Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

2018-06-12 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

of 97

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (11.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                         12 JUNE 2018




                 Figure 5 – Proposal Plan Extract Showing Dwelling Siting Arrangement


The buildings will be consistent with those already constructed on site. Each site has a minimum
width of 13 metres and a depth of 18 metres.
Internal works
Existing and proposed internal roads are 4 metres wide. The proposed internal road will be a
single lane one way circuit. Appropriate directional signage will be installed to guide traffic
direction. Boundary truncations have been applied to sites 221, 223, 226 and 227 as shown on
the proposal plans.
The applicant will be required to provide a 2 metre wide landscaping strip that contains dense
landscaping along the eastern boundary of the development to provide a buffer to existing
residential properties.
External Road works
A condition of the previous approval required the developer to upgrade Cooroy Connection Road
(Elm Street) at its intersection with Pearsons Road, which included the provision of two Bus
Stops with shelters, a pedestrian refuge and upgrade to existing kerb line and line marking. This
was to occur at stage 1A, however did not occur. The developer has only recently commenced
construction of the works. There are many dwellings that have been constructed that rely on this
intersection and safety is of concern. Although the Department of Main Roads have indicated
they have no requirements relating to this proposal, it is considered prudent to require this
intersection to be completed prior to the Operational Works (associated with the proposal)
commencing. This will be conditioned accordingly.




                                                                                        Page 51 of 97
Log in to download the original file

2018-06-12 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda(PDF, 11MB).pdf · 11.4 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.