Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Code Objective                    Developer's Assessment             Objectors' Assessment

DRIVEWAYS& CARPARKINGCODE

01 Vehicular access does not      Sl.1- S1.3 Complies                Does not Comply
adversely impact on safety,       Vehicle access is considered to    The Applicant fails to provide
capacity and operations of        be compliant with the relevant     objective evidence or verification of
the existing or planned road      requirements. The                  the source of its "considered" opinion
network, the proposed             development will comply            that vehicle access is compliant.
driveway, cycleways or           where applicable.                   In the contrary, the proposed
pedestrian pathway systems.                                          Development's vehicular access
                                                                     adversely impacts on safety of
                                                                    children using the pedestrian pathway
                                                                    to and from the School. The proposed
                                                                     Development will significantly
                                                                    increase the amount oltraffic      using
                                                                    the access easement.
                                                                    The Applicant fails to consider or
                                                                    address how children will be able to
                                                                    safely cross the access way to the
                                                                    service station in a safe manner.

04 Vehicular access does not     S4.1 Complies                      Does not Comply
adversely Impact on the          The development will comply        The current proposal will have a
capacity, operations    and      as required.                       significant adverse impact on the
maintenance of the existing                                         operation of the existing road
infrastructure;                                                     network In and around the School.

07 Sufficient carparking is      07 Complies                        Does not Comply
provided to accommodate          The proposed development           The qualification "technically" is an
the number and type of           will provide 10 car parking        obfuscation. The proposed
vehicles likely to be            spaces. Technically this is        Deveiopment does not comply with
generated by the                 below the minimum according        the minimum requirements according
development having regard        to Table 14-S1 Vehicle Parking     to Table 14-S1 Vehicle Parking
to the specifics of the use...   Requirements.    However, it is    Requirements.
                                 considered that 10 spaces are
                                 suitable given the ancillary       It is the Applicant's responsibility to
                                 nature of the proposed petrol      design a compliant solution in all
                                 building. The likely number of     respects, including provision of
                                 users of the service will be       required car parking spaces to comply
                                 there to refuel their vehicles,    with the planning scheme.
                                 which comprises leaving the        Council has determined by way of the
                                 vehicle at the fuel dispenser.     planning scheme what is 'suitable'.
                                 The amount of users                The Applicant provides no
                                 specifically using the site for    qualification, expert opinion or
                                 the ancillary shop component       justification to allow a conclusion that
                                 is considered to be low. It is     the amount proposed is "suitable."



                                                                                                              21

Used in these records

About this file

File size
9.8 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Petition.pdf · 9.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.