Council archive · source document
Development Application part 2 of 2 , Planning report/Plans MCU12/0036
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (28.5 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
/ iiiiiiii
-
~
Place Barcode here
( ~ -
80205067
~-
THIS IS THE NEXT PART OF A
MULTIPLE PART RECORD
Part LOf C
Application number: \)’.L.-’(J ~ <:s:J -
~
C:\Oocumcnts and Settings\eje\DesklopWulti Pan Record Cover Sheet NEXT PART
(J).doc
CJ5 _\ ,,0 /)0 .J
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 45 pages
Page 2
Planning Report Proposed Telecommunications Facility at Cooroy [OCR of page images] Planning Report Proposed Telecommunications Facility at Cooroy
Page 3
Planning Report
Table of contents
Executive Summary 3
Introduction 4
2 Proposal 5
3 Site Characteristics 9
4 Relevant Federal Legislation 12
5 State Planning Assessment 14
6 Planning Scheme 17
7 Environmental Impacts 21
8 Conclusion 23
Appendix 1 Site Plans
Appendix 2 Codes
Appendix 3 EME Report
2
Page 4
Planning Report
Executive Summary
Site and Proposal Details
Address of Site
r 4 Garnet Street, Cooroy OLD 4563
I
i
I
Real Property Description ] Lot 3 on RP147678
Site Area I 907m2
Local Authority I Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Planning Scheme 1 Noosa Plan
Zone I Community Services
~
i
Local Plan I Cooroy & Lake Macdonald Locality Plan
__j
i
~
Purpose of Proposal under the Planning Scheme Service and Utility Type 3 Tower
-
~
I Owner
J’ . Australian Telecommunications Corporation
!
Application Details
[ Preliminary Approval ~[ J Development Permit
[_ _j[ I Impact Assessment
C Impact Assessment ~[_~-~.~-~
Applicant Details
Telstra Corporation Ltd
I Applicant
I
c/- Urbis pty Ltd
GPO Box 3205
BRISBANE OLD 4001
~------_..
--------...-----~
I Contact Person !Grant Williams Ph: (07)3007 3800
,
----.........---’1
lour Reference ~ BA2513
.._..._-..._._-------"’-------__..____....__..’
3
Page 5
Planning Report
1 Introduction
Urbis pty Ltd has been commissioned by Telstra Corporation Ltd to prepare a development application for a
proposed new telecommunications facility at the existing Telstra Exchange, located at 4 Garnet Street,
Cooroy.
This town planning report addresses the merits of the development with regard to the provisions of the
Noosa Plan and the relevant sections of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. For the purpose of this report,
the Noosa Plan will be referred to as the ’Planning Scheme’ and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 will be
referred to as the ’SPA’.
As outlined in the Executive Summary, the application is for a Development Permit for a Material Change of
Use and a Preliminary Approval for Carrying out Building Work, and is subject to Impact Assessment.
It is considered that the development is appropriate and justified; therefore Council’s approval of the
application is sought, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.
4
Page 6
Planning Report
2 Proposal
2.1 Proposal Details
The proposal involves a Material Change of Use application (Impact Assessment) to install a
telecommunications facility over part of Lot 3 on RP147678, located at 4 Garnet Street, Cooroy and known
as the existing Telstra Cooroy Exchange. The proposed facility will be referred to by Telstra as the Cooroy
facility.
The development will comprise:
25 metre high monopole;
Three (3) CPX310R, Telstra Panel antennas (2.63m long) attached to the top of the monopole via a
triangular headframe (note that there is provision for a further nine (9)antennas as indicated in the plans;
and
Conduits and cable tray for feeder cables.
Associated equipment will be enclosed within the existing Telstra Exchange building on site. Access to the
proposed facility for maintenance is proposed to be via the existing entrance to the Telstra exchange off
Garnet Street. The proposed site layout and elevation plans are included in Appendix 1.
2.2 Construction and Maintenance Activity
The proposed telecommunications facility upgrade will be installed over a period of approximately 5 weeks.
The following construction activities will occur at the site:
Site set out;
Truck delivery of materials;
Pouring Concrete Foundations; and
Installation of telecommunications equipment (antennas).
The proposed development will be ’unmanned’ once constructed, with routine maintenance conducted
infrequently.
2.3 Investigations of Co-location
2.3.1 Identification of the Requirement for the Facility
The cellular mobile phone network is based on the use of small low powered intelligent two way radio
transmitters (mobile phones) that are interconnected over radio channels to the telephone network via a
series of mobile base stations.
The nature of the base stations is such that reliable communication is limited mainly to "line of sight" of the
mobile. Whilst some buildings and foliage can be penetrated, radio signals cannot penetrate more
substantial objects, such as hills. As a general rule, the higher a base station is elevated and the taller a
base station structure is, the greater its range of coverage.
Due to the need to re-use the frequencies within the network to support traffic from a large number of users,
the signals from the base stations must be restricted from travelling too far into the coverage area of adjacent
base stations. Otherwise users experience interference and poor call performance, and potentially call drop-
outs.
Telstra use a number of methods to identify those parts of the network that require improved coverage,
capacity and call performance. These methods include drive surveys, statistical measures, computer
modelling of coverage and the evaluation of customer complaints. When an area within the network is
identified as providing poor service and performance, investigations are undertaken to determine the
measures required to rectify these service and performance deficiencies.
5
Page 7
Planning Report
The first stage of the process is to consider if the deficiency can be improved through optimisation of the
existing network hardware, to avoid the deployment of additional infrastructure. This involves a review of the
antenna configurations at existing sites in the subject area, adjustments to software parameters and other
similar changes to the existing network configuration. In many instances, network optimisation offers
sufficient improvements and means that capital works or the construction of new facilities are not required to
remedy the situation.
However, if optimisation cannot deliver a satisfactory outcome, the deployment of a new site is considered.
The initial research undertaken is used to define the scope of the network deficiency and the performance
objective of the proposed new facility.
2.3.2 The Need for the Telstra Cooroy Facility
The site is required within Cooroy to relieve the capacity of the existing network in this area. The proposed
facility needs to able to absorb additional traffic and provide improved depth of coverage in the area. It is
noted that the decommissioning of the existing facility has been undertaken at the direction of Council.
The performance objective for the proposed facility is to provide a successful relocation through continued
call quality and performance in the target area. The facility will provide matching depth of coverage to
Lammermoor and surrounding areas.
2.3.3 Investigations of Opportunities for Optimisation of Existing Telstra Sites
The opportunity for facility co-location was thoroughly explored as part of this proposal. No suitable
alternatives for co-location, to achieve the desired coverage performance, were identified. Therefore, a new
site in the area was required to be considered. However, this development may provide opportunities for co-
locations in the future.
2.3.4 Process of Site Selection
Considering the inability to co-locate the proposed telecommunications facility with an existing facility,
selection of a suitable alternative site was required. The process of site selection involves identification of
sites that are capable of meeting the required service and performance requirements. Telstra apply and
evaluate a range of criteria as part of the site selection process. The search ring for the proposed site is
shown in Figure 1.
Telstra identifies potential sites that meet coverage requirements through the use of computer modelling
tools that produce the coverage that may be expected from different sites.
There are also a number of other criteria that are used to assess options and select sites that may be
suitable for the facility. These take into account factors other than the radio performance of the site, and
include:
The potential of obtaining tenure at the site, as Telstra is unable to lodge a development application
without the consent of the land owner;
Visual impact and the potential of obtaining relevant town planning approvals;
Proximity to sensitive uses and/or areas of environmental heritage; and
The cost of developing the site and the provision of utilities (power, access to the facility and
transmission links).
2.3.5 Why was the selected site chosen?
The alternative target sites were strictly limited given the residential nature of land uses in the area. Telstra
identified 5 alternative sites for the proposed facility, detailed below (refer to Figure 1):
Candidate A: Cooroy Telstra TE -
4 Garnet Street, Cooroy;
Candidate B: Ritek Building Solutions -
20 Lower Mill Road, Cooroy
Candidate C: SCRC Waste Treatment Plant -
Jarrah Street, Cooroy
Candidate D: Cooroy Sports Club -
Garnet Street, Cooroy
6
Page 8
Planning Report
Candidate E: Cooroy SES Property -
26 Emerald Street, Cooroy
Figure 1 -Locality Map of Candidates
A
CoonlY Telstra TE
.
Garnet Street
-26.418281
152.910961 (Approx.)
Candidate B
Rftek BUilding
Solutions
20 Lower Mil Road
-26.413382
152.909369 (Approx.)
CandidateC
SCRCWaste
Treatment Plant
Oft Jarrah Street
-26.413404
152.906881 (Approx.)
dldateE
Cooroy SES Property
26 Emerald Street
-26.41673
152.907410 (Approx.)
(Source: Google Maps 2010)
The specific catchment area sought to be addressed by the telecommunications facility is the township of
Cooroy and the southern outskirts of the town. Candidate A was considered most favourable from a
coverage point of view due to its central location. Following thorough analysis of planning controls,
Candidate A (Cooroy Telstra TE) appeared as the most suitable opportunity given the current land use of the
site (existing infrastructure), ease of access and overall coverage achievement. Therefore, Candidate A was
selected as the subject site.
The remaining candidates were not chosen for the following reasons:
Candidates Band C did not adequately achieve the coverage objectives due to the distance away from
the centre of Cooroy.
Candidate D would have been considered appropriate in addressing coverage, only if a significant pole
was erected. Given the close proximity of the candidate to residential development to the west, this was
not considered an appropriate option.
Despite the close location of Candidate E, a significant amount of elevation was lost from the centre of
Cooroy. Therefore a significant pole would have been required to achieve the coverage objectives.
Furthermore, the candidate was very close to adjoining residential development. Finally, the existence of
a DERM leasehold over the land due to the adjacent creek meant that site acquisition would have been
difficult.
2.3.6 Why was the proposed site design chosen?
In the case of the Cooroy facility, Telstra has decided to utilise a 25 metre high monopole with antennas
attached to the top via a headframe. It is acknowledged that the telecommunications facility proposes to
utilise a headframe to mount the antennas, as opposed to a turret mount which would result in a more
slender pole.
Telstra’s mobile network, known as Next G, is a 3G network which enables users to access high speed data
and wireless broadband services in additional to standard voice services. The uptake of data and broadband
services in Australia since the launch of Telstra’s network has been substantial and has resulted in a
7
Page 9
Planning Report
significant number of sites needing to be upgraded to provide the capacity to meet this demand. This
capacity is provided by increasing the number of antennas which are installed on the facilities. As shown on
the proposed elevation plans for the facility it is proposed to install three (3) antennas initially, with
reservation being made for a further nine (9)antennas if/when required. It is not practically possible to install
more than six (6) antennas using a turret mount and therefore a headframe is required to ensure future
capacity needs are met.
It is noted that Telstra has an exemption from obtaining planning content for the upgrades to their facilities
under the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cwth). However Telstra wish to be transparent with Council
regarding their potential future expansion plans and therefore have provided details of the potential scale of
the ultimate facility, showing all potential upgrades.
8
Page 10
Planning Report
3 Site Characteristics
3.1 Location
The site, located at 4 Garnet Street, Cooroy and formally described as Lot 3 on RP147678, comprises a total
area of approximately 907m2 (refer to Figure 2 below). The site is located within the suburb of Cooroy,
which is within the Sunshine Coast Regional Council (previously Noosa Shire Council), approximately 20km
west of Noosa. The site is situated within an urban area, characterised predominantly by commercial land
use and residential land uses to the south and east.
Figure 2 -Locality Map
RM~IO ~ t
i
’"1’~-:"
r
/:
;
f,: i -~
, COo<oy c-1II ,I
l :11
G......"
T """"’*1 ,’" ~~
. I
-
; ,".jr’ I
. IlO I
L~
’Nimtners I.ii ’~"-.~"~ ~tr
--
~~-~".
~
r
r;’ ~
--....
,.. ~
CIo
-~~-
~....__
,
$~".
r,’
j
I’
}."
’c~ I -
..,.._:.,......~--
------.-~
1, ,r ~’III
’;’;"";.J 0._
’,COoyMotora r~
!
III
~ ; I
I’
l’ SITE P t
I
.
~
l
......J.._
~
f
-~:
$ ,"’- [’
{
..
i
If
J
r
"
itil~
f i
8..,.
.
)l~-
G"<;: " 8In~ " 1
If ,4
,j
!,U I
’’’’liS’
,
[: .:’ A’I’ .
f ........._
"", .
.
.
’:"
.N
:_~ ~ _~l_ ’,~,’,’ ’"
:=:.~
.,.,._~.-~
~,~
’~.,.;;.r.~"-
~,
I /.
~~;,~fy~,,"’" :~,
?i? ~ L.,’ -..... -
oyEJ "
\
~o~
-
.
. "
t
.’"1
I
);J
,f ,
,
,
,
I
(’
} I~. "ii’"r ’~t
1
~
~.... f
31,
l
.\
(Source: Google Maps 2010)
3.2 Site Description, Topography and Vegetation
The site comprises one irregular shaped allotment, with frontage to Garnet Street to the south of the site
(refer to Figure 3). The proposed siting of the facility is at the north of the site occupying a narrow section of
vacant space. Access to the existing Telstra exchange is currently provided via Garnet Street. The
topography is generally flat across the site, sloping mildly to the east.
The site is owned by the Australian Telecommunications Corporation and currently occupies an existing
Telstra Exchange which services the suburb of Cooroy and surrounds. The existing exchange building is
located towards the north southern frontage of the site, and associated vehicular access and parking to the
east. The site does not contain any vegetation.
9
Page 11
Planning Report
Figure 3 -
Aerial Photograph
~
(Source: Google Maps, 2010)
Figure 4 -
Existing Built Form on the Site
10
Page 12
Planning Report
3.3 Surrounding Land Uses and Built Form
The site is located within an existing developed urban environment with predominantly commercial uses with
a residential periphery. Adjoining land uses can be described as follows:
North land uses immediately north of the site comprises the Cooroy Memorial Hall.
-
land beyond
comprises a mix of commercial development.
East -
land uses immediately to the east of the site comprise the railway line and the Cooroy Railway
Station. land beyond comprises low density residential development.
South -land to the south of the site contains a mix of vacant land and residential development.
West land immediately to the west of the site comprises a car dealership and a post office. land
-
beyond comprises commercial development, and further, residential development.
Figure 5 -
Surrounding land Uses
11
Page 13
Planning Report
4 Relevant Federal Legislation
The following information provides a summary of the Federal legislation relevant to telecommunications
development proposals.
4.1 Telecommunications Act 1997
The Telecommunications Act 1997 (the Act) came into operation on 1July 1997. The Act provides a system
for regulating telecommunications and the activities of carriers and service providers.
Under the Act, telecommunications carriers are no longer exempt from State and Territory planning laws
except in three limited instances:
1. There are exemptions for inspection of land, maintenance of facilities, installation of "low impact
facilities", subscriber connections and temporary defence facilities. These exemptions are detailed in
the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 and the Amendment No.1 of
1999 and these exceptions are subject to the Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997;
2. A limited case-by-case appeals process exists to cover installation of facilities in situations of national
significance; and
3. There are some specific powers and immunities from the previous Telecommunications Act 1991.
The proposal is for a freestanding monopole and associated antennas and equipment. Therefore the facility
cannot be considered low impact, as defined by the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities)
Determination and thus the proposal is not exempt from State planning laws in this instance.
4.2 Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997
The Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 (The Code) authorises a carrier to enter land, inspect land
and install and maintain a facility. The Code emphasises "best practice" design, planning and installation of
facilities, compliance with industry standards and minimisation of adverse impacts as much as practicable,
particularly in terms of degradation of the environment and visual impact. It is considered that the subject
proposal is "best practice" given that the proposal will:
Provide improved telecommunications and wireless internet overage in the Cooroy area;
.’ Be locateo on a non-residential site within the local area;
Comprise the smallest scale configuration possible for the site to reduce the visual impact of the
proposal;
Be co-located with other existing Telstra infrastructure within Cooroy;
Be located to integrate into the existing built form (electricity poles), which will minimise visual impacts.
4.3 Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation
Act 1999
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act commenced on 16 July 2000 and introduces
a new role for the Commonwealth Government in the assessment and approval of development proposals
where those proposals involve actions that have a significant impact on matters of National Environmental
Significance, the environment of Commonwealth owned land and actions carried out by the Commonwealth
Government.
The proposal is not of National Environmental Significance, as it will not impact on:
World Heritage Areas;
wetlands protected by International Treaty (The RAMSAR Convention)
nationally listed threatened species and communities;
12
Page 14
Planning Report
nationally listed migratory species;
all nuclear actions; and
the environment of Commonwealth Marine area.
13
Page 15
Planning Report
5 State Planning Assessment
5.1 Sustainable Planning Act 2009
The purpose of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) is to achieve ecological sustainability by
coordinating planning at all levels of government and by managing the development process as well as the
impact of the development.
The subject application is for a ’Material Change of Use’ and is assessable development. A Development
Permit is to be obtained prior to the commencement of the development. Assessment against the Planning
Scheme indicates that the proposed use is subject to Code Assessment, in accordance with Section 314 of
the SPA.
Pursuant to Section 314 of the SPA, where an application is identified as requiring Impact Assessment, the
assessment manager must assess the application as relevant, to the State Planning Regulatory provisions,
the Regional Plan for a designated region (where not appropriately identified in the Planning Scheme), State
Planning Policies (to the extent not identified in the Regional Plan or Planning Scheme)and relevant sections
of the Planning Scheme.
In addition, the assessment manager must assess the application having regard to the common material, any
development approval for and lawful use of the premises or adjacent premises and any referral agency’s
response for the application.
5.2 State Planning Policies
State Planning Policies (’SPPs’)are a mechanism for the State Government to express its interests in those
developments related economic, social, or environmental issues that can be implemented through planning
schemes and development assessments. SPPs are required to be integrated into local government planning
schemes, and where this has not occurred, the SPPs are to be considered when assessing development
applications, if relevant.
TABLE 1 CURRENT STATE PLANNING POLICIES
-
State Planning Policies
I
Applicability
j
SPP 2110-Koala conservation in South East Queensland Not A~; i~-bl;--Th;site Is-;;ot included ~thin-the I
aims to ensure that koala habitat conservation is taken into SEQKPA. It does not contain any specific
account in planning processes within the South East requirements for development and instead specifies
Queensland Koala Protection Area ("SEQKPA’),contributing requirements for Council’s when undertaking
to a net increase in koala habitat in south-east Queensland, strategic planning and making land use decisions.
and assist in the long term retention of viable koala The policy is not relevant to this application.
populations in south-east Queensland.
SPP 1/10-Protecting wetlands of high ecological significance1 Not Applicable -
The site is not included within the
in Great Barrier Reef catchments (temporary SPP)seeks to I Great Barrier Reef catchment. This Policy is
I
ensure that development in or adjacent to wetlands of high therefore of no relevance to the consideration of this’
ecological significance in Great Barrier Reef catchments is proposal.
planned, designed, constructed and operated to prevent the
loss or degradation of wetlands and their values, or enhances
I
these values, in particular, the hydrological regime and
I ecological values of those wetlands.
SPP 210~Acceleration of Compliance Assessment applies Not Applicable -
The proposed development does I
to requests for compliance assessment for development for not involve a request for compliance assessment
reconfiguring a lot that require compliance assessment. nor is it for a reconfiguration of a lot that requires
assessl!len!. ’Ihis_Po~~y i~~~e!_~p_!_e._of.!!o ~el~vancei
14
Page 16
Planning Report
SPP 1/07- Housing and Residential Development seeks to
:O::::’::iO;h~:~~;’:::::..:~e" l
ensure that large, higher growth local governments identify development applications are assessed and is
their community’s housing needs and analyse (and modify, if therefore of no relevance to the consideration of this
necessary) their planning schemes to remove barriers and proposal.
provide opportunities for housing options that respond to
identified needs.
SPP 2/07- Protection of Extractive Resources identifies Not Applicable -
The proposed development is not
those extractive resources of State or regional significance located in an identified Key Resource Area, nor is it
where extractive industry development is appropriate in within a designated Separation Area; accordingly
principle, and aims to protect those resources from this Policy is of no relevance to the proposed
developments that might prevent or severely constrain current development.
or future extraction when the need for utilisation of the
resource arises.
SPP 1/09 -
Reconfiguring a Lot Code for Land in Indigenous Not Applicable -
The proposed development does
Local Governments to which a Local Planning Scheme does not involve a reconfiguration of a lot within an
not apply seeks to ensure that private residential housing Indigenous Local Government area. This Policy is of
provided under the National Partnership Agreement on no relevance to the proposed development.
Remote Indigenous Housing is planned, designed,
constructed and operated to ensure adequate connection to
related infrastructure.
~
SPP 4/10 -
Healthy Waters is intended to ensure that
I Not Ap~licable The proposal will not produce
-
development is planned, designed, constructed and operated excess stormwater or change the flow of stormwater
to manage stormwater and waste water in ways that help runoff. Therefore, this policy is of no relevance to
protect the water environmental values specified in the the proposed development.
Environment Protection (Water)Policy 2009.
SPP 5/10 -
Air, Noise and Hazardous Materials seeks to Not Applicable -
The proposal does not involve the
facilitate the protection of the health and wellbeing of reconfiguration of a lot, or a material change of use,
individuals and the community from adverse impacts of air for the purpose of a sensitive land use.
and noise emissions. The SPP also seeks to facilitate the Furthermore, no part of the proposed development
protection of human safety from the impacts of hazardous is situated in a management area in Schedule 5 of
materials, while preserving the viable operation of industrial the Policy. Therefore the SPP is of no relevance to
activities in Queensland. the proposal.
----J
Temporary SPP 2/11- Planning for Stronger, More Resilient Not Applicable -
The proposal is not located in a
Floodplains seeks to ensure that development is planned, floodplain and consequently, the Temporary SPP is
designed and constructed to minimise potential flood damage of no relevance to the proposal.
to towns and cities and to improve safety of individuals and
communities.
SPP 3/11 -
Coastal Protection seeks to protect the coastal Not Applicable -
The site is not located within the
resources of the coastal zone by setting out criteria for land coastal zone, therefore the SPP does not apply.
use planning, coastal activities and development assessment,
enabling Queensland to manage development within the
coastal zone, including within coastal waters.
15
Page 17
Planning Report
5.3 Referral Agencies
A review of the referral triggers outlined in Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 has been
undertaken which has identified that no referrals are required to be undertaken for this application.
16
Page 18
Planning Report
6 Planning Scheme
6.1 Noosa Plan
As highlighted earlier in this report, the planning scheme applicable to the proposed development is the
Noosa Plan (the ’Planning Scheme’).
6.2 Strategic Framework
The Noosa Plan outlines a Strategic Framework which reflects the desired environmental outcomes (DEOs)
and summarises the approach taken by the Planning Scheme to achieve the DEOs. In
facilitating the
achievement of the desired environmental outcomes, the Strategic Framework provides a more specific
outline of how the three strands of ecological sustainability (environmental, economic and social) are
balanced and integrated within the Livingstone Shire.
6.2.1 Desired Environmental Outcomes
The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 maintains the effect of Section 3.5.14 (2)(a)of the Integrated Planning
Act 1997, which required that the assessment manager’s decision for Impact Assessable application must
not "compromise the achievement of the desired environmental outcomes for the planning scheme area".
The Noosa Plan identifies DEOs by ’use’ rather than under general themes. Accordingly, an assessment of
the proposal against the ’Infrastructure and Services’ Desired Environmental Outcome (DEO)contained
within the Planning Scheme demonstrates that the proposal meets the intent of the DEO as follows:
L) INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES
The efficient provision and use of services such as water, sewerage, power, telecommunications and
waste disposal caters for the needs of residents and visitors, relative to their location within Noosa.
Response:
The proposed development is consistent with this DEO. The proposal seeks approval for a
telecommunication facility within Cooroy. This will overcome coverage and network capacity issues
for local residents and visitors of Cooroy.
The ongoing viability of existing infrastructure services and facilities are protected from the impacts of
future development.
Response:
The proposed development is consistent with this DEO. The proposal seeks to consolidate an
existing Telstra exchange by providing a telecommunications tower on the same land. This will
prevent the need to acquire new land for the facility.
Community Implications of Infrastructure & Services
Coastal urban residents and visitors expect a certain level of infrastructure and servicing, which includes
power, telecommunications, garbage collection, running water and flush toilets.
Response:
Whilst the proposed development is not located in a coastal area, it proposes telecommunications
infrastructure to relieve and enhance the existing network in Cooroy.
Broadband telecommunications infrastructure allows people to work and study from home and access
goods and services over the Internet.
Response:
The proposed facility will particularly enhance the data capacity capabilities of mobile phones within
the Cooroy area; allowing people to efficiently access the internet on their mobile devices.
While telecommunication facilities are very important, towers and other installations are not located in
visually prominent locations.
17
Page 19
Planning Report
Response:
The proposed development is consistent with this DEO. The proposal seeks approval for a
telecommunication facility to service the central and southern areas of Cooroy. Consequently, it is
appropriate to locate the facility at the existing Telstra exchange, between the main commercial strip
and the railway station. Due to the elevated location, the tower will be limited to 25 metres. It will be
relatively concealed from the main street by the adjacent commercial development. It will be visible
from the residential development on the eastern side of the railway line, however its prominence will
be shared with other poles and wires in the vicinity.
6.3 Definition
Under the Planning Scheme, the proposed development is defined as a Service and Utility -
Type 3 Tower.
The planning scheme definition is outlined as follows:
Service and utility: means any premises used for the delivery of a public service not otherwise defined. The
term includes the following types:
Type 3 Tower The use of premises for a tower, antennas or mast and supporting shelter or
-
equipment, in the provision or supply of electricity or telecommunications. The use excludes facilities
deemed to be "Low Impact Facilities" under the Telecommunication (Low Impact Facility)
Determination Act 1997, and excludes power poles. The use includes a telecommunication tower,
wind turbine, high voltage transmission lines (11Okv or greater).
Given the proposal involves the development of a tower for the provision of telecommunications; the
proposed facility requires assessment against Planning Scheme Policy 23 (PSP23).
6.4 Zoning
The level of assessment is determined from the tables contained in the Cooroy & Lake Macdonald Locality
Plan under the Community Services Zone Level of Assessment Table. The proposed Service and Utility-
Type 3 Tower development is considered Impact Assessable. Figure 6 illustrates the Community Services
zoning of the site.
18
Page 20
Planning Report
Figure 6 Cooroy & Lake Macdonald Locality Plan Zoning Map
- -
oDet.ached Housin.gl
oSemi-Attached Housing
.Attached Housing
. Business Centre
oCommunity Services
oIndustry
. Rural Settlement
. Rural
D Open Space Recreation
. Open Space Conservation
(Source: Noosa Plan)
The overall outcomes for the Cooroy & Lake Macdonald Locality are extensive and specific intents are
supplied for each of the zones within the area.
The intent of the Community Services Zone under the Planning Scheme is the following:
Land committed or planned for community purposes-
is protected and managed to enable the efficient and timely delivery of community services; and
is consistent with the indoor recreation, education, health, social and safety needs of the local
community, including people with special needs, such as the elderly, children, low-income earners and
disabled persons;
19
Page 21
Planning Report
The proposed facility represents a response to the development and growth of the township of Cooroy. The
increased demand on the existing telecommunications network and new requirements for data enabled
’smart phones’ inform the necessity for this new facility.
The proposal has been assessed against the relevant Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions of the
Cooroy and Lake Macdonald Locality Code in Appendix 2 of this report.
6.5 Codes
The following Codes from the Planning Scheme have been identified as being applicable to the application:
Cooroy and Lake Macdonald Locality Code;
Infrastructure Uses Code; and
Planning Scheme Policy 23 -
Telecommunication Towers.
6.6 Overlays
The following Overlays from the Planning Scheme have been identified as being applicable to the
application:
Local Heritage and Character Overlay;
The abovementioned Overlay applicable to the site is further investigated as follows:
6.6.1 Local Heritage and Character Overlay
The site is identified on the Local Heritage and Character Overlay as containing land within the character
area (refer to Figure 7).
The Maple Street Character Area is focused around the historic business centre of Cooroy and extends from
Marara St in the north to Crystal Street in the south and includes 9-73 Maple Street and 19 Crystal Street.
The character area contains a number of business, community and residential buildings remaining from the
early to mid-twentieth century, which influence the character of this area. The heritage overlay code specifies
that development is to ’be sympathetic to the main streetscape. Specifically, new building works are to be
located at the rear of sites or where least visible from the streetscape. The proposal adheres to these
objectives.
Figure 7 -
Local Heritage and Character Overlay
o
I
’_ore...
~IL.~~
The Noo&a P$an
""""fleSle
! .....-
’F"’~ ~\.
t..
~
"
LJ
~~’S:’ t
i7lLl_
--
.- ..
CharBClerAtea
f.8 L-~_
I [~." -~ .
I
I
~
I,
.
~...oialTlOl
’’1/ t’
.
_’
~~{~-
’ltln
I
~_ .’ f Op.fSII
......-..
....’"
\
I,
’(
20
Page 22
Planning Report
7 Environmental Impacts
7.1 Environmental Values
7.1.1 State and Local Values
The site does not contain any values of local or state significance.
7.1.2 Vegetation Communities
The site does not contain any significant vegetation.
7.1.3 Topography and Scenic Amenity
The site’s topography is relatively flat. Views of the facility from the surrounding area will be possible;
however given the relatively small scale of the facility, adverse impacts on scenic amenity will be limited.
7.1.4 Soil
The site is not located in an erosion prone area and no significant ground disturbance will result as part of the
installation.
7.1.5 Waterways & Water bodies
There are no waterways or water bodies located on the site and no significant ground disturbance will result
as part of the installation.
7.1.6 Declared Pests & Environmental Weeds
There are no known pests or environmental weeds on site.
7.2 Public Safety
Public safety will not be jeopardised as the facility will be secure from public access and warning signs will be
placed at appropriate locations.
The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) has set limits for
electromagnetic radiation exposure from mobile phone base stations. All licensed carriers must comply with
the ARPANSA limits. The ARPANSA limits are consistent with the guidelines of the World Health
Organisation. Please refer to the EME report in Appendix 3.
7.3 Visual Impact
To ensure there are no ’dead spots’ or ’drop outs’ within the coverage perimeter and in order to achieve its
desired coverage in the area, Telstra needs to sufficiently elevate its antennas above physical obstructions,
such as built form and vegetation.
While the proposed antennas will adequately meet the required Telstra coverage objectives, due care was
taken in the design and positioning of the facility so as to minimise impact on the surrounding areas. As a
result, Telstra has chosen to install a 25 metre pole with antennas. The height of the facility is required to
provide continued mobile and wireless broadband services to Cooroy. The minimal visual impacts on the
area can be attributed to the
following factors:
The visual impact of the facility from Maple Street will be minimal given the extent of commercial
development lining the streets. From the residential area on the eastern side of the railway line, the
facility will be visible in combination with a number of other poles and wires associated with the railway;
21
Page 23
Planning Report
The size and configuration of the installation represents the lowest impact option available for the site, to
ensure coverage is achieved in the area; and
The proposed development will not impact on the existing use of the site or the surrounding land uses.
22
Page 24
Planning Report
8 Conclusion
The proposed telecommunications facility at Cooroy will form an integral component in the enhancement of
mobile telecommunications network for Telstra Corporation Limited. Importantly, the proposed facility will
provide enhanced mobile phone coverage to the surrounding area, to ensure quality of coverage for users.
Telstra, together with Urbis Pty Ltd, has undertaken an assessment of the relevant matters as required by
the Telecommunications Act 1997, Environment Protection, Biodiversity and Conservation Act 2000 and the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009. The proposal is considered appropriate in light of the relevant legislative,
environmental, technical, radio coverage and public safety requirements.
This assessment of the site at Cooroy for the development of a Telecommunications Facility indicates that
the proposal is a suitable form of development on the site. The proposed facility is considered suitable for
this location for the following reasons:
No clearing of vegetation at the site will be necessary;
The proposed use complements existing telecommunication infrastructure located on site, and will
integrate with the built form in the surrounding area;
The size and configuration of the upgrade represents the lowest impact option available for the site;
The proposed facility provides a structure on which other telecommunications carriers can co-locate in
the future if required; and
The installation will address a number of customer complaints relating to mobile telephone coverage,
capacity and the quality of mobile telephone calls in the Cooroy Township.
The proposal represents sound planning, and will not result in any potential significant adverse impacts on
the amenity of the site or the surrounding environment. On the basis of the assessment contained within this
report, Sunshine Coast Regional Council is requested to favourably consider the development proposal,
subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.
23
Page 25
Planning Report
Appendix 1 -
Site Plans
24
[OCR of page images]
Maes
Planning Report
Appendix 1 — Site Plans
24
Page 26
~ ---------------~
I RFNSA SITE No. 4563006
~..- -
Real Est.te ,-
t
t,
I A ,
r.~ -:::::::
V1fim/))ersln
--’-__
----..____
eo.,OY Cen Ill.~
_rmBey"" .. ,g
’I
A
I ,
-,
t3
11
V
CBA,ATM S
-
-
,
-
,
_:X}STtNG FENCE ,.. I ~
I ,
-,
-,
-,
Salv.l;onAImY
i!J F4mit Stort Bendigo
e"",
$
-, "-.
J,
-, --. Gern f Sf
I Garn"ts! G’;’~~ TI ..
I
,... -
I / ’.
12
,.
’-....]
.
,
"
"~:~~
!
COOIOllfJ
I
{,
,
V1
ort:~~~ ~
I / W
LJ
Z
Vlcto,y In
5 r
..
..
ii
.1
B W ~-...__ E,_
\ B
I g/
L.L.
I..!:l "
1/
.___
Rel>!ry
[H
;::.
"’-
tu
Z
t-
}1 -
---__ ,Coo<oylrlkso..o.
~ooICl""
~
<.
\
I ,",-, (/)
I
~/
(/)
X
w
1
<:
_,
3"
a
"’T2
~
~ \
><,
~
I tu/ Ul
Copyright CD Universal Press Pty Ltd.
,
LOCALITY PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED TELSTRA
-, _J HEADFRAME
PROPOSED FOUNDA nON PAD
COOROY
c PROPOSED 25m POLE MEMORIAL c
8
PROPOSED CABLE HALL TN
SP178334
TRA Y 450 WIDE
I
....
2
I ,
-
,
-, RP14767:J8’ ,
"-
f;:j
~
V) 2
’-<J
o 0: RP147678 o
PROPOSED TELSTRA PANEL
~
r--_
I
I
ANTENNAS 3 x CNPX310R-4P
/1
I
I’ 303
I
I RP911165
1
1
POST OFFICE
/I
I 1
....
1 COOROY EXCHANGE r---1
-..J
BUILDING
/ I
I ....
306
:~
SITE LAYOUT I~
~
I RP911165
E g E
1m o 1m 2m 3m 5m
GARNET STREET
4m
SCALE 1:100
NOTES:
COMPLIANCE BO){_ SITE ACCESS
1. FOR EME SIGNS NOT A TED ~ REFER TO 005486 FOR DETAILS. D
COMPLETED AS PER DESIGN
fZI PROPOSED LEASE AREA AL TERA TIONS IN RED D 5m o 5m 10m 15m 20m 25m
SCALE 1:500 I PRELIMINARY I I
NAME (PRINT!
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SIGNATURE DATE ORDER DRAWN CHKD AMENDMENT EXAM APPD DATE ISS I
DO NOT
SCALE
PART OF LOT 3 ON RP147678
SITE STRUCTURE CO-ORDINATES 4009896 RNA ADM PREUMINARY ISSUE 21.02.12
i;elstra
PARISH OF TEWANTIN
COUNTY OF MARCH GPS READING ACCURACY: :!:10m MOBILE NETWORK SITE 56491 I
F
CENTRE OF POLE COOROY EXCHANGE
I
m ....- LATITUDE -26.25057 IGDA 94) kordia- 4 GARNET
SITE LAYOUT AND ACCESS
STREET, COOROY, OLD, 4563
F
I
LtJ NETWORK people .technology .1on.
$NE,~,
LONGITUDE 152.54381 IGDA 94) DWG
@ Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 All rights reserved. NO. Q 11 0539 I
1 4 3
L_____________ ---~
Page 27
~-------------------------------------------~
T 1 I ? ’i /"" c:’)
4 I 6
I
TELSTRA ANTENNA CONFIGURATION TABLE
I A sz E.L. 25.0m
ANTENNA ANTENNA TYPE & ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA SECTOR NO.
A
14;::::;F= ClL PROPOSED TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS 3 x CNPX310R-4P
No SIZE H x W x D ST A TUS HEIGHT BEARING & SYSTEM
I ClL FUTURE TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS 3 x CNPX310R-4P
ClL A.G.L. IxoT)
Sl: WCDMA850
ClL FUTURE TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS 6 x VVPX310R-V4
I @) Al
ARGUS CNPX310R-4P PANEL
2630 x 370 x 120
PROPOSED 25.0m 600
Sl: WCDMA850
S1: SPARE
Sl: SPARE
I PROPOSED TELSTRA S2: WCDMA850
-
HEADFRAME ARGUS CNPX310R-4P PANEL S2: WCDMA850
A2 PROPOSED 2S.0m 1800
I 2630 x 370 x 120 S2: SPARE
S2: SPARE
I NOTES:-
ARGUS CNPX310R-4P PANEL
S3: WCDMA8S0
S3: WCDMA8S0
B 1. ALL ACCESS POINTS ON THE STRUCTURE MUST BE BIRD PROOFED AS PER EXTERNAL PLANT POLICY 003615.
A3 PROPOSED 2S.0m 3000 B
2630 x 370 x 120 S3: SPARE
I 2. FOR SITE SPECIFIC NOTES REFER TO SHEET SO. S3: SPARE
3. FOR EME SIGNS NOT A TED ~REFER TO 005486 FOR DET AILS. ARGUS CNPX310R-4P PANEL
I 4. THIS DRAWING SET IS A PRELIMINARY DRAWING ONLY AND IS ISSUED FOR COMMENT. A4
2630 x 370 x 120
FUTURE 2S.0m 600
IT IS NOT A DETAILED SURVEY / STRUCTURAL ORA WING AND THEREFORE
f--
I COULD BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
AS
ARGUS CNPX310R-4P PANEL
2630 x 370 x 120 FUTURE 2S.0m 1800
f-
I A6
ARGUS CNPX310R-4P PANEL
2630 x 370 x 120 FUTURE 2S.0m 3000
I A7
ARGUS VVPX310R- V 4 PANEL
1277 x 290 x 103
FUTURE 2S.0m 600
c
I PROPOSED 25.0m MONOPOLE
A8
ARGUS VVPX310R- V 4 PANEL
FUTURE 2S.0m 1800
c
1277 x 290 x 103
I A9
ARGUS VVPX310R-V4 PANEL
2S.0m 3000
1277 x 290 x 103 FUTURE
I v Al0
ARGUS VVPX310R-V4 PANEL
’"
FUTURE 2S.0m 600
~ 1277 x 290 x 103
/
I ARGUS VVPX310R-V4 PANEL
All FUTURE 2S.0m 1800
1277 x 290 x 103
I ARGUS VVPX310R-V4 PANEL
A 12 FUTURE 2S.0m 3000
1277 x 290 x 103
I o o
I EME TELSTRA #6 SIGN
FIXED TO STRUCTURE ~
NEW CABLE ENTRY
I
I
5.0m A.G.L.
PROPOSED TELSTRA
450mm HORIZONT AL
GANTRY
~
~
WINDOW~
~
111 I I I I I II I I
/
I I
COOROY EXCHANGE BUILDING
I If -[ T I I I I 1 T 1 1 I I I
’-
PROPOSED CABLE TRA Y ____
I SUPPORT LEGS
t:::r--...
I E
FOUNDATION PAD
~ \J E.L. OO.Om
E
I GROUND LEVEL
WEST ELEV A TION
I 1m o 1m 2m 3m 4m Sm
SCALE 1:125
I PRELIMINARY I
I ORDER DRAWN CHKD AMENDMENT EXAM APPD DATE ISS ’-
DO NOT
4009896 RNA ADM PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21.02.12 1
’;elstra
I SCALE
MOBILE NETWORK SITE 56491
F
I COMPLIANCE BOX COO ROY EXCHANGE
I W
......-....
_,;.-
D
COMPLETED AS PER DESIGN
AL TERA liONS IN RED D
kordia: 4 GARNET
WEST ELEVATION
STREET, COOROY, QLD, 4563
F
people Iktechnology..on.
$NegNETWORK
NAME (PRINT)
I SIGNATURE DATE
@ Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 All rights reserved. 2~~ Q 11 0539 I~W. IN~{X
1 2 I :1 ""/ 4 I 5
L ---------------------_ -__________ _ _
~ _ _ _
~ _
~3~
Page 28
Planning Report
Appendix 2 -
Codes
Cooroy and Lake Macdonald Locality Code
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
6.9 Effects of Use
Amenity No solution provided 01 Complies
01 Uses are located, designed The proposed facility is sited at the rear
and operated to avoid of the existing Telstra Exchange. It is
significant adverse changes to buffered on one side by a strip of
the light, air quality, noise, commercial development facing the
accessibility or other conditions main road and on the other side by the
enjoyed by users of railway line and station.
associated, adjoining or nearby
uses.
Scenic amenity No solution provided 02Complies
02 Important scenic vistas The proposal does not impede on any
including those to and from Mt views to Mt Gooroy, Mt Tinbeerwah or
Gooroy, Mt Tinbeerwah and Black Mountain. Mt Gooroy to the south
Black Mountain are protected and Mt Tinbeerwah are not viewable
and uninterrupted to maintain from the township of Gooroy. Black
aesthetic and cultural values of Mountain is hidden by the adjacent
the natural landscape. ridgeline along the main road through
Gooroy
Major road network No solution provided 03 Complies
03The function of, and visual The proposal is not located on, or does
amenity and character not impact visually upon any of the
surrounding the, major road mention roads.
network, including Diamond St,
Gooroy-Noosa Road, Belli
Greek Road and Lake
Macdonald Drive is protected
and enhanced.
Laneways No solution provided 04 Complies
04 Uses do not diminish the The proposal is not located on or
ability of laneways to- adjacent to a laneway. It is located such
that it does not impact upon access and
a) relieve traffic on streets;
movement in Gooroy.
b) provide convenient and safe
rear access to premises; and
c) add to the heritage
character of Gooroy;
AND
05 Access for new uses is 05 Not Applicable
only taken off a laneway where The proposal is not located on or
upgrading works are carried adjacent to a laneway.
out to the laneway to enable
the laneway to accommodate
the anticipated levels of traffic.
6.10 Built Form
Density No solution provided 06 Not Applicable
06The density of The proposed facility will be unmanned.
development within the site Whilst the tower will be 25 metres in
area- height, it reflects an intended use for
a) is compatible with the site and a necessary service for the
surrounding township of Gooroy.
development; and
b) does not exceed-
i. For the Semi-
Attached Housing
Zone-1 dwelling unit
per 400m2 of site area
Page 29
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
with a maximum
population density of
100 persons per
hectare;
ii. For the Attached
Housing Zone-
maximum population
density of 100 persons
per hectare; and
iii. For the Business
Centre Zone-
maximum population
density of 100 persons
per hectare
iv. For the Community
Services Zone
maximum population
density of 320 persons
per hectare exclusively
for the purposes of
Residential Aged Care
and 160 persons per
hectare for any other
form of Retirement &
Special needs
housing; and
c) has a low site impact to
enhance the opportunity to
maintain natural site
characteristics such as
native vegetation and
natural landforms.
Height 07 Generally Complies
07Buildings and other 57.1 Buildings and other structures The proposed tower is to be 25 metres
structures- have a maximum building height of- in height. However, the narrow profile of
a) are low rise and present a) if in the Rural or Rural Settlement the structure will reduce the visual
a building height consistent Zone-8m, or 9m where the pitched dominance in the surrounding area.
with structures on adjoining roof but no other part of the building Furthermore, there are a number of
and or structure exceeds 8m; or telegraph-style poles within close
proximity of the proposed, which will
surrounding premises; b) if in the Open Space Recreation assist in the ’stepping down’ of height to
b) have a maximum Zone and used for an indoor sporting
the envisaged 8 metres.
building height of 2 storeys; complex-11m
c) do not visually dominate c) if in the Industry Zone-10m;
the street, surrounding d) in all other zones-8m.
spaces or the existing
skyline;
d) preserve the amenity of
surrounding land uses;
e) respect the scale of
existing vegetation;
and
f) respond to the
topography of the site by
avoiding extensive
excavation and filling.
Page 30
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
Setbacks 08 Complies
08 Buildings and other 58.1 Buildings and structures com ply The proposed facility will be located at
structures are appropriately with the minimum setbacks identified the rear of the lot. The existing Telstra
designed and sited to- in Schedule 1 -
Exchange and the proposed facility are
a) provide amenity for users Minimum Boundary Setbacks. both unmanned and there are no
of the premises as well as regular ’users’ of the premises.
Furthermore, only the rear of adjoining
preserve the visual and
sites actually border the proposed site
acoustic privacy of
location so these sites should not be
adjoining and nearby significantly impacted. As the structure
properties; proposed has a narrow profile, it is not
b) preserve any existing envisaged that visual continuity will be
vegetation that will buffer impacted in the same way.
the proposed building from
adjoining uses;
c) allow for landscaping to
be provided between
buildings; and
d) maintain the visual
continuity and pattern of
buildings and landscape
elements within the street.
Site cover, gross floor No solution provided 09-012 Not Applicable
area and plot ratio The major component of the proposed
09The site cover, gross facility is not a roofed structure.
floor area and plot ratio of
buildings and other roofed
structures-
a) results in a building scale
that is compatible with
surrounding development;
b) does not present an
appearance of bulk to
adjacent properties, roads
or other areas in the vicinity
of the site;
c) maximises the retention
of existing vegetation and
allows for soft landscaping
between buildings;
d) allows for adequate area
at ground level for outdoor
recreation, entertainment,
clothes drying and other
site facilities; and
e)facilitates onsite
storm water management
and vehicular access.
010 Site cover does not
exceed-
a)for a class 1 or class 10a
structure within the
Detached Housing Zone, -
i for a single storey
building -
50%; or
ii for a building of 2 or
more storeys 50%
-
Page 31
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
on the ground floor
and 30% for the
upper storey(s), or
40% for all storeys
for a building of 2 or
more storeys;
b) for other classes within
the Detached Housing Zone
-40%;
c)for the Semi-Attached
Housing Zone-40%;
or
d)for the Attached Housing
Zone-40%
e)for the Community
Services Zone-50%
011 For Multiple Housing
Type 2 buildings have a
maximum plot ratio of
0.45:1.
012 For Multiple housing
Type 3 or 4, Visitor
accommodation Type 4,
or the accommodation unit
com ponent of an
Entertainment and dining
business Type 3-
maximum gross floor area
is
equivalent to the maximum
allowable population in
2
persons multiplied by 40m .
013 For the Business 013 Not Applicable
Centre Zone plot ratio does The proposal is not located in the
not exceed- Business Centre Zone.
a) 0.8:1 for site areas up to
and including 2,000m 2; and
b) 0.3:1 for the balance of a
2
site over 2,000m .
Flooding and drainage S14.1 For new buildings or S14.1 Not Applicable
014 Buildings and other structures or additions of more than The structure proposed will not result in
works are designed and 50m2gross floor area to an existing the addition of more than 50m2 gross
sited to- building or structure, floor levels for floor area, and there is no habitable
a) provide flood free access habitable rooms are- space.
to premises and flood free a)for areas where minimum floor
habitable areas; levels are available-not less than
b) allow only minor, short the specified level;
term and infrequent flooding b) for areas where flood modelling is
1
Council has mapping of minimum floor levels and flood levels and flood modelling for some parts of the Shire. Contact the Land
Development Section of Noosa Shire Council.
Page 32
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
of non-habitable areas; available-a minimum of 500mm
c) ensure carparking areas above the modelled flood level; and
can be adequately drained; c)for areas where flood modelling is
d) ensure drainage does not available, a minimum of 500mm
not adversely impact upon above the highest known flood level;
other premises; and AND
e) ensure filling or S14.2 Where Council infrastructure
514.2 Not Applicable
excavation does not is available-
The proposal will not require any
adversely im pact upon a) any drainage (including buildings artificial drainage.
other premises by- and yards) flows to that
i. causing ponding of infrastructure; and
water on the site or b) the infrastructure has the capacity
nearby land; to accept any additional loading;
AND
ii. increasing flooding, S14.3 Car parking and manoeuvring 514.3 Not Applicable
which adversely areas are constructed at a level that Car parking will not be required for this
affects the safety or permits the parking area to drain development because the use will be
unmanned. It is envisaged that service
use of any land from the site by gravity means,
vehicles can access the site from the
upstream and without the need for mechanical
car parking area to the east.
downstream; and pumping; or
S14.4 Basements for residential
514.4 Not Applicable
iii. adversely affecting uses have flood immunity above the
The proposed development is not for a
the flow of water in 0100 where alternative means to
residential use.
any overland flow mechanical pumping are used to
path. achieve such immunity; or
S14.5 Basements for non-residential
514.5 Not Applicable
uses have flood immunity above the
0100 that may be achieved by The proposed development will be
unmanned.
means of mechanical pumping
where the mechanical feature is
installed with adequate holding tanks
and an alternative Backup power
source.
Sloping sites S15.1 Buildings are of split level 015 Not Applicable
015 On sloping sites, design that step down the slope or The proposed development will be
buildings and structures are have a suspended floor construction; unmanned. The facility will not be multi-
designed to maximise the (See Figure 6.1 below) level and the site is not considered to
use of natural slope and AND have an excessive slope.
minimise the need for cut S15.2 Cut or fill is less than 2m in
and fill. depth;
AND
S15.3 The distance between the
ground and the lowest part of the
floor of the building does not exceed
3m.
Figure 6.1-Design for sloping site
(suspended floor)
.
~
/---,~1 ""
~
IiT~~’_:~ ~
~~~’~’:--t
~-
-/r
h 4hJ-
Roof form S16.1 With the exception of industrial 016 Not Applicable
016 Roof forms- buildings the main roof of the The main component of the proposed
a) contribute positively to building has a facility does not have a roof.
Page 33
~~,~.,n-FF"~’’’’’’-’’’’~~_’__’’’’-’’’
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
the local skyline; roof pitch no less than 12 degrees
b) complement the low rise and has
character of the locality; minimum 600mm eaves to at least
c) use simple traditional 75% of the perimeter of the building;
roof designs, such as AND
hipped, gabled or skillion; S16.2 Building and structures do not
and include
d) do not create rooftop terraces.
opportunities for residents
to overlook the private open
space areas of
neighbouring properties.
Public transport node 017 Not Applicable
017An accessible and safe S17.1 A public transport node is The proposed development will be
public transport node is located within Cooroy as identified in unmanned and will not require close
established and operated Schedule 5 on Map 1. access to the public transport network.
within Cooroy that- Furthermore, the proposal is not for a
a) links public transport public transport facility.
services to other centres
and destinations throughout
the Sunshine Coast; and
b) forms part of an
integrated transport network
that is accessible via
pedestrian and bicycle
pathways.
6.11 Environment, conservation and recreation
Environment and cultural No solution provided 018 Complies
heritage values The proposed facility will not result in
018 There are no Advisory note the removal of any vegetation on the
significant adverse effects PSP24 -
Effluent Disposal details site. The operation of the facility will not
on biodiversity, natural requirements for the design and result in any physical emissions nor
vegetation, native fauna siting of effluent disposal systems impact upon any areas of heritage
habitat, landscape quality, where located outside a sewerage significance.
water quality or cultural service area. Compliance with
heritage values, including PSP24 will be considered as part of
those related to- Council’s assessment of the
a) changes to natural plumbing and drainage application.
drainage;
b) disturbance to any of the
wetland systems;
c) management of landslide
and fire risk;
d) erosion and the transport
of sediments off site;
e) unmanaged public
access;
f) effluent disposal2;
g) changes to fauna habitat
and behaviour;
and
2
Council may request additional information on the proposed method of effluent disposal to ensure the nature of the
development is compatible with environmental values. Refer to PSP1 Information Council May Request.
-
Page 34
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
h) disturbance of buildings
and features, including
natural features, of cultural
heritage significance.
Open space network S19.1 and S20.1 Open space 019 Not Applicable
019 An integrated open corridors and existing native The proposal is not located in an open
space network is vegetation in areas indicated in space corridor. The site currently
established, enhanced and Schedule 5 Map 4 are protected
-
contains a Telstra exchange facility
protected throughout the from fragmentation and within the realms of the existing
locality to- encroachment by development. developed town centre.
a) provide for both passive
and active recreational
pursuits;
b) provide connectivity for
pedestrians,
cyclists, and horse riders;
c) provide habitat
connectivity for wildlife;
d) protect watercourses and
drainage lines;
e) protect vegetation on
steep slopes; and
f)form a scenic backdrop
for residential development;
AND
020 The open space
network links- 020 Not Applicable
a)forests including parts of The proposal does not impact upon the
Tewantin and Ringtail State open space network.
Forests;
b) the catchment of Lake
Macdonald;
c)the vegetated ranges of
the sub-coastal escarpment
in the north, south, and east
of the locality; and
d) the riparian corridors of
the Six-Mile and Ringtail
Creeks and their tributaries.
Noosa Trail Network S21.1 Development includes 021 Not Applicable
021 A comprehensive linkages to or The proposal does not impact upon the
network of bridle trails and between existing or future Noosa Trail Network.
pedestrian and bicycle components of the Noosa Trail
linkages is established, Network, as indicated in Schedule 5
enhanced and protected -
Map 3;
incorporating road reserves, AND
State forests, Council S21.2 Development does not have
owned land and private an adverse im pact on the access
lands consistent functions of the Noosa Trail Network,
with the lifestyle and as indicated in Schedule 5 -
Map 3,
outdoor recreation needs of including severing of existing or
Noosa’s residents and future linkages;
visitors; OR
AND S21.3 Alternative linkages to those
022The Noosa Trail indicated 022 Not Applicable
Network in the locality is in Schedule 5 -
Map 3 are provided; The proposal does not impact upon the
supported by overnight AND Noosa Trail Network.
camping facilities, S21.4 Linkages to the Noosa Trail
homehosted Network
Page 35
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
accommodation and are designed and constructed in
signage, allowing local accordance
residents and visitors to with-
experience the a) Australian Standard 2156.1
natural values of the area Walking
and to access key Tracks Part 1: Classification and
destinations including- Signage
a) the town of Cooroy; to a minimum of a Class 4 Standard;
b) Lake Macdonald; and
c) the Botanic Gardens; and b) Australian Standard 2156.2
d) State forests, Walking
conservation parks and Tracks Part 2: Infrastructure Design;
other recreation facilities in 522.1 No solution provided
the locality.
Pedestrian and bicycle 023 Not Applicable
pathways The proposal does not impact upon the
023Safe and convenient 523.1 Pedestrian and bicycle pedestrian and bicycle pathways of
pedestrian and bicycle pathways are Cooroy.
pathways are provided and provided and retained where
retained between and indicated in Schedule 5 Map 2;
-
around key destinations, AND
including- 523.2 Contributions toward a
a) between Cooroy and Pathways
Tewantin; Network are provided in accordance
b) between Cooroy and the with
Noosa Botanical Gardens; PSP20.
and
c) within and around the
town of Cooroy.
Protection of Lake 524.1 Within the Lake Macdonald 024 Not Applicable
Macdonald water supply catchment The proposal will not result in any
024 Development does not area shown on Natural Resources physical emissions and will not impact
adversely im pact on the Overlay upon the Lake Macdonald water supply
Lake Macdonald water Map OM3.5, buildings and other catchment.
supply. structures are not located below
AND 98.5m AHD.
025The number and No solution provided. 025 Not Applicable
location of access points to The proposal does not involve access
watercourses is controlled 525.1 No solution provided to a watercourse.
and managed to
prevent adverse impacts on
water quality in Lake
Macdonald;
AND
026 Not Applicable
026 Key nodes are 526.1 No solution provided
The proposal is not within proximity of
established and
Lake Macdonald or any associated
appropriately managed at waterways.
the following locations and
include facilities such as
parking and picnic areas-
a) the northern part of the
lake, in the vicinity of the
water treatment plant,
scouts and fish hatchery;
b) the western part of the
lake in conjunction with the
Botanic Gardens and
associated picnic areas;
and
Page 36
Planning Report
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
c) the eastern part of the
lake, in the vicinity of the 527.1 No solution provided
Old Tinbeerwah School
Park. Advisory note
AND PSP24 Effluent Disposal details
-
027Treatment and requirements for the design and 027 Not Applicable
disposal of waste water siting of The proposal does not impact upon the
does not have any effluent disposal systems where Noosa Trail Network.
detrimental impact on located
Noosa’s outside a sewerage service area.
major water storage and Compliance with PSP24 will be
supply Lake Macdonald3.
-
considered
as part of Council’s assessment of
the
plumbi~ and drain e ~ication.
3
Council may request additional information on the proposed method of effluent disposal to ensure the nature of the
development is compatible with environmental values. Refer to PSP1 Information Council May Request.
-
Page 37
Planning Report
Infrastructure Uses Code
T probable solutions (if code
Specific outcomes
I assessable) I Compliance
14.39 Effects of use
Location and siting 51.1 For Installations and 030 Complies
030The location and siting of Towers, where practicable, The location of the proposed facility on land
Infrastructure Uses- infrastructure is-
used exclusively for an existing Telstra
a)maximises accessibility for a) co-Iocated with existing
Exchange, ensures that the proposed use
maintenance purposes; and Infrastructure Uses; or
will not disrupt access for other purposes.
b) does not disrupt access for b) located on or within an existing The will be three points of access for the
other purposes. building;
facility; from the street frontage and at two
AND
points from the access route accompanying
51.2 Easements for access to
the adjoining railway line. It is proposed
Infrastructure Uses are granted
that all of the additional components to the
to the Councilor the beneficiary of
tower be stored in the existing Telstra
the easement to ensure suitable
exchange building.
access can be gained, where
practicable.
5eparation from incompatible No solution provided. 031 Complies
uses
Section 3.3 of this report identifies the
031 Sufficient separation
surrounding land uses. It is noted that the
distance is provided between
proposed use is compatible with the
Infrastructure Uses and
existing use on the site. Neighbouring
incompatible uses on the same
premises are used for community and
site and neighbouring premises
commercial purposes and the location of
to maintain amenity for
the site is well buffered from sensitive land
neighbouring uses. uses.
032Vehicular access to the site 53.1. Vehicle access to the 032 Complies
of the Infrastructure Use does infrastructure is gained from roads
Access to the site is gained via Garnet
not adversely impact on other than local residential streets
Street, which ends in a cul-de-sac at the
residential amenity. to maintain residential amenity.
railway line. This part of Garnet street
contains limited residential access and is
predominantly used to access the car
parking area adjacent to the railway line.
Building siting and design No solution provided 033 Complies
033The siting and design of
Despite the size of the proposed
buildings or other structures telecommunications facility, the pole will
reflects and is compatible with
have a slim profile and not stand out in the
the setting and character of the
setting. There are other poles within close
locality in which the
proximity to the proposed in addition to
Infrastructure Use is located,
wires and metal structures associated with
including the use of sympathetic the railway line.
colour schemes.
5afety and security 55.1 For Installations and S5.1 Complies
034 Infrastructure Uses are Towers-the use is fenced with
There will not be public access to the site.
secure and potential impacts security fencing; The tower will be enclosed by a security
from vandalism are minimised. AND
fence equipped with warning messages for
55.2 For other Infrastructure
potential intruders. The associated
Uses-no probable solution
equipment will be stored in the locked
Telstra Exchange building.
Artificial lighting 56.1 Lighting associated with the S6.1 Not Applicable
035The generation of spill light use isdesigned, installed, The proposed facility will not require any
by development, which gives rise operated and maintained in artificial lighting for operation.
to annoyance, discomfort, accordance with Section 3 of
distraction or a reduction in the AS4282 The Control of the
ability to see essential Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor
information, is avoided. Lighting.
Mechanical plant and 57.1 Plant and equipment are- 036 Complies
equipment a)located more than 2m from any All equipment additional to the
036 Mechanical plant and property boundary; and telecommunications tower will be located in
equipment (including air b) screened by dense vegetation the existing Telstra Exchange Building.
conditioning equipment) are- or
a) positioned to mini mise adverse fencing (i.e. 1.5m wide vegetated
Page 38
Planning Report
Specific outcomes probable solutions (if code Compliance
assessable)
impacts on the amenity of any buffer area);
residential premises; OR
b) designed and positioned to S7.2 Plant and equipment are
visually integrate with the building located within a building.
and roof design; and
q_ ~o..2..riately screened.
Environment & heritage values No solution provided 037 Complies
037There are no significant
The proposed facility will be unmanned.
adverse effects on the Advisory note There will be no emissions from the facility
biodiversity, natural vegetation, PSP24 -
Effluent Disposal details
and no vegetation is required to be
native wildlife, habitats, requirements for the design and removed during construction or operation.
landscape quality, water quality siting of effluent disposal systems
or heritage values, including where located outside a sewerage
those related to- service area.
a) changes to natural drainage; Compliance with PSP24 will be
b) disturbance to any of the considered as part of Council’s
wetland systems; assessment of the plumbing and
c) management of landslide and drainage application.
fire risk;
d) erosion and the transport of
sediments offsite;
e) unmanaged public access;
f) effluent disposal4;
g) changes to fauna habitat and
behaviour; and
h) disturbance of buildings and
features, including natural
features, of heritage significance.
Service & Utility Type 3 -
Tower
Specific outcomes probable solutions (if code Compliance
assessable)
14.41 Effects of use
Visual amenity S10.1 The tower is- 039 Complies
039 The tower is visually a) not established in the Detached The proposed facility is to be located in a
integrated with its landscape or Housing, Semi-Attached Housing,
community use area in conjunction with an
townscape setting so as not to be Attached Housing or Visitor Mixed
existing Telstra Exchange. It is located at
visually dominant or obtrusive. Use Zones;
the rear of the lot, comprising a grey
b) camouflaged through the use of coloured 25 metre monopole. The
colours and materials which blend
positioning, profile and colour of the pole
into the surrounding landscape;
are such that it will not be visually
and
dominating from the commercial main
c) unobtrusive when viewed from street or any of the surrounding major
any part of the major road roads. The facility will provide opportunities
network,5 or for other providers to collocate in a central
S10.2 The tower is co-located on
area, where coverage capacity is easily
an existing telecommunication achieved.
tower;
AND
S10.3 The height of the tower does
not exceed-
4
Council may request additional information on the proposed method of effluent disposal to ensure the nature of the
development is compatible with environmental values. Refer to PSP1 -Information Council May Request.
5
PSP23 Telecommunication Towers provides guidance and information in relation to the installation of telecommunication
towers.
Page 39
Planning Report
Specific outcomes probable solutions (if code Compliance
assessable)
a)20 metres where on land in the
Community Services, Business
Centre or Industry Zones; or
b) 25 metres where on land in the
Rural Zone.
Health and safety No solution provided 040 Not Applicable
040The development avoids or
The proposed facility will not result in the
effectively manages any emission of any light, noise or vibration as
emissions of light, noise, vibration
a result of operation.
or
radiation beyond the site such
that-
a) environmental nuisance to
occupants or users of
surrounding premises is not
caused;
b) unacceptable risks to the
environment or to personal and
public safety are unlikely to be
caused; and
c) public access is restricted to
meet workplace, health and
safety requirements.
Access to sunlight 512.1 For proposed buildings or 512.1 Complies
041 The Tower does not cast structures having a height
Whilst the proposal is above 8.5 metres in
shadows such that the amenity of exceeding 8.5m above ground
height, it does not have a cross sectional
surrounding premises or level and a cross sectional area
are exceeding 20m2, therefore the shadows
useability of public open space is exceeding 20m2, shadowing does cast will have minimum impact.
unduly reduced. not affect residential lots, child
care centres or public open space
to the extent of more than 20% of
their site area for a period in
excess of three hours on any day
of the year.
Page 40
Planning Report
Noosa Planning Scheme Policy 23
Specific outcomes Compliance
_
Low Impact Facilities
a) The Telecommunications (Low Impact Facilities) Not Appl icable
Determination 1997 defines low impact facilities that
The proposed development does not represent a low-
remain under the control of the Commonwealth
impact facility.
Government. Facilities that are not specified in the
Determination cannot be considered low impact facilities
and may be regulated by the Noosa Plan. A copy of the
Determination is available from the Australian
Government Department of Communications, Information
Technology and the Arts. (Checktheir website at:
http://www.dcita.gov.au/).
b) In some cases additional equipment added to existing
facilities may be determined to be a minor change. Where
there is an existing approval in place, such minor
changes may only require a change to the development
approval. An application process is involved, however
there is no public notification period, refer to Section
3.5.241 and 3.5.332 of the Integrated Planning Act.
c) The Telecommunication industry is encouraged to
comply with Low Impact Mobile Facilities: Guidelines for
Better Visual Outcomes 2001 published by the Mobile
Carriers Forum.
Site location for telecommunication towers that are not low impact
2.1 Proposals for towers over premises that are in the
Complies
Community Services, Industry or Business Centre Zones The proposed site at the existing Telstra Exchange is
and comply with the Infrastructure Uses Code are
located in the Community Services zone.
generally consistent with The Noosa Plan.
2.2 Applications on sites containing environmentally Complies
sensitive areas, such as native habitat, steep slopes or The proposed development is not located on a site
ridgelines are unlikely to be supported, if those areas are containing environmentally sensitive areas, steep slopes
likely to be adversely impacted upon by the proposed or ridgelines.
development.
Matters for consideration
3.1 In addition to matters identified in The Noosa Plan, Noted.
Council may when assessing proposals
for telecommunication towers have regard to other
considerations.
3.2 Council is unlikely to support proposals that would Complies
result in the following- The proposed development will not result in the loss of
a) Loss of vegetation on steep slopes or ridgelines; or vegetation, degradation of views from the major roads or
b) Visual scaring or the degradation of views or vistas impact on waterways. The site is strategically located at
from the major road network; or the rear of the existing Telstra exchange
-
removed from
c) Loss of distinct character associated with the various the main commercial strip to preserve the character of the
towns, villages or rural areas of township.
the Shire; or
d)Alteration to key landform and landscape characters
such that they become dominated by the facility; or
e) Impact on views to and from waterways, beaches and
riparian zones.
3.3 There is still much debate regarding the potential
Complies
health risks associated with electromagnetic radiation.
An EME report is included in Appendix 3.
Carriers need to provide evidence that necessary
measures have been taken to ensure public health and
safety will not be adversely affected. In the absence of
such evidence, Council is likely to adopt the
precautionary principle and may refuse the application.
3.4 Wherever practical towers should -
Page 41
Planning Report
Specific outcomes Compliance
a) Maintain the integrity of landmarks and places of Complies
significance; The siting of the proposed tower at the rear of the lot and
b) Avoid interrupting significant views; the colour and design of the facility ensure that it will have
c) Be architecturally integrated with the building/structure a minimal impact on the amenity of the area as much as
they are mounted on; practically possible.
d) Be positioned to minimise clutter of multiple facilities;
e) Be colour matched to their background, using no
reflective paint;
f) Be at least partially screened by vegetation; and
g) Be positioned and designed to be less visible by
edestrians.
Co-location
Carriers are obliged to consider co-locating on existing
Complies
towers or public utility structures in the area. However it is
Co-location has been considered as part of this
acknowledged that co-location will not always result in the
application, but no suitable solutions were identified. The
best visual outcome. To assist with the identification of
proposed facility will provide the opportunity for other
potential co-location sites as new towers are installed on carriers to co-locate in a central area, where coverage
a regular basis the most up to date inventory of facilities
capacity is strong.
is provided by the Australian Communications Authority
via their website at www.dcita.ov.au
Page 42
fT;elstra
Summary of Estimated RF EME levels around the Proposed
Mobile Phone Base Station at Telstra Exchange 4 Garnet St, Cooroy QlD 4563
Introduction: Date 2/12/2011 NSA Site No (4563006)
This report summarises the estimated maximum cumulative radiofrequency (RF)electromagnetic energy (EME)levels at
ground level emitted from the existing Mobile Phone Base Station antennas at Telstra Exchange 4 Garnet St Cooroy QLD 4563
.
Maximum EME levels are estimated in 3600 circular bands out to 500m from the base station. The procedures for making the
estimates have been developed by the Australian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA)1.These are
documented in the ARPANSA Technical Report; "Radio Frequency EME Exposure Levels Prediction Methodologies" which is
-
available at http://www.arpansa.gov.au
EME Health Standard
ARPANSA, an Australian Government agency in the Health and Ageing portfolio has established a Radiation Protection
Standard2 specifying limits for continuous exposure of the general public to RF transmissions at frequencies used by mobile
phone base stations. Further information can be gained from the ARPANSA web site.
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)3mandates exposure limits for continuous exposure of the
general public to RF EME from mobile phone base stations. Further information can be found at the ACMA website
http://emr.acma.gov.au
Existing Site Radio Systems There are currently no existing radio systems for this site.
Proposed Site Radio Systems
Table of Predicted EME levels -
Proposed
Maximum Cumulative EME Level -
All carriers at this site
Distance from the antennas at Telstra Exchange 4 Garnet St
in 3600 circular bands (%of ARPANSA exposure limits2)
Public exposure limit = 100%
Om to 50m 0.017%
50m to 100m 0.07%
100m to 200m 0.4%
200m to 300m 0.33%
300m to 400m 0.15%
400m to 500m 0.085%
Maximum EME level
161.32 m, from the antennas at Telstra Exchange 4 Gamet 0.4%
St
Note: Estimation for the maximum level of RF EME at 1.5m above the ground from the existing and proposed antennas assuming level
ground. The estimated levels have been calculated on the maximum mobile phone call capacity anticipated for this site. This estimation does
not include possible radio signal attenuation due to buildings and the general environment. The actual EME levels will generally be
significantly less than predicted due to path losses and the base station automatically minimising transmitter power to only serve established
phone calls5. Where applicable, particular locations of interest in the area surrounding the base station, including topographical variations, are
assessed in Appendix A "Other areas of Interest" table on the last page.
Summary -
Proposed Radio Systems
Environmental EME report (v10.3) (2007ARPANSA Format) Produced with RF-Map2 2.0 (Build 0.293)
Page 43
RF EME levels have been estimated from the existing and proposed antennas at Telstra Exchange 4 Gamet 5t Cooroy OLD
4563. The maximum cumulative EME level at 1.5 m above ground level is estimated to be 0.4 % of the ARPANSA public
exposure limits.
Reference Notes:
1. The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA)is a Federal Government agency incorporated under
the Health and Ageing portfolio. ARPANSA is charged with responsibility for protecting the health and safety of people, and the
environment, from the harmful effects of radiation (ionising and non-ionising).
2. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA),2002, ’Radiation Protection Standard: Maximum Exposure
Levels to Radiofrequency Fields 3 kHz to 300 GHz’, Radiation Protection Series Publication No.3, ARPANSA, Yallambie Australia.
-
[Printed version: ISBN 0-642-79400-6 ISSN 1445-9760]
[Web version: ISBN 0-642-79402-2 ISSN 1445-9760]
3. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)is responsible for the regulation of broadcasting,
radiocommunications, telecommunications and online content. Information on EME is available at http://emr.acma.gov.au/
4. The EME predictions in this report assume a near worst-case scenario including:
-
base station transmitters operating at maximum power (no automatic power reduction)
-
simultaneous telephone calls on all channels
-
an unobstructed line of sight view to the antennas.
In practi a worst-case scenario is rarely the case. There are often trees and buildings in the immediate vicinity, and cellular
networks automatically adjust transmit power to suit the actual telephone traffic. The level of EME may also be affected where
significant landscape features are present and predicted EME levels might not be the absolute maximum at all locations.
5. Further explanation of this report may be found in "Understanding the ARPANSA Environmental EME Report" and other documents
on the ARPANSA web site, http://www.aroansa.gov.au
Issued by: Telstra, Data reference file Cooroy QLD 4563 20111202135140
- -
Environmental EME report (v10.3) (2007ARPANSA Format) Produced with RF-Map2 2.0 (Build 0.293)
Page 44
Appendix A
Table of Other Areas of Interest
Height / Scan Maximum Cumulative EME Level
All Carriers at this site
Additional Locations
relative to location
ground level
(%of ARPANSA exposure Iimits2)
Public exposure limit = 100%
ACIF Code Section 5.5 -
community consultation Existing Site Update -
No additional
plan new sites n/a locations identified. Refer to previous table
for the environmental EME assessment
Topography/Buildings n/a No locations identified
Other (e.g. significant previous community concern) n/a No locations identified
Note: Estimation for the maximum EME levels at selected areas of interest over a height range relative to the specific ground level at
the area of interest. This table includes any existing and proposed radio systems.
Estimation Notes I Assumptions -
Other Areas of Interest
Variable ground topography has been included in the assessment of the "Other Areas of Interest" as per ARPANSA methodology
Insert other data / notes as required
Environmental EME report (v10.3) (2007ARPANSA Format) Produced with RF-Map2 2.0 (Build 0.293)
Page 45
Planning Report
Appendix 3 -
EME Report
[OCR of page images]
Planning Report
Appendix 3 — EME Report
Page 46
l’
\ ~’:
I
.j’
Planning Report
Appendix 4 -
Photo Montage
[OCR of page images]
Planning Report
Appendix 4 — Photo Montage
Used in these records
Development Application part 2 of 2 , Planning report/Plans MCU12/0036Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 28.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.