Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

13. BRHH - Questions and comments from BRHH owners v1(JL) · MCU19/0117

of 5

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

   14. Will the current BRHH managers be managing the proposed visitor
       accommodation on Lot 500?

The house is proposed to be managed privately.

   15. What are the implications for the new management agreement currently being
       prepared?

Please forward any new management agreement terms, so the body corporate
solicitors can review the implications.

   16. Doesn’t the proposed development need Body Corporate approval?

It is our understanding based on the previous development application that the body
corporate does not need to approve the proposed development prior to lodging with
Noosa Council for Planning Approval. Furthermore, attached is legal advice regarding
Body Corporate Approval.

   17. The new plans seem to be calling the formerly proposed wave pool a lagoon
       to disguise that it is a commercial wave pool…if the intention is to operate a
       business, then the existing scheme does not allow that unless it is operated
       by the caretaker managers….no other business can operate from the site.

The lagoon is for private use only. The application does not propose to use it as a
commercial wave lagoon – only for the holiday homeowner – similar to the private golf
course at 368 Dath Henderson Rd.

   18. How is the lagoon/wave pool accessed….do the visitors have to enter via the
       existing community?...Wouldn’t that also give them access to the BRHH
       facilities?

The lagoon is accessible from the new driveway access along Beach Rd. Lot 500
currently has access to the BRHH facilities on body corporate land.

   19. The development application indicates that the proposed new 2 bedroom
       house is commensurate to the “adjoining 48 x 2 bedroom Holiday Houses” –
       the adjoining BRHH are all 3 and 4 bedroom houses.

The original BRHH were approved as 2-bedroom buildings with media and other
rooms. Many of these have are being used and advertised to include more than 2-
bedroom houses.

   20. I’m assuming the plan is to start with one house and add more…doesn't say
       that but that is what it looks like….the overall plan should be spelt out if that is
       the long-term aim.

Currently, the proposal is to build one house and lagoon. There is potential to add more
holiday houses (up to 48) just like what is approved at the BRHH and previously
master planned for the site.



                                                                                          3

Used in these records

About this file

File size
244 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

13. BRHH - Questions and comments from BRHH owners v1(JL).pdf · 244 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.