Council archive · source document
13. BRHH - Questions and comments from BRHH owners v1(JL) · MCU19/0117
14. Will the current BRHH managers be managing the proposed visitor
accommodation on Lot 500?
The house is proposed to be managed privately.
15. What are the implications for the new management agreement currently being
prepared?
Please forward any new management agreement terms, so the body corporate
solicitors can review the implications.
16. Doesn’t the proposed development need Body Corporate approval?
It is our understanding based on the previous development application that the body
corporate does not need to approve the proposed development prior to lodging with
Noosa Council for Planning Approval. Furthermore, attached is legal advice regarding
Body Corporate Approval.
17. The new plans seem to be calling the formerly proposed wave pool a lagoon
to disguise that it is a commercial wave pool…if the intention is to operate a
business, then the existing scheme does not allow that unless it is operated
by the caretaker managers….no other business can operate from the site.
The lagoon is for private use only. The application does not propose to use it as a
commercial wave lagoon – only for the holiday homeowner – similar to the private golf
course at 368 Dath Henderson Rd.
18. How is the lagoon/wave pool accessed….do the visitors have to enter via the
existing community?...Wouldn’t that also give them access to the BRHH
facilities?
The lagoon is accessible from the new driveway access along Beach Rd. Lot 500
currently has access to the BRHH facilities on body corporate land.
19. The development application indicates that the proposed new 2 bedroom
house is commensurate to the “adjoining 48 x 2 bedroom Holiday Houses” –
the adjoining BRHH are all 3 and 4 bedroom houses.
The original BRHH were approved as 2-bedroom buildings with media and other
rooms. Many of these have are being used and advertised to include more than 2-
bedroom houses.
20. I’m assuming the plan is to start with one house and add more…doesn't say
that but that is what it looks like….the overall plan should be spelt out if that is
the long-term aim.
Currently, the proposal is to build one house and lagoon. There is potential to add more
holiday houses (up to 48) just like what is approved at the BRHH and previously
master planned for the site.
3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
13. BRHH - Questions and comments from BRHH owners v1(JL).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 244 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.