Original source · versioned page text
Other Change Decision Notice - Council Meeting Decision 132005 638 04 (As Published)
Officer: Matthew Pinese
Direct Telephone: 07 53296316
Our Reference: 132005.638.04
Your Reference: n/a
23 December 2025
Noosa Shire Council
C/- Adamson Town Planning Pty Ltd
PO Box 894
COOROY QLD 4563
[email protected]
Dear Shane
Decision Notice – Other Change
Planning Act 2016
I refer to your application and advise that on 18 December 2025, Council decided to approve
the application, subject to conditions.
Details of the decision are as follows:
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No: 132005.638.04
Street address: Eumundi Land Fill 561 Eumundi Noosa Road,
Doonan Qld 4562
Real property description: Lot 77 on SP298776 (formally Lot 77 on SP177938)
Planning Scheme: Noosa Plan 2020 (25 September 2020)
2. DECISION DETAILS
The following type of approval was issued on 24 November 2005:
• Material Change of Use – Expansion of Special Purpose (Waste Disposal & Recycling
Facility) & Ongoing Clearing Purposes.
In relation to the request to make an Other Change to the existing approval, Council on 18
December 2025, decided to approve the requested changes. The changes are detailed
below.
• Approve the application
• Amend condition 15 and include additional conditions 46 to 56
3. CURRENCY PERIOD OF APPROVAL
The currency period for this development approval is stated in the conditions below.
ABN 97.969.214.121 PO Box 141
noosa.qld.gov.au Tewantin QLD 4565
[email protected] 07 5329 6500
Page 1 of
72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.
Full text of the other 71 pages
Page 2
4. ASSESSMENT MANAGER CONDITIONS
PLANNING
When Conditions must be Complied With
Land Use
1. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with
the approved plans of development. The approved plan is titled Proposed Future
Development of Noosaville Landfill stamped and dated 24 November 2005 and as may
be amended by these conditions.
2. The development must be undertaken and operated in a manner that causes no
detrimental effect upon the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of the creation of
excessive noise, lighting nuisance or other emissions.
3. Existing trees on the site and within road reserves are to be retained, except where
required to be removed due to building operations or the conduct of the approved use.
4. Cleared vegetation is to be suitably processed by one of the following methods and
removed from the site:
a. Processing through a woodchipper or shredder. The resulting mulch is to be
stockpiled loose in heaps of less than 1000 cubic metres, less than 2.5 metres
high with a minimum of 10 metres between edges of heaps.
b. Disposal for firewood.
c. Disposal for landscaping purposes.
d. Transport to alternative site for breaking down materials provided that all
necessary permits have been obtained to allow the alternate site to be used for
this purpose.
e. The Applicant is advised that burning off is an unacceptable method of disposal.
5. Any advertising sign or device is to comply with Council’s policies on advertising.
6. A Bushfire Management Plan is required to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert
detailing any measures that are required to be undertaken on the subject site to ensure
the risk of bushfire hazard is minimised and managed. The plan shall be to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service.
7. The proposed extensions to the Waste disposal and recycling facility shall incorporate
requirements for the management of acid sulfate soils in accordance with State Planning
Policy 2/02 – Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils.
8. A Koala Management Plan is required to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert
detailing any proposed relocation of koalas and rehabilitation of other areas of the site
with suitable koala food trees, if appropriate.
9. The Development Permit for a material change of use of premises lapses if the use has
not happened by 24 November 2009 unless an application to extend the currency is
approved by Council.
Land Development
10. Any person acting on this permit shall prevent erosion and sediment export from leaving
the site. Site control measures such as silt fencing, controlled gravel access to the site
and controlled disposal of waste, will be necessary.
11. Prior to undertaking any excavation, the person acting on this permit shall contact public
utility service providers to ascertain the location of their underground services.
Page 2 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 3
12. The person acting on this permit shall apply and obtain all other necessary permits
including crane, road opening, hoarding, footpath occupation and/or any other approvals
required under any other Act or By-Law.
13. The transportation of all materials to and from the site shall be undertaken in a manner
such that no particulate matter escapes onto a public road. All vehicles carrying
materials either to or from the site shall be covered to prevent materials including dust
being windblown from the vehicle.
Additional conditions 15 February 2024
14. Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied with
prior to the use commencing, and then compliance maintained at all times while the use
continues.
Approved Plans
15. Development authorised by this approval must be undertaken generally in accordance
with the Approved Plans listed in the table/s below. The plans must be amended to
incorporate the amendments listed within the table below and resubmitted to Council
prior to the commencement of any works commencing on the site.
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
501042 CO2 A Proposed offset planting plan prepared 7/12/2023
by Noosa Council
M25-0445Rpt A Flood Impact Assessment prepared by February 2025
Covey
The following plans require amendment.
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
M25-0042Rpt A Stormwater Management Plan prepared February 2025
by Covey
▪ Specify the final HES basin detail from the range of options
Amendments
presented in the report, including consideration of whether
a Type-B HES basin may present a lower-risk option
compared to the flap-gated arrangement proposed to
prevent back-flows into the Type-A arrangement as
currently proposed;
▪ Include all details for the sizing and proposed levels of the
HES basin within the body of the report, based on recent
detailed survey at the point of discharge and downstream;
and
▪ Include construction-phase erosion and sediment control
plans which document how the transition from the current
HES basin location to the ultimate location (including filling
for the RRA pad) will be achieved.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
Page 3 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 4
Nature and Extent of Approved Use
16. This development permit authorizes a Utility Installation (Waste disposal and recycling
facility) to be established on the site. The subject use is limited to waste management
and ancillary activities associated with the primary use occurring on the site.
17. The landfill waste management activities must not extend outside the designated use
areas as shown on the approved plans. Signage is to be placed along the northern,
eastern, and southern boundaries of the approved use areas to assist in delineating the
edge of the approved use areas and surrounding bushland.
18. This approval does not approve any new building or structures within the resource
recovery area except for any fencing or signage permitted as part of this approval.
Public safety
19. Public signage must be erected along all internal roads to assist the public navigate
through the site, in particular the resource recovery area.
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
20. A detailed Offset Delivery Plan (ODP) must be developed in accordance with the
Environmental Offsets Act 2014. The development must offset a minimum 500 non
juvenile koala habitat trees (the impact) at the ratio of 6:1 to satisfy the State Government
Supported Infrastructure Koala Policy 2017.The ODP shall include details such as
species composition, planting density, planting methodology, annual reporting and
include a minimum 5-year maintenance for the proposed 1.8ha Offset area.
21. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person* which certifies that
the subject works have been undertaken in accordance with the approved Offset
Delivery Plan prior to the commencement of the use of the additional area.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
22. Construct a minimum 1.8m temporary fence around the operational areas of the landfill
to prevent rubbish from leaving the landfill area and depositing in the adjoining bushland.
23. A Weed Management Plan must be prepared which addresses weed management
along the interface of the proposed earthworks footprint with bushland areas, including
but not limited to a minimum 5m grassed buffer area between the proposed resource
recovery and the adjoining vegetation to the north. Control of all weed species listed in
the following standards and legislation must be undertaken:
a. Declared plants under the Land Protection (Biodiversity Act 2014 and subordinate
Regulation 2016)
b. Council’s Biosecurity Plan 2020 pest plants listed in schedule 1 part 3, schedule
2, and nonscheduled invasive species.
24. The requirements and recommendations of the approved weed management plan must
be implemented. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person*
which certifies that the subject works have been undertaken in accordance with the
approved Weed Management Plan.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
25. A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified person*.
Page 4 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 5
26. The sites supervising engineer must ensure that the sediment and erosion control
measures have:
a. Been duly designed by an RPEQ or CPESC and constructed in accordance with
“best practise” methods,
b. Been revised by an RPEQ or CPESC to address the issues raised by changes in
the projected construction schedule and/or methods,
c. Been revised to address predicted rainfall events, and
d. Achieve the desired environmental outcomes.
27. The erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, and
maintained in accordance with the current best practice standards.
28. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person* which certifies that
the subject works have been undertaken in accordance with the Sediment and Erosion
Control Plan.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
29. A Vegetation Removal & Fauna Management Plan must be prepared by a suitably
qualified person to mitigate the risk of clearing impacts to all native fauna and adjoining
vegetation. The sequential clearing requirements specified under the Nature
Conservation (Koala) Conservation Plan 2017 are to be adopted in the Plan.
30. A suitably qualified person must be engaged to manage flora and fauna prior and during
clearing to ensure works are carried out in accordance with the Vegetation Removal and
Fauna Management Plan (required as part of this approval) and the Nature
Conservation Act 1992.
31. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person* which certifies that
the subject works have been undertaken in accordance with the approved Vegetation
Removal & Fauna Management Plan.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
32. An Arborist Assessment must be completed by a suitably qualified and experienced
Level 5 consulting arborist of the trees likely to be impacted along the edge of the
earthworks footprint and any recommendations made are adopted. Disturbance to
retained remnant vegetation and tree root protection zones of large, retained habitat
trees (trees with dbh >300mm) that occur next to the clearing area is to be avoided as
far as practicable.
33. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person* which certifies that
the subject works have been undertaken in accordance with the approved Arborist
assessment.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
Bushfire management
34. A bushfire hazard assessment must be prepared in accordance with the SPP 2019
Guidelines: Natural hazards Risk and Resilience Bushfire 2019 and the QFES Bushfire
Resilience Community 2019 for the development.
35. The development must be carried out in accordance with the requirements and
recommendations of the Bushfire Management Plan. Certification must be submitted to
Council from a qualified person* which certifies that the subject works have been
undertaken in accordance with the approved Bushfire Management Plan.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
36. A copy of the Bushfire Management Plan must be provided to the nearest fire authority
Page 5 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 6
and always maintained at the waste management facility site office.
37. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person* which certifies that
the development has been undertaken and constructed in accordance with the bushfire
management conditions of this Decision Notice.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
38. A review and certification of the Bushfire Management Plan is required every 5 years to
ensure its currency and must be submitted to Council from a qualified person*.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
Environmental covenant
39. A vegetation protection covenant must be registered against the title/s of the property
over the area identified as the 1.8ha Proposed Offset Planting Area as shown on the
Approved Plans pursuant to Section 97A of the Land Title Act 1994. The covenant
document and a survey plan must be submitted to Council for endorsement prior to
lodgement with the relevant titles authority for registration of title. The covenant
document must:
a. incorporate the requirements of this Decision Notice
b. include Noosa Council as Covenantee reference Queensland Land Title Registry
Standard Terms Document No. 715597513.
40. The vegetation protection covenant document must be registered with the titles office
before the commencement of the use of the expanded Resource Recovery Area.
ENGINEERING
Earthworks and Retaining Walls
41. All fill and associated batters must be contained entirely within the approved use area
and must be designed and certified by a suitably qualified person.
Acid Sulfate Soils
42. An Acid Sulfate Soils Investigation Report must be prepared to mitigate the risk of acid
sulfate soils on the adjacent bushland /wetland areas.
All requirements and recommendations of the Acid Sulfate Soils Investigation Report
must be certified by a suitably qualified person*.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
STORMWATER
43. Prior to the construction of the pad area for the expansion of the Resource Recovery
Area (RRA) and the relocation of the HES basin, provide an updated SWMP, which is
based on the Covey’s Stormwater Management Plan (M25-0042Rpt, Issue A) dated
February 2025 and which addresses the following:
a. Specify the final HES basin detail from the range of options presented in the report,
including consideration of whether a Type-B HES basin may present a lower-risk
option compared to the flap-gated arrangement proposed to prevent back-flows
into the Type-A arrangement as currently proposed;
b. Include all details for the sizing and proposed levels of the HES basin within the
body of the report, based on recent detailed survey at the point of discharge and
downstream; and
c. Include construction-phase erosion and sediment control plans which document
how the transition from the current HES basin location to the ultimate location
(including filling for the RRA pad) will be achieved.
Page 6 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 7
44. All future building floor levels and waste management areas are to be provided with
surface levels which are a minimum of 300mm above the 1%AEP local flood level,
including allowance for climate change by year 2100.
45. Works are to be undertaken generally in accordance with Covey’s Flood Impact
Assessment (M25-0445Rpt, Issue A) dated February 2025. In conjunction with detailed
design for the project, the design of the fill pad and the Flood Assessment are to be
updated to incorporate a system for flow conveyance and distribution along the northern
boundary of the fill pad which achieves greater replication of existing flow patterns to the
retained vegetation north of the works. This is required in order to mitigate potential
changes in wetness resulting from frequent discharges or the risk of erosion during less
frequent events.
Additional Conditions 18 December 2025
Approved Plans
46. Development authorised by this approval must be undertaken generally in accordance
with the Approved Plans listed in the table below.
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
GC 147 MPAC 1 0 Site Now prepared by Flexure Pty Ltd 14/02/2025
GC 147 MPAC 4 0 Infrastructure and demolition prepared 14/02/2025
by Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 5 0 Site – proposed works prepared by 14/02/2025
Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 6 0 Site + new weighbridges prepared by 14/02/2025
Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 7 0 Site – infrastructure prepared by Flexure 14/02/2025
Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 8 0 Plan – Reviva-ground, 1st prepared by 14/02/2025
Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 9 0 Plan – Reviva-roof prepared by Flexure 14/02/2025
Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Plan – structure reviva prepared by 14/02/2025
10 Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Plan – Transfer – ground prepared by 14/02/2025
11 Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Plan – Transfer – 1st prepared by 14/02/2025
12 Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Plan – Transfer – roof prepared by 14/02/2025
13 Flexure Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Plan – structure transfer prepared by 14/02/2025
14 Flexure Pty Ltd
Page 7 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 8
GC 147 MPAC 0 Sections prepared by Flexure Pty Ltd 14/02/2025
15
GC 147 MPAC 0 Elevations Reviva prepared by Flexure 14/02/2025
16 Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Elevations Transfer prepared by Flexure 14/02/2025
17 Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Reviva Entry View prepared by Flexure 14/02/2025
18 Pty Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Transfer View prepared by Flexure Pty 14/02/2025
19 Ltd
GC 147 MPAC 0 Recycle prepared by Flexure Pty Ltd 14/02/2025
21
GC 147 MPAC 0 Recycle/Reviva prepared by Flexure Pty 14/02/2025
22 Ltd
Building Height
47. The maximum height of the development must not exceed 9 metres above the ground
level. Including where excavation is undertaken the exposed portion of the external
façade of the building.
Building Appearance
48. External design features, materials and finishes must be as shown on the Approved
Plans, with no inclusions or alterations made without approval in writing by Council.
Water & Sewer Connections
49. The development must be provided with a potable water supply having a capacity
sufficient for the use.
50. An underground connection to reticulated sewerage must be provided to the premises
in accordance with the standards and requirements of Northern SEQ Distributor–
Retailer Authority (Unitywater).
51. A Certificate of Completion from the Northern SEQ Distributor–Retailer Authority
(Unitywater) must be submitted to Council that certifies an underground connection to
reticulated water and sewerage has been provided to the premises.
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
52. A detailed offset delivery plan (ODP) must be developed generally in accordance with
the Environmental Offsets Act 2014, and Revised Determination and Location of Offset
Requirements – Site A on Lot 77 SP298776, dated 6th February 2025, prepared by
Native Foresters.
53. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person* which certifies that
the subject works have been undertaken in accordance with the Offset Delivery Plan
prior to the commencement of the use of the additional area.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
Page 8 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 9
54. All recommendations outlined in Section 7.0 of the Flora and Fauna Assessment must
be fully implemented before the commencement of the new facilities. Certification
prepared by a suitably qualified person, must be provided to confirm that all works have
been completed in accordance with the Flora and Fauna Assessment.
55. Rehabilitation and weed management of the 30-metre-wide vegetation buffer area west
of the Cleanaway Depot must be undertaken generally in accordance with the
recommendations of the Revised Determination and Location of Offset Requirements –
Site A on Lot 77 SP298776 Letter.
56. Certification must be submitted to Council from a qualified person* which certifies that
the rehabilitation and weed management works have been undertaken in accordance
with the Revised Determination and Location of Offset Requirements – Site A on Lot 77
SP298776 Letter.
*(Refer to Advisory Note)
5. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
241227-FFA 2 Flora and Fauna Assessment prepared 7/02/2025
by Native Foresters
- - Revised Determination and Location of Letter Dated 6th
Offset Requirements – Site A on Lot 77 February 2025
SP298776 prepared by Native Foresters
- 01 Bushfire Management Plan prepared by, 10/10/2024
Rob Friend and Associates Pty Ltd
244035 C100 A Site Overview and Key Plan 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C201 A General Arrangement Sheet 1 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C202 A General Arrangement Sheet 2 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C203 A General Arrangement Sheet 3 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C204 A General Arrangement Sheet 4 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C250 A Typical Sections Overview 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C251 A Typical Sections Sheet 1 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C252 A Typical Sections Sheet 2 13/02/2025
Page 9 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 10
Prepared by Covey
244035 C300 B Bulk Earthworks Overview 20/12/2024
Prepared by Covey
244035 C301 A Bulk Earthworks Sheet 1 10/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C302 A Bulk Earthworks Sheet 2 10/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C500 A Longitudinal Sections 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C600 A Cross Sections Sheet 1 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
244035 C601 A Cross Sections Sheet 2 13/02/2025
Prepared by Covey
Page 10 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 11
6. REFERRAL AGENCIES
The referral agencies applicable to this application are:
Referral Status Referral Agency and Referral Trigger Response
Address
Concurrence Department of Natural Clearing native The agency provided its
Resources & Mines, PO vegetation response on 1
Box 383, Gympie QLD November 2005
4570 (Reference No.
2005/10121697737). A
copy of the response is
attached
Concurrence Department of Main Material change of use of The agency provided its
Roads, PO Box 183, premises near a State response on 3 June
Gympie QLD 4570 transport corridor 2005 (Reference No.
2005/638). A copy of
the response is
attached
Concurrence Department of State Clearing native The agency provided its
Development, vegetation response on 15 January
Infrastructure, Local State transport corridors 2024 (Reference No.
Government and and future state transport 2311-37804 SRA). A
Planning (SARA), corridors copy of the response is
PO Box 1129, attached
Maroochydore QLD
4558
Concurrence Department of State Clearing native The agency provided its
Development, vegetation response on 13
Infrastructure, Local State transport corridor November 2025
Government and (Reference No. 2503-
Planning (SARA), 45382 SRA). A copy of
PO Box 1129, the response is
Maroochydore QLD attached
[email protected]
d.gov.au
7. ADVISORY NOTES
The following notes are included for guidance and information purposes only and do not form
part of the assessment manager conditions:
1. All clearing of vegetation is to be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations
of the Environmental Assessment Report Flora and Fauna study for the proposed
expansion of the Noosaville Waste Landfill which include the following protective
measures for Fauna
PROTECTIVE MEASURE SPECIES AFFECTED
Establish a protective buffer of at least 30m around Wallum froglet
shallow acidic water bodies
Page 11 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 12
Maintain water quality and hydrological patterns Wallum froglet
within the habitat of the species
No prescribed burns in the winter months around Wallum froglet
water bodies
Protect the heath where-ever possible Ground parrot
Mosaic burns should be conducted to maintain the Ground parrot
integrity of the heath. Prescribed burns should not be
more frequent than every two to three years, but at
least every 15 years
Retain nectar and fruit-bearing trees Grey-headed flying-fox
Care should be taken to ensure that no animals are Echidna
killed during clearing for the new waste disposal site
Hollow-using species
Retain hollow-bearing trees where possible Hollow-using species
Qualified Person
2. For the purpose of preparing an Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan, a qualified person
is considered to be a person who:
a. Is a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ); or
b. Environmental/Soil Scientist with current professional membership status at a
relevant organisation (e.g. ASSSI, AIG; EIANZ; GSA); and
c. Has a minimum of 5 years of professional experience in the field of Acid Sulfate
Soils.
3. For the purpose of preparing and certifying in accordance with an offset management
plan, a qualified person is considered to be an ecologist with a minimum of 3 years
current experience in vegetation offset management.
4. For the purpose of Preparing management plans, certification and managing plant pests,
a qualified person is considered to be:
d. an environmental consultant with a minimum of 3 years current experience
in the field of pest plant management.
5. For the purpose of preparing a Fauna Management Plan, a qualified person is
considered to be an ecologist with a minimum of 3 years current experience in the field
of fauna assessment and management and with a current certification under the
Queensland Parks and Wildlife Services.
6. For the purpose of preparing an Arborist Report, a qualified person is considered to be
a person with either:
a. ISA certification; or
b. a Diploma of Arboriculture in addition to a minimum of 3 years current
experience in the field of arboriculture.
7. For the purpose of preparing a Bushfire Management Plan, and for certifying compliance
with the bushfire requirements of this Decision Notice, a qualified person is considered
to be an ecologist with a minimum of 3 years current experience in the field of bushfire
assessment and management.
Page 12 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 13
Advertising Devices
8. All Advertising Devices must comply with Schedule 10 of Subordinate Local Law No.1
(Administration) 2015 including both temporary and permanent signage. All
freestanding, pylon or pole signs or signage that is illuminated requires approval from
Council prior to being installed. All signage identified in s6 of Schedule 10 of Subordinate
Local Law No. 1 is prohibited from being erected in the Shire.
Resubmission of Amended Plans Required
9. The conditions of this Decision Notice require resubmission of plan/s to Council with
amendments. Please address the amended plans to Council’s Development
Assessment Branch with the Reference No. 132005.638.03.
Nature Conservation Act
10. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the Nature Conservation
Wildlife Management Regulation 2006 which is regulated by the State Government.
There may be a requirement to undertake a Flora Survey pursuant to Flora Survey
Guidelines prior to any clearing activities pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Nature
Conservation Wildlife Management Regulation 2006. Exemptions are listed in Division
5 of the same Act. Further information can be obtained at this website
https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/licences-permits/plants-animals/protected-plants/ or by
calling the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection on 1300 130 372.
There may also be a requirement to obtain State Government Approval of a Species
Management Plan prior to any activities that tamper with any place that is being used by
a native animal for breeding activities. This is regulated by Section 332 of the Nature
Conservation Wildlife Management Regulation 2006. Further information regarding this
matter can be obtained at this website https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/licences-
permits/plants-animals/species-management-program/ or by calling the relevant State
Department.
Infrastructure Charges
11. All developments and/or changes to existing developments may require payment of
“Infrastructure Charges” (as applicable) in accordance with Council’s “Charges
Resolution” made pursuant to the planning legislation and regulations current at the time
of issue. For further information, please refer to https://www.noosa.qld.gov.au/planning-
development/development-tools-guidelines/infrastructure-charges
8. PROPERTY NOTES
Not applicable.
9. VARIATION APPROVAL DETAILS
Not applicable.
10. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED
Type of Development Permit Required Subject of the required Development Permit
Development Permit for Building Works All building work.
11. SUBMISSIONS
Not applicable.
Page 13 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 14
12. RIGHTS OF APPEAL
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from
the Planning Act 2016 is attached.
During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make
written representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development
approval. If Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations, a negotiated decision
notice will be issued. Only one negotiated decision notice may be given.
13. OTHER DETAILS
If you wish to obtain more information about the decision, electronic copies are available on
line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au or at Council Offices.
Yours faithfully,
Patrick Murphy
Manager | Development Assessment
Development & Regulation
Enc: Referral Agency Response
Appeal Rights
Approved Plans/Documents
cc. [email protected]
Dept of Natural Resources & Mines
Dept of Main Roads
DECISION NOTICE HISTORY
• Original Decision Notice – 24 November 2005. Material Change of Use – Expansion of Special Purpose (Waste Disposal
and Recycling Facility) and Ongoing Clearing Purposes
• Other Change – 15 February 2024, amend the approved plans and inclusion of additional conditions 14 - 45
• Negotiated Decision Notice – 16 May 2024, with an amendment to conditions 40 and 43.
• Other Change – 18 December 2025 – amend condition 15 and include additional conditions 46 to 56.
Page 14 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 15
Referral Agency Response
PLANNING ACT 2016 & PLANNING REGULATION 2017
Page 15 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 16
Referral Agency Response — Material Change of Use 5 3.3.16 Integrated Planning Act 1997 1. Application information 1.1. Applicant’s name: Noosa Shire Council 1.2, Property description: 77 SP177938 - Noosa Shire 1.3. Assessment Manager/Reference: Noosa Shire Council 14. Date application was referred to Department: 26 April 2005 1.5. Departmental Reference: eLVAS Case No: 2005/101216, File Ref. No: GYP/000280, Trackjob No: 1RO40SNAM0004 1.6, Type/s of development sought by the application: O Material Change of Use 2. Concurrence Agency response: The Chief Executive of the Department of Natural Resources and Mines directs that the following conditions must be imposed on any approval given by the Assessment Manager: 2.1 This permit does not authorise the clearing of any native vegetation that is on any land not contained within the area identified as Permit A on the attached Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan RARP2005/101216, 2.2 Expansion of the area designated for Waste Disposal and Recycling Facility within Lot 77 on SP177938 is restricted to the area identified as Permit A on the attached Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan RARP2005/101216. 2.3 Prior to clearing for the establishment of additional landfill cells and waste management facilities, a storm-water management and sediment control plan that prevents storm-water, sediment and other possible contaminants from encroaching into areas outside of the area of Permit A on RARP2005/101216, must be developed and instituted so as to be effective during the operational works stage of the site preparation and landfill construction. 2.4 The design and construction of new landfill cells must incorporate a leachate management system that prevents the escape of water from the landfill cells into the surrounding environment. 2.5 The leachate management system must incorporate a groundwater monitoring system and response strategy that is capable of rapid identification of cell leakage and rectification measures, 2.6 The design and construction of the expanded waste management facility must incorporate a storm-water control system that will prevent, in perpetuity, storm-water, sediment and other possible contaminants from encroaching into surrounding areas of remnant vegetation. 2.7 All works are to be undertaken in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency Guidelines for Landfill siting, design, operation and rehabilitation, Waste Disposal — ERA 75. IDAS Referral Agancy Response: Page 16 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 17
2.8 All firebreaks necessary to protect infrastructure that is to be developed within the expanded waste management facility must be contained with the area of Permit A on RARP2005/101216, 2.9 Prior to the commencement of operational works that is the clearing of remnant vegetation within the area of Permit A on RARP2005/101216 a remnant vegetation restoration plan for properties described Table | must be developed in accordance with the NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 3 Octaber 2005 attached to this notice. The restoration plan must apply to a minimum of 24 ha of land within the area of properties described in Table 1. The restoration plan must achieve as an outcome the establishment of a minimum of |9ha of a remnant endangered regional ecosystem and the establishment of a minimum of Sha of a remnant not of concern regional ccosystem within 20 years of the date of this notice. Table 1. Property descriptions subject to remnant vegetation restoration plan - Noosa Shire. 1RP170398 3RP138769 | IRP149832 2RP164019 2RP 163499 1RP163496 3RP134347 100SP167229 ARP906937 6RP194347 | 2RP 134347 3RP168290 2RP164019 1RP160978 2RP 162747 TRP193959 3RP167264 2RP149832 ARP 164020 9SP143416 2.10 Prior to the commencement of operational works that is the clearing of remnant vegetation within the area of Permit A on RARP2005/101216 the remnant vegetation restoration plan must be provided to and approved by the Chief Executive NR&M as being consistent with the NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 3 October 2008 attached to this notice. 3. Reasons: A Statement of Reasons is attached at Schedule 1. 4, Additional comments or information: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Under section 23 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 a person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity docs not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage (the "cultural heritage duty of care"), Maximum penalties for breaching the duty of care are $750,000 for a corporation and $75,000 for an individual. Applicants will comply with the duty of care in relation to Aboriginal cultural heritage if they are acting in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines gazetted under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003, available on the Department's website, or in accordance with an agreement with the Aboriginal party for the area or a cultural heritage management plan approved under part 7 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003. Applicants should also undertake a search of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database and the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register, administered by the Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Application forms to undertake a free search of the Cultural Heritage Register and the Database may be obtained by contacting the Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit on (07) 323 83838 or on the Department's website www.nrm.gid gov au/cultural_heritage. Natural Resources and Mines - Referral Agency Response Page 20f7 Page 17 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 18
Definitions Particular words and terms used in the above conditions are defined as follows: ‘Vegetation’ means vegetation as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, ‘Remnant vegetation’ means remnant vegetation as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. ‘Remnant endangered regional ecosystem,’ means remnant regional ecosystem as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, ‘Remnant of concern regional ecosystem,’ means remnant regional ecosystem as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, ‘Remnant not of concern regional ecosystem,’ means remnant regional ecosystem as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. ‘Clear’ for vegetation means clear as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. ‘ha’ means hectares. 5. Authorised Officer Signature: Peter Lazzarini Senior Vegetation Management officer South East Region 1 November 2005 Attachments: = Schedule 1 — Statement of Reasons = NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 3 October 2005 = Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan RARP2005/101216 Natural Resources and Mines - Referral Agency Response Page 3 of 7 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 18 of 72
Page 19
eLVAS Case No: 200S/101216 File Ref. No: GYPHO0280 Trackjob No: [ROJOSNAMO Schedule 1 Statement of Reasons Referral Agency Response Application for Material Change of Use Noosa Shire Council The following Statement of Reasons is provided pursuant to s. 3.3.18(7) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 Introduction 1. The Department of Natural Resources and Mines (NR&M) received an application from Noosa Shire Council on 26 April 2005. 2. The application is for MCU (Concurrence) on Lot 77 SP177938 - Noosa Shire Council. 3. A field inspection was conducted by the assessing officer on 30 September 2005. 4, An Information Request was sent by registered post to the applicant on the 21 June 2005, This request disclosed information that was adverse to the approval of the application and requested that the applicant demonstrate how the application complied with particular Performance Requirements described within the NR&M Material Change of Use Policy and requested clarification of the area of land subject to the application and identification of the elements of the proposed use. 5. The applicant responded to the Information Request on the 26 July 2005, 05 August 2005, 21 September 2005, 04 October 2005 and 05 October 2005. 6. An Assessment Report was sent to the Delegate of the Chief Executive, Peter Lazzarini, on 28 October 2005. 7, The Delegate determined the Referral Agency Response on | November 2005. Evidence Item eLVAS Reference Standard References Integrated Planning Act 1997 Schedule 5 (Community Infrastructure). NA NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets, NA 3 October 2005 Certified Regional Ecosystem Map version 4.2. NA Regional Ecosystem Description Data base (REDD) Vers 4.2. NA Environmental Protection Agency. Aerial photograph QAP$969 — 86 Nambour 2003 NA 1:25,000 Topographic & Drainage NR&M spatial data. WA 1:100,000 Geology NR&M spatial data (shect 9545) NA | Natural lakes NR&M spatial data, NA Natural Springs NR&M spatial data NA | Natural wetlands NR&M spatial data NA State Wildlife Corridor NR&M spatial data NA Essential Habitat NR&M spatial data / NA _ Subject parcel description (322.4ha) on NR&M Smartmap datahase. NIA Natural Resources and Mines - Referral Agency Response Page 4 of 7 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 19 of 72
Page 20
Evidence collected during assessment Field Evidence collected 30 Sept 2005. [cL VAS $9321) 89321 Plan titled: Proposed future development of Noosaville Landfill [eLWV AS 70864) — reproduced in figure 1 of this report Figure 1 &2 (above): area applied to be cleared for landfill cells, drain and organic processing area requiring the removal of Endangered, Of Concern and Not of Concern Regional Ecosystems. [eL VAS 89295] 89295 Correspondence from Doug Bames (Noosa Shire Council) dated 12 August 2004 [eLVAS 18822] 18822 Submission to NR&M Chief Executive to have an application operational works clearing accepted as a relevant purpose under s22A of the VMA99, dated 9 September 2004 [eL VAS 29745]. 29745 Correspondence from Gordon Guymer, Acting Director, Vegetation Management to Noosa Shire Council dated 19 November 2004 [eL VAS 38028] Correspondence from Noosa Shire Council to Gordon Guymer, Acting Director, Vegetation Management, dated 22 December 2004 [eL VAS 89270] - copy provided by Applicant on 30 September 2005. 89270 Email correspondence between Noosa Shire Council (Wayne Schafer) and Tom Crothers (RSD, NR&M SER) dated 23 February 2005 [el VAS 89272] — copy provided by Applicant on 30 September 2005. 89272 Correspondence from Michelle Marrinon (NR&M) to Noosa Shire Council dated 10 February 2005 [eL VAS 89266} — copy provided by Applicant on 30 September 2005, Martoo Counsulting (May 2005), Proposal Report. RO0428-2-A (Version 2) (eLVAS 57802 & 57813). 57802/57813 Noosa Shire Council: Solid Waste Management Strategic Plan 2004 — 2014 (adopted by Council 25" November 2004) — on CD on File _ Responses to information requested: 70864 26 July 2005 [eL VAS 70864] 70864 05 August 2005 [eLVAS 73581] 73581 21 September 2005 [eLVAS 85623] 85623 04 October 2005 [eLVAS 89824] 89824 05 October 2005 [eLVAS 90656] | 90656 Additional information from Applicant concerning wetland protection measures and response to PR's A2.2 A2.2 & A2.3 [eLVAS 90656] 90656 Appendix B to cLVAS 57813; Thomas, G. Agnew, G. & Lees, N. (March 2004), Environmental Assessment Report Flora and Fauna Study for the proposed expansion of the Noosaville Waste Treatment Works (Landfill), Section 2.4 & Figure 3 (Vegetation associations) 57813 Correspondence to the applicant advising of NR&Ms expectations with respect to evidence required to demonstrate compliance with AS A2.6.5. [eLVAS 81707] - based on advice from the Vegetation Services Policy Unit received 22 August 2005 [eLVAS Doc 106829). Doc 106829 Assessment Report Dated 31 October 2005 Natural Resources and Mines - Referral Apency Response Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 5of7 Page 20 of 72
Page 21
Findings relevant to the imposition of conditions. Clearing of remnant vegetation as result of the MCU was found to be as described in Table 2 below. Table 2 VM Status ‘otal Area (Ha) 2.5.3 15, 254 Not of Concern 4. 2.3. Of Concern 0. area assessable The Chief Executive NR&M or delegate found that the clearing to occur as result of the MCU is for community infrastructure if there is no suitable alternative site for mecting the community need for the community infrastructure. Proposed clearing of assessable vegetation associated with the MCU is within an area of regional ecosystem |2.3.13 that is identified as a natural wetland affording reference to the definition of a wetland within the MCU Policy and the REDD Version 4.2. The regional ecosystems identified as wetland regional ecosystems are considered potential discharge areas and areas subject to waterlogging. This corresponds to low lying areas of RE 12.5.3 & 12.5.4 dominated by Melaleuca species and the area of 12.3.13 within the area of the proposed development. The remnant vegetation restoration program proposed for Lake MacDonald demonstrates that the applicant has the capacity, intent and resources to embark on a program that may result on the recovery of an equivalent area of endangered, of concern and not of concern remnant vegetation that will be removed as a consequence of the proposed landfill expansion. In consideration of the NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 3 October 2005, it was found that the restoration program proposed did not demonstrate that all elements of Part A of the Policy will be achieved. In particular: Items A.3, A.8, A8(2) & A.9. As a consequence it was found that the remnant vegetation restoration program proposed did not effectively demonstrate that the restoration will occur as a consequence of the proposed development, Reasons for the imposition of conditions. 1 Conserving remnant endangered, of concern and not of concem regional ecosystems and protecting biodiversity. Preventing loss of biodiversity and maintaining ecological processes associated with natural wetlands, lakes and springs. Ensuring clearing does not cause land degradation and to maintain ecological processes, increased salinity and waterlogging and the salinisation of ground and surface water are to be prevented. Conserving remnant endangered regional ecosystems, remnant of concern regional ecosystems, and remnant not of concer regional ecosystems in manner that ensures that the current extent of endangered, of concern and not of concer regional ecosystems are maintained. Natural Resources and Mines - Referral Agency Response Page 6 of 7 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 21 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 22
Peter Lazzarini Senior Vegetation Management Officer South East Region 1 November 2005 Natural Resources and Mines - Referra’ Agency Response Page 7 of 7 Page 22 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 23
Scale 1:12,500 @ A3 paper size the location of the permitted cinaring 05000 200 300 400 600 700 800 9001,000 m 08100200 3c0 400880 G0 To0 80 901600. a ny Rey a Projection: UTM (MGA Zone 56) Datum: GDA94 — 8? delegated claaring conbactor(s). chown on this pian are The property boundaries APPROXIMATE ONLY. They are NOT an accurate representation of the leps/ boundaries. Note: This pian must be read in conjunction with the Referral Agency Response 2008/101216 LEGEND [L) sitiect ics Pome a © Derived Reterence Points for GPS Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan A & ree etererne OY EODIIN) Prepares by: LMO Deter 28 Oxnuter 2006, Permit A in Lot 77 on SP177938 Queensland = Tractjob No. IRD4OSNAMOODE centre: cvwme REQION: SOUTH EAST = -— — ee ree} RARP2005/101216 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 23 of 72
Page 24
| Title of Policy:
*Policy Number: : :
*Version Number:
“Documentation Status:
CO Draft 0
*SIGN OFF BY DELEGATED OFFICER:
L Operationally capable of being implemented
Endorsed and Published
Queensland Government
Natural Resources and Mines
“een NATURAL RESOURCES & MINES’ POLICY ~~
Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets
C] Archived
Endorsed by Position — Director, Vegetation Signature *
Management c / —
Date Bhic { of
2. Meet business policy and legislative needs
Endorsed by Position Deputy Director General Signature —
Date Blois ‘
3. Approved to be implemented
Approved by Position —_ Director General
Date
4. Policies containing Non-Exempt Content
Position DDE Wee Signature
Approved to be published on the Intemet by a DD-G, ED, woul, /
“Date 7 /10fos
Signature
Policies containing Exempt Content
Approved to be published on the Internet (refer to the attached approval) Oo
5. Please Tick the bax
Original signed off by officer QO Filed on CHQ/[NUMBER} Pt Oo
Policy Number: Prefix/Number/Year Version No;
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Last Updated: 23/09/05
Page 24 of 72
Page 25
Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines RATIONALE: ‘The Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VMA) was enacted to regulate the clearing of vegetation over al! tenures in both rural and urban areas, The purposes of the Act include the conservation of remnant regional ecosystems, preventing the loss of biodiversity, maintaining ecological processes, managing the environmental effects of clearing and the phasing out of broadecals clearing of ~~ > “remnant vegetation in Queensland by 3-Becember 2005 ne nnn Significant challenges exist to achieve the State's vegetation management objectives whilst recognising other goals of government that include accommodating population growth, maintaining the quality of life for existing and future communities and providing infrastructure. Vegetation offsets can assist in balancing these interests in some circumstances, as they provide a mechanism for development to proceed, whilst at the same time ensuring long-term conservation of remnant regional ecosystems. The Regional Vegetation Management Codes for Ongoing Clearing Purposes set out performance requirements that vegetation clearing applications for a relevant purpose under S.22A of the VMA must meet. The Concurrence Agency Policy for a Material Change of Use and Reconfiguring a Lot set out performance requirements which development applications that are for a material change of use must meet. A vegetation offset may be proposed by an applicant as an alternative solution to meet a number of performance requirements, This interim policy gives guidance on what would constitute an acceptable offset under those particular Codes and Policies. PURPOSE/SCOPE: This policy applies to offsets proposed to meet a performance requirement under a Regional Vegetation Management Code for Ongoing Clearing Purposes, the Concurrence Agency Policy for a Material Change of Use or the Concurrence Agency Policy for Reconfiguration of a Lot, . This policy is to be used by Vegetation Management Officers and other relevant officers when assessing a development application that proposes offsetting as en acceptable solution to 2 performance requirement. POLICY: A. Where an application proposes an offset to meet the following performance requirement (or similar):- To conserve remnant endangered regional ecosystems, remnant of concern regional ecosystems, and remnant not of concern regional ecosystems, the current extent of remnant endangered regional ecosystems, remmant of concern regional ecosystems and remnant not of concern regional ecosystems and Category 1, category 2 and category 3 areas shown on a property map of assessable vegetation are maintained’. ' Maintaining the current extent may be interpreted as maintaining the current extent, ultimately. Policy Number; Prefix/Number/Year Version No: Last Updated: 23/09/05 Page 25 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 26
Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines the application niust meet all of the following criteria, prior to thé development approval ~~~ being granted: 1. The area to be offset must: a) be mapped as non-remnant vegetation; and b) not be vegetation that is required to be retained under other conditions of a evelopment approval and —————— = a a -- c) not be acategory 1, category 2, category 3 or category 4 area on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation. 2. If the regional ecosystem that is proposed to be cleared: : a) Is below 5% of its pre-clearing extent, and is less than 500 ha in total extent, the area to be offset must have the same pre-clearing regional ecosystem as the area proposed to be cleared; or b) Is less than 200 ha in total extent ar the clearing would result in the regional ecosystem being less than 200 ha, the area to be offset must have the same pre-clearing regional ecosystem as the area proposed to be cleared; or c) does not meet the description of 2a) or 2b), the area to be offset must be mapped as a pre-clearing regional ecosystem that has the same conservation status as the area - proposed for clearing and must be on the same landzone as the regional ecosystem proposed for clearing. 3. The offset area must have the potential to be mapped as remnant vegetation in the future. Therefore, the extent of the offset area must be at least 2 hectares, . 4. The offset must be geographically close to the area proposed for clearing. The closer it is, the more likely that localised environmental effects of the clearing will be directly mitigated and that ecological equivalence will be achieved, The offset must be within the same bioregion and should ideally be within the same subregion as the area proposed for clearing. 5. As itis likely that the offset area will be in poorer condition or of less ecological value per hectare than the area proposed to be cleared, the ratio of offset: impact area must be greater than 1:1, The offset area must be larger than the area being cleared to compensate for risk and uncertainty in the establishment of the offset, and so that the outcome is no net loss of biodiversity. 6. The offset area must be otherwise unprotected, that is, it must be vegetation that is not assessable under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, and be vegetation that is not protected by another instrument of any level of Government. 7. The offset must be additional to actions or works carried out using public funds or actions or works required to fulfil other regulatory obligations. 8. The offset must be legally secured. A range of legal tools are available in Queensland to provide an enduring conservation mechanism. These include: 8) Dedication as a protected area under $29 or 846 of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (for example, a voluntary nature refuge); Policy Number: Prefix/Number/Year Version No: Last Updated: 23/09/05 Page 26 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 27
@ Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines by Declavation as an area of high nahure conservation value under e8.16-19 of the . Vegetation Management Act 1999; ¢) Use of a covenant over offset areas under the Land Title Act 1994, Land Act 1994 and Integrated Planning Act 1997. 8._ The offset must become ecologically equivalent to the area proposed to be cleared, Factors _ to consider in regard to ecological equivalence are: OO 2) shape and edge effects. Patches of vegetation with a shape that provides a low perimeter to area ratio are less susceptible to edge effects. Therefore the offset area should have a perimeter (metres) to area (hectares) ratio of no more than 200: 1; and b) condition, Condition can be described in terms of genetic or species diversity, Presence and abundance of native fauna, presence and abundance of feral animals, pests and weeds, health of soil and water and general long-term viability of the vegetation; and : c) whether revegetation and/or restoration of the offsct area is required. Offsetting existing intact vegetation is preferable to an offset involving Tevegetation of a severely degraded area. A revegetated area is generally of less biodiversity value, at least in the short to medium term, than an intact natural vegetation community, and there is a higher chance of the offset succeeding over time if the vegetation is intact; and a) connectivity of the offset to other areas of native vegetation. If the offset is linked to other areas of native vegetation, the restoration/revegetation works have greater chance of succeeding and providing long term conservation outcomes. In bioregions where there is a State or a Regional Wildlife Corridor, the offset should preferably be located within the State or Regional Corridor. €) size. Size is strongly correlated with the long-term viability of patches of native Vegctation, Larger areas are less susceptible to ecological edge effects and are more likely to sustain viable populations of native flora and fauna than smaller areas, Small habitat arcas can mean that wildlife species are more vulnerable to disease, bushfire, pests, changes in climate, or inbreeding. 9. The offset proposal must include a detailed revegetation or restoration plan which specifies how the offset area will achieve the desired remnant regional ecosystem status, and scfs out the following: a) risks to the revegetation or restoration project, such as weed infestations and fire, and actions that will be undertaken to minimise those risks; and : b) goals and measures which quantify the realistic stages by which the offset area will reach remnant status; and c) the establishment of a monitoring program, including photo monitoring points and the recording of species composition, abundance and mean heights of species at those sites; and d) remedial actions that will be undertaken if the goal/measure of any stage of the restoration or revegetation plan is not met. Policy Number: Prefix/Number/ Year Version No: Last Updated; 23/09/05 Page 27 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 28
Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines ~~ Bo Where an application proposes an offset te nicer the POOWIig AeCeptAble SHlution (Or similar):- Where clearing occurs (in « remnant endangered, remnant of concern, remnant not of concer regional ecosystem or a category 1, category 2 or category 3 aree on a PMAV), the clearing is offset by protecting another area of non-temnant vegetation (other than a category 1, category 2, category 3 area on a sawn =~ PMAY) that achiowes the followings a) the regional ecosystern to be restored is the same regional ecosystem as the regional ecosystem to be cleared; and b) the area of the regional ecosystem to be restored is at least equal to the area to be cleared; and ¢) there is a demonstrated high probability that within 20 years the area being restored will be capable of being mapped as remnant vegetation. the application must meet all of the following criteria, prior to the development approval being granted: 1. The area to be offset must be: 2) mapped as non-remnant vegetation; and b) must not be a category 1, category 2, category 3 or category 4 area on a property map of assessable vegetation. 2. The arca to be offset must be protected. A range of legal tools are available in Queensland to provice an enduring conservation mechanism. These include: a) Dedication as a protected area under 29 or 546 of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (for example, a voluntary nature refuge); b) Declaration as an area of high nature conservation value under as.16-19 of the “Vegetation Management Act 1999;. c) Use of a covenant over offset areas under the Land Title Act 1994, Land Act 1994 and Integrated Planning Act 1997. 3. ‘The area to be offset will become the same regional ecosystem as the regional ecosystem that is to be cleared. Therefore the application must demonstrate that: a) the pre-clearing regional ecosystem of the offset area is the same as the area proposed to be cleared; or b) other evidence that the offset arca will become the same regional ecosystem, such as the landform, any current natural regeneration on the site, or the remnant regional ecosystems surrounding the area; and ¢) the area to be offset is within the same bioregion and should ideally be within the same subregion as the area proposed to be cleared; and d) adetailed revegetation or restoration plan which sets out the works to be undertaken, the goals and measures of each stage of the restoration process and includes a monitoring program of species composition and abundance (sce 5, below). 4. The area to be offset must be at least equal to the area to be cleared. As it is likely the offset area will be in poorer condition or of less ecological value per hectare than the area Proposed to be cleared, the ratio of offset: cleared arez may need to be greater than 1:1, The offset area must also be larger than the area being developed to compensate for risk and Policy Number: Prefix/Number/Year Version No: Last Updated: 23/09/05 Page 28 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 29
Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines ~~“ ncerfainty iti thé €steblishiiient Of thé Offset, and’so that the outcome is ho net loss of — biodiversity, 5. The offset area must be able to be mapped as remnant vegetation within twenty years, Therefore the: - a) extent of the offset area must be at least 2 hectares. “nnn napplication-must inelude-a detailed revegetation-or restoration plan-which specifies: i. risks to the revegetation or restoration project, such as weed infestations and fire, and actions that will be undertaken to minimise those risks; ii. goals and measures which quantify the realistic stages by which the offset area will reach remnant status within the 20 year period; iii. the establishment of a monitoring program, including photo monitoring points and the recording of species composition, abundance and mean heights of species at those sites; and iv, remedial actions that will be undertaken if the goal/measure of any stage of the restoration or revegetation plan is not met; and v. reference to published literature; or vi. @ written opinion of a recognised expert in the field of revegetation and restoration; or vii. comparison to revegetation/restoration projects in similar regional ecosystems and similar conditions. C. An offset proposed to meet a different Performance Requirement or Acceptable Solution of a Regional Vegetation Management Code for Ongoing Clearing Purposes or the Concurrence Agency Policy for a Material Change of Use to those mentioned in Part A or B of this Policy, nwust be referred to the Vegetation Management Policy Unit. D. Any development approval involving an offset must contain conditions relating to the revegetation / restoration plan. E. Financial contributions do not constitute an acceptable offset. F. The land on which an offset is proposed must be included in the development application, DEFINITIONS: Note: Where any term is already defined in a Regional Vegetation Management Code for Ongoing Purposes, the Concurrence Agency Policy for a Material Change of Use, the Concurrence Agency Policy for Reconfiguring a Lot or the Vegetation Management Act 1999, this policy does not redefine the term. Bioregions: are based on broad landscape patterns that reflect the major structural geoiogies and climate as well as major changes in floristic and faunal assemblages. Bioregions contain a number of subregions, Bioregions are described by Sattler and Williams (1999) in The Conservation Status of Queensland's Bioregional Ecosystems, Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane, or can be found at: http://www.nrm.qld.gov.au/vegetation/pdf/bioregion_v0001.pdf Policy Number: Prefix/Number/Year Version No: Last Updated: 23/09/05 Page 29 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 30
Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines “-'"Eandzone: “is a Siniplified geology/substrate-landform Classification for Queenstand utilised in the regional ecosystem framework. Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV): means a map ~ a) Certified by the chief executive as the property map of assessable vegetation for a perticular area; and ———-b)- Maintained by the department for the purpose of showing, for the.area = 2. -/ i, Category 1 areas; and ii, Category 2 areas; and iii. Category 3 areas; and iv. Category 4 areas; and ¢) Showing areas subject to @ remnant map or regional ecosystem map for the area, Relevant purposes: are 8) a project declared to be a significant project under the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971, section 26; : b) necessary to control non-native plants or declared pests; ¢) toensure pubdlic safety; d) for establishing a necessary fence, firebreak, road or other built infrastructure, if there is no suitable alternative site for the fence, firebreak, road or infrastructure; ) anatural and ordinary consequence of other asscssable development for which a development approval as defined under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 was given, or a development application as defined under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 was made, before 16 May 2003; f) for fodder harvesting; 2) for thinning; h) for clearing of encroachment; i) for an extractive industry; j) for clearing regrowth on leases issued under the Land Act 1994 for agriculture or grazing purposes, Subregions: delineate significant differences within the bioregion in landscape pattern usually associated with geology and geomorphology or finer climatic patterns. Sub regions are contained within a bioregion. Policy Number: Prefix/Number/Year Version No: Last Updated: 23/09/05 Page 30 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 31
Main Roads CONDITIONS AND STATEMENT OF REASONS Application type: Material change of use Council: Noosa Shire Main Roads File No: 92/140/702.8 Council Ref: 005/638 Read: Eumundi-Noosa Road Development Number: 6959 Response Date: 3 June 2005 ISSUES / CONCERNS CONDITIONS OF THE REASONS, DEVELOPMENT FOR INFORMATION, STUDIES, THE SUBJECT APPLICATION | FINDINGS, USED IN SETTING OF CONDITIONS INCLUDED: Management of access to a State- The Department of Main Roads The access design has to achieve controlled toad considers the current road access to | acceptable standards i order to Eumundi-Noosa Road from lot 77__| ensure that there are no deimmental SP177938 1s satisfactory and 1s umpacts on the safety and efficiency considered to be the permutted road | of the State-controlled road access for the proposed use network. Access to Eumundi-Noosa Road1s || By minimising the number of to be lumted to this permitted road | pomts of access to the State- access location only. controlled road network, safety and efficiency are maximused Direct access from Emu Mountam Road to lot 77 SP177938 1s not penmutted Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 31 of 72
Page 32
2.8 All firebreaks necessary to protect mfrastructure that is to be developed within the expanded waste management facilhty must be contamed with the area of Permst A on RARP2005/101216. 2.9 Prior to the commencement of operational works that is the clearing of remnant vegetation within the area of Permit A on RARP2005/101216 a remnant vegetation restoration plan for properties described Table 1 must be developed in accordance with the NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 3 October 2005 attached to this notice. The restoration plan must apply to a mmimum of 24 ha of land within the area of properties described in Table 1. The restoration plan must achieve as an outcome the establishment of a mimmum of 19ha of a remnant endangered regional ecosystem and the establishment of a mintmum of Sha of a remnant not of concert Tegional ecosystem within 20 years of the date of this notice. Table 1. Property descriptions subject to remnant vegetation restoration plan - Noosa Shire. 1IRP170398 3RP138769 4RP149832 2RP164019 2RP163499 1RP163496 3RP134347 100SP 167229 1IRP906937 6RP134347 2RP134347 3RP168290 2RP164019 1RP160978 2RP 162747 1RP193959 3RP167264 2RP149832 4RP164020 9SP143416 2.10 Prior to the commencement of operational works that 1s the clearing of remnant vegetation within the area of Permit A on RARP2005/101216 the remmant vegetation restoration plan must be provided to and approved by the Chief Executive NR&M as being consistent with the NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 3 October 2005 attached to this notice. 3. Reasons: A Statement of Reasons 1s attached at Schedule 1 4. Additional comments or information: Aboriginal Cultaral Heritage Under section 23 of the Aboriginal Cultural Herttage Act 2003 a person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the actrvity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage (the “cultural heritage duty of care"). Maximum penalties for breaching the duty of care are $750,000 for a corporation and $75,000 for an individual. Applicants will comply with the duty of care n relation to Aboriginal cultural heritage if they are acting m compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines gazetted under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003, available on the Department’s website, or in accordance with an agreement with the Aboriginal party for the area or a cultural heritage Management plan approved under part 7 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003. Applicants should also undertake a search of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database and the Aboriginal Cultural Hentage Register, administered by the Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit, Department of Natural Resources and Mines Application forms to undertake a free search of the Cultural Hentage Register and the Database may be obtained by contacting the Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit on (07) 323 83838 or on the Department's website www.nrm.qid.gov au/cultural_hentage. Natural Resources and Mines - Referral Agancy Response Page 2 of 7 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 32 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 33
Definitions Particular words and terms used 1n the above conditions are defined as follows: ‘Vegetation’ means vegetation as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 ‘Remnant vegetation’ means remnant vegetation as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. ‘Remnant endangered regional ecosystem,’ means remnant regional ecasystem as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999. Remnant of concern regional ecosystem,’ means remnant regional ecosystem as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 ‘Remuont not of concern regional ecosystem,’ means remnant regional ecosystem as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 ‘Clear’ for vegetation means clear as defined under the Vegetanon Management Act 1999 ‘ha’ means hectares. 5. Authorised Officer Signature: thier Peter Lazzarini Semor Vegetation Management officer South East Region 1 November 2005 Attachments: = Schedule 1 — Statement of Reasons = NR&M Interim Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets 3 October 2005 - Referral Agency Response (Vegetation) Plan RARP2005/101216 Natural Resources and Mines - Referral Agency Response Page 3 of 7 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 33 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 34
Queensland Government SARA reference: 2311-37804 SRA Council reference: 132005.638.03 15 January 2024 Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council PO Box 141 Tewantin QLD 4565 [email protected] Attention: Mr Samuel Osakwe Dear Mr Osakwe SARA referral agency response—561 Eumundi Noosa Road, Doonan (Referral agency response given under section 56 of the Planning Act 2016) The development application described below was confirmed as properly referred by the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) on 17 November 2023. Response Outcome: Referral agency response — with conditions Date of response: 15 January 2024 Conditions: The conditions in Attachment 1 must be attached to any development approval Reasons: The reasons for the referral agency response are in Attachment 2 Development details Description: Development permit Material change of use for Expansion of Utility Installation - Noosa Landfill. SARA role: Referral agency SARA trigger: * Schedule 10, Part 3, Division 4, Table 3, Item 1 (10.3.4.3.1) (Planning Regulation 2017) Native Vegetation Clearing South East Queensland (North) regional office Level 4, Foundation Place 3 South Sea Islander Way, Maroochydore Page 10f5 PO Box 1128, Maroochydore QLD 4558 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 34 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 35
2303-33878 SRA * Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 4, Item 1 (10.9.4.2.4.1) (Planning Regulation 2017) Material change of use on a premise that is within 25m of a State transport corridor and within 100m of a State-controlled road intersection SARA reference: 2311-37804 SRA Assessment manager: Noosa Shire Council Street address: 561 Eumundi Noosa Road, Doonan Real property description: Lot 77 on SP298776 Applicant name: Noosa Council C/- Adamson Town Planning Applicant contact details: 28 Eenie Creek Rd Noosaville QLD 4566 [email protected] Human Rights Act 2019 A consideration of the 23 fundamental human rights protected under considerations: the Human Rights Act 2019 has been undertaken as part of this decision. It has been determined that this decision does not limit human rights Representations An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency, at any time before the application is decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response (s.30 Development Assessment Rules). Copies of the relevant provisions are in Attachment 3. A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information. For further information please contact Jodie Wilson, Senior Planning Officer, on 5352 9778 or via email [email protected] who will be pleased to assist. Yours sincerely Garth Nolan Manager (Ptanning) cc Noosa Council, [email protected] enc Attachment 1 - Referral agency conditions Attachment 2 - Reasons for referral agency response Attachment 3 - Representations about a referral agency response provisions Attachment 4 - Documents referenced in conditions State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 2 0f 5 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 35 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 36
Attachment 1—Referral agency conditions 2303-33878 SRA (Under section 56(1)(b)(i) of the Planning Act 2016 the following conditions must be attached to any development approval relating to this application) (Copies of the documents referenced below are found at Attachment 4) No. Conditions Condition timing Material change of use 10.3.4.3.1 — Clearing native vegetation - The chief executive administering the Planning Act 2016 nominates the Director-General of the Department of Resources to be the enforcement authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following condition(s): 1. Clearing of vegetation must: (a) only occur within Area A (Part A‘) as shown on the attached: i. Vegetation Management Plan, prepared by Queensland Government, reference VMP 2311-37804 SRA, Sheet 1 of 41, version 1; and (b) not exceed 0.81 hectares. At all times er into an agreed delivery arrangement to deliver an environmental offset in accordance with the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 to counterbalance the significant residual impacts on the matter of state environmental significance being: hectares of remnant vegetation intersecting with a wetland within the following regional ecosystems: i. 0.64 hectares of Least Concern Regional Ecosystem 12.3.13, and ii, 0.17 hectares of Endangered Regional Ecosystem 12.5.3. Prior to commencing any works that impact on the matter of environmental significance State Assessment and Referral Agency Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 3 of 5 Page 36 of 72
Page 37
2303-33878 SRA
Attachment 2—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)
The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
* The proposal is for a development permit ‘other change’ to an existing development approval
(2005/638) for material change of use for use of the premise to expand the existing landfill operation
* The subject site is located within 25 metres of a state-controlled road and involves clearing of
approximately 0.81ha of mapped regulated vegetation category B, of which 0.64 ha is mapped as
wetland and 0.17 ha is within 100 m of the wetland.
* SARA assessed the development application against State code 1: Development in a
state-controlled road environment of the SDAP, version 3.0 and determined that without conditions,
the development achieves compliance with the performance outcomes of the State code.
* SARA assessed the development application against State code 16: Native vegetation clearing
of the SDAP, version 3.0 and determined that the development complies with the relevant
performance outcomes, subject to conditions to ensure:
o Vegetation clearing is limited to 0.81ha of mapped regulated vegetation category B
o Clearing of the mapped wetland and matters of state environmental significance (MSES) is
mitigated through the provision of an environmental offset in accordance with the
Environmental Offsets Act 2014
Material used in the assessment of the application:
the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
the SDAP (version 3.0), as published by SARA
the Development Assessment Rules
SARA DA Mapping system
State Planning Policy mapping system {delete if not used]
section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019
Attachment 3—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions
(page left intentionally blank)
‘State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 5
Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 37 of 72
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 38
2303-33078 SRA
Attachment 4—Documents referenced in conditions
{page left intentionally blank)
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 5
Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 38 of 72
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 39
Development Assessment Rules—Representations about a referral agency response The following provisions are those set out in sections 28 and 30 of the Development Assessment Rules? regarding representations about a referral agency response Part 6: Changes to the application and referral agency responses 28 Concurrence agency changes its response or gives a late response 28.1. Despite part 2, a concurrence agency may, after its referral agency assessment period and any further period agreed ends, change its referral agency response or give a late referral agency response before the application is decided, subject to section 28.2 and 28.3. 28.2. A concurrence agency may change its referral agency response at any time before the application is decided if— (a) the change is in response to a change which the assessment manager is satisfied is a change under section 26.1; or (b) the Minister has given the concurrence agency a direction under section 99 of the Act; or (c) the applicant has given written agreement to the change to the referral agency response? 28.3. A concurrence agency may give a late referral agency response before the application is decided, if the applicant has given written agreement to the late referral agency response. 28.4. Ifa concurrence agency proposes to change its referral agency response under section 28.2(a), the concurrence agency must— (a) give notice of its intention to change its referral agency response to the assessment manager and a copy to the applicant within 5 days of receiving notice of the change under section 25.1: and (b) the concurrence agency has 10 days from the day of giving notice under paragraph (a), or a further period agreed between the applicant and the concurrence agency, to give an amended referral agency response to the assessment manager and a copy to the applicant. ‘ Pursuant to Section 68 of the Planning Act 2016 2 In the instance an applicant has made representations to the concurrence agency under section 30, and the concurrence agency agrees to make the change included in the representations, section 28.2(c) is taken to have been satisfied. Page 1 of2 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 39 of 72
Page 40
Part 7: Miscellaneous 30 Representations about a referral agency response 30.1. An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency at any time before the application is decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response? 3 An applicant may elect, under section 32, to stop the assessment manager's decision period in which to take this action. If a concurrence agency wishes to amend their response in relation to representations made under this section, they must do so in accordance with section 28. Page 2ot2 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 40 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 41
PLANS AND DOCUMENTS wey referred to in the REFERRAL AGENCY RESPONSE = SARAref: 201 07R4.9R4 Date: 19 Jernaary 2008 1:10 000 @ A3 paper sze ° 250 509 750 1,000 rratres Projection: GDA2020 MGA Zone 56 Notes: Derved Reference Foints are provided to assist in the locaton of ares boundaries. Responsibility tor locating these boundaries lies solely with he lanchoider. Watercourse and drainage feature locations shown on the certfied Vegetaton Management Watercourse and ‘only and require ground truthing to identify the exact location of the watercourse or drainage teature. ‘The property boundanes shown on ts plan are APPROXIMATE ONLY. They are NOT an accurate representation of the legs! boundaries. This pian must be read In conjunction with conditions attached to 2311-37804 SRA ‘\Vegemtion Management, Drainage Feature Map. These alignments are approximate Pian are derived trom the LESEND 4S Deived Reference Ser Points [7 Satject Lets} a ne eae C bo | ~SP298776 ©The Suate o Queenziand, 2023 (Steam ender lebe) \ VMP 2311-37804 SRA Note: Ths Is © colaur map and must be reproduces in colow N version: 1 | @LVAS Case ID: 2023003938 Sheet 4 oF 4 Vegetation Management Plan Plan of Area A (Part A’) in Lot 77 on Plan bi Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 VMGS-NRA2S31 Page 41 of 72
Page 42
Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 RA2o-N Our reference: 2503-45382 SRA Your reference: 132005.638.04 Applicant reference: 23026 13 November 2025 The Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565 [email protected] Attention: Mr Matthew Pinese Dear Sir/Madam Changed referral agency response—with conditions (Given under section 28 of the Development Assessment Rules) SELIVERING FOR QUEENSLAND Queensland *) Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning On 23 October 2025 SARA received representations from the applicant requesting SARA change its referral agency response. SARA has considered the representations and now provides this changed referral agency response which replaces the response dated 10 October 2025. Applicant details Applicant name: Noosa Shire Council Applicant contact details: C/- Adamson Town Planning Pty Ltd 312 Lake MacDonald Drive Lake MacDonald QLD 4563 [email protected] Location details Street address: 561 Eumundi Noosa Road, Doonan Real property description: Lot 77 on SP298776 Local government area: Noosa Shire Council Application details Development permit Other change to a Material Change of Use to expand the Resource Recovery Area (Utility Installation). South East Queensland (North) regional Level 4, Foundation Place 3 South Sea Islander Way, Maroochydore Page 1 of 8 PO Box 1129, Maroochydore QLD 4558 Page 42 of 72
Page 43
(2803-45382 SRA
Referral triggers
The development application was referred to the department under the following provisions of the
Planning Regulation 2017:
« §$10.3.4.3.1 Material change of use that involves clearing native vegetation
«© 10.94.2.4.1 Material change of use near a State transport
corridor
Conditions
Under section 56(1)(b)(i) of Planning Act 2016, the conditions set out in Attachment 1 must be attached
to any development approval.
Reasons for decision to impose conditions
The department must provide reasons for the decision to impose conditions. These reasons are set out in
Attachment 2.
Representations
An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency, at any time before the application is
decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response (s.30 Development Assessment
Rules). Copies of the relevant provisions are in Attachment 4.
A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information.
For further information please contact Sean Elvines, Senior Planning Officer, on 5352 9778 or via email
[email protected] who will be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
{ (
Jamaica Hewston
Manager
cc Noosa Shire Council, [email protected]
enc Attachment 1—Changed conditions to be imposed
Attachment 2—Changed reasons for decision to impose conditions
Attachment 3—Changed advice to the assessment manager
Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response provisions
Attachment 5—Documents referenced in conditions
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 2 of &
Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 43 of 72
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 44
2503-45382 SRA Attachment 1—Changed conditions to be imposed No. | Conditions Condition timing Material change of use 10.9.4.2.4.1 — Material change of use near a State transport corridor—The chief executive administering the Planning Act 2016 nominates the Director-General of the Department of Transport and Main Roads to be the enforcement authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following conditions: 1. (a) Road access is located generally in accordance with the Site Atall times Master Plan prepared by Covey Associates Pty Ltd, dated 13 Feb 2025, reference 244035, Issue A, as amended in red by SARA on 13 November 2025. (b) The road access (at the road access location) comprises of a Rural Property Access Type C sealed to the property boundary with a 6m throat, Auxiliary Left Turn Treatment (AUL) and Channelised Right Tum Treatment (CHR). (c) The road access, referred to in part (b) of this condition, must be maintained in accordance with: i) the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ Standard Drawing 1807, Rural Property Access Type C (i) the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ Road Planning and Design Manual, 2nd Edition (ii) the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ Policies and Technical Specifications (iv) the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ Standard Drawings Roads, and (v) relevant local government requirements. 2. Carry out the stormwater management of the development generally in | At all times accordance with ‘Stormwater Quantity’ of the Stormwater Management Plan, prepared by Covey Associates Pty Ltd, dated Feb 2025, reference M25-0042Rpt, Issue A, as amended in red by SARA dated 13 November 2025. 10.3.4.3.1 — Material change of use that involves clearing native vegetation—The chief executive administering the Planning Act 2016 nominates the Director-General of the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Manufacturing and Regional and Rural Development to be the enforcement authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following conditions: 3. Clearing of native vegetation associated with the material change of Atall times use must not occur within Area B (B1-B6), as shown on: * Vegetation Management Plan, prepared by the Queensland Government, reference VMP 2503-45382 SRA, sheet 1 of 1, version 4 2. and * Attachment: 2503-45382 SRA Derived GPS Reference Points, prepared by the Queensland Government 4. Built infrastructure associated with the Material Change of Use, other Atall times than for fences, roads, underground services must not be established, constructed or located within Area C (C1-G45) as shown on: * Vegetation Management Plan, prepared by the Queensland Government, reference VMP 2503-45382 SRA, sheet 1 of 1, version 42, and * Attachment: 2503-45382 SRA Derived GPS Reference Points, State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 3 of 8 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 44 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 45
2803-45382 SRA prepared by the Queensland Government. State Assessment and Referral Agency Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 4 of 8 Page 45 of 72
Page 46
2803-45382 SRA Attachment 2—Changed reasons for decision to impose conditions The reasons for this decision are: * The application seeks a change (other) to a development permit for a material change of use to expand the Resource Recovery Area (Utility Installation) at 561 Eumundi Noosa Road, Doonan, formally described as lot 77 on SP298776. * SARA assessed the application against the following of the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP v3.2): ° State code 1: Development in a State controlled road environment ° State code 16: Native vegetation clearing. « SARA determined that the proposed development complies with State codes 1 and 16 of the SDAP, subject to conditions to ensure the development: ° does not compromise the safety, operational performance or physical integrity of the State controlled road © avoids and minimises the clearing of, and impacts to, native vegetation. Material used in the assessment of the application: « the development application material and submitted plans Planning Act 2016 Planning Regulation 2017 the SDAP (version 3.2), as published by SARA the Development Assessment Rules SARA DA Mapping system « Section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019. State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 8 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 46 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 47
2503-45382 SRA Attachment 3—Changed advice to assessment manager General advice 1. Terms and phrases used in this document are defined in the Planning Act 2016, its regulation or the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) (version 3.2). If a word remains undefined it has its ordinary meaning. State Transport - Public utility works and connections 2 . ; : 4 water/sewer, telecommunication), and in accordance with TMR technical standards (Non- Tran: Utility Mana, int and Design Manual) Non-Trans; Utility Management and nual (D. Tran: in Ri “ Approvals must be obtained prior to commencing any utility works within the state-controlled road reserve. Please contact the public utility team via email at [email protected] for further information on the application and approval process. State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 6 of & Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 47 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 48
2503-45382 SRA Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response (page left intentionally blank) State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 7 of 8 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 48 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 49
2503-45382 SRA
Attachment 5—Documents referenced in conditions
{page left intentionally blank)
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 8 of 8
Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 49 of 72
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 50
PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. referred to in the REFERRAL AGENCY RESPONSE Amended in red by SARA on 13 Novembor 2025 Page 50 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 51
j covey STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ele Noosa Shire Council Project: Doonan Landfill Resource Recovery Location: 561 Eumundi-Noosa Road, Doonan Amended in red by SARA on 13 November 2025 PLANS AND DOCUMENTS ~ ¥ referred to in the ey DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL = =~ SARA ref: 2503-45382 SRA Date: 13 November 2025 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 51 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 52
Document Set ID: 24377726 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Neasa Shire Council Location: Doonan DOocuMENT IssUE APPROVAL Project No: 244035 Title: Stormwater Management Plan Client: Noosa Shire Council Amended in red by SARA on Date: February 2025 13 November 2025 Issue: A Distribution: Noosa Shire Council Covey Associates Pty Ltd © Copyright Covey Associates Pty Ltd (2025). This document is the property of Covey Associates Pty Ltd. This document and the information contained in it are solely for the use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copies of reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by Covey Associates Pty Ltd. Covey Associates Pty Ltd makes no representation, undertakes no duty and accepts no responsibility to any third party who may use or rely upon this document, or the information contained in it. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Parts of this document contain material originally prepared by: This material is the intellectual property and copyright of Covey Associates Pty Ltd. (oso (Ullaeims : YC opuy Author: Anna Williams Reviewer: Allister Gaffney Bsc (env.eng) BEng (Hons) MEng, RPEng, RPEQ 1 Project No: 244035 ~_ covey 25-0042 Rpt Issue A Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 52 of 72
Page 53
Document Set ID: 24377726 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Neasa Shire Council Location: Doonan DOocuMENT ISSUE APPROVAL Project No: 244035 Title: Stormwater Management Plan Client: Noosa Shire Council Amended in red by SARA on Date: February 2025 13 November 2025 Issue: A Distribution: Noosa Shire Council Covey Associates Pty Ltd © Copyright Covey Associates Pty Ltd (2025). This document is the property of Covey Associates Pty Ltd. This document and the information contained in it are solely for the use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copies of reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by Covey Associates Pty Ltd. Covey Associates Pty Ltd makes no representation, undertakes no duty and accepts no responsibility to any third party who may use or rely upon this document, or the information contained in it. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Parts of this document contain material originally prepared by: This material is the intellectual property and copyright of Covey Associates Pty Ltd. Claw Willaans WG aofuey Author: Anna Williams Reviewer: Allister Gaffney Bsc (env.eng) BEng (Hons) MEng, RPEng, RPEQ 1 Project No: 244035 ~ covey 25-0042 Rpt Issue A Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 53 of 72
Page 54
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 24 22 2.3 Site Location Existing Land-use, Topography and Drainage Proposed Land-use 4.0 STORMWATER QUALITY 41 42 43 44 Water Quality Monitoring 4.1.1 Treatable Areas 4.1.2 Scenario Method MUSIC Model Parameters Proposed Stormwater Treatment Train MUSIC Modelling Results 5.0 MAINTENANCE PERIOD 5.1 Bioretention Basins 5.1.1 ‘Construction Period’ Maintenance Requirements 5.1.2 ‘Maintenance Period’ Maintenance Requirements 5.1.3 ‘Operational Period’ Maintenance Requirements 6.0 CONCLUSION 7.0 REFERENCES 10 10 10 10 10 11 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Project No: 244035 M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Page 54 of 72
Page 55
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Site Locality (courtesy of Nearmap, accessed February 2025) ..... — — | Figure 3-1 Proposed Development Concept ..........-..-...-..-» > Figure 4-1 Overall Stormwater Catchment (extract from report no. M25-0045Rpt) ... .6 Figure 5-1 Site Stormwater Quality Catchment Plan .. 8 UST OF TABLES Table 5-1 Pollutant Reduction Targets for Southeast Queensland .............-..ssee0n in woe aes F Table 5-2 MUSIC Source Node Characteristics................... 8 Table 5-3 MUSIC Details for the Proposed Treatment Train... 9 Table 5-4 MUSIC Mode! Results for the Overall Treatment Train....... 9 LST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A Engineering Plans APPENDIX B MUSIC Mode! (Electronic Copy) 3 Project No: 244035 ~™] covey M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Page 55 of 72 Document Set ID: 24377726 9 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 56
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) contains information regarding the stormwater management strategies for the proposed redevelopment of the Noosa Shire Council Doonan Landfill Resource at 561 Eumundi-Noosa Road, Doonan. This SMP refers to the proposed stormwater quantity and quality management for the site and is in support of the ‘Change application’ for the Doonan Landfill Resource Recovery Redevelopment Stage 1A. Noosa Shire Council (NSC) requires that stormwater quality and quantity be appropriately managed and treated prior to discharge from the site. The Queensland State Planning Policy (SPP, 2017) also requires that urban development projects demonstrate how the potential impacts to receiving environments are mitigated. This SMP outlines the requirements for effective stormwater management for the proposed development. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location The proposed development site is located at 561 Eumundi-Noosa Road, Doonan. The real property description is Lot 77 $P298776. The property has an area of approximately 192 ha and is bounded by Hollett Road to the north, Walter Hay Drive to the east, Emu Mountain Arterial Road to the south and Eumundi- Noosa Road to the west. More than half of the property is vacant land with grassland and vegetation. Refer to Figure 2-1 for the site locality. Figure 2-1 Site Locality (courtesy of Nearmap, accessed February 2025) 4 Project No: 244035, ~_ covey M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 56 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 57
Document Set ID: 24377726 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan 2.2 Existing Land-use, Topography and Drainage The site in its existing state is the Noosa Resource Recovery Centre which is mainly covered with maintained bushland in the northem portion of the site and existing buildings and land fill areas in the southern portion. The site is surrounded by bushland to the east, west and south. There are residential lots and a golf course to the north. The site slope is approximately 1.5%, with gradual changes in elevation from 30 m AHD to 16 m AHD. The site slopes from south to north and discharges over the northern boundary to the northern road reserve before flowing through the golf course. 3.0 Proposed Land-use The development is a Recycle and Transfer Station Centre and associated infrastructure which is replacing the Solid Waste Depot and Reviva Noosa Reuse Shop buildings. Refer to Figure 3-1. Earthworks have been proposed to accommodate the development of the site and to facilitate efficient drainage. Appropriate drainage infrastructure has been proposed in the design, including overland flow swales to discharge local flows from the site and to convey runoff from external catchments around the site. Figure 3-1 Proposed Development Concept 5 Project No: 244035 a covey 25-0042 Rpt Issue A Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 57 of 72
Page 58
Client: Noosa Shire Council 4.0 STORMWATER QUANTITY Stormwater quantity management for the site ensures a “no-actionable nuisance” design for the proposed development. Development of the site will result in an increase in impervious area and a corresponding increase in peak stormwater runoff. However, as the proposed development area (2.24 ha) is much smaller than the overall catchment (287 ha) the minor increase in the fraction impervious has a negligible effect on the overall catchment peak discharges. As the proposed development has a fraction impervious higher than the overall catchment and is located closer to the downstream boundary (outlet) the peak discharge will arrive at the outlet much sooner than the overall catchment. Therefore, the increase in the peak discharge for the overall catchment will be negligible. Further, stormwater detention is not required for the proposed development. Refer to Figure 4-1 for the overall stormwater catchment. Refer to the Flood Impact Assessment (Report No. M25-0045Rpt Issue A) prepared by Covey Engineers for further details. Figure 4-1 Overall Stormwater Catchment (extract from report no. M25-0045Rpt) Project No: 244035 M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 58 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 59
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan
5.0 STORMWATER QUALITY
This section of this SMP will demonstrate how the proposed stormwater quality management strategy will
comply with the requirements of the NSC and the SPP (2017) by demonstrating how the relevant stormwater
pollutant reduction objectives will be met.
Stormwater runoff generated from the site must achieve the required pollutant reduction targets required
under the State Planning Policy (2017) and the Noosa Shire Council's Planning Scheme (2020). These targets
are listed in Table 5-1. MUSIC modelling software version 6.3.0 was used to demonstrate compliance with
these pollutant reduction targets in this assessment.
Table 5-1 Pollutant Reduction Targets for Southeast Queensland
ee ae to Tet ee) sores
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 80% reduction in average annual load of pollutants
Total Phosphorus (TP) 60% reduction in average annual load of pollutants
Total Nitrogen (TN) 45% reduction in average annual load of pollutants
Gross Pollutants (GP) 90% reduction in average annual load of pollutants
5.1 Water Quality Monitoring
Treatable Areas
The total treatable area for this water quality assessment is approximately 2.24 ha. The total treatable area
includes the existing development and associated road and carpark areas, as shown on Figure 5-1.
5.1.2 Scenario Method
The proposed development was modelled in MUSIC using split catchment source nodes. Three (3) industrial
source nodes were identified, comprising of road, ground cover and roof nodes. The proposed development
was modelled as two (2) sub-catchments (A and B).
7 Project No: 244035
™ covey 25-0042 Rpt Issue A
Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 59 of 72
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 60
Document Set ID: 24377726 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan Figure 5-1 Site Stormwater Quality Catchment Pian The areas used to model the source nodes were extracted from the proposed development plan. The nominated fraction impervious for each source node modelled in MUSIC was therefore: e Road source node: 100% impervious * Ground cover source node: 0% impervious ¢ Roof source node: 100% impervious 5.2 MUSIC Model Parameters The MUSIC Modelling Guidelines - South East Queensland Version 1.0 (WBD, 2010) was used to source base and storm flow concentrations and runoff generation. The model was calibrated using the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) data from Cooroy, 1973 - 1983 at a 6-minute time step in accordance with the W8D (2010) guidelines. All source nodes were set up in accordance with this guideline, specifically for split catchments. No routing of drainage links was applied as a conservative approach. This approach assumes that the flow through the drainage system is instantaneous, which likely overestimates the pollutant load. Refer to Table 5-2 for the split catchment source node characteristics for each sub-catchment. A copy of the MUSIC model is found in Appendix B. Table 5-2 MUSIC Source Node Characteristics 0.778 0.168 0.400 1.346 8 0.600 0.110 0.186 0.896 3 Project No: 244035 a covey M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 60 of 72
Page 61
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan 5.3 Proposed Stormwater Treatment Train Stormwater runoff from the proposed development will be treated by two (2) bioretention basins prior to discharging into the receiving environment. The proposed Bioretention Basin A will treat Sub-catchment A, and Bioretention Basin B will treat Sub-catchment B. Table 5-3 details the associated bioretention basin parameters used for the proposed treatment train. Table 5-3 MUSIC Details for the Proposed Treatment Train ee ee ree er ved tor ed er la Pret 2 " fen) bry ae p ‘ aie i] aay A 122 122 o7 03 80 80 Refer to the engineering plans in Appendix A for further details. 5.4 MUSIC Modelling Results MUSIC modelling of the proposed catchments was performed to ensure the nominated treatment strategy achieves the required pollutant reduction objectives listed in Table 5-1. The target reductions in stormwater pollutants are based on a comparison of an unmitigated scenario, having no treatment on site, and the mitigated scenario, which has stormwater treatment measures incorporated onto the site. As per the SPP (2017), MUSIC modelling is performed to demonstrate the environmental values of receiving waters are not negatively impacted through the release of nutrients and sediments into waterways. Table 5-4 provides the modelling results for the proposed development being treated by the proposed bioretention basins. Table 5-4 provides MUSIC modelling results for the overall catchment and considers all sub- catchments in Table 5-2 and the overall proposed treatment train. Table 5-4 MUSIC Model Results for the Overall Treatment Train Unmitigated Mitigated toe Toads) ts Tat Ly en A = pT (ean) ren Pete ts en eat) TSS 9590 1310 B11 30 Y ™. 16.7 4.39 73. 60 Y 1™N 72.6 37.2 48.8 45 Y GP 666 0 100 30 Y The MUSIC modelling results in Table 5-4 demonstrate that the stormwater management strategy proposed for the development site meets or exceeds the target reduction rates for major pollutants required by the NSC and the SPP (2017). 9 Project No: 244035 @] covey M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 61 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 62
Document Set ID: 24377726 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan 6.0 MAINTENANCE PERIOD The proposed bioretention basins will require management during both the construction period and maintenance period of the development. To establish vegetation and treatment functions in the bioretention systems, the filter media will require protection from the common pollutants generated in the construction phases of the development. During the operational phase, regular maintenance is required to ensure a comprehensive vegetation establishment, a critical component in stormwater pollutant uptake. Section 6.1 provides details for the general maintenance periods and the requirements for the bioretention basins. 6.1 Bioretention Basins 6.1.1 ‘Construction Period’ Maintenance Requirements Erosion and sediment control devices will be installed at the commencement of the works to capture and treat runoff during construction works. The sediment control devices should be cleaned out as required and at the end of the works. During the construction stage, all sediment control devices are to be inspected weekly, after runoff generating rain events and prior and after prolonged site shutdowns (e.g. holiday periods). Proposed bioretention basins may be excavated and used as a sediment basin, where appropriate. Any sediment basin will require weekly inspection to prevent scour and sediment build up. Basins should be inspected regularly and cleaned out when 1/3™ full. At the completion of construction, the sediment basins will be removed. The bioretention basin will be installed at the end of the construction phase when the site is stabilised. 6.1.2 ‘Maintenance Period’ Maintenance Requirements The bioretention basin on ground level may be temporarily turfed if required during the maintenance period. Once construction of 80% of the site in the catchment of the development is complete, the turf will be removed, and the basin will be vegetated appropriately. 6.13 ‘Operational Period’ Maintenance Requirements Maintenance is to be carried out as needed to ensure continued functionality of the system. Maintenance includes initial watering plants in new system, removal of litter or plant debris and reparation of eroded areas. 10 Project No: 244035 ma covey M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 62 of 72
Page 63
Document Set ID: 24377726 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noasa Shire Council Location: Doonan 7.0 CONCLUSION This SMP demonstrates the stormwater management strategies proposed for redevelopment of the Doonan Landfill Resource Recovery at 561 Eumundi-Noosa Road, Doonan satisfy Noose Shire Council (NSC) and Queensland State Planning Policy (SPP, 2017) requirements. As described in Section 3.0, the change to the overall catchment peak flows within the overall catchment will be negligible since the proposed development area is insignificant compared to the overall catchment area discharging downstream. Further, the peak discharge of the proposed development will arrive at the outlet well before the overall catchment peak discharge. Ultimately, this ensures no actionable nuisance to the surrounding properties due to the proposed development and therefore no detention measures are required for the site. As described in Table 5-4, the stormwater treatment measures selected for the proposed development achieve the performance criteria set by the NSC and by the SPP (2017). Annual load reductions of TSS, TP and TN between the unmitigated and mitigated MUSIC model scenarios have been met or exceeded. It is considered that a conservative approach has been taken as no routing in the drainage links has been adopted. Sufficient consideration of stormwater controls has been demonstrated by: * Compliance with the requirements of the Noosa Shire Council's Planning Scheme (2020); © Compliance with the State Planning Policy (2017); and * Compliance with QUDM (2017). u Project No: 244035 @a covey M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 63 of 72
Page 64
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Noosa Shire Council Location: Doonan 8.0 REFERENCES Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (2017) State Planning Policy Brisbane, Queensland. Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia, Queensland Division Ltd (2017) Queensland Urban Drainage Manual, Fourth Edition 2017. Noosa Shire Council, Noosa Plan 2020. Water by Design (2010) MUSIC Modelling Guidelines, South East Queensland Version 1.0. 2 Project No: 244035 ~ covey M25-0042 Rpt Issue A Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 64 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 65
APPENDIX A ENGINEERING PLANS Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 65 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 66
aa La Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 66 of 72
Page 67
APPENDIX B MUSIC Mobet (ELECTRONIC Copy) Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 67 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 68
Se eS a = TT
PLANS AND DOCUMENTS ep
referred to in the tear
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL sf
os SARA ref: 2503-45382 SRA
ate reese Dccccceceeeeeees
Noses Cerwed Felerence Mora ara prowiied to annaf in fre locaton af anes Gounseven Meaporaaty for
locating thames bounchaves ben soley with fhe lanchotder
Wheeccuna and dhenage future bobs tow cn be Yageicn Nenagenert Man awe dertved bom the
certihes Vagetaion Marazerrent \Nalercourss and Oranaga Feanire Map. These abgrenerts ave apcrcoriate
Cort and reqube ground ufing to iderraly fhe exact locaton a! fre wateocuran oF drainage featre,
The property Bounchases shawn on this pian ae APPROOOMATE ONLY. Thay are NOT an wccurate
Projection: GDA2I20 MGA Zone 56 Datuee GOAZIZ0 reprenertarson of the legal bourdarars
‘This plan must be read in conjunction with conditions attached to 2503-45382 SRA
. = 0 70 1.000 meets
LEGEND
+1) Datvad Ratrunce Stat Pus (ue atactrvee) hs ae Vegetation Management Plan ee
eet emi It may] Pin of Area A (Parte At - Az}, Area B =
Se iL (Parts B1 - B6) and Area C (Part C1) in Lot © The Sate of Queenan, 2005
oo ~ Caaring mast nose 77 on Plan SP298776
(Ate C - Fisatreaunatety suter
(oedy conta intusiuctsre sennited) A VMP
‘TD: Warucnuna ane crag ea ‘i 2503-45382 SRA
Note Tha a colour reap and rent be sepeactvond in colour Werson:2 | @LVAS Case ID: 2025/001316 Sheet 1 of 1
Tee
Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 68 of 72
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 69
Attachment: 2503-45382 SRA Derived Reference Points Datum: GDA2020, Projection: MGA Zone 56 Document Set ID: 24377726 Derived Rafusence Points ase prowided to ami! in te location of Area bouncers aed delegated Co (Coordinates Wart ai a point neicated on the accompanying plan aad contrus mequertasty when abe are ret eben i 1 1 hee ot ae 3 2 ee ene eee ae i a salar porns ek eae 3 2 er Ferare ie ete i Sia Fore ee eas oe + aero eh he 4 sais tne out i ied ele fie eer i otis ee ee eae rr % ee heen a ~ 1 tase rena? jn eon o- a ieee ree a eI ~ sae renee nS o- ie ee a ~ 1s aaa rere oe ewes o- 4 ties Pees a ~ dase rere eee ~ a ie ee ee eee ~ ye eee seus ~ 3 Ein knee. ens = + en rears seuss i 2 rowate sea a a pore seuiet at = mae eas at * rorwaer en a * reas at # ne a a awe a a ro at 8 nase ar * renata at 22 ree at a Fina m Fy * * # a * e EEEEEREEEEEEREEEEEPERERREEESE RET EESEEEE! HEHE EEG Sucseertsereetsesererceress PRCCRRERESSEERRREESESSETSTSST TERRE EES EP EEREEEESE FERRER ESTEE EEER EEE EEE GEERECEEEEEE nen Pera rae pera nae rrr rere rae carry rerene ners rerun rere rere rere ry naan Pera aes rman Rasa persue rr rere mre? Porat EREEEEREEEESUEEEEESUEEEEEE EERE REEEESESSOESUEPEREEECEEEREEEEEEEEEEERIESEEEE Be ane em ‘eine nee ine em ‘aie ‘ihe ‘as ‘axe nen ‘ae ‘as aaa ‘ies pares ‘eit ae ‘ie east east ee ean siete ae iat ie aa ‘aie aie ein Geeeseszsessescecsceress es i Date: PLANS AND DOCUMENTS referred to in the DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL === SARA ref: 13 November 2025 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 69 of 72
Page 70
Development Assessment Rules—Representations about a referral agency response The following provisions are those set out in sections 28 and 30 of the Development Assessment Rules’ regarding representations about a referral agency response Part 6: Changes to the application and referral agency responses 28 Concurrence agency changes its response or gives a late response 28.1. Despite part 2, a concurrence agency may, after its referral agency assessment period and any further period agreed ends, change its referral agency response or give a late referral agency response before the application is decided, subject to section 28.2 and 28.3. 28.2. A concurrence agency may change its referral agency response at any time before the application is decided if— (a) the change is in response to a change which the assessment manager is satisfied is a change under section 26.1; or (b) the Minister has given the concurrence agency a direction under section 99 of the Act; or (c) the applicant has given written agreement to the change to the referral agency response.” 28.3. A concurrence agency may give a late referral agency response before the application is decided, if the applicant has given written agreement to the late referral agency response. 28.4. If a concurrence agency proposes to change its referral agency response under section 28.2(a), the concurrence agency must— (a) give notice of its intention to change its referral agency response to the assessment manager and a copy to the applicant within 5 days of receiving notice of the change under section 25.1; and (b) the concurrence agency has 10 days from the day of giving notice under paragraph (a), or a further period agreed between the applicant and the concurrence agency, to give an amended referral agency response to the assessment manager and a copy to the applicant. Pursuant to Section 68 of the Planning Act 2016 In the instance an applicant has made representations to the concurrence agency under section 30, and the concurrence agency agrees to make the change included in the representations, section 28.2(c) is taken to have been satisfied. Page 12 Documert Set ID: 24300607 Versior: 1, Version Date: 14/11/2025 Document Set ID: 24377726 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025 Page 70 of 72
Page 71
Part 7: Miscellaneous 30 Representations about a referral agency response 30.1. An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency at any time before the application is decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response* * An applicant may elect, under section 32, to stop the assessment manager's decision period in which to take this action. If a concurrence agency wishes to amend their response in relation to representations made under this section, they must do so in accordance with section 28. Page 2.02 Documern Set ID: 24300807 Version: 1, Version Date: 14/11/2025 Document Set ID: 24377726 Page 71 of 72 Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025
Page 72
Appeal Rights
PLANNING ACT 2016 & PLANNING REGULATION 2017
Chapter 6 Dispute resolution (3) The appellant or, for an appeal to a tribunal, the registrar must,
within the service period, give a copy of the notice of appeal to –
Part 1 Appeal rights
(a) the respondent for the appeal; and
229 Appeals to tribunal or P&E Court
(b) each co-respondent for the appeal; and
(1) Schedule 1 of the Planning Act 2016 states –
(c) for an appeal about a development application under schedule
(a) Matters that may be appealed to – 1, table 1, item 1 – each principal submitter for the
(i) either a tribunal or the P&E Court; or development application; and
(ii) only a tribunal; or (d) for and appeal about a change application under schedule 1,
table 1, item 2 – each principal submitter for the change
(iii) only the P&E Court; and application; and
(b) The person- (e) each person who may elect to become a co-respondent for the
appeal, other than an eligible submitter who is not a principal
(i) who may appeal a matter (the appellant); and
submitter in an appeal under paragraph (c) or (d); and
(ii) who is a respondent in an appeal of the matter; and (f) for an appeal to the P&E Court – the chief executive; and
(iii) who is a co-respondent in an appeal of the matter; and (g) for an appeal to a tribunal under another Act – any other
(iv) who may elect to be a co-respondent in an appeal of the person who the registrar considers appropriate.
matter. (4) The service period is –
(2) An appellant may start an appeal within the appeal period. (a) if a submitter or advice agency started the appeal in the P&E
(3) The appeal period is – Court – 2 business days after the appeal has started; or
(a) for an appeal by a building advisory agency – 10 business (b) otherwise – 10 business days after the appeal is started.
days after a decision notice for the decision is given to the (5) A notice of appeal given to a person who may elect to be a co-
agency; or respondent must state the effect of subsection (6).
(b) for an appeal against a deemed refusal – at any time after the (6) A person elects to be a co-respondent by filing a notice of election,
deemed refusal happens; or in the approved form, within 10 business days after the notice of
(c) for an appeal against a decision of the Minister, under chapter appeal is given to the person.
7, part 4, to register premises or to renew the registration of 231 Other appeals
premises – 20 business days after a notice us published under
(1) Subject to this chapter, schedule 1 and the P&E Court Act, unless
section 269(3)(a) or (4); or
the Supreme Court decides a decision or other matter under this
(d) for an appeal against an infrastructure charges notice – 20 Act is affected by jurisdictional error, the decision or matter is non-
business days after the infrastructure charges notice is given appealable.
to the person; or
(2) The Judicial Review Act 1991, part 5 applies to the decision or
(e) for an appeal about a deemed approval of a development matter to the extent it is affected by jurisdictional error.
application for which a decision notice has not been given –
(3) A person who, but for subsection (1) could have made an
30 business days after the applicant gives the deemed
application under the Judicial Review Act 1991 in relation to the
approval notice to the assessment manager; or
decision or matter, may apply under part 4 of that Act for a
(f) for any other appeal – 20 business days after a notice of the statement of reasons in relation to the decision or matter.
decision for the matter, including an enforcement notice, is
(4) In this section –
given to the person.
decision includes-
Note –See the P&E Court Act for the court’s power to extend the appeal
period. (a) conduct engaged in for the purpose of making a decision; and
(4) Each respondent and co-respondent for an appeal may be heard (b) other conduct that relates to the making of a decision; and
in the appeal. (c) the making of a decision or failure to make a decision; and
(5) If an appeal is only about a referral agency’s response, the (d) a purported decision; and
assessment manager may apply to the tribunal or P&E Court to
withdraw from the appeal. (e) a deemed refusal.
(6) To remove any doubt. It is declared that an appeal against an non-appealable, for a decision or matter, means the decision or
infrastructure charges notice must not be about- matter-
(a) the adopted charge itself; or (a) is final and conclusive; and
(b) for a decision about an offset or refund- (b) may not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed,
set aside or called into question in any other way under the
(i) the establishment cost of trunk infrastructure identified in Judicial Review Act 1991 or otherwise, whether by the
a LGIP; or Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity; and
(ii) the cost of infrastructure decided using the method (c) is not subject to any declaratory, injunctive or other order of
included in the local government’s charges resolution. the Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity
230 Notice of appeal on any ground.
(1) An appellant starts an appeal by lodging, with the registrar of the 232 Rules of the P&E Court
tribunal or P&E Court, a notice of appeal that- (1) A person who is appealing to the P&E Court must comply with the
(a) is in the approved form; and rules of the court that apply to the appeal.
(b) succinctly states the grounds of the appeal. (2) However, the P&E Court may hear and decide an appeal even if
(2) The notice of appeal must be accompanied by the required fee. the person has not complied with the rules of the P&E Court
PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 72 of 72
Document Set ID: 24377726
Version: 13, Version Date: 23/12/2025