MCU170049 - Submission - Tracy & Jim Blayney

Tracy and Jim Blayney
Wolngarin Holiday Resort
3/27 Munna Crescent

NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566

W: 54498755
M: 0432671009

t = : E: [email protected]
27 July, 2017 z |

Mr Patrick Murphy

The Assessment Manager
Noosa Council

9 Pelican Street

TEWANTIN QLD 4565

RE: Proposed Development
From: Detached House
To: Home Based Business (Type 3 Significant Scale)

Application # MCU17/0049

Good Morning Patrick,

We are the owners of 7 Fuller Court, Noosaville and our house is located directly behind the proposed
development (MCU17/0049).

At the present time the property is rented as we are in the process of selling our business, Wolngarin Holiday
Resort, and will be moving into the house at Fuller Court when the business is sold.

| am writing to ask that Noosa Council refuse the planning application proposed for 8 McKenna Court,
Noosaville as the impact of this proposed Home Based Business Type 3 on our family and our quality of life
in our home will be dramatically affected if this application was approved.

As evidence of the “proposed” business suggests (when it was previously operating on a much smaller scale)
the use, even on the small level that it was, was not minimal and the activities conducted on the premises
were inappropriate for the residential location it is situated in; resulting in complaints from neighbours to
Council.

Local children are already well catered for with regards to Swim Schools in the area as the closest, Diamond
Swim School, is just over 500 metres away at Good Shepherd Lutheran College. This is open to the general
public and not just students from GSLC. Other Swim Schools include Noosa Aquatic Centre, Tewantin State
School Swim School and Eumundi Aquatic Centre to name a few.

This proposed development breaches many of the specific outcomes of the “The Noosa Plan”.

The most relevant breach in Part 11 of the Noosaville Locality Plan is in Division 18 - Specific
Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Detached Housing Zone. Table 11.14 Section 11.12
“Inconsistent Uses.” It clearly states in this section of the plan (031) “the following defined uses and
use classes are inconsistent uses and are not located in the Detached Housing Zone - d) Home-based
business Type 3.

There is no solution provided in the “Probable solutions” section as it is completely inappropriate for a
business of this nature to be located in a zone classified as residential.