Original source · versioned page text
2019-09-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 SEPTEMBER 2019
Page 54 of 76
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 SEPTEMBER 2019
Visual Impact Assessment
PEA 1802 of 2019
less effective at screening the existing built form. While the streetscape of this internal road is
dominated by the built form and hardstand areas, views to the green backdrop of the bushland reserve
are an attractive feature.
14 It is relevant to note that both Rene Street and the road providing access to the site are internal to the
wider industrial area. These roads are not major roads through residential areas, rural areas, or natural
landscapes, where a traveller might not expect to see industrial development and accompanying
signage. Rather, the only reason for someone to travel along those roads would be to attend one of the
industrial tenancies, and their sensitivity to and their expectations of the visual environment would be
formed accordingly.
2.3 The Building
15 ~—s The building upon which the proposed sign is to be located is a relatively uncomplicated building — it is a
simple rectangular form with limited variation in wall planes, limited fenestration or other detailing, and
treated with a limited (almost singular) block colour palette of muted tones. As a consequence, the
building itself is particularly recessive in the visual setting. Such an outcome is in contrast to some of the
other buildings in the locality (such as the Tradelink building opposite the subject site) where the
building is treated to effectively present as an amplification of the corporate branding that is depicted in
the signage.
16 =©The approved drawings show landscaping along the western part of the subject site, including three
medium to large trees (Harpulia pendula) between the road verge and the building/carparking area.
These trees will further screen and soften the appearance of the building.
17 ~—s As noted, the proposed sign is 5.6m wide and 1.57m high. It is located on the northern elevation of the
Actrol building, which is approximately 43m wide and 9.2m high. As noted in the application material,
the proposed sign represents just 2.5% of the entire northern facade of the building. While larger than
4sqm, the proposed sign presents as a modest addition to the building facade, and the facade provides a
large, uncluttered backdrop for the sign.
12 of 17
Page 54 of 76See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.