Original source · versioned page text
Annex 12 - Code 12 - Declared fish habitat area
Attached to the e-mail DA Application - Noosa Oyster Project (2 of 3).
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
were assessed as being in relatively poor condition
due to high sediment loads observed on and around
the existing rocky reef and rubble areas, with some
sections of reef having a high coverage of fine
sediment.
ESP also confirmed that given the speed at which
Padina can colonise hard surfaces (dead oyster
shell) elsewhere in the estuary, it is anticipated that
supplementary habitat provided as part of the
proposed restoration project would be colonised
rapidly within 1 year of deployment, and that
coverage would be similar to the current condition
within 2 to 3 years post deployment, particularly in
sections that particularly in sections that remain
subtidal and not covered by fine silt.
Mangroves and seagrasses are not within the
footprint of this project and will not be impacted at
any restoration site.
Alternatives to the oyster ecosystem restoration
methodology proposed are evaluated in the Project
Restoration Plan, Section 6.3. Impact minimisation
Oyster ecosystems are known to increase the
biomass of fish relative to adjacent bare habitat. They
also provided hard substrates, which are colonised
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 12: Development in a fish declared habitat area Page 4 of 39
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.