11. Appendix G - Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan

 

Sub Unit 1

Sub Unit 7b

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

\ Environmental
Wf Services
Spenearae Seoetunenent:enmumenes

PO Box 985 Porogian Baach OLD 4573
ABN, 60 625 108 625

  
     

BUSHFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT
658 LOUIS BAZZO DR, RINGTAIL CREEK QLD (4RP160124)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

           
   

  

LOUIS BAZZO PTY LTD

 

(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum| Potential | Potential] Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum] Potential |Potential|
Vegetation Hazard Class | 5. tyyq| Sutfaceand | Total Fuel | Weather | Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire | | Vegetation Hazard Class |, |. | Surfaceand | Total Fuel | Weather | Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire
# YP) NearSurface | Load(t/ha) | Severity | Slope Slope | Intensity | Intensity # YP®| NearSurface | Load(t/ha) | Severity} Slope Slope | intensity |Intensity
Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) . Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) *
VHC 43.6 - Water bodies or VHC 9.1 - Moist to dry
very low vegetation cover eg 0 2 a N/A N/A | N/A** | Low | Jeucalypt open forests on 1 a 24,2 47 10 1 29,524
coastal lowlands and ranges.
Sub Unit 2
Sub Unit 7c
Combines Fire Tianna | Makiinara li Rotana 7] (Firetine intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
Vegetation Hazard Class |. | .74_| Surfaceand | Totalfuel | Weather| Effective | site | fireline | Bushfire combined GS acer cera | eee rs | ee tae Rated
# Fone txPS: | Near Surfaces | toad, (t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope | Intensity | Intensity Vegetation Hazard Class Prone lyre Surface and Total Fuel | Weather| Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire
Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFD!) (degrees) | (degrees) | _(kw/m) * “ Near Surface | Load(t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope Intensity |Intensity
VHC 404 - Continuous low Fuel Load (t/ha) (FEDI) | (degrees) | (degrees)| _(kw/m) 2
\pasortieacae 2 45 5 47 N/A N/A N/AS* tow | lwncoa-Moist to dry
jeucalypt open forests on 1 21 24.2 47 3 1 18,214 | Medium
Sub Unit 3 coastal lowlands and ranges
Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum| Potential | Potential} Sub Unit 8a
Vegetation Hazard Class | , Surface and | Total Fue! | Weather | Effective Site Fireline fire | _(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
fT rone TPe| Nearsurface | toad (t/ha) | Severity | Slope Slope | Intensity | Intensity Combined Fire | Maximum |Maximum]| Potential [Potential
Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) ® Vegetation Hazard Class Surface and | Total Fuel | Weather| Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire
Prone Type Y x
Unc aaa Laceo toasted # Near Surface | Load(t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope Intensity | Intensity
ire cover si hele areas 3 5 8 47 N/A N/A N/AS* Low Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) =
ee 1 95 10.1 47 6 1 4,229 | Medium
Sub Unit 4
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type) Sub Unit 8b
Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum} Potential |Potential) (Fircine intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
Vegetation Hazard Class Surface and Total Fuel | Weather | Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum| Potential |Potential
Prone Type i a .
# NearSurface | Load (t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope Intensity | Intensity] | Vegetation Hazard Class Prove Ty) Surface and Total Fuel | Weather| Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire
Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) = # is NearSurface | Load(t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope | Intensity | Intensity)
eee crane ; Ni NA Nr tee Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| _(kw/m) =
jing an 2 3.8 3.8 4 A = z
ater Aine, 1 95 10.1 a7 1 1 2,995 | tow
Sub Unit 5 Sub Unit 9a
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol madelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
v tion tlecard cl ees Total Fuel Weck ae si ae Bushfl i Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum] Potential |Potential
cs ae a el | Type ve a ae x @ . re a NE i - i ie = t re | Vegetation Hazard Class Prove Type Surface and | Total Fuel | Weather| Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire
Fi fs ' ace (t/ha) exe 4 cos ae on te ty, nsersiy # 3 Near Surface | Load(t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope Intensity |Intensity
WCE -ConlentS ee ticee Ee) REEDIIES a (eeerces) (ce erees e(kw/in) Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFD!) _| (degrees) | (degrees)| (kw/m) | *
See VHC 8.1 - Wet eucalypt tall
simple, semi-dedduous ie 4, 31 35 47 4 1 41,666
Taeopirl ta Rotsehipl ne 3 3.5 35 47 N/A N/A N/A* tow | [open forest
forest
Sub Unit 9b
Sub Unit 6 (Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol madelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type) Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum| Potential |Potential
‘Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum] Potential [Potential] | V' tion Hazard Class Surface and Total Fuel | Weather| Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire
# Prone TYPE | NearSurface | Load(t/ha) | s si I Int Intensity
Vegetation Hazard Class - = Surface and | Total Fuel | Weather | Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire ear Oe 1a) | Severity OPE ee Intensity | Int
# rone Pe) wearsustace: | Load (t/ha), | Severity Slope Siope | i ty | Intensity! Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFD!) | (degrees) | (degrees)| _(kw/m) Ss
Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFD) | (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) | 2 | |VHC81-Wet eucalypt tall 1 31 35 47 1 1 33,875
Nib Set as ee 1 238 26 a7 7 1 58,272 —e
hardwood plantations
Sub Unit 9c
Sub Unit 7a (Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation tyne)
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type) Combined Are Maximum |Maximum] Potential |Potential
Combined Fire Maximum |Maximum| Potential |Potential] | Vegetation Hazard Class Prone” Surface and | Total Fuel | Weather| Effective Site Fireline | Bushfire
Vegetation Hazard Class | | type | Su*faceand | Total Fuel | Weather | Effective Site | Fireline | Bushfire # rone TYPE | NearSurface | Load(t/ha) | Severity | Slope Slope | Intensity |Intensity.
# Near Surface | Load(t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope Intensity | Intensity Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) 2
Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m) if VHC 8.1 - Wet eucalypt tall
VHC9.1 - Moist to dry lopen forest Z 3 5 it g - ee
eucalypt open forests on 1 2 24,2 47 1 1 15,866 | Medium
[coastal lowlands and ranges

 

Potential |Potential
Bushfire
Intensity | Intensity

 

 

Sub Unit 9d
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
Combined Fire Maximum = |Maximum.
Vegetation Hazard Class Premera Surface and | Total Fuel | Weather| Effective Site Fireline
# Near Surface | Load(t/ha) | Severity Slope Slope
Fuel Load (t/ha) (FFDI) | (degrees) |(degrees)| (kw/m)
oe aren 1 31 35 47 7 1 51,248

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

# From: Lennard, 1, & Onie, K, (2017) Fetimating the patential bushfim hazard af vegetation patches and carridacs —an enhancement of
Queensland’s methodalogy far State-wide mapping of bushfire prone areas. CSIRO, Australia
* From: Leonard, J., Newnham, G., Opie, K, and Blanchi, R. (2014) A new methodology for state-wide mapping of bushfire prone areas in

Queensland. CSIRO, Australi

a,

** Fireline intensity, radiant heat flux, and bushfire attack level are not calculated for non-bushfire prone VHCs grass fire prone VHCs (prone type =
2) and/ar low hazard VHCs (prone type = 3) as per Bushfire Resilient Cammunities 2019 Sections 7.5.2, 7.6 & Figure 14 (remnant/mature fuel loads
assumed).
Note, Effective Slope is measured bythe maximum slape conditions underlying the hazardous vegetation relative ta the proposed development
footprint & Site Slope is measured bythe maximum slope conditions underlying the setback area located between the hazardous vegetation and
the proposed development footprint.

 

1 vERSIONT

eee Ta

 

 

ISSUE

DETAILS

DATE

 

NIT CKD]

  

SUB UNITS 3 of 3

E818 LOCLNENT AsV NOT EE COPIED CR TRIMEATTTED M21 FCRUAOR SY AKT
AKCLE #ITAGU" THE NRITEN CONSENT OF NEES.

  
   

J001313

soa e

   

PLAN:

BFO2C

eu

1