identified on our log sheets are representative of the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual and vary over the site. Abbreviations Dk — Dark, Lt—Light, Gy —Grey, Rd—Red, Br— Brown, Or- Orange, Mott — Mottled. LP, MP, HP - Low, Medium, High Plasticity. SW - Slightly Weathered Rock. P (p) — blows/100 mm approved penetrometer DW - Distinctly Weathered Rock. UTP — Unable to penetrate EW - Extremely Weathered Rock. Cohesive Soil Strengths approximate safe bearing capacities for clay-based soils. Very soft (VS) — < 25 kPa Soft (S) — 25 to 50 kPa Firm (F) — 50 to 100 kPa Stiff (St) — 100 to 200 kPa Very Stiff (VSt) — 200 to 400 kPa Hard (H) — 400+ kPa Soil Strengths Sands and Gravels Density SPT “N” value Relative Density (%) Very Loose (VL) <4 <15 Loose (L) 4-10 15 —35 Medium Dense (MD) 10-30 35-65 Dense (D) 30-50 65 — 85 Very Dense (VD) > 50 > 85 Particle Sizes. Prefix Range of Sizes (mm) Boulder - > 200 Cobble - 63 — 200 Coarse 20-63 Gravel Medium 2-20 Fine 0.6 —2.0 Coarse 0.2—-0.6 Sand Medium 0.075 — 0.2 Fine 0.002 — 0.075 Clay < 0.002 Moisture Condition Dry Looks and feels dry, clay soils are normally hard, powdery or friable. Moist Feel cool, darkened in colour, no free water on hands when remoulding. Wet Soils are weak, free water can occur; granular soils bind together, clay softened. Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. 5 Site Investigation Report 022-164
Page 7
This footing is founded above the critical depth 4 _ Ground/pad level ee a | | unstable line and is deemed to eel [ —j be unstable. Ng, Lie, Voy, stable NG i Le Piers must be excavated to below the critical depth N line to provide stability to these footings. th This footing is founded below critical line and Any proposed or existing excavation. The builder must ensure all excavations are discovered and the footing and slab is secured below the critical line accordingly. This should include a search of all council & other records for as constructed plans to establish excavation depths & widths. Yo is stable ZN... ~“., “. a i‘ Q 30 degrees ., se TRS Ts Horizontal (“6ferelay) N.S E S Critical Depth line measured from deepest In the case of a buried pipe the point of the excavation nearest the footing. invert level is usually above and away from the nearest corner of the excavation. Critical Depth Line X Unearthed Geotechnical P/L. 6 Site Investigation Report 022-164
Page 8
Lot 199 (*79) GYMPIE KIN KIN ROAD, KIN KIN. 022-164 Proposed Cabins Site. Borehole No 1 (Cabin 1) p D p Borehole No 2 (Cabin 2) v.Clayey Silty Gravelly Sand SC 3 100 v.Clayey Silty Gravelly Sand SC (Dark Grey Brown) (Dark Grey Brown) Moist & Disturbed 2 | 200 Moist & Disturbed Sandy Gravelly Clay CI/MP 3 | 300 Sandy Gravelly Clay CI/MP (Orange Brown Mottled) 2 400 (Orange Brown Mottled) Moist & Stiff 3 | 500 Moist & Stiff 4 600 ~ (0.032 = Iss, Ls = 12.6%) ~ 4 | 700 5 | 800 (Friable Weathered Rock Lenses) 7 900 (Friable Weathered Rock Lenses) 10 | Im UTP Hand Auger 15+ | 1100 UTP Hand Auger (Distinctly Weathered Rock DW) 1200 (Distinctly Weathered Rock DW) 1300 75-100 mm Jarret style Hand Augers. p = blows/100mm - 9kg Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. UTP = Unable to penetrate. UNEARTHED GEOTECHNICAL P/L. PO Box 1204, GYMPIE. Q 4570. 8/08/2022 Borehole No 3 (Cabin 3) p_ | Depth v.Clayey Silty Gravelly Sand SC 2 100 (Dark Grey Brown) Moist & Disturbed 3 200 Sandy Gravelly Clay CI/MP 2 300 (Orange Brown Mottled) 3 400 Moist & Stiff 4 500 4 600 5 700 7 800 (Friable Weathered Rock Lenses) 9 900 15 lm UTP Hand Auger 1100 (Distinctly Weathered Rock DW) 1200 1300 UTP = Unable to penetrate. Note - All field information and test results collected during our site investigation and detailed in the accompanying report, including any site plans, log and data sheets are only to be used for the purposes of this report. No third party use of any part of this information is authorised without specific or written consent.
Page 9
,--
EXISTING
�
LARGE PROMINENT TREES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SITE (CABINS 1,2,3)
- - ,_,
100 0 100
I
SCALE I : 5000
CLIENT: ANTHONY McDONOUGH (0407 493 611)
200
I
300 M
I
\\synology\General\JO BS\022-164-GympieKin Kin\022-164-Drawings.dwg
8/08/2022
COPYRIGHT: THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF
UNEARTHED GEOTECHNICAL AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED
OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF
UNEARTHED GEOTECHNICAL.
LOT 199 SP233184 (199) GYMPIE KIN KIN ROAD,
ORIG. SHEET SIZE: A4
K IN_K _IN_._N_O_O_S_A_C_O_U_N_C_IL_. -----------1SCALE: 1 :5000
_______ _
UNEARTHED GEOTECHNICAL P/L
A.J. TRELOAR QBCC Lie. No. 740251 PO Box 1204, GYMPIE, QLD 4570 0417 132 300 [email protected] PLAN No. 022-164
Page 10
SCALE | : 500 as \\synology\General\JOBS\022-164-GympieKinKin\022-164-Drawings.dwg CLIENT: ANTHONY McDoNouGH (0407 493 6lI) 8/08/2022 Lot 199 SP233184 (199) GYMPIE KIN KIN ROAD, KIN KIN. NoosA COUNCIL. COPYRIGHT: THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF Une ary yT BE COPIED ORIG. SHEET SIZE: A& UNEARTHED GEOTECHNICAL P/L A.J. TRELOAR QBCC Lic_No.74025|_ PO Box 1204, GYMPIE, QLD 4570 0417 152 300 [email protected]. AU SCALE: 1:500 PLAN No. 022-164
Page 11
Used in these records
Geotech Inestigation.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.