Original source · versioned page text
11. Appendix G - Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan
Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v2 NCES REF: J001313 Lot 4 on RP160124 – 658 Louis Bazzo Dr, Ringtail Creek QLD 4565 Plan BF04 – Setback Requirements depicts the <29kW/m2 RHF setback requirement relative to the proposed wedding marquee and associated infrastructure. Plan BF04 demonstrates the minimum 64m proposed separation between SU9b; the closest adjacent hazardous vegetation, and the wedding marquee facilitates an acceptable risk of radiant heat impact in accordance with Assessment Benchmark 4 of the SPP Bushfire 2019. It is noted however that the marquee is expected to be constructed of a canvass like material which offers limited to negligible resistance against direct flame, radiant heat and ember attack. The modelled radiant heat flux exposure acting on the marquee was determined to be 8.02 kW/m² (refer Appendix 3). Table G1 of AS3959 2018 reports that humans feel pain after 10 – 20 seconds of direct exposure (i.e., outside of the marquee) to 4kW/m² RHF and after 3 seconds of exposure to 10kW/m ² RHF. Leonard et al reports that ‘Human skin is damaged by exposure levels greater than 2 kW/m ²’ (Leonard, J, Opie, K et al. (2014). It is therefore apparent that whilst the marquee location satisfies Assessment Benchmark 4 of the SPP Bushfire 2019 it should not be relied upon as a shelter in place option given its material palette and degree of RHF exposure. The ‘Refuge’ Flamesol presented in Appendix 3 identifies that a minimum 150m separation to SU9b is required for an unshielded shelter in place location to achieve <2kW/m² radiant heat flux exposure. © 2024 21
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (11. Appendix G - Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.